Final Results of the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial: A Multi-Institutional Prospective Randomized Phase III Study Evaluating the Role of Adjuvant High-Dose Interferon Alfa-2b and Completion Lymph Node Dissection for Patients Staged by Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy.

PURPOSE: The Sunbelt Melanoma Trial is a prospective randomized trial evaluating the role of high-dose interferon alfa-2b therapy (HDI) or completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for patients with melanoma staged by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were eligible if they were age 18 to 70 years with primary cutaneous melanoma ≥ 1.0 mm Breslow thickness and underwent SLN biopsy. In Protocol A, patients with a single tumor-positive lymph node after SLN biopsy underwent CLND and were randomly assigned to observation versus HDI. In Protocol B, patients with tumor-negative SLN by standard histopathology and immunohistochemistry underwent molecular staging by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Patients positive by RT-PCR were randomly assigned to observation versus CLND versus CLND+HDI. Primary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In the Protocol A intention-to-treat analysis, there were no significant differences in DFS (hazard ratio, 0.82; P = .45) or OS (hazard ratio, 1.10; P = .68) for patients randomly assigned to HDI versus observation. In the Protocol B intention-to-treat analysis, there were no significant differences in overall DFS (P = .069) or OS (P = .77) across the three randomized treatment arms. Similarly, efficacy analysis (excluding patients who did not receive the assigned treatment) did not demonstrate significant differences in DFS or OS in Protocol A or Protocol B. Median follow-up time was 71 months. CONCLUSION: No survival benefit for adjuvant HDI in patients with a single positive SLN was found. Among patients with tumor-negative SLN by conventional pathology but with melanoma detected in the SLN by RT-PCR, there was no OS benefit for CLND or CLND+HDI.

Prognostic factors in young women with cutaneous melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Gender is an established prognostic factor in cutaneous melanoma; women as a group have a better overall prognosis than men. However, the investigators hypothesized that melanoma in young women may have distinct clinicopathologic features and biologic behavior compared with melanoma in older women, possibly related to tanning bed use and excessive acute episodes of sun exposure. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of a large multicenter study that accrued patients between 1996 and 2003 and included patients aged 18 to 70 years with cutaneous melanoma ≥1 mm Breslow thickness and no evidence of regional or distant metastatic disease. All women with follow-up data were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses as well as Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis were performed to test for differences in clinicopathologic variables, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) between female patients ≤40 and >40 years of age. RESULTS: A total of 1,056 female patients were divided into 2 groups: those >40 years of age (n = 757 [71.7%]) and those ≤40 years of age (n = 299 [28.3%]). Overall, there were no differences in Breslow thickness, ulceration, or sentinel lymph node status between groups. Compared with older women, younger women were more likely to have truncal melanomas (39.5% vs 29.5%, P = .0017) and less likely to have regression of the primary tumor (6.4% vs 11.5%, P = .0208). The mean number of sentinel lymph nodes removed was 2.82 for younger women and 2.29 for older women (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that Breslow thickness, ulceration, and tumor-positive sentinel lymph node were associated with worse DFS in both the younger and older groups; truncal location was associated with worse DFS in the younger group only. The same factors were predictive of OS in both groups, except that ulceration was not significant in the younger patient group. In the younger patient group, the 5-year KM DFS rates were 78.1% for truncal melanomas and 92.5% for nontruncal melanoma locations (P = .0009); the corresponding 5-year KM OS rates were 76.6% and 93.9% (P = .0003). In the older patient group, the 5-year KM DFS rates were 84.1% for truncal and 82.8% for nontruncal melanomas (P = NS), and the corresponding 5-year KM OS rates were 81.6% and 87.5% (P = .0049). CONCLUSIONS: Although women with cutaneous melanoma tend to have a better prognosis than men, women ≤40 years of age with primary melanoma of the trunk may represent a subgroup at higher risk for disease recurrence and metastasis.

Assessment of mitotic rate reporting in melanoma.

BACKGROUND: In patients with cutaneous melanoma, mitotic rate (MR) historically has been reported as the number of mitoses per high-power field (hpf) or per 10 hpf. The most recent revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system now incorporates MR and specifies that MR should be reported as mitoses per mm(2), with a conversion factor of 1 mm(2) equaling 4 hpf. However, because many pathologists continue to report MR in hpf units, we sought to compare the 2 conventions for reporting MR; this is important now that MR is used for staging and prognostic information. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of a database that combined patients from a large multicenter study and our single-institution melanoma database. All patients with pathology reports that included MR were included. For patients with MR reported in hpf units, MR was converted to mitoses per 10 hpf. Statistical analysis was performed to test differences in Breslow thickness (BT), ulceration, sentinel lymph node (SLN) status, and overall survival (OS) (log-rank test) between the mitoses per mm(2) group versus the mitoses per 10-hpf group. RESULTS: A total of 1,148 patients were identified; of these, 759 were reported as per mm(2) and 389 were reported in hpf units. When patients were subdivided into categories of MR of 0, 1, or more than 1, there was no statistically significant difference in mean or median BT, ulceration, or SLN positivity within categories between patients with MR per mm(2) versus patients with MR reported per 10 hpf. There was also no difference in OS between groups. Subdividing into smaller categories of MR of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or more than 5 did not yield different results. CONCLUSIONS: Although the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system reports a conversion factor for MR of 1 mm(2) equals 4 hpf, no clinically meaningful differences in predictors of prognosis (BT, ulceration, SLN positivity) or OS were seen between groups when a conversion factor of 1 mm(2) equaling 10 hpf was used. Therefore, for practical purposes, MR reported per 10 hpf approximates MR per mm(2).

Prognostic implications of anatomic location of primary cutaneous melanoma of 1 mm or thicker.

BACKGROUND: Breslow thickness, ulceration, and sentinel lymph node (SLN) status are well established as the most important prognostic factors for patients with cutaneous melanoma. Anatomic location of the primary tumor is generally considered to play a minor role in determining prognosis compared with these other factors. This analysis was performed to better define the influence of anatomic location of the primary melanoma on prognosis. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized trial that included patients ages 18 to 70 years with melanomas 1 mm or greater in Breslow thickness, all patients underwent SLN biopsy and completion lymphadenectomy if tumor-positive SLN were found. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors predictive of disease-free survival (DFS), local and in-transit recurrence-free survival (LITRFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 2,500 patients were included in this analysis with a median follow-up period of 68 months. Anatomic locations included head, neck, trunk, upper extremity, and lower extremity. Age, Breslow thickness, and percentage of patients with a positive SLN were significantly different by anatomic location on univariate analysis, as were positive SLN status, presence of regression, sex, and histologic subtype (P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, anatomic location was an independent predictor of SLN status (P < .0001), DFS (P = .045), LITRFS (P = .023), and OS (P < .0001). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, anatomic location was associated significantly with DFS, LITRFS, and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic location of the primary melanoma is an important independent predictor of SLN status and prognosis. Patients with primary melanomas of the head/neck and trunk have a worse prognosis than primary melanomas of other anatomic locations.

Lymphovascular invasion as a prognostic factor in melanoma.

The prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in melanoma remains controversial. Clinicopathologic data from a prospective trial of patients with melanoma were analyzed with respect to LVI. Disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors predictive of tumor-positive sentinel nodes (SLN) and survival. A total of 2183 patients were included in this analysis; 171 (7.8%) had LVI. Median follow-up was 68 months. Factors associated with LVI included tumor thickness, ulceration, and histologic subtype (P < 0.05). LVI was associated with a greater risk of SLN metastasis (P < 0.05). By KM analysis, LVI was associated with worse OS (P = 0.0009). On multivariate analysis, age, gender, thickness, ulceration, anatomic location, and SLN status were predictors of OS; however, LVI was not an independent predictor of OS. Among patients with regression, the 5-year OS rate was 49.4 per cent for patients with LVI versus 81.1 per cent for those with no LVI (P < 0.0001). LVI is associated with a greater risk of SLN metastasis. Although LVI is not an independent predictor of OS in general, it is a powerful predictor of worse OS among patients who have evidence of regression of the primary tumor.

Regression does not predict nodal metastasis or survival in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

Controversy exists regarding the prognostic implications of regression in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Some consider regression to be an indication for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy because regression may result in underestimation of the true Breslow thickness. Other data support regression as a favorable prognostic indicator, representing immune system recognition of the primary tumor. This analysis was performed to determine whether regression predicts nodal metastasis, disease-free survival (DFS), or overall survival (OS). Post hoc analysis was performed of a multicenter prospective randomized trial that included patients aged 18 to 70 years with cutaneous melanomas 1 mm or greater Breslow thickness. All patients underwent SLN biopsy; those with tumor-positive SLN underwent completion lymphadenectomy. Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival, univariate analysis, and multivariate analysis were performed. A total of 2220 patients (261 with regression; 1959 without regression) were included in this analysis with a median follow-up of 68 months. Patients with regression were more likely to be male, older than 50 years old, and have lower median Breslow thickness, superficial spreading histologic subtype, and a nonextremity anatomic location (P < 0.05 in all cases). Regression was not significantly associated with Clark level, ulceration, lymphovascular invasion, number of SLNs removed, or SLN metastasis. On multivariate analysis, factors independently predictive of DFS included Breslow thickness, ulceration, and SLN status (P < 0.05 in all cases); the same factors along with age, gender, and anatomic tumor location were significantly associated with OS (P < 0.05 in all cases). Regression was not significantly associated with DFS (risk ratio [RR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-1.27; P = 0.68) or OS (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.76-1.32; P = 0.93). These data suggest that regression is not a significant prognostic factor for patients with cutaneous melanoma and should not be used to guide clinical decision-making for such patients.

Prognostic significance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in melanoma.

The prognostic significance of tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) response in cutaneous melanoma is controversial. This analysis of data from a prospective, randomized trial included patients with cutaneous melanoma > or = 1.0 mm Breslow thickness who underwent wide local excision and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors associated with TIL response, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). A total of 515 patients were included; TIL response was classified as "brisk" (n = 100; 19.4%) or "non-brisk" (n = 415; 80.6%). Patients in the nonbrisk TIL group were more likely to have tumor-positive SLN (17.6% vs 7%; P = 0.0087). On multivariate analysis, nonbrisk TIL response, increased tumor thickness, and ulceration were significant independent predictors of tumor-positive SLN. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, 5-year DFS rate was 91 per cent for those with a brisk TIL response compared with 86 per cent in the nonbrisk group (P = 0.41). The 5-year OS rates were 95 per cent versus 84 per cent in the brisk versus nonbrisk TIL groups, respectively (P = 0.0083). However, on multivariate analysis, TIL response was not a significant independent factor predicting DFS or OS. TIL response is a significant predictor of SLN metastasis but is not a major predictor of DFS or OS.

Does mitotic rate predict sentinel lymph node metastasis or survival in patients with intermediate and thick melanoma?

BACKGROUND: The significance of mitotic rate (MR) in melanoma remains controversial. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of a prospective randomized trial that included patients with melanoma of 1.0 mm or greater, all patients underwent wide excision and sentinel node (sentinel lymph node [SLN]) biopsy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors predictive of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 551 patients had MR reported. A cut-off point of 6 mitoses/mm(2) best discriminated DFS and OS: 455 patients (82.6%) had MR less than 6/mm(2). SLN were tumor-positive in 14.7% of low MR versus 31.3% of high MR patients (P = .0003). There were significant differences in DFS (P = .0014) and OS (P = .0002) between the 2 groups, however, MR failed to remain significant in the multivariate model. CONCLUSIONS: MR is weakly predictive of SLN status but it is not an independent predictor of survival for melanomas 1.0 mm or thicker.

Second primary melanomas: incidence and outcome.

The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of multiple primary melanomas (MPM) and other cancers types among patients with melanoma. Factors associated with development of MPM were assessed in a post hoc analysis of the database from a multi-institutional prospective randomized trial of patients with melanoma aged 18 to 70 years with Breslow thickness 1 mm or greater. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Forty-eight (1.9%) of 2506 patients with melanoma developed additional primary melanomas. Median follow-up was 66 months. Except in one patient, the subsequent melanomas were thinner (median, 0.32 mm vs. 1.50 mm; P < 0.0001). Compared with patients without MPM, patients with MPM were more likely to be older (median age, 54.5 vs. 51.0 years; P = 0.048), to have superficially spreading melanomas (SSM) (P = 0.025), to have negative sentinel lymph nodes (P = 0.021), or to lack lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (P = 0.008) with the initial tumor. On multivariate analysis, age (P = 0.028), LVI (P = 0.010), and SSM subtype of the original melanoma (P = 0.024) were associated with MPM. Patients with MPM and patients with single primary melanoma had similar DFS (5-year DFS 88.7 vs. 81.3%, P = 0.380), but patients with MPM had better OS (5-year OS 95.3 vs. 80.0%, P = 0.005). Nonmelanoma malignancies occurred in 152 patients (6.1%). Ongoing surveillance of patients with melanoma is important given that a significant number will develop additional melanoma and nonmelanoma tumors. With close follow-up, second primary melanomas are usually detected at an early stage.

Surveillance after surgical treatment of melanoma: futility of routine chest radiography.

BACKGROUND: Current recommendations by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and other groups suggest that follow-up of cutaneous melanoma may include chest radiography (CXR) at 6- to 12-month intervals. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy of routine CXR for recurrence surveillance in melanoma. METHODS: Post hoc analysis was performed on data from a prospective, randomized, multi-institutional study on melanoma ≥1.0 mm in Breslow thickness. All patients underwent excision of the primary melanoma and sentinel node biopsy with completion lymphadenectomy for positive sentinel nodes. Yearly CXR and clinical assessments were obtained during follow-up. Results of routine CXR were compared with clinical disease states over the course of the study. RESULTS: A total of 1,235 patients were included in the analysis over a median follow-up of 74 months (range, 12-138). Overall, 210 patients (17.0%) had a recurrence, most commonly local or in-transit. Review of CXR results showed that 4,218 CXR were obtained in 1,235 patients either before, or in the absence of, initial recurrence. To date, 88% (n = 3,722) CXR are associated with no evidence of recurrence. Of CXR associated with recurrence, only 7.7% (n = 38) of surveillance CXR were read as "abnormal." Overall, 99% (n = 4,180) of CXR were read as either "normal" or found to be falsely positive (read as "abnormal," but without evidence of recurrence on investigation). Only 0.9% (n = 38) of all CXR obtained were true positives ("abnormal" CXR, with confirmed first known recurrence). Among these 38 patients with true positive CXR, 35 revealed widely disseminated disease (multiorgan or bilateral pulmonary metastases); only 3 (0.2%) had isolated pulmonary metastases amenable to resection. Sensitivity and specificity for surveillance CXR in detecting initial recurrence were 7.7% and 96.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The routine use of surveillance CXR provides no clinically useful information in the follow-up of patients with melanoma. CXR does not detect recurrence at levels sufficient to justify its routine use and, therefore, cannot be recommended as part of the standard surveillance regimen for these patients.

Prognostic information from sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thick melanoma.

HYPOTHESIS: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy provides valuable prognostic information for patients with thick (T4) melanoma. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of data from a prospective, randomized trial. SETTING: Academic and private hospitals. PATIENTS: Data of 240 patients with melanoma thicker than 4 mm were analyzed. Patients with tumor-positive SLNs underwent completion lymphadenectomy. Disease-free and overall survival were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors predictive of tumor-positive SLNs and disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Median thickness of melanoma was 5.6 mm, and patients were followed up for a median of 50 months. The SLNs were tumor positive in 100 patients (41.7%); 18% of these had additional positive nodes on completion lymphadenectomy. Extremity tumor location (risk ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.24; P = .001), Clark level (1.95; 1.33-2.87; P = .02), and lymphovascular invasion (1.57; 1.13-2.17; P = .01) were associated with a greater risk of tumor-positive SLNs. The patients with tumor-negative SLNs had significantly better median disease-free survival (46.5 vs 31.0 months; P = .04) and overall survival (55.5 vs 43.0 months; P = .004) compared with patients with tumor-positive SLNs. On multivariate analysis, male sex (risk ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-2.50; P = .02), increasing Breslow thickness (1.58; 1.10- 2.30; P = .03), ulceration (1.73; 1.18-2.59; P = .02), and tumor-positive SLNs (1.68; 1.17-2.43; P = .009) were associated with worse overall survival. CONCLUSION: The SLN biopsy provides useful prognostic information for patients with T4 melanoma.

The prognostic significance of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis in melanoma.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that metastasis beyond the sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) to the nonsentinel nodes (NSN) is an important predictor of survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis was performed of a prospective multi-institutional study that included patients with melanoma ≥ 1.0 mm in Breslow thickness. All patients underwent SLN biopsy; completion lymphadenectomy was performed for all SLN metastases. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were computed by Kaplan-Meier analysis; univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with differences in survival among groups. RESULTS: A total of 2335 patients were analyzed over a median follow-up of 68 months. We compared 3 groups: SLN negative (n = 1988), SLN-only positive (n = 296), and both SLN and NSN positive (n = 51). The 5-year DFS rates were 85.5, 64.8, and 42.6% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year OS rates were 85.5, 64.9, and 49.4%, respectively (P < 0.001). On univariate analysis, predictors of decreased OS included: SLN metastasis, NSN metastasis, increased total number of positive LN, increased ratio of positive LN to total LN, increased age, male gender, increased Breslow thickness, presence of ulceration, Clark level ≥ IV, and axial primary site (in all cases, P < 0.01). When the total number of positive LN and NSN status were evaluated using multivariate analysis, NSN status remained statistically significant (P < 0.01), while the total number of positive LN and LN ratio did not. CONCLUSIONS: NSN melanoma metastasis is an independent prognostic factor for DFS and OS, which is distinct from the number of positive lymph nodes or the lymph node ratio.

Factors associated with false-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Some melanoma patients who undergo sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy will have false-negative (FN) results. We sought to determine the factors and outcomes associated with FN SLN biopsy. METHODS: Analysis was performed of a prospective multi-institutional study that included patients with melanoma of thickness > 1.0 mm who underwent SLN biopsy. FN results were defined as the proportion of node-positive patients who had a tumor-negative sentinel node biopsy. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: This analysis included 2,451 patients with median follow-up of 61 months. FN, true-positive (TP), and true-negative (TN) SLN results were found in 59 (10.8%), 486 (19.8%), and 1,906 (77.8%) patients, respectively. On univariate analysis comparing the FN with TP groups, respectively, the following factors were significantly different: age (52.6 vs. 47.6 years, p = 0.004), thickness (mean 2.1 vs. 3.1 mm, p = 0.003), lymphovascular invasion (LVI; 3.7 vs. 13.7%, p = 0.037), and local/in-transit recurrence (LITR; 32.2 vs. 12.4%, p < 0.0001); these factors remained significant on multivariate analysis. Overall 5-year survival was greater in the TN group (86.7%) compared with the TP (62.3%) and FN (51.3%) groups (p < 0.0001); however, there was no significant difference in overall survival comparing the TP and FN groups (p = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to evaluate FN SLN results in melanoma, with a FN rate of 10.8%. FN results are associated with greater patient age, lower mean thickness, less frequent LVI, and greater risk of LITR. However, survival of patients with FN SLN is not statistically worse than that of patients with TP SLN.

Prospective multi-institutional study of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for molecular staging of melanoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic significance of molecular staging using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in detecting occult melanoma cells in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and circulating bloodstream. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter study, eligibility criteria included patient age 18 to 71 years, invasive melanoma > or = 1.0 mm Breslow thickness, and no clinical evidence of metastasis. SLN biopsy and wide excision of the primary tumor were performed. SLNs were examined by serial-section histopathology and S-100 immunohistochemistry. A portion of each SLN was frozen for RT-PCR. In addition, RT-PCR was performed on peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). RT-PCR analysis was performed using four markers: tyrosinase, MART1, MAGE3, and GP-100. Disease-free survival (DFS), distant-DFS (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1,446 patients with histologically negative SLNs underwent RT-PCR analysis. At a median follow-up of 30 months, there was no difference in DFS, DDFS, or OS between the RT-PCR-positive (n = 620) and RT-PCR-negative (n = 826) patients. Analysis of PBMC from 820 patients revealed significant differences in DFS and DDFS, but not OS, for patients with detection of more than one RT-PCR marker in peripheral blood. CONCLUSION: In this large, prospective, multi-institutional study, RT-PCR analysis on SLNs and PBMCs provides no additional prognostic information beyond standard histopathologic analysis of SLNs. Detection of more than one marker in PBMC is associated with a worse prognosis. RT-PCR remains investigational and should not be used to direct adjuvant therapy at this time.

Gender-related differences in outcome for melanoma patients.

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the factors associated with the well-established gender difference in survival for patients with melanoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Gender is an important factor in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Male patients have a worse outcome when compared with females. The reasons for this difference are poorly understood. METHODS: This prospective multi-institutional study included patients aged 18 to 70 years with melanomas > or =1.0 mm Breslow thickness. Wide excision and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy was performed in all patients. Clinicopathologic factors, including gender, were assessed and correlated with disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 3324 patients were included in the covariate analyses; 1829 patients had follow-up data available and were included in the survival analyses. Median follow-up was 30 months. On univariate analysis, men (n = 1906) were more likely than women to be older than 60 years (P < 0.0001), have thicker melanomas (P < 0.0001), have primary tumor regression (P = 0.0054), ulceration (P < 0.0001), and axial primary tumor location (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, age (P = 0.0002), thickness (P < 0.0001), ulceration (P = 0.015), and location (P < 0.0001) remained significant in the model. There was no difference in the rate of SLN metastasis between men and women (P = 0.37) on multivariate analysis. When factors affecting survival were considered, the prognosis was worse for men as validated by lower DFS (P = 0.0005), DDFS (P < 0.0001), and OS (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Male gender is associated with a greater incidence of unfavorable primary tumor characteristics without an increased risk for nodal metastasis. Nonetheless, gender is an independent factor affecting survival.

Clinicopathologic factors associated with false-negative sentinel lymph-node biopsy in breast cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have suggested a variety of factors that may affect the false negative (FN) rate for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in breast cancer. Because FN results are relatively rare, no prior studies have had sufficient sample size to allow detailed statistical analysis of factors predicting FN results. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage T1-2, N0 invasive breast cancer were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter study. All patients underwent SLN biopsy, followed by planned completion axillary dissection regardless of the SLN results, to assess the FN rate. SLN biopsy was performed using radioactive colloid injection in combination with isosulfan blue dye in 94% of cases. Dermal, subdermal, peritumoral, or subareolar radioactive colloid injection techniques were used at the discretion of each institution. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with a FN result. RESULTS: SLNs were identified in 3870 of 4117 patients (94%). There were 1243 true positive, 2521 true negative, and 106 FN results. Age, histologic subtype, the number of non-SLN removed, tumor palpability, type of breast biopsy, and SLN injection technique were not significant factors. On multivariate analysis, tumor size <2.5 cm, upper outer quadrant tumor location, removal of only a single SLN, minimal surgeon experience, presence of a single positive axillary LN, and use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for SLN analysis were independently associated with an increased risk of FN results. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon experience, tumor size and location, and the number of SLN removed are preoperative and intraoperative factors that independently predict the risk of a FN result. In contrast to suggestions from other smaller studies, age does not affect the likelihood of a FN result; a lesser, rather than greater, number of positive axillary nodes was associated with an increased likelihood of a FN result; and IHC analysis of the SLN increases, rather than decreases, the risk of FN results.

Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of the type of biopsy (needle vs. excisional) on lumpectomy margin status has not been well established. The objective of this study was to determine whether needle biopsy is associated with a higher positive margin rate at time of lumpectomy. METHODS: We evaluated this hypothesis in the setting of a prospective multi-institutional study. A total of 3975 patients were enrolled in the University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study from May 7, 1998 to June 3, 2003. Patients who underwent lumpectomy at the time of their sentinel lymph node biopsy were the focus of this analysis. Patients with clinical stage T1 N0 and T2 N0breast cancer were eligible; 29 patients were found to have T3 tumors on final pathology. Pathologists at each institution defined margin positivity, and tumor at the inked margin of resection was the study guideline. RESULTS: Median patient age was 59 years, and median tumor size was 1.5 cm. A total of 2658 patients underwent lumpectomy with the following results. The cancer of 1515 patients was diagnosed by fine-needle or core-needle biopsy and of 821 patients was diagnosed by excisional biopsy; in 322 patients the method of diagnosis was unknown. The type of previous biopsy did not significantly affect the positive-margin rate at the time of lumpectomy (13.3% vs. 11.0% for needle and excisional biopsy, respectively, P = 0.107). However, patients with larger tumors were more often found to have a positive margin (11.4% vs. 13.9% vs. 27.6% for T1, T2, and T3 tumors, respectively; P = 0.010). No difference was found in margin status after excision of palpable versus nonpalpable tumors (10.6% vs. 10.9%, respectively, P = 0.743). Histologic subtype, however, did affect margin status (15.8% vs. 9.8% positive margins for lobular vs. ductal type, respectively, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In this multi-institutional study, increasing tumor size and lobular histologic subtype were associated with a greater likelihood of a positive margin. The type of biopsy, needle or excisional, had no effect on the ability to achieve negative margins.

Correlation between prognostic factors and increasing age in melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Age of patients with melanoma varies directly with mortality and inversely with the presence of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis. To gain further insight into this apparent paradox, we analyzed the relationship between age and other major prognostic factors. METHODS: The Sunbelt Melanoma Trial is a prospective, randomized study with 79 institutions involving SLN biopsy for melanoma. Eligible patients were 18 to 70 years old with melanoma of > or = 1.0-mm Breslow thickness and clinically N0 regional lymph nodes. SLNs were evaluated by serial histological sections and immunohistochemistry for S-100 protein. RESULTS: A total of 3076 patients were enrolled in the study, with a median follow-up of 19 months. Five age groups were examined: 18 to 30, 31 to 40, 41 to 50, 51 to 60, and 61 to 70 years. Trends between age and several key prognostic factors was identified: as age group increased, so did Breslow thickness (analysis of variance; P <.001), the incidence of ulceration and regression, and the proportion of male patients (each variable: chi2, P <.001). The incidence of SLN metastasis, however, declined with increasing age (chi2; P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: As age increases, so does Breslow thickness, the incidence of ulceration and regression, and the proportion of male patients-all poor prognostic factors. However, the frequency of SLN metastasis declines with increasing age. It is not known whether this represents a decreased sensitivity (higher false-negative rate) of the SLN procedure in older patients or a different biological behavior (hematogenous spread) of melanomas in older patients.