Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 28(14): 3021-3031, 2022 07 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35552651

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This phase Ib/2 trial investigated pembrolizumab-containing trimodality therapy in patients with gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with GEJ adenocarcinoma (cT1-3NanyM0) received neoadjuvant pembrolizumab-containing chemoradiation (CROSS regimen) followed by surgical resection and adjuvant pembrolizumab. The primary endpoints were tolerability in the first 16 patients and pathologic complete response [pCR (ypT0N0)]. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). An independent propensity-score-matched cohort (treated with CROSS without immunotherapy) was used for comparison. Exploratory analyses included immune biomarkers in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and plasma. RESULTS: We enrolled 31 eligible patients, of whom 29 received all expected doses of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and 28 underwent R0 resection. Safety endpoints were met. The primary efficacy endpoint was not met [7/31 (22.6%) achieved pCR]. Patients with high [i.e., combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10] baseline expression of programmed death (PD)-L1 in the TME had a significantly higher pCR rate than those with low expression [50.0% (4/8) vs. 13.6% (3/22); P = 0.046]. Patients with high PD-L1 expression also experienced longer PFS and OS than propensity-score-matched patients. Among trial patients with PD-L1 CPS < 10, unprespecified analysis explored whether extracellular vesicles (EV) could identify further responders: an elevated plasma level of PD-L1-expressing EVs was significantly associated with higher pCR. CONCLUSIONS: Adding pembrolizumab to trimodality therapy showed acceptable tolerability but did not meet the pre-specified pCR endpoint. Exploratory analyses suggested that high PD-L1 expression in the TME and/or on EVs may identify patients most likely to achieve tumor response.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Junção Esofagogástrica/patologia , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Microambiente Tumoral
2.
Clin Transl Immunology ; 10(4): e1267, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33968403

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Inhibitors to the checkpoint proteins cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) are becoming widely used in cancer treatment. However, a lack of understanding of the patient response to treatment limits accurate identification of potential responders to immunotherapy. METHODS: In this study, we assessed the expression of PD-1 and CTLA-4 on 19 leucocyte populations in the peripheral blood of 74 cancer patients. A reference data set for PD-1 and CTLA-4 was established for 40 healthy volunteers to determine the normal expression patterns for these checkpoint proteins. RESULTS: Unsupervised hierarchical clustering found four immune profiles shared across the solid tumor types, while chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients had an immune profile largely unique to them. Furthermore, we measured these leucocyte populations on an additional cohort of 16 cancer patients receiving the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in order to identify differences between responders and non-responders, as well as compared to healthy volunteers (n = 20). We observed that cancer patients had pre-treatment PD-1 and CTLA-4 expression on their leucocyte populations at different levels compared to healthy volunteers and identified two leucocyte populations positive for CTLA-4 that had not been previously described. We found higher levels of PD-1+ CD3+ CD4- CD8- cells in patients with progressive disease and have identified it as a potential biomarker of response, as well as identifying other significant differences in phenotypes between responders and non-responders. CONCLUSION: These results are suggestive that categorisation of patients based on immune profiles may differentiate responders from non-responders to immunotherapy for solid tumors.

3.
Transfusion ; 46(1): 14-23, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16398726

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It was hypothesized that transfusion of two granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized prophylactic granulocyte components into allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplant patients during the regimen-related neutropenic interval would result in clinical benefit. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: HLA-matched sibling PBPC donors (n=151) were biologically randomized based on ABO mismatch to donate granulocyte components (Cohort G) or not donate granulocytes (control group, Cohort C). ABO-matched donors who did not meet other study-specific criteria were reassigned to Cohort C. RESULTS: Feasibility, defined as the proportion of ABO-matched donors who underwent granulocyte collections, was 42 percent (53 of 125). The percentage of patients who developed fever during the initial hospitalization was greater in Cohort C versus Cohort G (82.7% vs. 64.2%; p=0.03). In the interval from when granulocyte transfusions were initially given in Cohort G (Day +3 or Day +5) until neutrophil engraftment, the number of febrile days was less in Cohort G versus Cohort C (median, 0 vs. 1; Mann-Whitney p=0.003). The median number of days of intravenous antibiotics given during the initial hospitalization was less in Cohort G versus Cohort C (9 vs. 11; Mann-Whitney p=0.03), a difference accounted for in the interval from Day +3 or Day +5 to neutrophil recovery. There was no significant difference in length of the initial hospital stay, acute graft-versus-host disease rates, or 100-day survival between the two cohorts. CONCLUSION: This prospective study demonstrates a modest, but significant, benefit of G-CSF-mobilized HLA-matched prophylactic granulocyte transfusions in neutropenic allogeneic PBPC recipients.


Assuntos
Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos e Macrófagos/administração & dosagem , Granulócitos/transplante , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/terapia , Neutropenia/prevenção & controle , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico , Sistema ABO de Grupos Sanguíneos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/mortalidade , Teste de Histocompatibilidade , Humanos , Injeções Intravenosas , Transfusão de Leucócitos , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/complicações , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutropenia/etiologia , Neutropenia/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Sepse/prevenção & controle , Transplante Homólogo
4.
Blood ; 105(8): 3035-41, 2005 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15126314

RESUMO

We hypothesized that low-dose (550-cGy), single-exposure, high dose rate (30 cGy/min) total body irradiation (TBI) with cyclophosphamide as conditioning for HLA-compatible unrelated donor (URD) bone marrow transplantation (BMT) would result in donor chimerism (DC) with a low risk for serious organ toxicity and treatment-related mortality (TRM). Twenty-six patients with good risk diagnoses (acute leukemia in first complete remission [CR] and chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia [CML]) and 84 with poor risk diagnoses underwent this regimen and URD BMT. Unsorted marrow nucleated cells were assessed for chimerism using VNTR probes. All DC occurred in 78 (86%) of 91 evaluable patients at 1 or more follow-up points. Graft failure occurred in 7 (7.7%) patients. Fatal organ toxicity occurred in only 2% of patients. TRM rates through 2 years of follow-up were 19% and 42% in those with good and poor risk diagnoses, respectively. Overall and disease-free survival rates in the good risk group were 47% and 40%, respectively, and in the poor risk group they were 25% and 21%, respectively, at a median follow-up for living patients of 850 days (range, 354-1588 days). This regimen resulted in 100% DC in most patients undergoing URD BMT with a relatively low risk for fatal organ toxicity and TRM.


Assuntos
Transplante de Medula Óssea , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/terapia , Quimeras de Transplante , Irradiação Corporal Total , Adulto , Transplante de Medula Óssea/efeitos adversos , Febre/etiologia , Febre/mortalidade , Seguimentos , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/mortalidade , Teste de Histocompatibilidade , Humanos , Infecções/etiologia , Infecções/mortalidade , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica/imunologia , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA