Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting is the Future: Pro.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains one of the most commonly performed operations worldwide. However, most CABG operations performed today are as invasive -apart from saphenous vein harvesting- as they were 50 years ago. While heart valve operations have become less invasive, CABG faces formidable challenges in doing so. Valve surgery requires a single surgical exposure to the valve intervened on, but less invasive CABG necessitates multiple surgical exposures to harvest internal thoracic artery conduits, source their inflow plus that of other grafts, and expose each coronary target to be grafted -including anterior, lateral, posterior, and inferior vessels. In this article, we rationalize why we believe that conventional CABG remains unduly invasive, associated with morbidity and prolonged recovery, and why less invasive CABG in its many forms, which we describe, represents a safe, practical, diffusible, and less invasive alternative to sternotomy CABG. Centers of excellence in coronary artery surgery should dedicate resources and expertise to developing high-quality, safe, durable, and advanced forms of lesser invasive CABG.

Endoscopic Robotic Mitral Operating Room as a Microsystem for Safety and Sustainability.

OBJECTIVE: Safety and sustainability are key elements of a robotic mitral valve (MV) program at any stage of development. Challenges include the positioning of the surgeon at the robotic console, increasing patient complexity, and upstream administrative staffing difficulties. We instituted a systems approach to maximize patient safety and maintain robotic service viability. METHODS: A single dedicated robotic operating room (OR) was equipped as a microsystem with team training in the operative steps, ergonomics, digital tools, and an explicit culture of safety. Outcomes of all robotic mitral procedures including concomitant procedures in the microsystem OR by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: From January 2014 through December 2023, 1,529 consecutive MV patients were operated with an endoscopic robotic approach. Ten patients (0.65%) were converted to conventional approaches. Overall, 1,300 MV repairs (85%) were performed with residual MV regurgitation of none to trace in 1,205 patients (92.7%), mild in 92 patients (7.1%), and moderate in 3 patients (0.23%). MV replacements were performed in 229 patients (15%) with no paravalvular leaks. Mortality was 0.08% in the repair group and 0.87% in the replacement group. No deaths have occurred in the last 38 months. Stroke occurred in 0.31% of repair patients and 1.3% of replacement patients. One patient developed transient renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: Organization of the robotic OR as a microsystem is associated with surgical efficacy and very low morbidity and mortality. A comparable microsystem approach using all or select components may promote safety and sustainability for robotic MV programs at all levels.

Robotic mitral surgery: recent advances and outcomes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review explores recent advancements in robotic cardiac surgery, specifically focusing on its application in diverse mitral valve surgeries. The aim is to provide an overview of current clinical practices and supporting evidence in this evolving field. RECENT FINDINGS: A literature review indicates a 30% surge in robotic mitral valve repair from 2015 to 2021, paralleled by a decline in sternotomy-based repair per the STS database. Robotic mitral valve repair consistently shows effective and safe outcomes, with comparable mortality but lower morbidity risks than sternotomy and thoracotomy. The robotic approach exhibits lower conversion to valve replacement, shorter ICU stays, and reduced 30-day readmissions. For experienced programs, robotic techniques prove versatile in various pathologies, including rheumatic heart valve disease, infective endocarditis, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and mitral annular calcification necessitating valve replacement. Literature supports their selective use in high-risk scenarios, including redo surgeries and elderly patients. SUMMARY: Recent evidence supports the growing use of robotic approaches in mitral valve surgery, highlighting their efficacy with comparable mortality rates but lower morbidity risks. Robotic techniques consistently yield positive outcomes across various pathologies and patient profiles, signaling a potential paradigm shift in mitral valve interventions.

Teaching the next generation of robotic coronary surgeons.

Robotic-assisted coronary bypass is an attractive option in the management of patients with isolated left anterior descending artery (LAD) disease or multi-vessel coronary disease providing the benefits of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to the LAD graft while avoiding the morbidity of a sternotomy. Although the learning curve is significant, both cardiothoracic surgery trainees as well as experienced coronary surgeons can learn this technique. As the prevalence of patients requiring these procedures increases, we must be prepared to respond by increasing our training of robotic coronary surgeons.

Developing Proficiency in Robotic Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this review is to provide recommendations for cardiac surgeons interested in adopting a robotic platform into their programs. METHODS: The recommendations are based on the experience of the authors and cover a diverse array of cardiac surgical procedures that are currently performed with robotic assistance. The focus, as with any innovative surgical approach, is to ensure patient safety, maximize quality and efficacy, and set realistic expectations about what is required to achieve proficiency in robotic cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Even though there may be steady growth in robotic cardiac procedures, it is possible that these procedures will be concentrated in higher-volume programs that already offer expertise in mitral valve or coronary surgery. Once success and proficiency with robotic cardiac approaches to coronary or valvular heart disease is achieved, as outlined in this review, surgeons may wish to embark on more complex robotic procedures, such as reoperative mitral valve surgery, totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass, or aortic valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining the same principles and techniques for coronary surgery or intracardiac procedures and maintaining the fundamentals of myocardial protection and cardiopulmonary bypass are essential to ensure excellent technical and clinical outcomes and to optimize patient safety.

Atrial fibrillation symptom reduction and improved quality of life following the hybrid convergent procedure: a CONVERGE trial subanalysis.

Background: CONVERGE was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that evaluated the safety of Hybrid Atrial Fibrillation Convergent (HC) and compared its effectiveness to endocardial catheter ablation (CA) for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) and longstanding PersAF (LSPAF). In 2020, we reported that CONVERGE met its primary safety and effectiveness endpoints. The primary objective of the present study is to report CONVERGE trial results for quality of life (QOL) and Class I/III anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) utilization following HC. Methods: Eligible patients had drug-refractory symptomatic PersAF or LSPAF and a left atrium diameter ≤6.0 cm. Enrolled patients were randomized 2:1 to receive HC or CA. Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale (AFSS) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were assessed at baseline and 12 months; statistical comparison was performed using paired t-tests. AAD utilization at baseline through 12 and 18 months post-procedure was evaluated; statistical comparison was performed using McNemar's tests. Results: A total of 153 patients were treated with either HC (n=102) or CA (n=51). Of the 102 HC patients, 38 had LSPAF. AFSS and SF-36 Mental and Physical Component scores were significantly improved at 12 months versus baseline with HC overall and for the subset of LSPAF patients treated with either HC or CA. The proportion of HC patients (n=102) who used Class I /III AADs at 12 and 18 months was significantly less (33.3% and 36.3%, respectively) than baseline (84.3%; P<0.001). In LSPAF patients who underwent HC (n=38), AADs use was 29.0% through 18 months follow-up versus 71.1% at baseline (P<0.001). Conclusions: HC reduced AF symptoms, significantly improved QOL, and reduced AAD use in patients with PersAF and LSPAF. ClinicalTrialsgov Identifier: NCT01984346.

Permanent Pacemaker Implantation and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Concomitant Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Tricuspid valve annuloplasty (TA) during mitral valve repair (MVr) is associated with increased risk of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, but the magnitude of risk and long-term clinical consequences have not been firmly established. OBJECTIVES: This study assesses the incidence rates of PPM implantation after isolated MVr and following MVr with TA as well as the associated long-term clinical consequences of PPM implantation. METHODS: State-mandated hospital discharge databases of New York and California were queried for patients undergoing MVr (isolated or with concomitant TA) between 2004 and 2019. Patients were stratified by whether or not they received a PPM within 90 days of index surgery. After weighting by propensity score, survival, heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs), endocarditis, stroke, and reoperation were compared between patients with or without PPM. RESULTS: A total of 32,736 patients underwent isolated MVr (n = 28,003) or MVr + TA (n = 4,733). Annual MVr + TA volumes increased throughout the study period (P < 0.001, trend), and PPM rates decreased (P < 0.001, trend). The incidence of PPM implantation <90 days after surgery was 7.7% for MVr and 14.0% for MVr + TA. In 90-day conditional landmark-weighted analyses, PPMs were associated with reduced long-term survival among MVr (HR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.75-2.19; P < 0.001) and MVr + TA recipients (HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.28-2.14; P < 0.001). In both surgical groups, PPMs were also associated with an increased risk of HFH (HR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.27-1.90; P < 0.001) and endocarditis (HR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.52-2.51; P < 0.001), but not with stroke or reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to isolated MVr, adding TA to MVr was associated with a higher risk of 90-day PPM implantation. In both surgical groups, PPM implantation was associated with an increase in mortality, HFH, and endocarditis.

National trends in emergency coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is often omitted from current research, and volumes as well as outcomes are unknown. The purpose of this research is to examine national trends in emergency CABG. METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons national adult cardiac surgical database was queried from 2005 to 2017 for patients who underwent emergency and emergency salvage isolated CABG procedures, and 92 607 patients were included for analysis. Generalized linear mixed models were used to assess time trends, taking into account the clustering effect of region. RESULTS: Over the study period, volumes of emergency and emergency salvage CABG declined from 7991 to 6916 cases/year. Emergency and emergency salvage cases accounted for ∼4.9% of all CABG procedures performed nationwide in 2005 and 4.1% in 2017. The predicted risk of mortality (PROM) declined in the entire patient cohort over time from 12% to 8% (P < 0.0001). Rates of important postoperative morbidities also declined including prolonged intubation, re-exploration for haemorrhage and postoperative pneumonia (P < 0.001). Observed-to-expected mortality rates rose over the study period from 0.81 to 1.06 as the overall PROM declined from 9.3% to 7.6%. Emergency salvage CABG rates also declined over the course of the study from 358 to 323 cases/year. The observed-to-expected ratios for mortality increased for emergency salvage CABG during the study from 1.16 to 1.66, and emergency salvage mortality rates averaged 46.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of patients undergoing emergency and emergency salvage CABG in the USA has declined. Increases in mortality are largely driven by emergency salvage cases, and the PROM algorithm may not accurately reflect the risk involved for these patients.

Trends in surgical aortic valve replacement in pre- and post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement eras at a structural heart center.

Background: The advent of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has directly impacted the lifelong management of patients with aortic valve disease. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved TAVR for all surgical risk: prohibitive (2011), high (2012), intermediate (2016), and low (2019). Since then, TAVR volumes are increasing and surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVR) are decreasing. This study sought to evaluate trends in isolated SAVR in the pre- and post-TAVR eras. Methods: From January 2000 to June 2020, 3,861 isolated SAVRs were performed at a single academic quaternary care institution which participated in the early trials of TAVR beginning in 2007. A formal structural heart center was established in 2012 when TAVR became commercially available. Patients were divided into the pre-TAVR era (2000-2011, n = 2,426) and post-TAVR era (2012-2020, n = 1,435). Data from the institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database was analyzed. Results: The median age was 66 years, similar between groups. The post-TAVR group had a statistically higher rate of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, heart failure, more reoperative SAVR, and lower STS Predicted Risk of Mortality (PROM) (2.0% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.0001). There were more urgent/emergent/salvage SAVRs (38% vs. 24%) and fewer elective SAVRs (63% vs. 76%), (p < 0.0001) in the post-TAVR group. More bioprosthetic valves were implanted in the post-TAVR group (85% vs. 74%, p < 0.0001). Larger aortic valves were implanted (25 vs. 23 mm, p < 0.0001) and more annular enlargements were performed (5.9% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.0001) in the post-TAVR era. Postoperatively, the post-TAVR group had less blood product transfusion (49% vs. 58%, p < 0.0001), renal failure (1.4% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.0001), pneumonia (2.3% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.01), shorter lengths of stay, and lower in-hospital mortality (1.5% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.0007). Conclusion: The approval of TAVR changed the landscape of aortic valve disease management. At a quaternary academic cardiac surgery center with a well-established structural heart program, patients undergoing isolated SAVR in the post-TAVR era had lower STS PROM, more implantation of bioprosthetic valves, utilization of larger valves, annular enlargement, and lower in-hospital mortality. Isolated SAVR continues to be performed in the TAVR era with excellent outcomes. SAVR remains an essential tool in the lifetime management of aortic valve disease.

Transthoracic Aortic Clamp Technique for Port-Only Endoscopic Robotic Mitral Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Many robotic mitral surgeons utilize right thoracotomy with transthoracic clamping of the aorta, while a smaller number employ a port-only endoscopic approach with endoaortic balloon occlusion of the aorta. We present our technique for a port-only endoscopic robotic approach with transthoracic clamping. METHODS: From July 2019 through December 2022, 133 patients underwent port-only endoscopic robotic mitral surgery with transthoracic clamp aortic occlusion and antegrade cardioplegia. Perfusion was through the femoral artery in 101 patients (76%) and axillary in 32 patients (24%). Clamp technique involved placing the clamp at the mid-ascending aorta, dynamic valve testing to 90 mm aortic root pressure, and closure of the cardioplegia cannula site prior to clamp removal. Indications for clamp utilization over balloon occlusion included both balloon supply issues and aortoiliac anatomy. RESULTS: Mitral repair was performed in 122 patients (92.7%) and mitral valve replacement in 11 patients (8.3%). Mean aortic occlusion time was 92 ± 21.4 min. Mean time from left atrial closure to clamp removal was 8.7 (7.2 to 12.8) min. There were no injuries to the aorta or surrounding structures, mortality, strokes, or renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: For robotic teams with endoaortic balloon capability, this technique may be useful in certain patients with aorto-iliac pathology or limited femoral artery access. Alternatively, robotic teams who employ transthoracic aortic clamping through a thoracotomy may find this technique useful to transition to a port-only endoscopic approach.

Hybrid epicardial-endocardial ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: A subanalysis of the CONVERGE Trial.

Background: Favorable clinical outcomes are difficult to achieve in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) with catheter ablation (CA). The CONVERGE (Convergence of Epicardial and Endocardial Ablation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Persistent Atrial FIbrillation) trial evaluated the effectiveness of hybrid convergent (HC) ablation vs endocardial CA. Objective: The study sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of HC vs CA in the LSPAF subgroup from the CONVERGE trial. Methods: The CONVERGE trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial that enrolled 153 patients at 27 sites. A post hoc analysis was performed on LSPAF patients. The primary effectiveness was freedom from atrial arrhythmias off new or increased dose of previously failed or intolerant antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) through 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was major adverse event incidence through 30 days with HC. Key secondary effectiveness measures included (1) percent of patients achieving ≥90% AF burden reduction vs baseline and (2) AF freedom. Results: Sixty-five patients (42.5% of total enrollment) had LSPAF; 38 in HC and 27 in CA. Primary effectiveness was 65.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 50.7%-80.9%) with HC vs 37.0% (95% CI 5.1%-52.4%) with CA (P = .022). Through 18 months, these rates were 60.5% (95% CI 50.0%-76.1%) with HC vs 25.9% (95% CI 9.4%-42.5%) with CA (P = .006). Secondary effectiveness rates were higher than CA with HC at 12 and 18 months. Freedom from atrial arrhythmias off AADs was 52.6% (95% CI 36.8%-68.5%) and 47.4% (95% CI 31.5%-63.2%) with HC at 12 and 18 months vs 25.9% (95% CI 9.4%-42.5%) and 22.2% (95% CI 6.5%-37.9%) with CA, respectively (12 months: P = .031; 18 months: P = .038). Three (7.9%) major adverse events occurred within 30 days of HC. Conclusion: Post hoc analysis demonstrated effectiveness and acceptable safety of HC compared with CA in LSPAF.

Age period cohort analysis of rheumatic heart disease in high-income countries.

INTRODUCTION: Rheumatic heart disease is considered well-controlled in high-income countries; however, its actual trends in mortality remain unclarified. We analyzed trends in mortality from rheumatic heart disease in association with age, period, and birth cohort. METHODS: We analyzed the WHO mortality database to determine trends in mortality from rheumatic heart disease in the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, Australia, USA, and Canada from 2000 to 2020. We used age-cohort-period modeling to estimate cohort and period effects. Net drift (overall annual percentage change), local drift (annual percentage change in each age group) and heterogeneity were calculated. RESULTS: In the most recent year, crude mortality rates and age-standardized mortality rates ranged from 1.10 in the USA to 6.17 in Germany, and 0.32 (95% CI 0.31-0.34) in Japan and 1.70 (95% CI 1.65-1.75) in Germany, respectively. During the observation period, while Germany had a constant trend in overall annual percentage change, all the other countries had significant decreasing trends (p < 0.0001, respectively). Annual percent change was not homogeneous across each group in all 8 countries (pheterogeneity < 0.0001), with 2 peaks in the younger and older age categories. In Germany, Italy, Australia, and Canada, we found increasing mortality rates among older patients. Improving period and cohort risks for rheumatic heart disease mortality were generally observed, excluding Germany where the period effect was worsening and the cohort effect was constant. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality trends from rheumatic heart disease were decreasing in the study high-income countries except for Germany where higher mortality and two peaks in annual percentage change in younger and older age groups warrant further investigation.

Mastering the Learning Curve for Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have evaluated the learning curve to achieve competency in robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) but have not identified thresholds for mastery. Robotic-assisted CABG is a minimally invasive alternative to sternotomy CABG. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of this procedure and to estimate the threshold for achieving mastery. METHODS: From 2009 to 2020, 1000 robotic-assisted CABG procedures were performed at a single institution. Robotic left internal mammary artery (LIMA) harvest followed by off-pump, LIMA-left anterior descending artery grafting using a 4-cm thoracotomy was performed. Short-term outcomes were obtained from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database, and long-term follow-up was obtained by telephone questionnaires from dedicated research nurses for all patients more than 1 year from surgery. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 64 ± 11 years, Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality was 1.1% ± 1.5%, and 76% (758) of patients were men. Thirty-day mortality occurred in 6 patients (0.6%; observed-to-expected ratio, 0.53), 5 patients (0.5%) experienced a postoperative stroke, and postoperative LIMA patency was 97.2% (491/505). Mean procedure time decreased from 195 minutes to 176 minutes, and conversion to sternotomy decreased from 4.4% (22/500) to 1.6% (8/500) after 500 cases. Short-term outcomes suggested expertise was reached between 250 and 500 cases. Long-term follow-up was completed in 97% of patients (873/896) with a median follow-up of 3.9 years (interquartile range, 1.8-5.8), and the overall survival rate was 89% (777). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted CABG can be performed safely with excellent results even during a surgeon's early experience. However the learning curve to achieve mastery is longer than required to achieve competency, with a threshold of approximately 250 to 500 cases.

Intensive Care Unit Bypass for Robotic-Assisted Single-Vessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

BACKGROUND: Fast-track and enhanced recovery after cardiac surgical procedures have shown reductions in intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, with unchanged outcomes. However, cost reduction by an ultra-fast-track protocol after minimally invasive cardiac operations, without compromising clinical benefits, has yet to be demonstrated. METHODS: A total of 215 consecutive patients underwent robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting, with 156 preoperatively stratified into conventional ICU recovery vs 59 candidates for a defined ICU-bypass protocol involving recovery room and floor care. Of these, 40 candidates completed the protocol, and 19 had conversion-to-ICU recovery. Because of right-skewed distribution, inpatient cost was log-transformed, and linear regression models were constructed to estimate geometric mean ratios (GMRs) comparing inpatient cost for these groups (conventional ICU recovery, ICU-bypass, conversion-to-ICU recovery), adjusted for The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score. RESULTS: Compared with the conventional ICU group, the ICU-bypass group conferred a 15% reduction in total inpatient (GMR, 0.85; P = .0007) and a 14% reduction in total variable direct costs (GMR, 0.86; P = .003). Compared with the conventional ICU group, the ICU-bypass and conversion-to-ICU groups had similar net hospital stay reductions (1.6-1.7 days). Relative to the conventional ICU group, ICU and floor duration were shortened after conversion to ICU, with a trend to reduced costs. Cardiac arrest, 30-day mortality, and stroke were absent, and other key adverse events did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A selective, successful ultra-fast-track ICU-bypass protocol for robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting reduces inpatient cost without affecting short-term outcomes. Conversion-to-ICU recovery also maintains outcomes and trends toward reduced costs.

Public reporting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: The quest for the optimal scorecard.

OBJECTIVE: A number of publicly available rating algorithms are used to assess hospital performance in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, concerns remain that these algorithms fail to correlate with each other and inadequately capture the case complexity of individual center practices. METHODS: Composite star ratings for isolated CABG from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons public reporting database were extracted for 2018-2019. U.S. News & World Report Best Hospitals was used to extract CABG ratings as well as overall cardiology and heart surgery ranking, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Compare was used to extract CABG volume and 30-day mortality. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess possible relationships. Expert opinion on risk adjustment and program evaluation was incorporated. RESULTS: Correlations between Society of Thoracic Surgeons star rating and U.S. News & World Report overall ranking in cardiology and heart surgery (r = 0.15) and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 30-day mortality (r = -0.27) were poor. Society of Thoracic Surgeons star rating correlated weakly with U.S. News & World Report CABG ratings (r = 0.33) and with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services CABG volume (r = 0.32), whereas the latter 2 correlated moderately (r = 0.52) with each other. Of the 75 centers with accredited cardiac surgery training programs, 13 (17%) did not participate in Society of Thoracic Surgeons public reporting. Important gaps were identified in risk assessment, and potential solutions are proposed. CONCLUSIONS: Correlations between current CABG public reporting systems are weak. Further work is needed to refine and standardize CABG rating systems to more adequately capture the scope and complexity of an individual center's clinical practice and to better inform patients.