RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate utilization trends in percutaneous embolization among radiologists and nonradiologist providers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nationwide Medicare Part B fee-for-service databases for 2005-2016 were used to evaluate percutaneous embolization codes. Six codes describing embolization procedures were reviewed. Physician providers were grouped as radiologists, vascular surgeons, cardiologists, nephrologists, other surgeons, and all others. RESULTS: The total volume of Medicare percutaneous embolization procedures increased from 20,262 in 2005 to 45,478 in 2016 (+125%). Radiologists performed 13,872 procedures in 2005 (68% of total volume) and 33,254 in 2016 (73% of total volume), a 140% increase in volume. While other specialists also increased the number of cases performed from 2005 to 2016, radiologists strongly predominated, performing 87% of arterial and 30% of venous procedures in 2016, more than any other single specialty. In 2014 and 2015, a sharp increase in venous embolization cases performed by nonradiologists preceded a sharp decrease in 2016, likely the result of complicated billing codes for venous procedures. Radiologists maintained a steady upward trend in the number of cases they performed during those years. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of percutaneous embolization procedures performed in the Medicare population increased from 2005 to 2016, reflecting a trend toward minimally invasive intervention. In 2016, radiologists performed nearly 10 times more arterial embolization procedures than the second highest specialty and more venous embolization procedures than any other single specialty.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica/tendências , Neoplasias/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Radiologistas/tendências , Especialização/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cardiologistas/tendências , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare Part B/tendências , Nefrologistas/tendências , Cirurgiões/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Improving the comprehension and communication of patient education materials could augment patient participation in shared clinical decision making. Inadequate healthcare-oriented educational resources for patients with a newly diagnosed complex disease, such as a cerebral aneurysm, can lead to an insufficient understanding of their ailment. As such, we hypothesized that a PowerPoint-style educational intervention with grade-conscious (i.e., sixth grade level) written material accompanied by visual graphics would help improve patient health literacy and satisfaction. METHODS: A randomized prospective pilot study was conducted during a 1-year period in 2018. Preclinic encounter knowledge assessment surveys were administered to 52 patients with brain aneurysms (newly diagnosed or during follow-up) presenting for their neurosurgery outpatient clinic visit. The patients were assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts, with 26 each in the educational intervention group and control group, using a quasi-randomization method of alternating the assigned group for each successive patient. At the conclusion of their clinic encounter, all the patients completed a postclinic encounter knowledge assessment and satisfaction survey. Differences in covariates such as gender distribution, age, and family history of aneurysms were analyzed between the control and intervention groups. RESULTS: The overall study cohort had a high baseline knowledge about cerebral aneurysms with an average preclinic encounter score of 5.37 on the 7-question survey. The educational intervention resulted in an upward trend in the patient knowledge scores. No statistically significant difference was detected in the patient satisfaction scores between the intervention and control groups. However, most of the patients receiving the educational intervention reported that the educational material was easy to understand (95.7%), helpful (86.9%), and relevant (87%) to their clinic visit. CONCLUSION: Overall, in the present prospective study, the use of a multimedia-based educational intervention resulted in an upward trend in knowledge without a statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction scores compared with the control patients. To better measure the effectiveness of multimedia-based patient education interventions, future studies should account for the patients' baseline education level, preexisting educational resources available to study patients, socioeconomic factors, and emotional state.
Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Letramento em Saúde/métodos , Aneurisma Intracraniano/terapia , Multimídia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraniano/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Participação do Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE. Although radiologists developed endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in the 1960s, vascular surgeons and cardiologists have become increasingly involved in its application. The purpose of this study was to examine utilization trends in endovascular and surgical treatment of PAD in recent years in the Medicare population. CONCLUSION. Surgical treatment of PAD has decreased each year from 2011 to 2016, whereas endovascular treatment has increased each year. By 2016, Medicare patients who needed revascularization for PAD were more than four times as likely to undergo endovascular as they were to undergo surgical treatment. Between 2011 and 2016, radiologists, vascular surgeons, and cardiologists all increased their endovascular volume, but by 2016, vascular surgeons and cardiologists performed three of every four endovascular procedures for the Medicare population. While only 12% of the total endovascular procedures for PAD were performed in 2016, radiology has grown its procedural volume each year from 2011 through 2016.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares/tendências , Medicare , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/tendências , Idoso , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: "Stand-alone" fusion implants attempt to alleviate the need for supplemental posterior instrumentation. OBJECTIVE: A biomechanical study was conducted to assess the stability of an integrated 3- screw interbody cage with, and without, supplemental posterior fixation. METHODS: Nondestructive biomechanical testing was performed on 19 healthy cadaver spine segments. Specimens were tested in 6 degrees of motion and a maximum pure bending moment of 10 Nm was applied. Specimens were evaluated in the following sequence: Intact, cage, cage ± facet bolts, and cage ± pedicle screws. Nonconstrained motion was measured at both the index and adjacent levels. RESULTS: The index levels were L2-L3 and L5-S1. The cage alone provided a significant decrease in motion at the L2-L3 level but not at L5-S1. At L2-L3, cage + pedicle screws decreased motion more effectively than cage + facet bolts, however, both the supplemented constructs outperformed intact (P < .05). At L5-S1, both posterior fixation systems appeared to have smaller degree of displacement compared to intact; however, no significant differences were observed at L5-S1 among the various constructs. Furthermore, the adjacent segments for each level (L1-L2 and L4-L5) had no significantly increased motion, compared to intact, for all 6 degrees of motion tested. CONCLUSION: The stand-alone cage was more effective at L2-L3, than at L5-S1, in limiting motion. At L5-S1, supplemental fixation may need to be considered. No abnormal motion was identified at the adjacent, normal segments, for the stand-alone, or the circumferential constructs at either level tested.
Assuntos
Fenômenos Biomecânicos/fisiologia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Parafusos Pediculares , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Cadáver , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fusão Vertebral/instrumentaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Online cardiovascular health materials are easily accessible with an Internet connection, but the readability of its content may limit practical use by patients. OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to assess the readability of the most commonly searched Internet health education materials for cardiovascular diseases accessed via Google. METHODS: We selected 20 commonly searched cardiovascular disease terms: aneurysm, angina, atherosclerosis, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, coronary artery disease, deep vein thrombosis, heart attack, heart failure, high blood pressure, pericardial disease, peripheral arterial disease, rheumatic heart disease, stroke, sudden death, valvular heart disease, mini-stroke, lower extremity edema, pulmonary embolism, and exertional dyspnea. Terms were selected on Google and selected up to 10 results in order of presentation in the search results by reviewing a maximum of 15 pages of Google search results specifically providing education toward patients to yield 196 total patient education articles. KEY RESULTS: All readability measures assessing grade level measures found the 196 articles were written at a mean 10.9 (SD = 1.8) grade reading level. Moreover, 99.5% of the articles were written beyond the 5th- to 6th-grade level recommended by the American Medical Association. CONCLUSIONS: Given the prominent use of online patient education material, we consider readability as a quality metric that should be evaluated prior to online publication of any health education materials. Further study of how to improve the readability of online materials may enhance patient education, engagement, and health outcomes.
RESUMO
Many Americans use smartphone-based mobile applications to acquire health information. Our study evaluated the readability of mobile application-based patient educational materials (PEMs) about five prevalent cancers in the United States. The Apple and Google mobile application marketplaces were queried for breast, colon, lung, prostate, and stomach cancer-related applications, which were subsequently screened for PEMs and assessed with 10 validated readability assessments. Twenty-one pertinent applications yielded 249 articles that were written at an 11.8 ± 2.3 grade level; only 12 (4.8%) articles were written below an eighth grade level. The majority of cancer-related PEMs were written at too difficult reading levels for American patients.
Assuntos
Compreensão , Redes de Comunicação de Computadores/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Informação em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aplicativos Móveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Smartphone/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Disseminação de Informação/métodos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Gestão da Informação/normas , Internet/normas , Internato e Residência , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/educação , Critérios de Admissão Escolar , Estudantes de Medicina , Escolha da Profissão , Humanos , Gestão da Informação/estatística & dados numéricos , Internet/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
The Internet is a major source of health care information for patients. The American Medical Association and the National Institutes of Health recommend that consumer health care websites be written at a third- to seventh-grade level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of readability of patient education websites pertaining to nuclear medicine. Methods: We searched for 10 terms on Google, collected the top 10 links for each term, and analyzed their level of readability using 10 well-established readability scales. Results: Collectively, the 99 articles were written at a grade level of 11.8 (SD, 3.4). Only 5 of the 99 articles were written at the third- to seventh-grade level recommended by the National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association. Conclusion: There is a clear discordance between the readability level of nuclear medicine-related imaging terms and the National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association guidelines. This discordance may have a negative impact on patient understanding, contributing to poor health outcomes.
Assuntos
Medicina Nuclear/educação , Sistemas On-Line , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , HumanosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement and retrieval rates among radiologists, vascular surgeons, cardiologists, other surgeons, and all other health care providers for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in the years 2012-2015. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nationwide Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files were used to determine the volume and utilization rate of IVC filter placement, IVC filter repositioning, and IVC filter retrieval, which correspond to procedure codes 37191, 37192, and 37193, respectively. Procedural code 37193 was not available before 2012, so data were reviewed for the years 2012-2015. RESULTS: The total volume of Medicare IVC filter placement decreased from 57,785 in 2012 to 44,378 in 2015, with radiologists responsible for 60% of all filter placements. Volume of IVC filter placement declined across all specialties, including radiologists, who placed 33,744 in 2012 and 27,957 in 2015. In contrast, total retrieval of IVC filters increased from 4,060 removals in 2012 to 6,166 in 2015. Retrieval rate per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries increased from 11 in 2012 to 16 in 2015. Radiologists removed the bulk of the filters: 64% in both 2012 and 2015. Vascular surgeons, cardiologists, and other surgeons retrieved, respectively, 20%, 10%, and 5% of all IVC filters in 2012 and 22%, 9%, and 5% in 2015. CONCLUSIONS: From 2012 to 2015, IVC filter placement steadily decreased across all specialties. Retrieval rate of IVC filters continued to rise over the same period. Radiologists were responsible for the majority of IVC filter placements and retrievals.
Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo , Radiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Filtros de Veia Cava , Veia Cava Inferior , Idoso , Cardiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Meralgia paresthetica is a non-life-threatening neurological disorder characterized by numbness, tingling, and burning pain over the anterolateral thigh due to impingement of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. This disorder has been seen in patients with diabetes mellitus and obesity, but has also been observed in patients after procedures such as posterior spine surgery, iliac crest bone grafts, lumbar disk surgery, hernia repair, appendectomies, and pelvic osteotomies that ultimately lead to compression or damage to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. Overall, permanent sequelae of meralgia paresthetica are rare, however, some cases do require intervention.
Assuntos
Neuropatia Femoral/etiologia , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Neuropatia Femoral/patologia , Neuropatia Femoral/fisiopatologia , Neuropatia Femoral/terapia , Lateralidade Funcional , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Coluna Vertebral/patologia , Coluna Vertebral/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The vast amount of information found on the internet, combined with its accessibility, makes it a widely utilized resource for Americans to find information pertaining to medical information. The field of radiology is no exception. In this paper, we assess the readability level of websites pertaining specifically to emergency radiology. METHODS: Using Google, 23 terms were searched, and the top 10 results were recorded. Each link was evaluated for its readability level using a set of ten reputable readability scales. The search terms included the following: abdominal ultrasound, abdominal aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, appendicitis, cord compression, CT abdomen, cholecystitis, CT chest, diverticulitis, ectopic pregnancy, epidural hematoma, dural venous thrombosis, head CT, MRI brain, MR angiography, MRI spine, ovarian torsion, pancreatitis, pelvic ultrasound, pneumoperitoneum, pulmonary embolism, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and subdural hematoma. Any content that was not written for patients was excluded. RESULTS: The 230 articles that were assessed were written, on average, at a 12.1 grade level. Only 2 of the 230 articles (1%) were written at the third to seventh grade recommended reading level set forth by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and American Medical Association (AMA). Fifty-two percent of the 230 articles were written so as to require a minimum of a high school education (at least a 12th grade level). Additionally, 17 of the 230 articles (7.3%) were written at a level that exceeded an undergraduate education (at least a 16th grade level). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of websites with emergency radiology-related patient education materials are not adhering to the NIH and AMA's recommended reading levels, and it is likely that the average reader is not benefiting fully from these information outlets. With the link between health literacy and poor health outcomes, it is important to address the online content in this area of radiology, allowing for patient to more fully benefit from their online searches.
Assuntos
Compreensão , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Letramento em Saúde , Internet , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , HumanosRESUMO
AIMS: The internet creates opportunities for Americans to access medical information about imaging tests and modalities to guide them in their medical decision-making. Owing to health literacy variations in the general population, the American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health recommend patient education resources to be written between the third and seventh grade levels. Our purpose is to quantitatively assess the readability levels of online radiology educational materials, written for the public, in 20 major university hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In September and October 2016, we identified 20 major university hospitals with radiology residency-affiliated hospital systems. On each hospital׳s website, we downloaded all radiology-related articles written for patient use. A total of 375 articles were analyzed for readability level using 9 quantitative readability scales that are well validated in the medical literature. RESULTS: The 375 articles from 20 hospital systems were collectively written at an 11.4 ± 3.0 grade level (range: 8.4-17.1). Only 11 (2.9%) articles were written at the recommended third to seventh grade levels. Overall, 126 (33.6%) were written above a full high-school reading level. University of Washington Medical Center׳s articles were the most readable with a reading level corresponding to 7.9 ± 0.9. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of websites at major academic hospitals with radiology residencies designed to provide patients with information about imaging were written above the nationally recommended health literacy guidelines to meet the needs of the average American. This may limit the benefit that patients can derive from these educational materials.
Assuntos
Diagnóstico por Imagem , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Letramento em Saúde , Hospitais Universitários , Internet , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , American Medical Association , Tomada de Decisões , Humanos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Estados UnidosRESUMO
PURPOSE: When prospective radiology residents decide where to apply to residency, many will use the Internet as a resource to garner information. Therefore, it is important for residency programs to produce and maintain an informative and comprehensive website. Here, we review 179 radiology residency program websites for 19 criteria including various aspects related to the residency application process, benefits, didactics, research, clinical training, and faculty leadership. METHODS: We evaluated 179 radiology residency program websites for the inclusion of 19 different criteria. Criteria for information not available directly on the website and links with no information were considered not present. RESULTS: Only 12 of the 179 (6.7%) program websites had at least 80% of the 19 criteria. In addition, 41 programs (23%) had less than 50% of the criteria listed on their websites. Websites ranged from having 16% of the criteria to as much as 95%. CONCLUSION: Although previous studies have shown that prospective radiology resident applicants are influenced by intangibles like current resident satisfaction and academic reputation, they have also shown that applicants are influenced by the educational curriculum, clinical training, program resources, research opportunities, and quality of faculty. Therefore, it is imperative to provide online resources for prospective candidates in an attempt for residency programs to remain competitive in recruiting high-quality US medical student graduates. These findings suggest there is room for improving the comprehensiveness of information provided on radiology residency program websites.
Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Serviços de Informação/normas , Internet , Internato e Residência , Radiologia/educação , Escolha da Profissão , Tomada de Decisões , Humanos , Candidatura a Emprego , Seleção de PessoalRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Google is the most popular search engine in the United States, and patients are increasingly relying on online webpages to seek information about individual physicians. This study aims to characterize what patients find when they search for radiation oncologists online. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Physician Comparable Downloadable File was used to identify all Medicare-participating radiation oncologists in the United States and Puerto Rico. Each radiation oncologist was characterized by medical school education, year of graduation, city of practice, gender, and affiliation with an academic institution. Using a custom Google-based search engine, up to the top 10 search results for each physician were extracted and categorized as relating to: (1) physician, hospital, or health care system; (2) third-party; (3) social media; (4) academic journal articles; or (5) other. RESULTS: Among all health care providers in the United States within CMS, 4443 self-identified as being radiation oncologists and yielded 40,764 search results. Of those, 1161 (26.1%) and 3282 (73.9%) were classified as academic and nonacademic radiation oncologists, respectively. At least 1 search result was obtained for 4398 physicians (99.0%). Physician, hospital, and health care-controlled websites (16,006; 39.3%) and third-party websites (10,494; 25.7%) were the 2 most often observed domain types. Social media platforms accounted for 2729 (6.7%) hits, and peer-reviewed academic journal websites accounted for 1397 (3.4%) results. About 6.8% and 6.7% of the top 10 links were social media websites for academic and nonacademic radiation oncologists, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Most radiation oncologists lack self-controlled online content when patients search within the first page of Google search results. With the strong presence of third-party websites and lack of social media, opportunities exist for radiation oncologists to increase their online presence to improve patient-provider communication and better the image of the overall field. We discuss strategies to improve online visibility.
Assuntos
Internet/estatística & dados numéricos , Radio-Oncologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Porto Rico , Radio-Oncologistas/classificação , Mídias Sociais/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Osteochondromas are the most common benign bone tumor typically seen in the appendicular skeleton and are rarely found in the spine. We present a case of an osteochondroma of the spine presenting with spinal cord compression. 27-year-old male presented with lower extremity weakness and paresthesia, decreased lower extremity sensation, and decreased proprioception. MRI showed a heterogeneous mass with minimal peripheral enhancement and without restricted diffusion. CT demonstrated a calcified mass extending from the left facet joint of T11-T12 with medial extension, resulting in severe central canal stenosis and cord compression. The patient underwent surgical resection with pathology demonstrating an osteochondroma.
Assuntos
Cartilagem Articular/patologia , Osteocondroma/complicações , Compressão da Medula Espinal/etiologia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Vértebras Torácicas/patologia , Adulto , Cartilagem Articular/cirurgia , Humanos , Hipestesia/diagnóstico , Hipestesia/etiologia , Extremidade Inferior , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Debilidade Muscular/diagnóstico , Debilidade Muscular/etiologia , Osteocondroma/diagnóstico , Osteocondroma/patologia , Osteocondroma/cirurgia , Parestesia/diagnóstico , Parestesia/etiologia , Compressão da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico , Compressão da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/patologia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Estenose Espinal/diagnóstico , Estenose Espinal/etiologia , Estenose Espinal/cirurgia , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodosRESUMO
Information for patients regarding their clinical conditions and treatment options is widely available online. The American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health recommend that online patient-oriented materials be written at no higher than a seventh-grade reading level to ensure full comprehension by the average American. This study sought to determine whether online patient-oriented materials explaining common pathology procedures are written at appropriate reading levels. Ten pathology procedures that patients would likely research were queried into Google search, and plain text from the first 10 Web sites containing patient education materials for each procedure was analyzed using 10 validated readability scales. We determined mean reading levels of materials grouped by readability scale, procedure, and Web site domain, the overall average reading level of all resources, and popular Web site domains. One hundred Web sites were accessed; one was omitted for short length (<100 words). The average reading grade level of the 99 materials, none of which met national health literacy guidelines (range, 7.3-17.4), was 10.9. Twenty-nine articles (29%) required a high school education for full comprehension, and 4 (4%) required an undergraduate college education. Most frequently accessed Web site domains included medlineplus.gov, webmd.com (both accessed 7 times), and labtestsonline.org (accessed 6 times). Average reading levels of the 11 most commonly accessed Web sites ranged from 8.25 (patient.info) to 12.25 (mayoclinic.org). Readability levels of most online pathology-related patient education materials exceeded those recommended by national health literacy guidelines. These patient education materials should be revised to help patients fully understand them.
Assuntos
Compreensão , Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Letramento em Saúde , Internet , Patologia/educação , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Leitura , Acesso à Informação , Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor/normas , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Guias como Assunto , Letramento em Saúde/normas , Humanos , Internet/normas , Informática Médica , Patologia/normas , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Terminologia como AssuntoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The Google search engine is a resource commonly used by patients to access health-related patient education information. The American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health recommend that patient education resources be written at a level between the third and seventh grade reading levels. We assessed the readability levels of online palliative care patient education resources using 10 readability algorithms widely accepted in the medical literature. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In October 2016, searches were conducted for 10 individual terms pertaining to palliative care and oncology using the Google search engine; the first 10 articles written for the public for each term were downloaded for a total of 100 articles. The terms included palliative care, hospice, advance directive, cancer pain management, treatment of metastatic disease, treatment of brain metastasis, treatment of bone metastasis, palliative radiation therapy, palliative chemotherapy, and end-of-life care. We determined the average reading level of the articles by readability scale and Web site domain. RESULTS: Nine readability assessments with scores equivalent to academic grade level found that the 100 palliative care education articles were collectively written at a 12.1 reading level (standard deviation, 2.1; range, 7.6-17.3). Zero articles were written below a seventh grade level. Forty-nine (49%) articles were written above a high school graduate reading level. The Flesch Reading Ease scale classified the articles as "difficult" to read with a score of 45.6 of 100. The articles were collected from 62 Web site domains. Seven domains were accessed 3 or more times; among these, www.mskcc.org had the highest average reading level at a 14.5 grade level (standard deviation, 1.4; range, 13.4-16.1). CONCLUSIONS: Most palliative care education articles readily available on Google are written above national health literacy recommendations. There is need to revise these resources to allow patients and their families to derive the most benefit from these materials.
Assuntos
Compreensão , Letramento em Saúde/métodos , Internet/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Letramento em Saúde/normas , Humanos , Oncologia/educação , Oncologia/métodos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic condition involving the inflammation of the colon and small intestine. IBD affects as many as 1.4 million people in the U.S. alone and costs the health care industry over $1.7 billion annually. Managing IBD normally requires invasive and often discomforting diagnostic tests. In an effort to alleviate the painful and costly nature of traditional diagnosis, there has been increasing research initiative focused on noninvasive biomarkers. PubMed, provided by the United States National Library of Medicine (NLM) at the National Institutes of Health, was utilized with the following search terms: 1) myeloperoxidase (MPO) 2), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and 3) neutrophils. The following terms were used interchangeably with search terms 1-3: 4) costs, 5) biomarkers, 6) review, and 7) etiology. In the context of IBD, myeloperoxidase (MPO), a lysosomal protein found in neutrophils, may serve as a viable biomarker for assessing disease status. Several studies demonstrated increased levels of neutrophils in patients with active IBD. Furthermore, studies have found significantly higher levels of MPO in patients with active IBD compared to patients without IBD as well as patients with inactive IBD. MPO is also expressed in higher concentrations in patients with more severe forms of IBD. When measuring treatment efficacy, MPO levels are indicative of the quality of response. MPO may serve as an important diagnostic and prognostic tool in assessing IBD status.
RESUMO
The majority of Americans use the Internet daily, if not more often, and many search online for health information to better understand a diagnosis they have been given or to research treatment options. The average American reads at an eighth-grade level. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the readability of online patient education materials on the websites of 14 professional organizations representing the major internal medicine subspecialties. We used ten well-established quantitative readability scales to assess written text from patient education materials published on the websites of the major professional organizations representing the following subspecialty groups: allergy and immunology, cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, hematology, hospice and palliative care, infectious disease, nephrology, oncology, pulmonology and critical care, rheumatology, sleep medicine, and sports medicine. Collectively the 540 articles analyzed were written at an 11th-grade level (SD 1.4 grade levels). The sleep medicine and nephrology websites had the most readable materials, written at an academic grade level of 8.5 ± 1.5 and 9.0 ± 0.2, respectively. Material at the infectious disease site was written at the most difficult level, with average readability corresponding to grades 13.9 ± 0.3. None of the patient education materials we reviewed conformed to the American Medical Association (AMA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines requiring that patient education articles be written at a third- to seventh-grade reading level. If these online resources were rewritten, it is likely that more patients would derive benefit from reading them.