Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Infect Dis Ther ; 5(3): 367-77, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27432414

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In clinical trials comparing telavancin (TLV) with vancomycin for treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia, TLV demonstrated lower clinical cure rates than vancomycin in patients who had mixed gram-positive and -negative infections and were concomitantly treated with either aztreonam (ATM) or piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ). Here, we investigated therapeutic interactions between TLV and ATM or PTZ in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model under simulated reduced renal function conditions. METHODS: In vitro one-compartment PK/PD models were run over 96 h simulating TLV 10 mg/kg every 48 h, ATM 500 mg every 8 h and PTZ continuous infusion 13.5 g over 24 h alone and in combination against P. aeruginosa, E. coli and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). The efficacy of antimicrobials was evaluated by plotting time-kill curves and calculating the reduction in log10 cfu/ml over 96 h. RESULTS: Against both MRSA strains, TLV was rapidly bactericidal at 4 h and maintained its activity over 96 h with no observed antagonism by either ATM or PTZ. PTZ maintained bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities against E. coli ATCC 25922 and clinical strain R1022 at 96 h, whereas both strains regrew as soon as 24 h in ATM models. Against P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, regrowth was noted at 24 h in models simulating ATM and PTZ. The addition of TLV to ATM or PTZ had no appreciable impact on activity against the two E. coli strains and P. aeruginosa strain. CONCLUSIONS: The combinations of TLV and either ATM or PTZ did not demonstrate any antagonistic activity. Clinical variables and patient characteristics should be further explored to determine possible reasons for discrepancies in outcomes. FUNDING: Theravance Biopharma Antibiotics, Inc.

2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(10): 5841-8, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27431221

RESUMO

Vancomycin remains the mainstay treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) despite increased treatment failures. Daptomycin has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with BSIs caused by MRSA isolates with vancomycin MICs of >1 mg/liter, but these studies relied on automated testing systems. We evaluated the outcomes of BSIs caused by MRSA isolates for which vancomycin MICs were determined by standard broth microdilution (BMD). A retrospective, matched cohort of patients with MRSA BSIs treated with vancomycin or daptomycin from January 2010 to March 2015 was completed. Patients were matched using propensity-adjusted logistic regression, which included age, Pitt bacteremia score, primary BSI source, and hospital of care. The primary endpoint was clinical failure, which was a composite endpoint of the following metrics: 30-day mortality, bacteremia with a duration of ≥7 days, or a change in anti-MRSA therapy due to persistent or worsening signs or symptoms. Secondary endpoints included MRSA-attributable mortality and the number of days of MRSA bacteremia. Independent predictors of failure were determined through conditional backwards-stepwise logistic regression with vancomycin BMD MIC forced into the model. A total of 262 patients were matched. Clinical failure was significantly higher in the vancomycin cohort than in the daptomycin cohort (45.0% versus 29.0%; P = 0.007). All-cause 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the vancomycin cohort (15.3% versus 6.1%; P = 0.024). These outcomes remained significant when stratified by vancomycin BMD MIC. There was no significant difference in the length of MRSA bacteremia. Variables independently associated with treatment failure included vancomycin therapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24 to 3.76), intensive care unit admission (aOR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.34 to 4.54), and infective endocarditis as the primary source (aOR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.16 to 4.68). Treatment of MRSA BSIs with daptomycin was associated with reduced clinical failure and 30-day mortality; these findings were independent of vancomycin BMD MIC.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Daptomicina/uso terapêutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Vancomicina/farmacologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Daptomicina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/patogenicidade , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Vancomicina/efeitos adversos , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico
3.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(3): 1708-16, 2016 Jan 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26729497

RESUMO

Vancomycin remains the mainstay treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, including pneumonia. There is concern regarding the emergence of vancomycin tolerance, caused by heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA), and subsequent vancomycin treatment failure. Pneumonia is associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially with delays in appropriate therapy. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients with hVISA pneumonia compared to those with vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus (VSSA) pneumonia. A retrospective cohort of patients with MRSA pneumonia from 2005 to 2014 was matched at a ratio of 2:1 VSSA to hVISA infections to compare patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes. hVISA was determined by the 48-h population analysis profile area under the curve. Characteristics between VSSA and hVISA infections were compared by univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine independent risk factors of inpatient mortality. Eighty-seven patients were included, representing 29 hVISA and 58 VSSA cases of pneumonia. There were no significant differences in demographics or baseline characteristics. Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were a median of 7 (interquartile ratio [IQR], 5 to 8) in hVISA patients and 5 (IQR, 3 to 8) in VSSA (P = 0.092) patients. Inpatient mortality was significantly higher in hVISA patients (44.8% versus 24.1%; P = 0.049). Predictors of inpatient mortality upon multivariable regression were SOFA score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 1.70), Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) positivity (aOR, 6.63; 95% CI, 1.79 to 24.64), and hVISA phenotype (aOR, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.18 to 13.21). Patients with hVISA pneumonia experienced significantly higher inpatient mortality than those with VSSA pneumonia. There is a need to consider the presence of vancomycin heteroresistance in pneumonia caused by MRSA in order to potentially improve clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Resistência a Vancomicina , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenótipo , Pneumonia/microbiologia , Pneumonia/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA