RESUMO
PURPOSE: Frailty increases the risk of mortality among patients. We studied the prognostic significance of frailty using the modified 5-item frailty index (5-mFI) in patients harboring a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of patients surgical treated at a single neurosurgical institution at the standard radiochemotherapy era (January 2006 - December 2021). Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18, newly diagnosed glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, supratentorial location, available data to assess the 5-mFI index. RESULTS: A total of 694 adult patients were included. The median overall survival was longer in the non-frail subgroup (5-mFI < 2, n = 538 patients; 14.3 months, 95%CI 12.5-16.0) than in the frail subgroup (5-mFI ≥ 2, n = 156 patients; 4.7 months, 95%CI 4.0-6.5 months; p < 0.001). 5-mFI ≥ 2 (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 1.31; 95%CI 1.07-1.61; p = 0.009) was an independent predictor of a shorter overall survival while age ≤ 60 years (aHR 0.78; 95%CI 0.66-0.93; p = 0.007), KPS score ≥ 70 (aHR 0.71; 95%CI 0.58-0.87; p = 0.001), unilateral location (aHR 0.67; 95%CI 0.52-0.87; p = 0.002), total removal (aHR 0.54; 95%CI 0.44-0.64; p < 0.0001), and standard radiochemotherapy protocol (aHR 0.32; 95%CI 0.26-0.38; p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of a longer overall survival. Frailty remained an independent predictor of overall survival within the subgroup of patients undergoing a first-line oncological treatment after surgery (n = 549) and within the subgroup of patients who benefited from a total removal plus adjuvant standard radiochemotherapy (n = 209). CONCLUSION: In newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype patients treated at the standard combined radiochemotherapy era, frailty, defined using a 5-mFI score ≥ 2 was an independent predictor of overall survival.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Right-sided vagus nerve stimulation (RS-VNS) is indicated when the procedure was deemed not technically feasible or too risky on the indicated left side. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to systematically review the literature on RS-VNS, assessing its effectiveness and safety. METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted: Pubmed/MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase and Web of science databases were searched from inception to August 13th,2023. Gray literature was searched in two libraries. Eligible studies included all studies reporting, at least, one single case of RS-VNS in patients for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. RESULTS: Out of 2333 initial results, 415 studies were screened by abstract. Only four were included in the final analysis comprising seven patients with RS-VNS for a drug-resistant epilepsy. One patient experienced nocturnal asymptomatic bradycardia whereas the other six patients did not display any cardiac symptom. RS-VNS was discontinued in one case due to exercise-induced airway disease exacerbation. Decrease of epileptic seizure frequency after RS-VNS ranged from 25 % to 100 % in six cases. In the remaining case, VNS effectiveness was unclear. In one case, RS-VNS was more efficient than left-sided VNS (69 % vs 50 %, respectively) whereas in another case, RS-VNS was less efficient (50 % vs 95 %, respectively). CONCLUSION: Literature on the present topic is limited. In six out of seven patients, RS-VNS for drug-resistant epilepsy displayed reasonable effectiveness with a low complication rate. Further research, including prospective studies, is necessary to assess safety and effectiveness of RS-VNS for drug-resistant epilepsy patients.
