Impact of Helicobacter pylori Eradication on Surgical Treatment of Peptic Ulcer Disease: Systematic Review.

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) poses a significant global healthcare challenge, with an intricate interplay between stomach acid-pepsin levels and mucosal protective mechanisms. The emergence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) as a major etiological factor revolutionized the therapeutic landscape, highlighting the importance of bacterial eradication in PUD management. Surgical intervention remains vital, particularly in cases of perforated peptic ulcers, despite a shift towards conservative approaches. Understanding the impact of H. pylori eradication on surgical outcomes is crucial for optimizing PUD management. This systematic review was conducted to assess how H. pylori eradication treatment impacts surgical results in patients with PUD. The criteria for inclusion involved research studies on individuals aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of PUD that necessitated surgical treatment. Important results comprised eradication rates, complications after surgery, recurrence rates, and overall outcomes for patients. Two researchers independently screened and extracted data from electronic databases using a thorough search strategy. The evaluation of quality employed standardized instruments for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Nine research projects met the requirements for inclusion, offering information on the effectiveness of H. pylori elimination treatment on surgical results. Different rates of eradication were noted, with a notable number of patients experiencing postoperative complications. Recurrence of ulcers was a concern, despite treatment, emphasizing the complexity of PUD management. Studies have shown that eradication therapy is effective in certain patient groups, like young men with perforated peptic ulcers. Still, there are obstacles, especially for patients who test negative for H. pylori and experience recurring ulcers. The integration of H. pylori eradication with surgical intervention represents a holistic approach to PUD management. Although eradication therapy has the potential to enhance surgical results, difficulties remain, requiring personalized treatment approaches that consider patients' unique characteristics and the cause of the disease. This research adds to the growing knowledge of PUD treatment, stressing the importance of proper management.

Correction: Prevalence, Predictors, and Characteristics of Waterpipe Smoking Among Jazan University Students in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.5334/aogh.2912.].

Prevalence, Predictors, and Characteristics of Waterpipe Smoking Among Jazan University Students in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Waterpipe smoking (WPS), also called shisha, has considerable short and long-term effects on human health. WPS has become increasingly popular among the youth in Jazan society. Hence, this study is aimed to assess the prevalence, predictors, and characteristics (knowledge and attitude) of WPS among male and female students at Jazan University. Methods and materials: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among 405 students. Data were collected using a self-administered validated questionnaire. The prevalence and predictors of WPS and the association between important socio-demographic factors (sex, type of college, parents smoking, home mate smoking and close friend smoking) were studied. Results: The prevalence of WPS among students was high, approximately 34.0%. The prevalence rate was significantly higher in males (42.5%, n = 74) than in females (27.0%, n = 57) (p = 0.001). The main predictors of WPS were: being male (OR = 1.99, 95% CI [1.30, 3.06], p = 0.001), believing that shisha smoking is less harmful & addictive than cigarettes (OR = 3.84, 95% CI [1.88, 7.83], p < 0.001 and 3.80, 95% CI [2.0, 7.11], p < 0.001, respectively), and having a close friend who smokes (OR = 6.85, 95% CI [3.84, 12.22], p < 0.001). Conclusions: WPS prevalence among Jazan University students was high, and the most influential factors were being male, having smoker housemates and friends, and having incorrect thoughts and beliefs.

Two-Implant-Supported Mandibular Overdentures: Do Clinical Denture Quality and Inter-Implant Distance Affect Patient Satisfaction?

PURPOSE: To investigate the following three null hypotheses in patients rehabilitated with a mandibular overdenture supported by two unsplinted implants: (1) patient satisfaction is not related to the clinical quality of the dentures; (2) inter-implant distance (IID) has no effect on the clinical quality of the dentures; and (3) IID does not influence patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty edentulous patients who were rehabilitated with a two-implant-supported mandibular overdenture participated in the study. Independent investigators evaluated the dentures on the basis of five clinical criteria using the validated Denture Quality Evaluation Form, and the patients completed the validated Denture Satisfaction Scale. Irreversible hydrocolloid impressions of the mandible were made and poured immediately in die stone. The IID was measured by adapting an orthodontic wire to the mandibular alveolar ridge crest, extending from the center of one implant to the center of the other. Spearman correlation analyses were used to identify possible correlations, with a significance level set at P < .05. RESULTS: The clinicians' overall mean rating of the clinical quality of the dentures was 91.5% (standard deviation 6.27%). The stability of the mandibular overdenture and of the maxillary conventional complete denture was significantly related to satisfaction (r = 0.389 and r = 0.44, respectively). Significant associations were found between the mandibular stability items and satisfaction with both maxillary and mandibular dentures. The stability of the maxillary denture was significantly associated with patient satisfaction with mandibular denture retention, stability, and comfort. None of the 12 denture satisfaction items were significantly associated with IID. Similarly, IID did not have an effect on the quality of either denture in terms of retention, stability, or occlusion. CONCLUSION: Denture stability was the feature that had the most influence on patient satisfaction with the mandibular overdenture and with the maxillary conventional denture. IID had no effect on the clinical quality of either denture and did not influence patient satisfaction.