Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 28(12): 1109-1115, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30328648

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anxiety associated with pediatric surgery can be stressful. Midazolam is a well-accepted anxiolytic in this setting. However, there are cases in which this medication is not effective. Zolpidem is a short-acting nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic drug that is administered orally and has quick onset of action (~15 minutes), and 2-3 hour duration. AIMS: Based on the theory that impaired perception following oral zolpidem administration would suppress the development of anxiety, we sought to compare zolpidem to midazolam for pediatric preoperative anxiety. METHODS: This prospective randomized double-blinded clinical trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of oral midazolam and zolpidem for anxiety premedication. Eighty ASA class I-II pediatric patients between 2 and 9 years old, surgery >2 hours, and at least 23 hours postoperative admission were included in the study. Randomization was done with 0.5 mg/kg midazolam or 0.25 mg/kg zolpidem administered orally. The primary outcome measure was between group difference in patient anxiety at the time of separation using the Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale. Secondary outcomes included emergence delirium and mask acceptance at induction. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale scores at separation between midazolam (median/interquartile range = 26.7/23.3-36.6) and zolpidem (median/interquartile range = 30.0/23.3-56.6) groups, difference 0.01 (95% CI -3E-5 , 3E-2 ; P = 0.07). Mask acceptance score was significantly better in the midazolam group. There was no significant difference in emergence delirium scores between groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that zolpidem, as dosed, was similar to midazolam with regard to anxiety scoring, and inferior with regard to mask acceptance scores.


Assuntos
Ansiolíticos/administração & dosagem , Ansiedade/tratamento farmacológico , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Midazolam/administração & dosagem , Medicação Pré-Anestésica/métodos , Zolpidem/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/psicologia
2.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol ; 25(3): 315-20, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22552530

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Clinical studies and new guidelines are frequently being published in the area of preoperative fasting. A growing population of patients with obstructive sleep apnea is being referred for outpatient procedures including adenotonsillectomy. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently published preoperative fasting guidelines for pediatric patients are covered along with studies comparing gastric volume following different fasting intervals. Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea is discussed. Clinical presentation, severity, perioperative risks, and controversies as whether outpatient procedures are suitable for these patients are presented. New data covering different perioperative aspects are presented. SUMMARY: A more liberal preoperative intake is encouraged with fasting for 2 h for clear liquids, 4  h for breast milk, 6  h for formula and light meals, and 8  h for heavy meals is widely accepted. Interpersonal variation in residual gastric volume exists. Children with obstructive sleep apnea under 3 years of age and those with severe obstructive sleep apnea and comorbidities are not candidates for ambulatory surgery. Polysomnography has specific preoperative indications. Dexmedetomidine can decrease emergence agitation and has an opioid-sparing effect. Intravenous acetaminophen is presented as an opioid-sparing analgesic. Dexamethasone is effective in preventing postoperative nausea without increased risk of bleeding. Surgical techniques may affect postoperative pain.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Anestesia , Pediatria , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Jejum , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/complicações , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/diagnóstico
3.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 23(4): 479-83, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19285430

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to analyze perioperative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) insertion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery in the authors' institution from 1995 to 2005 and to propose an explanation for changes in use over this period. A secondary objective was to assess patient variables associated with IABP use. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study including patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 1995 and 2005. SETTING: The Cardiothoracic Anesthesia Patient Registry of a single teaching institution was queried to obtain the required information. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty thousand two hundred sixty-nine cardiac surgery patients. INTERVENTIONS: Intra-aortic balloon pump insertion before surgery, after cardiopulmonary bypass, or in the cardiovascular intensive care unit was assessed in patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery, valve surgery, or both. Select patient variables were analyzed for their association with IABP insertion. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examinations, milrinone use, and mortality rates also were determined. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 30,269 cardiac surgery patients, 1,310 (4.32%) underwent IABP insertion. Combined preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative IABP use decreased from 7.8% in 1995 to 3.0% in 2005. Simultaneously, the intraoperative use of milrinone increased from 4.8% to 8.8% and postoperative use increased from 5.2% to 7.8%. The number of intraoperative TEE examinations more than doubled from approximately 1,700 to 3,500. The overall mortality for patients with preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative IABP insertion was 12.6%, 17.5%, and 47.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: From 1995 to 2005, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative IABP use decreased by approximately 60% in cardiac surgery patients. Simultaneously, the use of TEE and milrinone each doubled. Although a cause-effect relationship cannot be established from the present study's observational data, the trends coincide and may be related.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Balão Intra-Aórtico , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Feminino , Testes de Função Cardíaca , Humanos , Balão Intra-Aórtico/efeitos adversos , Balão Intra-Aórtico/mortalidade , Período Intraoperatório/mortalidade , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Milrinona/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Fosfodiesterase/uso terapêutico , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA