Dual MPO/PR3 ANCA positivity and vasculitis: insights from a 7-cases study and an AI-powered literature review.

OBJECTIVES: Anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) are rare conditions characterized by inflammatory cell infiltration in small blood vessels, leading to tissue necrosis. While most patients with AAV present antibodies against either myeloperoxidase (MPO) or proteinase 3 (PR3), rare cases of dual positivity for both antibodies (DP-ANCA) have been reported, and their impact on the clinical picture remains unclear. The goal of this study was to investigate the clinical implications, phenotypic profiles, and outcomes of patients with DP-ANCA. METHODS: A retrospective screening for DP-ANCA cases was conducted at Brest University Hospital's immunology laboratory (France), analyzing ANCA results from March 2013 to March 2022. Clinical, biological, imaging, and histological data were collected for each DP-ANCA case. Additionally, a comprehensive literature review on DP-ANCA was performed, combining an AI-based search using BIBOT software with a manual PUBMED database search. RESULTS: The report of our cases over the last 9 years and those from the literature yielded 103 described cases of patients with DP-ANCA. We identified four distinct phenotypic profiles: (i) idiopathic AAV (∼30%), (ii) drug-induced AAV (∼25%), (iii) autoimmune disease associated with a low risk of developing vasculitis (∼20%), and (iv) immune-disrupting comorbidities (infections, cancers, etc) not associated with AAV (∼25%). CONCLUSION: This analysis of over a hundred DP-ANCA cases suggests substantial diversity in clinical and immunopathological presentations. Approximatively 50% of DP-ANCA patients develop AAV, either as drug-induced or idiopathic forms, while the remaining 50%, characterized by pre-existing dysimmune conditions, demonstrates a remarkably low vasculitis risk. These findings underscore the complex nature of DP-ANCA, its variable impact on patient health, and the necessity for personalized diagnostic and management approaches in these cases.

Efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone pulse followed by oral prednisone vs. oral prednisone alone in sarcoidosis tubulointerstitial nephritis: a randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: We determine the benefit of pulsed methylprednisolone for improving kidney function in patients with sarcoidosis tubulointerstitial nephritis. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled trial in patients with biopsy-proven acute tubulointerstitial nephritis caused by sarcoidosis at 21 sites in France. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a methylprednisolone pulse 15 mg/kg/day for 3 days, then oral prednisone (MP group) or oral prednisone 1 mg/kg/day alone (PRD group). The primary end point was a positive response at 3 months, defined as a doubling of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) compared with the eGFR before randomization. RESULTS: We randomized 40 participants. Baseline eGFR before PRD was 22 mL/min/1.73m2 {interquartile range [IQR], 16-44} and before MP was 25 mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR, 22-36) (P = .3). The two groups did not differ in underlying pathological lesions, including mean percentage of interstitial fibrosis and intensity of interstitial infiltrate. In the intent-to-treat population, the median eGFR at 3 months did not significantly differ between the PRD and MP groups: 45 (IQR, 34-74) and 46 (IQR, 39-65) mL/min/1.73m2. The primary end point at 3 months was achieved in 16 of 20 (80%) PRD patients and 10 of 20 (50%) MP patients (P = .0467). The eGFR was similar between the two groups after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment. For both groups, eGFR at 1 month was strongly correlated with eGFR at 12 months (P < .0001). The two groups did not differ in severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: Compared with a standard oral steroid regimen, intravenous MP may have no supplemental benefit for renal function in patients with tubulointerstitial nephritis caused by sarcoidosis.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01652417; EudraCT: 2012-000149-11.

Kidney Histopathology Can Predict Kidney Function in ANCA-Associated Vasculitides with Acute Kidney Injury Treated with Plasma Exchanges.

BACKGROUND: Data from the PEXIVAS trial challenged the role of plasma exchange (PLEX) in ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV). We aimed to describe kidney biopsy from patients with AAV treated with PLEX, evaluate whether histopathologic findings could predict kidney function, and identify which patients would most benefit from PLEX. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective study on 188 patients with AAV and AKI treated with PLEX and 237 not treated with PLEX. The primary outcome was mortality or KRT at 12 months (M12). RESULTS: No significant benefit of PLEX for the primary outcome was found. To identify patients benefitting from PLEX, we developed a model predicting the average treatment effect of PLEX for an individual depending on covariables. Using the prediction model, 223 patients had a better predicted outcome with PLEX than without PLEX, and 177 of them had >5% increased predicted probability with PLEX compared with without PLEX of being alive and free from KRT at M12, which defined the PLEX-recommended group. Risk difference for death or KRT at M12 was significantly lower with PLEX in the PLEX-recommended group (-15.9%; 95% CI, -29.4 to -2.5) compared with the PLEX not recommended group (-4.8%; 95% CI, 14.9 to 5.3). Microscopic polyangiitis, MPO-ANCA, higher serum creatinine, crescentic and sclerotic classes, and higher Brix score were more frequent in the PLEX-recommended group. An easy to use score identified patients who would benefit from PLEX. The average treatment effect of PLEX for those with recommended treatment corresponded to an absolute risk reduction for death or KRT at M12 of 24.6%. CONCLUSIONS: PLEX was not associated with a better primary outcome in the whole study population, but we identified a subset of patients who could benefit from PLEX. However, these findings must be validated before utilized in clinical decision making.

DNA methylation modulates HRES1/p28 expression in B cells from patients with Lupus.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease is an autoimmune disease of unknown aetiology that affects predominantly women of child bearing age. Since previous studies, including ours, have demonstrated that CD4+ T cells and B cells from SLE patients are defective in their ability to methylate their DNA upon antigen stimulation, the aim of this study was to investigate whether DNA demethylation affects the transcription of HRES-1 in B cells. HRES-1 is the prototype of Human Endogenous Retrovirus (HERV) overexpressed in SLE. We have observed that SLE B cells were characterized by their incapacity to methylate the HRES-1 promoter, both in unstimulated and in anti-IgM stimulated B cells. In turn, HRES-1/p28 expression was increased in SLE B cells after B cell receptor engagement, but not in controls. In SLE B cells the Erk/DNMT1 pathway was defective. In addition, blocking the autocrine-loop of IL-6 in SLE B cells with an anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody restores DNA methylation and control of HRES-1/p28 expression became effective. As a consequence, a better understanding of HERV dysregulation in SLE reinforces our comprehension of the disease and opens new therapeutic perspectives.

Homozygous FCGR3A-158F mutation is associated with delayed B-cell depletion following rituximab but with preserved efficacy in a patient with refractory lupus nephritis.

Rituximab (RTX), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has shown promising results in a small group of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients treated for lupus nephritis (LN). However, such observations were not confirmed in the double-blind LUNAR study. Accordingly, the factors associated with the clinical response remain to be characterized. We report the case of a young woman with known LN successfully re-treated with RTX and steroids and homozygous for the low-affinity FCG3RA 158F genotype. Although B-cell depletion was delayed, complete remission with anti-DNA antibody negativity and proteinuria normalization were maintained for 5 years. The implications for disease pathogenesis and clinical monitoring are discussed.

Monoclonal anti-CD20 antibodies: mechanisms of action and monitoring of biological effects.

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody to CD20, an antigen found on B cells. It was developed for the treatment of B cell lymphomas but was subsequently found useful in a number of autoimmune disorders. The efficacy of rituximab varies with the maturity and location of the target B cells, nature of the effector cells, pharmacokinetic considerations, time to B cell depletion and time to B cell restoration. As a result, substantial variability occurs across patients and between courses in a given patient. Laboratory tests can be used to monitor the effects of rituximab. Tests that predict the treatment response include CD20 density, Fc gamma IIIa receptor genotype and complement efficiency. To monitor the effect of rituximab, pharmacokinetic tests, B cell counts and xenoantibody levels are useful. Finally, to determine whether retreatment is in order, specific B cell subsets or autoantibodies can be looked for. None of the available tests is entirely reliable.

Association of alpha-actinin-binding anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies with lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVE: Anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies may contribute to the pathogenesis of glomerulonephritis (GN) by cross-reacting with alpha-actinin in murine models and in some patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We therefore sought to determine possible disease associations with serologic and clinical features and to characterize this new autoantibody specificity. METHODS: One hundred patients with SLE were recruited into this multicenter study, as well as 100 rheumatic disease controls and 2,100 healthy blood donors. Clinical disease was evaluated by the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI; excluding the anti-DNA component). Anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected by conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and by a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Anti-alpha-actinin antibodies were detected by ELISA, and their specificity was confirmed by Western blotting and by indirect immunofluorescence using rat kidney sections and mesangial cells as substrates. Highly positive sera were selected for absorption experiments and were affinity-purified for cross-reactivity studies and measurement of antibody avidity. RESULTS: Sera from 62 of the SLE patients had anti-dsDNA antibodies; 21 of these sera also had anti-alpha-actinin antibodies, as compared with 1 of the 38 sera without anti-dsDNA antibodies. Of the 22 patients with anti-alpha-actinin antibodies, 10 had GN, as compared with 14 of the 78 without anti-alpha-actinin antibodies (P < 0.01). In patients with GN, anti-alpha-actinin, but not anti-dsDNA, antibodies correlated with the SLEDAI score (minus the anti-DNA component) and with treatment. The fraction of serum anti-dsDNA antibodies that cross-reacted with alpha-actinin exhibited high avidity for dsDNA, as determined using a commercial EIA for high-avidity anti-dsDNA antibodies and an in-house conventional ELISA. CONCLUSION: The alpha-actinin-binding antibodies are significantly associated with GN in SLE. Whether such autoantibodies may anticipate the development of this complication of SLE remains to be verified.