Minimum 5-Year Clinical and Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Primary Arthroscopic Scapulothoracic Bursectomy and Partial Scapulectomy for Snapping Scapula Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Snapping scapula syndrome (SSS) is a rare condition that is oftentimes debilitating. For patients whose symptoms are resistant to nonoperative treatment, arthroscopic surgery may offer relief. Because of the rarity of SSS, reports of clinical outcomes after arthroscopic SSS surgery are primarily limited to small case series and short-term follow-up studies. PURPOSE: To report minimum 5-year clinical and sport-specific outcomes after arthroscopic bursectomy and partial scapulectomy for SSS and to identify demographic and clinical factors at baseline associated with clinical outcomes at minimum 5-year follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Patients who underwent arthroscopic bursectomy and partial scapulectomy for SSS between October 2005 and February 2016 with a minimum of 5 years of postoperative follow-up were enrolled in this single-center study. Clinical outcome scores, including the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score, shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, were collected at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Additionally, it was determined which patients reached the minimal clinically important difference. Bivariate analysis was used to determine whether baseline demographic and clinical factors had any association with the outcome scores. RESULTS: Of 81 patients eligible for inclusion in the study, follow-up was obtained for 66 patients (age 33.6 ± 13.3 years; 31 female). At a mean follow-up of 8.9 ± 2.5 years (range, 5.0-15.4 years), all of the outcome scores significantly improved compared with baseline. These included the ASES (from 56.7 ± 14.5 at baseline to 87.2 ± 13.9 at follow-up; P < .001), QuickDASH (from 38.7 ± 17.6 to 13.1 ± 14.6; P < .001), SANE (from 52.4 ± 21.2 to 82.7 ± 19.9; P < .001), SF-12 Physical Component Summary (from 39.7 ± 8.3 to 50.3 ± 8.2; P < .001), SF-12 Mental Component Summary (from 48.2 ± 11.7 to 52.0 ± 9.0; P = 0.014) and VAS pain (from 5.2 ± 2.1 to 1.4 ± 2.0; P < .001). The minimal clinically important difference in the ASES score was reached by 77.6% of the patients. Median postoperative satisfaction was 8 out of 10. It was found that 90.5% of the patients returned to sport, with 73.8% of the patients able to return to their preinjury level. At the time of final follow-up, 8 (12.1%) patients had undergone revision surgery for recurrent SSS symptoms. Older age at surgery (P = .044), lower preoperative SF-12 Mental Component Summary score (P = .008), lower preoperative ASES score (P = .019), and increased preoperative VAS pain score (P = .016) were significantly associated with not achieving a Patient Acceptable Symptom State on the ASES score. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing arthroscopic bursectomy and partial scapulectomy for SSS experienced clinically significant improvements in functional scores, pain, and quality of life, which were sustained at a minimum of 5 years and a mean follow-up of 8.9 years postoperatively. Higher patient age, inferior mental health status, increased shoulder pain, and lower ASES scores at baseline were significantly associated with worse postoperative outcomes.

Mid-term outcomes of microfracture for the treatment of focal, full-thickness cartilage defects isolated to the humeral head.

BACKGROUND: While microfracture has been shown to be an effective treatment for chondral lesions in the knee, evidence to support its use for chondral defects in the shoulder is limited to short-term outcomes studies. The purpose of this study is to determine if microfracture provides pain relief and improved shoulder function in patients with isolated focal chondral defects of the humeral head at a minimum 5-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients who underwent microfracture procedure for isolated focal chondral defects of the humeral head with a minimum follow-up of 5 years between 02/2006 and 08/2016 were included. At minimum 5-year follow-up, pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were collected, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and patient satisfaction level (1 = unsatisfied, 10 = very satisfied). Demographic, injury, and surgical data were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical failure was defined as revision surgery for humeral chondral defects or conversion to arthroplasty. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine survivorship at 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria. There were 15 men and 2 women with an average age of 51 years (range 36-69) and an average follow-up of 9.4 years (range 5.0-15.8). The median ASES score improved from 62 (range: 22-88) preoperatively to 90 (range: 50-100) postoperatively (P = .011). Median satisfaction was 8 out of 10 (range: 2-10). There was no correlation between patient age or defect size and PROs. Postoperatively, patients reported significant improvements in recreational and sporting activity as well as the ability to sleep on the affected shoulder (P ≤ .05). Three patients failed and required revision surgery. The Kaplan-Meier analysis determined an overall survivorship rate of 80% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: The presented study illustrates significant improvements for PROs, improved ability to perform recreational and sporting activities, and a survival rate of 80% at a mean of 9.4 years after microfracture for focal chondral humeral head defects.

Patient-reported outcomes of arthroscopic repair for partial or full-thickness upper third subscapularis tendon tears with open sub-pectoral biceps tenodesis: minimum 10-year outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although short-term results are promising, there are limited data for long-term results of arthroscopic subscapularis (SSC) repair. The purpose of this study is to report minimum 10-year outcomes of primary arthroscopic repair of isolated partial or full-thickness tears of the upper third of the SSC tendon. METHODS: Patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of isolated upper third SSC tears, Lafosse type I (>50% of tendon thickness) or type II were included. Surgeries were performed by a single surgeon between November 2005 and August 2011. Patient-reported outcome measures were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed at minimum follow-up of 10 years. Patient-reported outcomes utilized included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (SANE), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (QuickDASH), the Short Form 12 physical component summary, return to activity, and patient satisfaction. A subanalysis of patient age and outcomes was performed. Retears, revision surgeries, and surgical complications were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 29 patients with isolated upper third SSC repairs were identified. After application of exclusion criteria, 14 patients were included in the final analysis. Follow-up could be obtained from 11 patients. The mean age at surgery was 52.7 years (range: 36-72) and the mean follow-up was 12 years (range 10-15 years). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 52.9 ± 21.8 preoperatively to 92.2 ± 13.7 postoperatively (P < .001). Regarding the SANE and QuickDASH scores, only postoperative data were available. Mean postoperative SANE, QuickDASH, and Short Form 12 physical component summary scores were 90.27 ± 10.5, 14.6 ± 15.5, and 49.2 ± 6.6, respectively. Median patient satisfaction was 10 (range 6-10). Patients reported improvements in sleep, activities of daily living, and sports. There was no correlation between patient age and clinical outcome (P > .05). No patients underwent revision surgery for a SSC retear. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic repair of upper third SSC tendon tears leads to improved clinical scores and high patient satisfaction at minimum 10-year follow-up. The procedure is durable, with no failures in the presented cohort.

Outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with prior anterior shoulder instability: minimum 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a history of anterior shoulder instability (ASI) commonly progress to glenohumeral arthritis or even dislocation arthropathy and often require total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The purposes of this study were to (1) report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after TSA in patients with a history of ASI, (2) compare TSA outcomes of patients whose ASI was managed operatively vs. nonoperatively, and (3) report PROs of TSA in patients who previously underwent arthroscopic vs. open ASI management. METHODS: Patients were included if they had a history of ASI and had undergone TSA ≥5 years earlier, performed by a single surgeon, between October 2005 and January 2017. The exclusion criteria included prior rotator cuff repair, hemiarthroplasty, or glenohumeral joint infection before the index TSA procedure. Patients were separated into 2 groups: those whose ASI was previously operatively managed and those whose ASI was treated nonoperatively. This was a retrospective review of prospective collected data. Data collected was demographic, surgical and subjective. The PROs used were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation score, QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score, and 12-item Short Form physical component score. Failure was defined as revision TSA surgery, conversion to reverse TSA, or prosthetic joint infection. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed. RESULTS: This study included 36 patients (27 men and 9 women) with a mean age of 56.4 years (range, 18.8-72.2 years). Patients in the operative ASI group were younger than those in the nonoperative ASI group (50.6 years vs. 64.0 years, P < .001). Operative ASI patients underwent 10 open and 11 arthroscopic anterior stabilization surgical procedures prior to TSA (mean, 2 procedures; range, 1-4 procedures). TSA failure occurred in 6 of 21 patients with operative ASI (28.6%), whereas no failures occurred in the nonoperative ASI group (P = .03). Follow-up was obtained in 28 of 30 eligible patients (93%) at an average of 7.45 years (range, 5.0-13.6 years). In the collective cohort, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation score, QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score, and 12-item Short Form physical component score significantly improved, with no differences in the postoperative PROs between the 2 groups. We found no significant differences when comparing PROs between prior open and prior arthroscopic ASI procedures or when comparing the number of prior ASI procedures. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a 79% 5-year survivorship rate in patients with prior ASI surgery and a 100% survivorship rate in nonoperatively managed ASI patients (P = .030). CONCLUSION: At mid-term follow-up, patients with a history of ASI undergoing TSA can expect continued improvement in function compared with preoperative values. However, TSA survivorship is decreased in patients with a history of ASI surgery compared with those without prior surgery.

Does glenoid version and its correction affect outcomes in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Correction of glenoid retroversion is commonly performed in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to increase component contact area and decrease eccentric loading of the glenoid component. Despite demonstrated biomechanical advantages, limited information exists on the clinical benefit of correcting glenoid retroversion. The purpose of this systematic review is to critically evaluate the existing literature on the effect of preoperative and postoperative glenoid retroversion on clinical functional and radiologic outcomes in patients who underwent anatomic TSA. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library evaluating the impact of glenoid retroversion on clinical and radiologic outcomes of TSA. English-language studies of level I through IV evidence were included. Blinded reviewers conducted multiple screens and methodological quality was appraised using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score. RESULTS: Sixteen studies, including 3 level III and 13 level IV studies (1211 shoulders), satisfied all inclusion criteria. To address glenoid retroversion, 9 studies used corrective reaming techniques, and 4 studies used posteriorly augmented glenoids. Two studies used noncorrective reaming techniques. Mean preoperative retroversion ranged from 12.7° to 24° across studies. Eleven studies analyzed the effect of glenoid retroversion on clinical outcomes, including patient-reported outcome scores (PROs), range of motion (ROM), or clinical failure or revision rates. Most studies (8 of 11) did not report any significant association of pre- or postoperative glenoid retroversion on any clinical outcome. Of the 3 studies that reported significant effects, 1 study reported a negative association between preoperative glenoid retroversion and PROs, 1 study reported inferior postoperative abduction in patients with postoperative glenoid retroversion greater than 15°, and 1 study found an increased clinical failure rate in patients with higher postoperative retroversion. Ten studies reported radiographic results (medial calcar resorption, Central Peg Lucency [CPL] grade, Lazarus lucency grade) at follow-up. Only 1 study reported a significant effect of pre- and postoperative retroversion greater than 15° on CPL grade. CONCLUSION: There is currently insufficient evidence that pre- or postoperative glenoid version influences postoperative outcomes independent of other morphologic factors such as joint line medialization. Given that noncorrective reaming demonstrated favorable postoperative outcomes, and postoperative glenoid version was not significantly and consistently found to impact outcomes, there is inconclusive evidence that correcting glenoid retroversion is routinely required.

Humeral Head Reconstruction With Osteochondral Allograft: Bone Plug Optimization for Hill-Sachs Lesions Using CT-Based Computer Modeling Analysis.

Background: Engaging Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs) pose a significant risk for failure of surgical repair of recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Reconstruction with fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) has been proposed as a treatment for large HSLs. Purpose: To determine the optimal characteristics of talus OCA bone plugs in a computer-simulated HSL model. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study; Level of evidence, 6. Methods: Included were 132 patients with recurrent anterior instability with visible HSLs; patients who had multidirectional instability or previous shoulder surgery were excluded. Three-dimensional computed tomography models were constructed, and a custom computer optimization algorithm was generated to maximize bone plug surface area at the most superior apex (superiorization) and minimize its position relative to the most medial margin of the HSL defect (medialization). The optimal number, diameter, medialization, and superiorization of the bone plug(s) were reported. Percentages of restored glenoid track width and conversion from off- to on-track HSLs after bone plug optimization were calculated. Results: A total of 86 patients were included in the final analysis. Off-track lesions made up 19.7% of HSLs and, of these, the mean bone plug size was 9.9 ± 1.4 mm, with 2.2 mm ± 1.7 mm of medialization and 3.3 mm ± 2.9 mm of superiorization. The optimization identified 21% of HSLs requiring 1 bone plug, 65% requiring 2 plugs, and 14% requiring 3 plugs, with a mean overall coverage of 60%. The mean width of the restored HSLs was 68%, and all off-track HSLs (n = 17) were restored to on-track. A Jenks natural-breaks analysis calculated 3 ideal bone plug diameters of 8 mm (small), 10.4 mm (medium), and 12 mm (large) in order to convert this group of HSLs to on-track. Conclusion: Using a custom computer algorithm, we have demonstrated the optimal talus OCA bone plug diameters for reconstructing HSLs to successfully restore the HSL track and, on average, 60% of the HSL surface area and 68% of the HSL width. Clinical Relevance: Reconstructing HSLs with talus OCA is a promising treatment option with excellent fit and restoration of HSLs. This study will help guide surgeons to optimize OCA bone plugs from the humeral head, femoral head, and talus for varying sizes of HSLs.

Minimum 10-Year Outcomes After Arthroscopic Repair of Partial-Thickness Supraspinatus Rotator Cuff Tears.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) has been reported to be 13% to 40% within the adult population, accounting for 70% of all rotator cuff tears. Approximately 29% of PTRCTs will progress to full-thickness tears if left untreated. The long-term clinical course after arthroscopic repair of PTRCTs is not well known. PURPOSE: To investigate minimum 10-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) of the supraspinatus tendon and to report reoperation and complication rates. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Patients were included who underwent arthroscopic RCR of a PTRCT performed by a single surgeon between October 2005 and October 2011. Arthroscopic RCR was performed with a transtendon repair of partial, articular-sided supraspinatus tendon avulsions, bursal-sided repair, or conversion into a full-thickness tear and repair. PRO data were collected preoperatively and at a minimum 10 years postoperatively. PRO measures included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, the shortened version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (QuickDASH), the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary, and patient satisfaction. Subanalyses were performed to determine if tear location or age was associated with outcomes. Retears, revision surgery, and surgical complications were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 33 patients (21 men, 12 women) at a mean age of 50 years (range, 23-68) met criteria for inclusion. Follow-up was obtained in 28 (87.5%) of the 32 eligible patients ≥10 years out from surgery (mean, 12 years; range, 10-15 years). Of the 33 PTCRTs, 21 were articular sided and 12 were bursal sided. Of the 33 patients, 26 underwent concomitant biceps tenodesis. At follow-up, the mean PROs were significantly improved when compared with preoperative levels: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score from 67.3 to 93.7 (P < .001), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation from 70.9 to 91.2 (P = .004), QuickDASH from 22.3 to 6.6 (P < .004), and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary from 44.8 to 54.2 (P < .001). Median postoperative satisfaction was 10 (range, 5-10). No patient underwent revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic repair of PTRCTs results in excellent clinical outcomes and high patient satisfaction at minimum 10-year follow-up. Furthermore, the procedure is highly durable, with a clinical survivorship rate of 100% at 10 years.

Minimum 5-Year Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopically Repaired Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Effect of Age on Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) can be challenging to treat, and the efficacy of repair of MRCTs in older patients has been debated. PURPOSE: To report minimum 5-year outcomes after primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of MRCT and determine whether age affects outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence 4. METHODS: The study included consecutive patients with MRCTs who were treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by a single surgeon between February 2006 and October 2016. MRCTs were defined as ≥2 affected tendons with tendon retraction to the glenoid rim and/or a minimum exposed greater tuberosity of ≥67. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 5 years included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score; the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (QuickDASH); the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS); and patient satisfaction. Surgical failure was defined as subsequent revision rotator cuff surgery or conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Regression analysis was performed to determine whether age had an effect on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 53 shoulders in 51 patients (mean age, 59.7 years; range, 39.6-73.8 years; 34 male, 19 female) met inclusion criteria with a mean follow-up of 8.1 years (range, 5.0-12.1 years). Three shoulders (5.7%) failed at 2.4, 6.0, and 7.1 years. Minimum 5-year follow-up was obtained in 45 of the remaining 50 shoulders (90%). Mean PROs improved as follows: ASES from 58.8 to 96.9 (P < .001), SANE from 60.5 to 88.5 (P < .001), QuickDASH from 34.2 to 6.8 (P < .001), and SF-12 PCS from 41.1 to 52.2 (P < .001). Patient satisfaction was a median of 10 (on a scale of 1-10). Age was not associated with any PRO measures postoperatively (P > .05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated significantly improved clinical scores, decreased pain, and increased return to activity for patients with MRCT at midterm follow-up (mean, 8.1 years; range, 5.0-12.1 years). In this patient cohort, no association was found between age and clinical outcomes.

Outcomes and Survivorship 5 Years After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Active Patients 70 Years and Older.

Background: Rotator cuff tears are common in the elderly population and are associated with increased pain, decreased function, and decreased enjoyment of recreational activities. Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes at a minimum of 5 years after arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears in recreational athletes aged ≥70 years at the time of surgery. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Included were recreational athletes aged ≥70 years who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) from December 2005 to January 2016. Patient and surgery characteristics were collected prospectively and retrospectively reviewed. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores utilized were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), the shortened version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (QuickDASH), 12-Item Short Form Health survey (SF-12) questionnaire (Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary), and patient satisfaction. Kaplan Meier survivorship analysis was performed, with failure defined as revision RCR or retear on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: Overall, 71 shoulders (n = 67 patients [44 men, 23 women]; mean age, 73.4 years [range, 70.1-81.3 years]) were included in this study. Follow-up data was obtained for 65 of the 69 available shoulders (94%) at a mean of 7.8 years (range, 5-15.3 years). Mean age at follow-up was 81.2 years (range, 75.7-91.0). One RCR was revised after a traumatic accident, and another had a symptomatic, MRI-confirmed retear. One patient had lysis of adhesions for stiffness 3 months postoperatively. All PRO scores improved from pre- to postoperatively-ASES, from 55.3 to 93.6; SANE, from 62 to 89.6; QuickDASH, from 32.9 to 7.3; and SF-12 Physical Component Summary, from 43.3 to 53 (P < .001 for all)-and the median satisfaction score was 10 out of 10. Postoperatively, 63% of the patients returned to their original fitness program and 33% of patients modified their recreational activity. Survivorship analysis showed a 98% survival rate at 5 years and a 92% rate at 10 years. Conclusion: Sustained improvement in function, reduced pain, and return to activities was seen after arthroscopic RCR in active patients ≥70 years old. Despite one-third of patients modifying their recreational activity, the cohort reported high levels of satisfaction and general health.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Versus Latissimus Dorsi Tendon Transfer for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Minimum 5-year Outcomes.

Background: Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has been introduced as a successful alternative to latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDTT) for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. Purpose: To compare minimum 5-year clinical outcomes of SCR and LDTT for the treatment of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears in patients with minimal evidence of arthritis and intact or reparable subscapularis tears. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent SCR or LDTT and had undergone surgery ≥5 years earlier were included. The SCR technique used a dermal allograft customized to the defect. Surgical, demographic, and subjective data were collected prospectively and reviewed retrospectively. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores utilized were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (QuickDASH), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS), and patient satisfaction. Further surgical procedures were documented, and treatment that progressed to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) or revision rotator cuff surgery was considered a failure. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed. Results: Thirty patients (n = 20 men; n = 10 women) with a mean follow-up of 6.3 years (range, 5-10.5 years) were included. A total of 13 patients underwent SCR and 17 patients underwent LDTT. The mean age of the SCR group was 56 years (range, 41.2-63.9 years), and the mean age of the LDTT group was 49 years (range, 34.7-57 years) (P = .006). One patient in the SCR group and 2 patients in the LDTT group progressed to RTSA. Two additional (11.8%) patients in the LDTT group had further surgery-1 had arthroscopic cuff repair and 1 had hardware removal with biopsies. The SCR group demonstrated significantly better ASES (94.1 ± 6.3 vs 72.3 ± 16.4; P = .001), SANE (85.6 ± 8 vs 48.7 ± 19.4; P = .001), QuickDASH (8.8 ± 8.7 vs 24.3 ± 16.5; P = .012), and SF-12 PCS (56.1 ± 2.3 vs 46.5 ± 6; P = .001) PROs at the final follow-up. There was no significant difference between groups in median satisfaction (SCR, 9; LDTT, 8 [P = .379]). At 5 years, survivorship rates were 91.7% and 81.3% for the SCR and LDTT groups, respectively (P = .421). Conclusion: At the final follow-up, SCR yielded superior PROs compared with LDTT for the treatment of massive, irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears despite similar patient satisfaction and survivorship between procedures.

Use of Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Anterior Shoulder Instability: Possible Effect on Surgical Management.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid bone loss is a critical factor in the management of anterior shoulder instability (ASI). Computed tomography (CT) is often considered the gold standard to evaluate glenoid bone loss, but it is associated with negative factors such as radiation. Thus, interest exists as to when orthopaedic surgeons need a CT scan to guide decision-making when treating ASI. PURPOSE: To determine whether information gained from a shoulder CT scan alters orthopaedic surgeons' management plan for ASI and, secondarily, to determine whether surgeon- and patient-specific factors affect whether a CT scan changes treatment and which clinical factors are most important in surgical decision-making. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A questionnaire composed of 24 ASI vignettes was administered to Herodicus Society members, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Neer Circle members, and sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons. Participants chose their recommended surgical treatment from the options of arthroscopic Bankart repair, open Bankart repair, bony reconstruction procedure, or other based on patient history, radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were then shown CT images and asked whether their treatment plan changed and, if not, whether the CT scan was not necessary or had reinforced their decision. Generalized linear mixed-effects logistic regression modeling was performed to assess the influence of vignette and respondent characteristics on treatment decisions. RESULTS: A total of 74 orthopaedic surgeons completed the survey; 96% were fellowship trained (sports medicine, 50%; shoulder and elbow surgery, 41%), and 66% practiced in academic settings. CT imaging did not change the selected treatment strategy in 75.6% of responses. In cases when management did not change, surgeons reported that the CT scan reinforced their decision in 53.4% of responses and was not necessary for decision-making in 22.2% of responses. Decision-making was more likely to be changed after CT in male patients and those with off-track lesions. CONCLUSION: Information gained from a CT scan did not alter treatment decision-making in three-quarters of vignettes among surgeons experienced in the management of ASI. The finding that CT scans did alter the treatment plan in nearly a quarter of cases is not insignificant, and it appears that in patients with borderline glenoid track status and few other risk factors for recurrence after arthroscopic stabilization, CT imaging is more likely to change management.

Knotless All-Suture, Soft Anchor Bankart Repair Results in Excellent Patient-Reported Outcomes, High Patient Satisfaction, and Acceptable Recurrent Instability Rates at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate minimum 2-year outcomes after arthroscopic knotless all-suture soft anchor Bankart repair in patients with anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series of patients who underwent Bankart repair using soft, all-suture, knotless anchors (FiberTak anchors) from 10/2017 to 06/2019. Exclusion criteria were concomitant bony Bankart lesion, shoulder pathology other than that involving the superior labrum or long head biceps tendon, or previous shoulder surgery. Scores collected preoperatively and postoperatively included SF-12 PCS, ASES, SANE, QuickDASH, and patient satisfaction with various sports participation questions. Surgical failure was defined as revision instability surgery or redislocation requiring reduction. RESULTS: A total of 31 active patients, 8 females and 23 males, with a mean age of 29 (range: 16-55) years were included. At a mean of 2.6 years (range: 2.0-4.0), patient-reported outcomes significantly improved over preoperative levels. ASES score improved from 69.9 to 93.3 (P < .001), SANE improved from 56.3 to 93.8 (P < .001), QuickDASH improved from 32.1 to 6.3 (P < .001) and SF-12 PCS improved from 45.6 to 55.7 (P < .001). Median patient postoperative satisfaction was 10/10 (range: 4-10). Patients reported a significant improvement sports participation (P < .001), pain with competition (P = .001), ability to compete in sports (P < .001), painless use of arm for overhead activities (P = .001), and shoulder function during recreational sporting activity (P < .001). Postoperative shoulder redislocations were reported in 4 cases (12.9%)-all after major trauma-with 2 patients progressing to Latarjet (6.45%) at 2 and 3 years postoperatively. There were no cases of postoperative instability without major trauma. CONCLUSIONS: Knotless all-suture, soft anchor Bankart repair resulted in excellent patient-reported outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and acceptable recurrent instability rates, in this series of active patients. Redislocation after arthroscopic Bankart repair with a soft, all-suture anchor only occurred after return to competitive sports with new high-level trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Capitellum Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Elbow.

Reconstruction of unstable osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the capitellum using fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation from the capitellum has the advantages of restoring hyaline cartilage, matching the native radius of curvature, and avoiding the donor-site morbidity encountered with osteochondral autograft transfer. This technical note describes the indications and contraindications, pertinent anatomy, and surgical technique of open osteochondral allograft transplantation using fresh distal humerus allograft for the treatment of unstable osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the capitellum.

Treatment options for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: a review of arthroscopic surgical options.

While functional reconstruction of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears remains a challenge, current techniques aimed at recentering and preventing superior migration of the humeral head allow for clinical and biomechanical improvements in shoulder pain and function. Recentering of the glenohumeral joint reduces the moment arm and helps the deltoid to recruit more fibers, which compensates for insufficient rotator cuff function and reduces joint pressure. In the past, the concept of a superior capsular reconstruction with a patch secured by suture anchors has been used. However, several innovative arthroscopic treatment options have also been developed. The purpose of this article is to present an overview of new strategies and surgical techniques and if existing present initial clinical results. Techniques that will be covered include rerouting the long head of the biceps tendon, utilization of the biceps tendon as an autograft to reconstruct the superior capsule, utilization of a semitendinosus tendon allograft to reconstruct the superior capsule, superior capsular reconstruction with dermal allografts, and subacromial spacers.

Impact of prior anterior instability on shoulder arthroplasty outcomes: a systematic review.

Background: Anterior shoulder instability (ASI) is a frequently encountered pathology. Patients with a history of ASI have an increased rate of developing glenohumeral osteoarthritis and becoming candidates for shoulder arthroplasty. This systematic review aims to synthesize outcomes for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty with a history of ASI. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) using PubMed, Embase, OVID Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating the impact of prior ASI on total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), reverse TSA, and/or hemiarthroplasty outcomes, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Studies were graded by level of evidence and data concerning patient demographics and outcomes were extracted. Results: Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria, including 596 patients (413 male, 181 female). The average age of the control and prior ASI groups were 57.5 and 57.0 years, respectively. Overall, 251 patients were treated operatively, 132 nonoperatively, and 213 were controls without a history of prior ASI. Shoulder arthroplasty techniques included TSA (436 shoulders), reverse TSA (130 shoulders), and hemiarthroplasty (14 shoulders). Prior anterior stabilization management included soft tissue repair, bony augmentation, and nonoperative treatment. Almost all studies reported no significant difference in subjective and functional arthroplasty outcomes between control and prior ASI groups, or between patients with prior ASI treated nonoperatively vs. surgically. Conclusion: Shoulder arthroplasty in the setting of prior ASI results in improved subjective and functional outcome scores that are comparable to patients without a history of instability.

Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair and Capsular Closure via Single Working Portal for Posterior Shoulder Instability.

Posterior shoulder instability (PSI) is a relatively less common form of instability that frequently affects young overhead or contact athletes. The etiology of PSI may be traumatic or atraumatic, with establishment of the diagnosis being more difficult in cases of atraumatic instability. Surgical management of PSI has evolved from open techniques to arthroscopic techniques. Posterior stabilization has commonly been performed with 2 posterior working portals with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. The objective of this Technical Note is to describe a technique for posterior labral repair using all-suture anchors with the patient in the beach-chair position via 1 working portal with capsular closure.

Clinical Outcomes of Pectoralis Major Tendon Repair with and without Platelet-Rich Plasma.

Purpose: To assess clinical outcomes following pectoralis major tendon (PMT) repairs and to compare outcomes of PMT repairs augmented with and without leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma (LP-PRP). Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed of patients who underwent a PMT repair from May 2007 to June 2019 with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria included revision PMT repair, PMT reconstruction, and concomitant repair of another glenohumeral tendon/ligament. LP-PRP was injected surrounding the PMT repair before wound closure. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) data were collected preoperatively and evaluated at final follow-up using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Score (SANE), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDASH), and Short Form 12 physical component summary (SF-12 PCS), patient satisfaction with outcomes. Results: Twenty-three men (mean age, 38.6 years; range, 20.5-64.3 years) were included in the final analysis. Mean time from injury to surgery was 30 days (range, 3-123 days). Follow-up was obtained for 16 of 23 patients (70%) at a mean of 5.1 years (range 2.0-13.0 years). Significant improvement in PROs was observed (ASES: 59.0 → 92.4, P = .008; SANE: 44.4 → 85.9, P = .018; QuickDASH: 44.4 → 8.5, P = .018; and SF-12 PCS: 42.5 → 52.6, P = .008). Median satisfaction was 9 of 10 (range, 6-10). Patients receiving LP-PRP had superior ASES (99.6 vs 83.0, P = .001), SANE (94.8 vs 74.6, P = .005), QuickDASH (0.24 vs 19.1, P = .001), and patient satisfaction (10 vs 9, P = .037) scores compared with those without PRP. PROs were unchanged based on chronicity, mechanism of injury, or tear location. One patient had revision surgery at 3.4 years due to adhesions. Conclusions: PMT repair produces improved PROs at final follow-up when compared with preoperative values. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

How to Fashion the Bone Block for Reconstruction of the Glenoid in Anterior and Posterior Instability.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid restoration techniques to address glenohumeral instability-induced anterior and posterior glenoid bone loss (AGBL and PGBL) often require reconstruction, but best-fit bone block (BFBB) modeling has not been developed. PURPOSE: To provide glenoid bony reconstruction models for anterior and posterior instability of the shoulder using a bone loss instability cohort with high-fidelity 3-dimensional (3D) imaging. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We reviewed consecutive patients indicated for operative stabilization who had posterior glenohumeral instability and suspected GBL who underwent 2-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT). Patients were matched by sex, laterality, and age to patients who underwent operative stabilization of anterior glenohumeral instability. Mimics software was used to convert all 2D CT scans into 3D models of the scapula. A BFBB model was designed to digitally reconstruct GBL and was used to predict the amount, anatomic configuration, and fixation configuration of bony reconstruction required in AGBL and PGBL. RESULTS: The study included 30 patients with posterior instability and 30 patients with anterior instability; the participants' mean ± SD age was 28.8 ± 8.15 years (range, 16.0-51.0 years). Mean surface area of AGBL was 24.9% ± 7.7% (range, 14.7%-39.1%). Mean BFBB dimensions to reconstruct the anterior glenoid were determined to be a superior-inferior length of 23.9 ± 4.2 mm, anterior-posterior width of 6.4 ± 2.4 mm, and height of 1 cm. Mean angle of AGBL bone block interface relative to glenoid to reconstruct the native concavity was 79.4°± 5.9°. For PGBL, the mean surface area was 9.2% ± 5.6% (range, 3.0%-26.3%). Mean BFBB dimensions to reconstruct the posterior glenoid were a superior-inferior length of 21.9 ± 3.4 mm, width of 4.5 ± 2.3 mm, and height of 1 cm. The mean angle of PGBL bone block interface relative to the glenoid to reconstruct the native concavity was 38.6°± 14.3°. Orientation relative to the vertical glenoid axis was 77.2°± 13.8° in anterior reconstructions versus 105.9°± 10.9° in posterior reconstructions. CONCLUSION: Patients with anterior instability required a more rectangular BFBB with a bone block-glenoid interface angle of 79°, whereas patients with posterior instability required a more trapezoidal, obtusely oriented BFBB with a bone block-glenoid interface angle of 39°. BFBBs for either AGBL or PGBL can be effectively designed, and their size and/or shape can be predicted based on approximate percentage of GBL.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Snapping Scapula Syndrome With Scapulothoracic Bursectomy and Partial Scapulectomy.

Snapping scapula syndrome (SSS) is a painful and debilitating condition that occurs as a result of disruption of normal scapulothoracic articulation and inflammation of numerous soft tissue and bursal structures that function to facilitate scapulothoracic motion. Historically, when nonoperative management of SSS failed, patients progressed to open surgical management. However, as arthroscopic techniques have evolved, the condition has been increasingly treated arthroscopically because of the minimally invasive nature, periscapular muscle-preserving approach with decreased risk to surrounding neurovascular structures, better intraoperative visualization, and quicker patient recovery and rehabilitation. The objective of this Technical Note is to describe our arthroscopic approach for the management of SSS using two portals to complete a scapulothoracic bursectomy and partial scapulectomy of the superomedial scapula. Level of Evidence: Level I: shoulder.