Analysis of failed therapy evaluations in radioembolization of primary and secondary liver cancers.

PURPOSE: To analyze patients' characteristics and reasons for not performing planned transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in liver cancer after 99mTc-labeled macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) evaluation. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort, all patients undergoing 99mTc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE for primary or secondary liver cancer between 2009 and 2018 were analyzed. Patients were assigned to either "TARE" or "no TARE" group. Patients' characteristics, arising reasons for not performing the planned TARE treatment as well as predictive factors for occurrence of these causes were analyzed. RESULTS: 436 patients [male = 248, female = 188, median age 62 (23-88) years] with 99mTc-MAA evaluation prior to planned TARE of primary or secondary liver cancer were included in this study. 148 patients (33.9%) did not receive planned TARE. Patients with a hepatic tumor burden > 50%, no liver cirrhosis, no previous therapies and a higher bilirubin were significantly more frequent in "no TARE" compared to "TARE" group. Main reasons for not performing TARE were extrahepatic tracer accumulation (n = 70, 40.5%), non-target accumulation of 99mTc-MAA (n = 27, 15.6%) or a hepatopulmonary shunt fraction of more than 20% (n = 23, 13.3%). Independent preprocedural parameters for not performing planned TARE were elevated bilirubin (p = 0.021) and creatinine (p = 0.018) and lower MELD score (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: A substantial number of patients are precluded from TARE following 99mTc-MAA evaluation, which is, therefore, implicitly needed to determine contraindications to TARE and should not be refrained from in pretreatment process. However, a preceding careful patient selection is needed especially in patients with high hepatic tumor burden and alteration in lab parameters.

Efficacy of 90Y-Radioembolization in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Depending on the Primary Tumor Side.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is associated with different molecular biology, clinical characteristics, and outcome depending on the primary tumor localization. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of 90Y-radioembolization (RE) for therapy of colorectal liver metastases depending on the primary tumor side. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of n = 73 patients with mCRC and RE in our university liver center between 2009 and 2018. Patients were stratified according to the primary tumor side (left vs. right hemicolon), treatment response was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) at follow-up after 3 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to analyze survival followed by Cox regression to determine independent prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS: Prior to RE, all patients had received systemic therapy, with either stable or progressive disease, but no partial or complete response. In n = 22/73 (30.1%) patients, the primary tumor side was in the right colon; in n = 51/73 (69.9%) patients, in the left colon. Hepatic tumor burden was ≤25% in n = 36/73 (49.3%) patients and >25% in n = 37/73 (50.7%) patients. At 3 months, n = 21 (33.8%) patients showed treatment response (n = 2 [3.2%]; complete response, n = 19 [30.6%]; partial response), n = 13 (21.0%) stable disease, and n = 28 (45.2%) progressive disease after RE. The median survival in case of primary tumor side in the left colon was significantly higher than for primary tumors in the right colon (8.7 vs. 6.0 months, p = 0.033). The median survival for a hepatic tumor burden ≤25% was significantly higher than that of >25% (13.9 vs. 4.3 months, p < 0.001). The median overall survival was 6.1 months. CONCLUSION: The median survival after RE in hepatic-mCRC depends on the primary tumor side and the preprocedural hepatic tumor burden.

Repeated radioembolization in advanced liver cancer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate safety and clinical outcome of repeated transarterial 90Y (yttrium) radioembolization (TARE) in primary and metastatic liver cancer. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2018, n=288 patients underwent TARE for treatment of malignant liver disease in a tertiary care hospital. This retrospective single center study analyzed the safety and outcome of patients (n=11/288) undergoing repeated resin microsphere TARE. Included patients suffered from hepatocellular carcinoma (n=3), colorectal cancer (n=2), breast cancer (n=2), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n=3), and neuroendocrine carcinoma (n=1). All patients had shown either partial response (n=9) or stable disease (n=2) after first TARE. Lab parameters, response assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST/RECIST) at 3 months and overall survival was analyzed. Additionally, patients with repeated TARE were compared to a matched control group (n=56) with single TARE therapy. Kaplan Meier analysis was performed to analyze survival. RESULTS: Patients after repeated TARE showed similar increase in lab parameters as compared to their first TARE. No case of radioembolization induced liver disease was observed. While n=5/11 patients showed a partial response and n=4/11 patients a stable disease after repeated TARE, only n=2/11 patients suffered from progressive disease. Median overall survival was 20.9±11.9 months for the repeated TARE group while it was 5.9±16.2 months for the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated 90Y TARE is safe and can be of benefit for patients yielding a comparable degree of local disease control compared to patients with singular TARE.

Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Treated with Yttrium-90 Radioembolization.

PURPOSE: To evaluate factors associated with survival following transarterial 90Y (yttrium) radioembolization (TARE) in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study analyzed the outcome of three tertiary care cancer centers in patients with advanced ICC following resin microsphere TARE. Patients were included either after failed previous anticancer therapy, including relapse after surgical resection, or for having a minimum of 25% of total liver volume affected by ICC. Patients were stratified and response was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria at 3 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to analyze survival followed by cox regression to determine independent prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS: 46 patients were included (19 male, 27 female), median age 62.5 years (range 29-88 years). A total of 65% of patients had undergone previous therapy, while 63% had a tumor volume > 25% of the entire liver volume. Median survival was 9.5 months (95% CI: 6.1-12.9 months). Due to loss in follow-up, n = 37 patients were included in the survival analysis. Cox regression revealed the extent of liver disease to one or both liver lobes being associated with survival, irrespective of tumor volume (p = 0.041). Patients with previous surgical resection of ICC had significantly decreased survival (3.9 vs. 12.8 months, p = 0.002). No case of radiation-induced liver disease was observed. DISCUSSION: Survival after 90Y TARE in patients with advanced ICC primarily depends on disease extent. Only limited prognostic factors are associated with a general poor overall survival.

THE VULKAN TECHNIQUE: A NOVEL OSTOMY-CLOSURE TECHNIQUE THAT REDUCES COMPLICATIONS AND OPERATIVE TIMES.

BACKGROUND: Ostomy reversals remain at high risk for surgical complications. Indeed, surgical-side infections due to bacterial contamination of the stoma lead to revision surgery and prolonged hospital stay. AIM: To describe the novel vulkan technique of ostomy reversal that aims to reduce operative times, surgical complications, and readmission rates. METHODS: Ostomy closure was performed using the vulkan technique in all patients. This technique consists of external intestinal closure, circular skin incision and adhesiolysis, re-anastomosis, and closure of the subcutaneous tissue in three layers, while leaving a small secondary wound through which exudative fluid can be drained. The medical records of enterostomy patients were retrospectively reviewed from our hospital database. RESULTS: The vulkan technique was successfully performed in 35 patients mainly by resident surgeons with <5 years of experience (n=22; 62.8%). The ileostomy and colostomy closure times were 53 min (interquartile range [IQR], 41-68 min; n=22) and 136 min (IQR: 88-188 min; n=13; p<0.001), respectively. The median hospital stay was seven days (IQR: 5-14.5 days); the length of hospital stay did not differ between ileostomy and colostomy groups. Major surgical complications occurred only in patients who underwent colostomy closure following the Hartmann procedure (n=2); grade≥IIIb according Clavien-Dindo classification. CONCLUSION: The vulkan technique was successfully applied in all patients with very low rates of surgical-site infections. Off note, residents with limited surgical experience mainly performed the procedure while operating time was less than one hour.

The vulkan technique: a novel ostomy-closure technique that reduces complications and operative times / Técnica vulkan para fechamento de ileostomia e colostomia: efetiva redução de complicações e tempo operatório

ABSTRACT Background: Ostomy reversals remain at high risk for surgical complications. Indeed, surgical-side infections due to bacterial contamination of the stoma lead to revision surgery and prolonged hospital stay. Aim: To describe the novel vulkan technique of ostomy reversal that aims to reduce operative times, surgical complications, and readmission rates. Methods: Ostomy closure was performed using the vulkan technique in all patients. This technique consists of external intestinal closure, circular skin incision and adhesiolysis, re-anastomosis, and closure of the subcutaneous tissue in three layers, while leaving a small secondary wound through which exudative fluid can be drained. The medical records of enterostomy patients were retrospectively reviewed from our hospital database. Results: The vulkan technique was successfully performed in 35 patients mainly by resident surgeons with <5 years of experience (n=22; 62.8%). The ileostomy and colostomy closure times were 53 min (interquartile range [IQR], 41-68 min; n=22) and 136 min (IQR: 88-188 min; n=13; p<0.001), respectively. The median hospital stay was seven days (IQR: 5−14.5 days); the length of hospital stay did not differ between ileostomy and colostomy groups. Major surgical complications occurred only in patients who underwent colostomy closure following the Hartmann procedure (n=2); grade≥IIIb according Clavien-Dindo classification. Conclusion: The vulkan technique was successfully applied in all patients with very low rates of surgical-site infections. Off note, residents with limited surgical experience mainly performed the procedure while operating time was less than one hour.

RESUMO Racional: O procedimento de reversão de ileostomia ou colostomia após procedimento cirúrgico colônico permanecem com alto risco de complicações cirúrgicas. De fato, as infecções do sítio cirúrgico, devido à inerente contaminação bacteriana da operação, levam às operações de revisão e hospitalização prolongadas. Objetivo: O presente estudo visa descrever a técnica vulkan de reversão de ostomia, avaliando tempos operatórios, complicações cirúrgicas e taxas de readmissão. Métodos: O fechamento de ostomia foi realizado utilizando a técnica vulkan em todos os pacientes. Ela consiste em incisão cutânea circular, reanastomose, fechamento da aponeurose e fechamento do tecido subcutâneo em três camadas, deixando uma pequena ferida secundária através da qual se pode drenar o líquido exsudativo. A documentação dos pacientes com enterostomia foram revisadas retrospectivamente a partir da base de dados do hospital. Resultados: A técnica vulkan foi realizada com sucesso em 35 pacientes, principalmente por cirurgiões residentes com menos de cinco anos de experiência (n=22; 62,8%). Os tempos de ileostomia e fechamento da colostomia foram 53 min (41-68 min; n=22) e 136 min (88-188 min; n=13; p<0,001), respectivamente. A média da permanência hospitalar foi de sete dias (5-14,5 dias); o tempo de internação não diferiu entre os grupos de ileostomia e colostomia. As complicações cirúrgicas maiores ocorreram somente nos pacientes que se submeteram ao fechamento da colostomia após o procedimento de Hartmann (n=2, grau ≥IIIb de acordo com a classificação de Clavien-Dindo). Conclusão: A técnica vulkan foi aplicada com sucesso em todos os pacientes com taxas muito baixas de infecções no local cirúrgico. Além disso, as operações foram realizadas principalmente por residentes com experiência cirúrgica limitada, resultando em tempos operatórios inferiores a uma hora.