2022: Perioperative and critical care year in review for the cardiothoracic surgery team.

This year, we have again assembled an expert opinion on several key topics that pertain to the perioperative and critical care management of the cardiac surgery patient and for patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Approximately 1 in 3 patients undergoing cardiac surgery have diabetes mellitus; contemporary glycemic control management of these patients to minimize perioperative complications are reviewed. Goal directed fluid therapy remains an area on interest and controversy; the use of albumin as a resuscitation fluid and recent clinical trial data is reviewed. Delirium is characterized as an acute confusional state occurring in 20-25% of patients after cardiac surgery. Insights on integrating the whole interdisciplinary team, including the family, with the DELirium Team Approach (DELTA) program are discussed. Optimal management for refractory hypoxemia with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) and the role of prone positioning remain a question. Data supporting this technique during VV-ECMO is reviewed-lastly, the contemporary management and supporting evidence for refractory postoperative vasoplegic shock after cardiopulmonary bypass is provided.

Practice Patterns in Sternal Closure and Evaluation of Adoption of a Novel Sternal Closure Device.

OBJECTIVE: The technique for sternal closure has remained largely unchanged owing to the efficacy, simplicity, and low cost of stainless-steel sternal wires. Despite their ubiquity, several other closure devices designed to address the complications associated with sternal wires such as sternal bleeding and dehiscence have become popular. We have developed a novel sternal closure device that reduces sternal bleeding and dehiscence. This study quantifies the use of currently available sternal closure devices and determines predicted uptake of the novel device. METHODS: An electronic survey, designed to determine practice patterns for sternal closure, was distributed to 70 US cardiac surgeons. The survey included a discrete choice section in which surgeons evaluated relative value of device attributes including cost, ease of emergent sternal reentry, and dehiscence risk. RESULTS: There were 70 surgeons from 30 states who completed the survey. The most frequent means of sternal closure was straight sternal wires (35.8%), followed by straight sternal wires plus figure-of-8 sternal wires (18.1%), double wires (10.9%), plates (10.2%), and other (25%). The relative utilization shifted from sternal wires to sternal plates as the risk for dehiscence increased. The adoption of the novel closure device was estimated at 34.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The standard stainless-steel sternal wire remains the most common means of sternal reapproximation, but its utilization is lower in patients at high risk for sternal dehiscence. Based on this survey, there is acceptance in the community for a novel sternal closure device designed to address the limitations of traditional sternal closure methods.

Mechanical Analysis of a Novel Sternal Closure System in Static Tensile Loading.

The most common means of sternal closure after sternotomy is stainless steel wire cerclage. These wires, while inexpensive and simple in design, are known to be associated with low strength and sternal dehiscence. In this biomechanical analysis, we compare single sternal wires, double sternal wires, and a novel sternal closure device we have designed to mitigate sternal dehiscence. The device uses polymer grommets at the sternal interfaces to distribute load over a large surface area of bone. Samples of each closure device were installed in a bone model and distracted at a rate of 10 mm/min while tensile forces were continuously measured and compared. Single wires generated the lowest stiffness and strength values, followed by the double wires. The novel device demonstrated significantly higher stiffness and strength at all displacements compared with the single and double wires. Clinical use of this device may result in meaningful reduction in complications associated with the use of standard sternal wires such as sternal separation and fracture.

Determinants of survival following heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Adult patients surviving with congenital heart disease (ACHD) is growing. We examine the factors associated with heart transplant outcomes in this challenging population with complex anatomy requiring redo-surgeries. METHODS: We reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing-Standard Transplant Analysis and Research database and analyzed 35,952 heart transplants from January 1st, 2000, to September 30th, 2018. We compared transplant characteristics for ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (n = 14,236), nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) (n = 20,676), and ACHD (n = 1040). Mean follow-up was 6.20 ± 4.84 years. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox-proportional hazards analysis were used to analyze survival data. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis confirmed that ACHD was associated greater in-hospital death compared to ICM (HR = 0.54, P < 0.001) and NICM (HR = 0.46, P < 0.001). Notable factors associated with increased mortality were history of cerebrovascular disease (HR = 1.11, P = 0.026), prior history of malignancy (HR = 1.12, P = 0.006), pre-transplant biventricular support (HR = 1.12, P = 0.069), postoperative stroke (HR = 1.47, P < 0.001) and postoperative dialysis (HR = 1.71, P < 0.001). ACHD transplants had a longer donor heart ischemic time (P < 0.001) and trend towards more deaths from primary graft dysfunction (P = 0.07). In-hospital deaths were more likely with ACHD and use of mechanical support such as use of right ventricular assist device (HR = 2.20, P = 0.049), biventricular support (HR = 1.62, P < 0.001) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (HR = 2.36, P < 0.001). Conditional survival after censoring hospital deaths was significantly higher in ACHD (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Heart transplant in ACHD is associated with a higher post-operative mortality given anatomical complexity but a better long-term conditional survival. Normothermic donor heart perfusion may improve outcomes in the ACHD population by reducing the impact of longer ischemic times.

Gastrointestinal bleeding following Heartmate 3 left ventricular assist device implantation: The Michigan Bleeding Risk Model.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) results in frequent hospitalizations and impairs quality of life in durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients. Anticipation of these events before implantation could have important implications for patient selection and management. METHODS: The study population included all adult HeartMate 3 (HM3) primary LVAD recipients enrolled in the STS Intermacs registry from January 2017 to December 2020. Using multivariable modeling methodologies, we investigated the relationships between preimplantation characteristics and postimplant bleeding, bleeding and death, and additional bleeding episodes on subsequent bleeding episodes and created a risk score to predict the likelihood of post-LVAD GIB based solely on preimplantation factors. RESULTS: Of 6,425 patients who received an HM3 LVAD, 1,010 (15.7%) patients experienced GIB. Thirteen preimplantation factors were independent predictors of post-LVAD GIB. A risk score was created from these factors and calculated for each patient. By 3 years postimplant, GIB occurred in 11%, 26%, and 43% of low-, medium- and high-risk patients, respectively. Experiencing 1 post-LVAD GIB event was associated with an increased risk for further GIB events, with 33.9% of patients experiencing at least 1 recurrence. While post-LVAD GIB was associated with mortality, there was no relationship between number of GIB events and death. CONCLUSIONS: The Michigan Bleeding Risk Model is a simple tool, which facilitates the prediction of post-LVAD GIB in HM3 recipients using 13 preimplant variables. The implementation of this tool may help in the risk stratification process and may have therapeutic and clinical implications in HM3 LVAD recipients.

Modeling and estimating a threshold effect: An application to improving cardiac surgery practices.

Estimating thresholds when a threshold effect exists has important applications in biomedical research. However, models/methods commonly used in the biomedical literature may lead to a biased estimate. For patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), it is thought that exposure to low oxygen delivery (DO2) contributes to an increased risk of avoidable acute kidney injury. This research is motivated by estimating the threshold of nadir DO2 for CABG patients to help develop an evidence-based guideline for improving cardiac surgery practices. We review several models (sudden-jump model, broken-stick model, and the constrained broken-stick model) that can be adopted to estimate the threshold and discuss modeling assumptions, scientific plausibility, and implications in estimating the threshold. Under each model, various estimation methods are studied and compared. In particular, under a constrained broken-stick model, a modified two-step Newton-Raphson algorithm is introduced. Through comprehensive simulation studies and an application to data on CABG patients from the University of Michigan, we show that the constrained broken-stick model is flexible, more robust, and able to incorporate scientific knowledge to improve efficiency. The two-step Newton-Raphson algorithm has good computational performances relative to existing methods.

Cannulation strategies for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a type of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in which the function of the heart and/or lungs is partially or completely replaced by a portable system that provides prolonged support to critically ill patients with respiratory or cardiac failure. There are two major variants of ECMO: veno-venous (VV) ECMO and veno-arterial (VA) ECMO. VV ECMO replaces the function of the lung in which it uses a cannula to remove venous blood and oxygenates it using the extracorporeal system, and returns the blood to the right atrium to be pumped to the body. VA ECMO is slightly different in that it replaces the function of the heart and lungs by returning oxygenated blood to the aorta. As a therapy for respiratory failure, ECMO minimizes hypoxia, diminishes lung stress and strain, and allows lung protective mechanical ventilation. As a support for acute and terminal heart failure, ECMO reduces preload, increases aortic flow, and allows for end-organ perfusion. Due to its physiological support and advantages, it is used for a variety of chronic and acute support purposes such as bridge therapy for heart/lung transplant, durable ventricular assist devices, and intermediate-term mechanical support postoperatively. Our review gives a broad overview of the two main types of ECMO strategies and their clinical indications, cannulation strategies, unique clinical utility, and their limitations.

Open Surgical Treatment of Acute and Chronic Pulmonary Embolism.

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of death and morbidity in the United States and the prevalence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), a possible sequela of PE, has increased during the past decade. The mainstay treatment of CTEPH is open pulmonary endarterectomy, a procedure performed under hypothermic circulatory arrest, which entails endarterectomy of the branch, segmental and subsegmental pulmonary arteries. Acute PE may be similarly be treated with an open embolectomy in certain select circumstances.

Foundations of a life support equipment exchange platform.

Background: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Supplies Platform (https://Supplies.ELSO.org) was created out of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) disposable product shortage prior to and during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This novel Platform supports Centers in obtaining disposables from other Centers when alternative avenues are exhausted. Methods: Driven by the opportunity for increased patient care by using the product availability of the 962 ELSO centers worldwide was the motivation to form an efficient online supply sharing Platform. The pandemic created by COVID-19 became a catalyst to further recognize the magnitude of the supply disruption on a global scale, impacting allocations and guidelines for institutions, practice, and patient care. Conclusions: Records kept on the Platform website are helpful to the industry by providing insights into where difficulties exist in the supply chain for needed equipment. Yet, the common thread is awareness, of how critical situations can stretch resources and challenge our resolve for the best patient care. ELSO is proud to support member centers in these situations, by providing a means of attaining needed ECMO life support products to cover supply shortages.

Periprocedural Complications With Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty: Analysis of Global Studies.

BACKGROUND: Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) was introduced as a treatment modality for patients with inoperable, medically refractory chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension decades ago; however, reports of high rates of pulmonary vascular injury have led to considerable refinement in procedural technique. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to better understand the evolution of BPA procedure-related complications over time. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of original articles published by pulmonary hypertension centers globally and performed a pooled cohort analysis of procedure-related outcomes with BPA. RESULTS: This systematic review identified 26 published articles from 18 countries worldwide from 2013 to 2022. A total of 1,714 patients underwent 7,561 total BPA procedures with an average follow up of 7.3 months. From the first period (2013-2017) to the second period (2018-2022), the cumulative incidence of hemoptysis/vascular injury decreased from 14.1% (474/3,351) to 7.7% (233/3,029) (P < 0.01); lung injury/reperfusion edema decreased from 11.3% (377/3,351) to 1.4% (57/3,943) (P < 0.01); invasive mechanical ventilation decreased from 0.7% (23/3,195) to 0.1% (4/3,062) (P < 0.01); and mortality decreased from 2.0% (13/636) to 0.8% (8/1,071) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Procedure-related complications with BPA, including hemoptysis/vascular injury, lung injury/reperfusion edema, mechanical ventilation, and death, were less common in the second period (2018-2022), compared with first period (2013-2017), likely from refinement in patient and lesion selection and procedural technique over time.

ECMO During COVID-19: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons/Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Survey.

Background: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Workforce on Critical Care and the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization sought to identify how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed the practice of venoarterial (VA) and venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) programs across North America. Methods: A 26-question survey covering 6 categories (ECMO initiation, cannulation, management, anticoagulation, triage/protocols, and credentialing) was emailed to 276 North American Extracorporeal Life Support Organization centers. ECMO practices before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were compared. Results: Responses were received from 93 (34%) programs. The percentage of high-volume (>20 cases per year) VV ECMO programs increased during the pandemic from 29% to 41% (P < .001), as did institutions requiring multiple clinicians for determining initiation of ECMO (VV ECMO, 25% to 43% [P = .001]; VA ECMO, 20% to 32% [P = .012]). During the pandemic, more institutions developed their own protocols for resource allocation (23% before to 51%; P < .001), and more programs created sharing arrangements to triage patients and equipment with other centers (31% to 57%; P < .001). Direct thrombin inhibitor use increased for both VA ECMO (13% to 18%; P = .025) and VV ECMO (12% to 24%; P = .005). Although cardiothoracic surgeons remained the primary cannulating proceduralists, VV ECMO cannulations performed by pulmonary and critical care physicians increased (13% to 17%; P = .046). Conclusions: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/Extracorporeal Life Support Organization collaborative survey indicated that the pandemic has affected ECMO practice. Further research on these ECMO strategies and lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic may be useful in future global situations.

Contemporary Management of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation at Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines for the treatment of moderate or severe ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have changed. This study assessed the real-world impact of changing guidelines on the management of IMR during CABG over time. We hypothesized that the utilization of mitral valve repair for IMR would decrease over time, whereas mitral valve replacement for severe IMR would increase. METHODS: Patients undergoing CABG in a statewide collaborative database (2011-2020) were stratified by severity of IMR. Trends in mitral valve repair or replacement were evaluated. To account for differences of the patients, propensity score-matched analyses were used to compare patients with and without mitral intervention. RESULTS: A total of 11,676 patients met inclusion criteria, including 1355 (11.6%) with moderate IMR and 390 (3.3%) with severe IMR. The proportion of patients undergoing mitral intervention for moderate IMR decreased over time (2011, 17.7%; 2020, 7.5%; Ptrend = .001), whereas mitral replacement for severe IMR remained stable (2011, 11.1%; 2020, 13.3%; Ptrend = .14). Major morbidity was higher for patients with moderate IMR who underwent mitral intervention (29.1% vs 19.9%; P = .005). In a propensity analysis of 249 well-matched pairs, there was no difference in major morbidity (29.3% with mitral intervention vs 23.7% without; P = .16) or operative mortality (1.2% vs 2.4%; P = .5). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with recent guideline updates, patients with moderate IMR were less likely to undergo mitral repair. However, the rate of replacement for severe IMR did not change. Mitral intervention during CABG did not increase operative mortality or morbidity.

Patient-Specific Computational Modeling of Different Cannulation Strategies for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Institution of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) results in unique blood flow characteristics to the end-organ vascular beds. We studied the interplay between cardiac-driven and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-driven flow to vascular beds in different ECMO configurations using a patient-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. A computational ECMO model (femoral artery cannulation [FAC]) was constructed using patient-specific imaging and hemodynamic data. Following model calibration, we augmented the 3D geometrical model to represent alternative ECMO configurations (ascending aorta cannulation [AAC] and subclavian artery cannulation [SAC]). We performed CFD analyses, including a novel virtual color-dye analysis to compare global and regional blood flow and pressure characteristics as well as contributions of cardiac and ECMO-derived flow to the various vascular beds. Flow waveforms at all the aortic branch vessels were pulsatile, despite low cardiac output and predominant nonpulsatile ECMO-driven hemodynamics. Virtual color-dye analysis revealed differential contribution of cardiac and ECMO-derived flow to the end-organ vascular beds in the FAC model, while this was more evenly distributed in the AAC and SAC models. While global hemodynamics were relatively similar between various ECMO configurations, several distinct hemodynamic indices, in particular wall shear stress and oscillatory shear patterns, as well as differential contribution of ECMO-derived flow to various vascular beds, showed remarkable differences. The clinical impact of this study highlighting the relevance of CFD modeling in assessment of complex hemodynamics in ECMO warrants further evaluation.

Comparison of Evaluations for Heart Transplant Before Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device and Subsequent Receipt of Transplant at Transplant vs Nontransplant Centers.

Importance: In 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services revised its national coverage determination, removing the requirement to obtain review from a Medicare-approved heart transplant center to implant a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for bridge-to-transplant (BTT) intent at an LVAD-only center. The association between center-level transplant availability and access to heart transplant, the gold-standard therapy for advanced heart failure (HF), is unknown. Objective: To investigate the association of center transplant availability with LVAD implant strategies and subsequent heart transplant following LVAD implant before the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy change. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs multicenter US registry database was conducted from April 1, 2012, to June 30, 2020. The population included patients with HF receiving a primary durable LVAD. Exposures: LVAD center transplant availability (LVAD/transplant vs LVAD only). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were implant strategy as BTT and subsequent transplant by 2 years. Covariates that might affect listing strategy and outcomes were included (eg, patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities) in multivariable models. Parameters for BTT listing were estimated using logistic regression with center-level random effects and for receipt of a transplant using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with death as a competing event. Results: The sample included 22 221 LVAD recipients with a median age of 59.0 (IQR, 50.0-67.0) years, of whom 17 420 (78.4%) were male and 3156 (14.2%) received implants at LVAD-only centers. Receiving an LVAD at an LVAD/transplant center was associated with a 79% increased adjusted odds of BTT LVAD designation (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.35-2.38; P < .001). The 2-year transplant rate following LVAD implant was 25.6% at LVAD/transplant centers and 11.9% at LVAD-only centers. There was an associated 33% increased rate of transplant at LVAD/transplant centers compared with LVAD-only centers (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.17-1.51) with a similar hazard for death at 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.90-1.08). Conclusions and Relevance: Receiving an LVAD at an LVAD-transplant center was associated with increased odds of BTT intent at implant and subsequent transplant receipt for patients at 2 years. The findings of this study suggest that Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy change may have the unintended consequence of further increasing inequities in access to transplant among patients at LVAD-only centers.