Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 48(7): 101684, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36921647

RESUMO

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement has become a useful alternative for patients with failed mitral prosthesis or annuloplasty rings who are deemed high risk for redo surgery. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes following transseptal (TS) and transapical (TA) approaches in transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring implantation (TMViV/R). Electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase were searched through November 2022. Both clinical trials and observational studies comparing patients undergoing TS and TA TMViV/R were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year mortality. Postoperative stroke, left ventricle outlet tract (LVOT) obstruction, mitral valve pressure gradient (MVPG), bleeding, and length of hospital stay were also evaluated. Seven observational studies were included comparing patients undergoing TS (n = 1875) and TA (n = 1120) TMViV/R. The TS group had significantly lower 30-day mortality (OR: 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.47, 0.94]; P = 0.02, I²â€¯= 0%) and lower one-year mortality risk group (HR: 0.79; 95% CI [0.63, 0.99]; P = 0.04, I²â€¯= 0%) compared to the TA group. The TS group had consistent shorter in-hospital stay (MD = -3.79; 95% CI [-5.23, -2.34] days; P < 0.0001, I²â€¯= 75%). Postoperative stroke, bleeding and LVOT obstruction tended to be lower in the TS but the results did not reach statistical significance. Postoperative MVPG was similar between both groups. The TS approach has lower early mortality, lower 1-year death hazard, shorter in-hospital stay, and a trend toward lower complication rates when compared to TA TMViV/R. Further controlled trials may support the evidence and provide long-term outcomes.


Assuntos
Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia
2.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 37(5): 744-753, Sept.-Oct. 2022. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1407302

RESUMO

Abstract There remains a significant paucity of information evaluating the effect of glycated HbA1c levels and its theorized effect on mortality and morbidity rates following cardiac surgery. Diabetes is a very common comorbidity in patients undergoing open heart surgery, as there is a shift in patient characteristics and greater risk. Currently, there is no clear consensus that an increase in HbA1c level is associated with increased perioperative mortality rate. However, the reported literature is more commonly able to demonstrate that elevated HbA1c levels is associated with increased rates of wound infection, cardiovascular events and renal failure, and thus, higher post-operative morbidities. This review aims to examine and synthesis the evidence behind each of the morbidities and mortalities associated with open heart surgery and the impact of high HbA1c on the reported outcomes.

3.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ; 37(5): 744-753, 2022 10 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33577257

RESUMO

There remains a significant paucity of information evaluating the effect of glycated HbA1c levels and its theorized effect on mortality and morbidity rates following cardiac surgery. Diabetes is a very common comorbidity in patients undergoing open heart surgery, as there is a shift in patient characteristics and greater risk. Currently, there is no clear consensus that an increase in HbA1c level is associated with increased perioperative mortality rate. However, the reported literature is more commonly able to demonstrate that elevated HbA1c levels is associated with increased rates of wound infection, cardiovascular events and renal failure, and thus, higher post-operative morbidities. This review aims to examine and synthesis the evidence behind each of the morbidities and mortalities associated with open heart surgery and the impact of high HbA1c on the reported outcomes.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Diabetes Mellitus , Humanos , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Morbidade , Fatores de Risco
4.
Diagnosis (Berl) ; 7(4): 349-356, 2020 Nov 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32621728

RESUMO

As the world continues to study and understand coronavirus disease (COVID-19), existing investigations and tests have been used to try and detect the virus to slow viral transmission and its global spread. A 'gold-standard' investigation has not yet been identified for detection and monitoring. Initially, computed tomography (CT) was the mainstay investigation as it shows the disease severity and recovery, and its images change at different stages of the disease. However, CT has been found to have limited sensitivity and negative predictive value in the early stages of the disease, and the value of its use has come under debate due to whether its images change the treatment plan, the risk of radiation, as well as its practicality with infection control. Therefore, there has been a shift to the use of other imaging modalities and tests, such as chest X-rays and ultrasound. Furthermore, the use of nucleic acid-based testing such as reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) have proven useful with direct confirmation of COVID-19 infection. In this study, we aim to review and analyse current literature to compare RT-PCR, immunological biomarkers, chest radiographs, ultrasound and chest CT scanning as methods of diagnosing COVID-19.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/genética , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Radiografia Torácica/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/métodos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Carga Viral/genética
5.
J Card Surg ; 35(8): 1941-1953, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32598523

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in cardiac surgery has been established in cases of postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock, which is refractory to conventional therapy with inotropes and intra-aortic balloon pulsation support. We sought to examine the literature in a systematic review manner on the outcomes of using ECMO postcardiac surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive electronic literature search was done to identify all the articles that have discussed the use of ECMO postcardiac surgery. The keywords and medical subject headings terms were used to identify the relevant articles. Studies have been screened according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: The identified studies have been summarized in each relevant section of this study. Cardiogenic shock postcardiac surgery can benefit from ECMO to varying degrees and the survival for this; otherwise, fatal condition has been shown to be improving through the use of ECMO. However, the decision and timing to initiate ECMO therapy remains selective and is dependent on a range of factors such as patient factor, clinician's judgment, meaning there is no consistent and solid ground regarding the timing of ECMO initiation. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that the circulatory support provided by ECMO improves survival rates for postcardiac surgery cardiogenic shock patients who are refractory to inotropic management, without such ECMO support patient mortality rates would be much greater.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Choque Cardiogênico/etiologia , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Choque Cardiogênico/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Acta Biomed ; 91(4): ahead of print, 2020 07 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33525230

RESUMO

Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), first emerged in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and has now become a worldwide health emergency. The symptoms of Coronavirus vary from anosmia, fever, and cough to severe complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, which often require intubation and subsequent ventilation. Procedures such as these are aerosol-generating, and this adds additional challenges due to the risks posed to staff. In this brief article, we discuss the need for ventilation, risks raised to healthcare staff in this context, and ways to potentially mitigate these risks. We also discuss emerging themes, including phenotypes of COVID-19 and the role of prone positioning.


Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Controle de Infecções , Respiração Artificial , COVID-19/complicações , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA