Performance of the 2023 Duke-International Society of Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Criteria for Infective Endocarditis in Relation to the Modified Duke Criteria and to Clinical Management-Reanalysis of Retrospective Bacteremia Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Revised diagnostic criteria for infective endocarditis (IE), the 2023 Duke-ISCVID criteria, were recently presented and need validation. Here, we compare the 2000 modified Duke criteria for IE with Duke-ISCVID among patients with bacteremia and relate the diagnostic classification to IE treatment. METHODS: We reanalyzed patient cohorts with Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, non-ß-hemolytic streptococci, Streptococcus-like bacteria, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Enterococcus faecalis, and HACEK (Haemophilus, Aggregatibacter, Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, Kingella) bacteremia. Episodes were classified as definite, possible, or rejected IE with the modified Duke and Duke-ISCVID criteria. Reclassification included the microbiology criteria, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, and cardiac implanted electronic devices. To calculate sensitivity, patients treated for IE were considered as having IE. RESULTS: In 4050 episodes of bacteremia, the modified Duke criteria assigned 307 episodes (7.6%) as definite IE, 1190 (29%) as possible IE, and 2553 (63%) as rejected IE. Using the Duke-ISCVID criteria, 13 episodes (0.3%) were reclassified from possible to definite IE, and 475 episodes (12%) were reclassified from rejected to possible IE. With the modified Duke criteria, 79 episodes that were treated as IE were classified as possible IE, and 11 of these episodes were reclassified to definite IE with Duke-ISCVID. Applying the decision to treat for IE as a reference standard, the sensitivity of the Duke-ISCVID criteria was 80%. None of the 475 episodes reclassified to possible IE were treated as IE. CONCLUSIONS: The Duke-ISCVID criteria reclassified a small proportion of episodes to definite IE at the expense of more episodes of possible IE. Future criteria should minimize the possible IE group while keeping or improving sensitivity.

Biofilm formation is associated with poor outcome in prosthetic joint infections caused by Staphylococcus lugdunensis.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus lugdunensis has been described as a pathogen of increasing importance in prosthetic joint infections (PJI). Our aim was to describe the clinical presentation of PJI caused by S. lugdunensis, and to correlate the biofilm-forming ability of the bacterial isolates to clinical outcome. METHOD: S. lugdunensis isolates from PJI episodes during 2015-2019 were included and analysed for biofilm formation using a microtiter plate assay. Medical records from the corresponding patients were reviewed. RESULTS: We identified 36 patients with PJI caused by S. lugdunensis during the study period. Early postoperative PJIs were most frequent (n = 20, 56%). Surgical intervention was performed in a majority of the patients (n = 33, 92%), and the dominating type of antibiotic treatment was a combination of rifampicin and ciprofloxacin (n = 27, 75%). The treatment success-rate was 81% (n = 29). All isolates causing PJI were able to form biofilm in vitro. Biofilm formation was significantly stronger in isolates causing relapsing vs non-relapsing PJI (mean OD550 3.1 ± 0.23 vs 1.14 ± 0.73 p = .001) and strong biofilm formation was also associated with late acute hematogenic PJI (mean OD550 1.8 ± 0.93 vs. 0.93 ± 0.81, p = .01). CONCLUSION: Strong biofilm production in S. lugdunensis isolates was associated with relapse in PJI.

Treatment outcome with penicillin G or cloxacillin in penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a retrospective cohort study.

An increasing proportion of penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (PSSA) has been reported over the last years. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare penicillin G with cloxacillin in the treatment of PSSA bloodstream infections. The primary outcome was the mortality rate after 90 days and the secondary outcome was the development of treatment complications of varying severity. Medical records from patients with PSSA bacteraemia during 2018-2020 were reviewed. Patient outcome was ranked on an ordinal scale according to severity: (i) alive at 90 days without any complications; (ii) adverse events not requiring treatment; (iii) change or addition of antibiotics owing to treatment failure or adverse events; (iv) relapse within 90 days; and (v) death within 90 days. The outcome ranking scale was dichotomised at every level and was analysed by logistic regression and a propensity score-weighted analysis. A total of 316 patients received cloxacillin and 68 patients received penicillin G as final treatment. Mortality rates did not differ significantly between the treatment groups (cloxacillin 19% vs. penicillin G 13%; P = 0.24), but patients treated with cloxacillin had an increased odds of having any complication compared with patients treated with penicillin G (odds ratio = 2.43, 95% confidence interval 1.30-4.53; P = 0.005). A propensity score analysis confirmed the results. Mortality rates in PSSA bacteraemia did not differ between treatment groups but cloxacillin treatment increased the overall odds of treatment complications.

Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus lugdunensis belongs to the CoNS group, but is regarded to be more virulent than most other CoNS. It is also remarkably susceptible to antibiotics, including penicillin G. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate different methods for penicillin susceptibility testing, to assess penicillin susceptibility rates among S. lugdunensis and to describe the clinical presentation including antibiotic treatment. METHODS: Clinical isolates of S. lugdunensis were tested for penicillin susceptibility using disc diffusion according to CLSI (10 U disc) and EUCAST (1 U disc), assessment of zone-edge appearance, nitrocefin test and Etest for MIC determination. PCR of the blaZ gene was used as a reference method. RESULTS: Of the 112 isolates included in the study, 67% were susceptible to penicillin G according to blaZ PCR. The EUCAST disc diffusion test had 100% sensitivity, whereas the CLSI method had one very major error with a false-susceptible isolate. When zone-edge appearance was included in the assessment, the false-susceptible isolate was correctly classified as resistant. Foreign-body infection was the most common focus of infection, affecting 49% of the participants. Only 4% of the patients were treated with penicillin G. CONCLUSIONS: Penicillin susceptibility is common in S. lugdunensis and the disc diffusion method according to EUCAST had a higher sensitivity than that of CLSI. Assessment of zone-edge appearance could increase the sensitivity of the disc diffusion test. Penicillin susceptibility testing and treatment should be considered in S. lugdunensis infections.

Penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: susceptibility testing, resistance rates and outcome of infection.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is an important human pathogen that causes both superficial and invasive infections. Penicillin is now rarely used in the treatment of SA infections due to widespread resistance and a concern about the accuracy of existing methods for penicillin susceptibility testing. The aims of the present study were to determine the frequency of penicillin-susceptible SA isolates from blood and wound cultures in Lund, Sweden, and to evaluate methods for penicillin testing in SA. We also wanted to investigate if penicillin-susceptible isolates are associated with higher mortality. METHODS: Hundred blood culture isolates collected 2008/2009, 140 blood culture isolates from 2014/2015, and 141 superficial wound culture strains from 2015 were examined. Penicillin susceptibility was tested with disk diffusion according to EUCAST guidelines, and results were confirmed with a cloverleaf assay and PCR amplification of the BlaZ gene. Patient data for all bacteraemia cases were extracted from medical records. RESULTS: The disk diffusion method with assessment of both zone size and zone edge appearance had high accuracy in our study. About 57% of bacteraemia isolates from 2008/2009 were sensitive to penicillin compared to 29% in 2014/2015 (p < .0001). In superficial wound cultures, 21% were penicillin susceptible. There was no difference in co-morbidity or mortality rates between patients with penicillin resistant and penicillin sensitive SA bacteraemia. CONCLUSION: Disk-diffusion is a simple and reliable method to detect penicillin resistance in SA, and susceptibility rates are significant. Penicillin has many theoretical advantages and should be considered in the treatment of SA bacteraemia when susceptible.