Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast for the Treatment of Japanese Patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis: Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a pruritic, painful, recurrent, and chronic dermatitis with limited therapeutic options. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast for the treatment of Japanese patients with PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment. METHODS: This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) total score ≥ 12 and moderate or severe pustules/vesicles on the palm or sole (PPPASI pustule/vesicle severity score ≥ 2) at screening and baseline with an inadequate response to topical treatment. Patients were randomized (1:1) to apremilast 30 mg twice daily or placebo for 16 weeks, followed by a 16-week extension phase during which all patients received apremilast. The primary endpoint was achievement of PPPASI-50 response (≥ 50% improvement from baseline in PPPASI). Key secondary endpoints included change from baseline in PPPASI total score, Palmoplantar Pustulosis Severity Index (PPSI), and patient's visual analog scale (VAS) for PPP symptoms (pruritus and discomfort/pain). RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were randomized (apremilast: 46; placebo: 44). A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved PPPASI-50 at week 16 with apremilast versus placebo (P = 0.0003). Patients receiving apremilast showed greater improvement in PPPASI at week 16 versus placebo (nominal P = 0.0013), as well as PPSI and patient-reported pruritus and discomfort/pain (nominal P ≤ 0.001 for all). Improvements were sustained through week 32 with apremilast treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, headache, and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: Apremilast treatment demonstrated greater improvements in disease severity and patient-reported symptoms versus placebo at week 16 in Japanese patients with PPP with sustained improvements through week 32. No new safety signals were observed. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT04057937.

Point Prevalence Surveys of Antimicrobial Prescribing in a Non-Acute Care Hospital in Saitama Prefecture, Japan.

Background: The global point prevalence survey (Global-PPS) is the standard for the surveillance of prescribed antimicrobials among inpatients and provides data for the development of hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs. Aim: To evaluate the prevalence and quality of antimicrobial prescriptions using the universally standardized Global-PPS protocol in a non-acute care hospital in Saitama Prefecture, Japan. Methods: Antimicrobial prescriptions for inpatients, staying at the hospital overnight, were surveyed on three separate week days in November 2018, January 2019, and May 2019. Information on the prescribed antimicrobials on the survey target day was obtained from the in-hospital pharmacy. Survey data were collected by physicians, based on the extracted information. Patient information was anonymized and entered in the Global-PPS Web application by physicians. We report the antimicrobial use prevalence, the indication for prescription, diagnosis, the most prescribed antimicrobials, and a set of quality indicators related to antimicrobial prescribing. Results: In total, 6.7% of the surveyed inpatients (120/1796) were prescribed antimicrobials on the survey day. Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim was the most commonly prescribed, with 20.0% of systemic antibiotic prescriptions (ATC J01). Of all antibiotics for systemic use, up to 58.4% were Watch antibiotics, as defined by the World Health Organization AWaRe classification. The most prescribed group of systemic antibiotics was non-penicillin beta-lactam antibiotics (34.4%), followed by penicillin antibiotics in combination with beta-lactamase inhibitors (25.6%), and sulfonamides with trimethoprim (20.8%). Healthcare-associated infections and medical prophylaxis were the most common indications reported in 69.3% and 26.3% of prescriptions, respectively. The most common diagnosis for systemic antibiotic prescriptions was pneumonia (49.6%). Reasons for antimicrobial prescriptions were indicated in the medical records for 67.1% of prescriptions, and the stop/review date was documented to be 50.3%. Compliance with local guidelines reached 66.7%. Conclusions: This study highlights important challenges related to antimicrobial prescription in a highly specific, non-acute care patient population.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of the therapeutic efficacies between miriplatin and epirubicin.

AIM: The therapeutic efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) using miriplatin was evaluated in comparison with that using epirubicin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Two hundred and eight-nine HCC patients receiving TACE were retrospectively enrolled; none of the patients gave a previous TACE history. The short-term therapeutic efficacy was evaluated by computed tomography (CT) performed 1 month later. In patients showing TE-4, CT and/or magnetic resonance imaging examinations were performed repeatedly and the long-term therapeutic efficacy was assessed based on local tumor recurrence. RESULTS: After exclusion of 68 patients (CT not performed at 1 month), 97 patients treated with epirubicin and 124 treated with miriplatin were analyzed. The percentage of patients showing TE-4 was 46.8% in the miriplatin-TACE group, being significantly higher than that in the epirubicin-TACE group (33.0%). The cumulative local recurrence rates at 18 months were 71.2% in the miriplatin-TACE group and 43.1% in the epirubicin-TACE group; multivariate analysis revealed higher local tumor recurrence rates in the miriplatin-TACE group than in the epirubicin-TACE group. CONCLUSION: For HCC patients, although miriplatin-TACE was superior to epirubicin-TACE in the short term, it proved inferior to the latter in the long term. The merits of TACE using miriplatin should be further investigated, because adverse effects appear to be minimal after miriplatin administration.

Modulation of intestinal P-glycoprotein function by polyethylene glycols and their derivatives by in vitro transport and in situ absorption studies.

We examined the effect of polyethylene glycols (PEGs) with different molecular weights and their derivatives on the intestinal absorption of rhodamine123, a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate, across the isolated rat intestinal membranes by an in vitro diffusion chamber system. The serosal to mucosal (secretory) transport of rhodamine123 was greater than its mucosal to serosal (absorptive) transport, indicating that the net movement of rhodamine123 across the intestinal membranes was preferentially secretory direction. The secretory transport of rhodamine123 was inhibited by the addition of PEGs with average molecular weights of 400, 2000 and 20,000, irrespective of its molecular weight. The inhibitory effects of these PEGs for the intestinal P-gp function were concentration dependent over the range 0.1-20% (v/v or w/v). Similar inhibitory effect for the intestinal P-gp function was observed when PEG derivatives including PEG monolaurate, PEG monooleate and PEG monostearate were added to the mucosal site of the chambers. Furthermore, we also examined effect of PEG20,000 on the intestinal absorption of rhodamine123 by an in situ closed loop method. The intestinal absorption of rhodamine123 was enhanced in the presence of PEG20,000. These findings suggest that PEGs and their derivatives are useful excipients to inhibit the function of intestinal P-gp, thereby improving the intestinal absorption of P-gp substrates, which are secreted by a P-gp-mediated efflux system.