Diagnostic yield and psychological outcomes among women pursuing trio-exome sequencing: Do women with recurrent anomalous fetal phenotypes experience more negative psychological outcomes?

PURPOSE: To describe psychological outcomes among people with recurrent anomalous pregnancies pursuing trio-exome sequencing (exome sequencing (ES)) compared to those with one affected. METHODS: We analyzed data from a prospective ES cohort, enrolling patients with major fetal anomaly and normal microarray. Participants completed validated scales before and after ES. We (1) compared responses of those with multiple anomalous pregnancies to those with one affected and (2) conducted linear regression to examine associations between multiple affected pregnancies and post-ES constructs. RESULTS: Of 166 trios, 61 (37%) received results from ES. Forty (24%) had more than one affected pregnancy and 45% of those received a result explaining the fetal phenotype. All participants had clinically significant presequencing generalized psychological distress. For the 93 who completed the post-ES surveys, those with multiple affected pregnancies had higher psychological adaptation scores but worse test related distress scores (9.3 (6.2) versus 7.1(5.6), p = 0.12) and (14.3 (1.5) versus 15.4 (1.4), p = 0.01). In linear regression models, there were no significant differences in post-ES constructs after adjusting for clinically relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: All individuals experienced significant generalized psychological distress in the pre-ES period, extending our knowledge of how pregnancy history contributes to parental sequencing outcomes.

Maternal carrier screening with single-gene NIPS provides accurate fetal risk assessments for recessive conditions.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of carrier screening for cystic fibrosis, hemoglobinopathies, and spinal muscular atrophy with reflex single-gene noninvasive prenatal screening (sgNIPS), which does not require paternal carrier screening. METHODS: An unselected sample of 9151 pregnant individuals from the general US pregnant population was screened for carrier status, of which 1669 (18.2%) were identified as heterozygous for one or more pathogenic variants and reflexed to sgNIPS. sgNIPS results were compared with newborn outcomes obtained from parent survey responses or provider reports for a cohort of 201 pregnancies. RESULTS: Overall, 98.7% of pregnant individuals received an informative result (no-call rate = 1.3%), either a negative carrier report or, if identified as heterozygous for a pathogenic variant, a reflex sgNIPS report. In the outcomes cohort, the negative predictive value of sgNIPS was 99.4% (95% CI = 96.0%-99.9%) and average positive predictive value (PPV) of sgNIPS was 48.3% (95% CI = 36.1%-60.1%). Importantly, personalized PPVs accurately reflected the percentage of affected pregnancies in each PPV range, and all pregnancies with a sgNIPS fetal risk of >9 in 10 (90% PPV) were affected. CONCLUSION: Although traditional carrier screening is most effective when used to assess reproductive risk before pregnancy, more than 95% of the time it is pursued during a pregnancy and is complicated by incomplete uptake of paternal carrier screening (<50%) and misattributed paternity (∼10%). Even in an idealized setting, when both partners have carrier screening, the maximum risk for having an affected pregnancy is 1 in 4 (equivalent of a 25% PPV). Carrier screening with sgNIPS during pregnancy is an alternative that does not require a paternal sample and provides accurate fetal risk in a timely manner that can be used for prenatal counseling and pregnancy management.

Parental motivations for and adaptation to trio-exome sequencing in a prospective prenatal testing cohort: Beyond the diagnosis.

PURPOSE: To understand motivations for and parental interpretation of results from trio-exome sequencing (ES) for fetal anomalies with a negative standard genetic diagnosis. METHODS: Analysis of an ongoing, prospective prenatal trio-ES study of pregnancies with ultrasound-identified congenital anomalies and lack of a standard genetic diagnosis. After determination of pregnancy disposition, participants completed questionnaires and a semi-structured interview pre- and post-sequencing. Interviews were analyzed using a constructivist grounded theory methodology to identify themes. Associations between themes and ES result were also examined. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six trios have been sequenced. Of those, 45 (36%) resulted in fetal diagnosis. One hundred twenty-five women completed pre-sequencing surveys, and 91 women completed post-sequencing surveys. The main themes identified include (1) variable reasons to pursue ES, (2) limited expectations but high hopes from ES, (3) parental adaptation to uncertain results, (4) impact on personal health and reproduction, and (5) gratitude for the process. CONCLUSION: Participants pursued ES for various reasons, most often to identify a diagnosis and guide reproduction. Post-sequencing, most participants described the process, their interpretation of results, and the impact of receiving the results. Less frequently, but of most concern, participants expressed anxiety about testing and implications for themselves, relationships, and other family members, thus identifying an area of high need for additional support among patients undergoing prenatal ES.

Impact of prenatal exome sequencing for fetal genetic diagnosis on maternal psychological outcomes and decisional conflict in a prospective cohort.

PURPOSE: To evaluate associations between prenatal trio exome sequencing (trio-ES) and psychological outcomes among women with an anomalous pregnancy. METHODS: Trio-ES study enrolling patients with major fetal anomaly and normal microarray. Women completed self-reported measures and free response interviews at two timepoints: pre- (1) and post- (2) sequencing. Pre-sequencing responses were compared with post-sequencing responses; post-sequencing responses were stratified by women who received trio-ES results that may explain fetal findings, secondary findings (medically actionable or couples with heterozygous variants for the same recessive disorder), or negative results. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen trios were enrolled. Of those, 41/115 (35.7%) received results from trio-ES, including 36 (31.3%) who received results that may explain the fetal phenotype. These women had greater post-sequencing distress compared with women who received negative results, including generalized distress (p = 0.03) and test-related distress (p = 0.2); they also had worse psychological adaptation to results (p = 0.001). Genomic knowledge did not change from pre- to post-sequencing (p = 0.51). CONCLUSION: Women show more distress after receiving trio-ES results compared with those who do not, suggesting that women receiving results may need additional support or counseling to inform current and future reproductive decisions.

Use of a novel computerized decision aid for aneuploidy screening: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To assess whether knowledge following use of a decision aid (DA) for aneuploidy screening and testing is inferior to knowledge in women who saw a genetic counselor (GC) only. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled noninferiority trial of pregnant women at ≤22 weeks. Women who were scheduled for GC were randomly allocated to use a DA before GC or to GC alone. The primary outcome was knowledge score, comparing women who had used the DA only to those who saw GC alone. Analysis was by intent to treat. RESULTS: Between January and October 2017, 197 women were randomized, 105 to GC only and 92 to DA use before GC. Demographics and baseline knowledge were similar between groups. Mean knowledge score following DA use was not inferior to mean knowledge score following GC only (10.4 vs. 10.6, p = 0.306). Decisional conflict was similar following completion of the DA to following GC only, but was reduced following completion of both the DA and GC compared with GC only (0.22 vs. 1.74, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Knowledge surrounding aneuploidy screening in women who used a DA was not inferior to knowledge in women who underwent GC. Use of the DA in addition to GC reduced decisional conflict.

Development, Implementation, and Assessment of a Genetics Curriculum Across Institutions.

Objective Many residency programs offer limited exposure and minimal didactic time genetics, despite its frequent use in obstetrics and gynecology. The objective of this study was to develop, pilot, and assess a three-module women's health genetics curriculum for residents that was easily transferable between institutions. Methods An interactive three-module genetics curriculum covering basic principles, prenatal screening/diagnosis, and cancer genetics was developed. A pre- and posttests were used to assess improvement in knowledge. Subjective feedback was obtained to assess curricular satisfaction. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Results The curriculum was administered at two institutions. Forty-eight residents attended ≥ 1 session. Twenty completed the pretest, and 23 completed the posttest. At the first institution, using audience response system, the percentage correct per question increased on 10/14 questions between pre- and posttests. All students felt the curriculum was useful and would strongly recommend to other residents. At the second institution, pre/posttests were distributed on paper. Mean scores significantly improved between pre- and posttests (p = 0.007). On the pretest, no residents scored > 70%. However, 8/13 scored > 70% on the posttest (p = 0.002). Instructors at both institutions described the curriculum as easy to use/implement. Conclusion This three-module workshop on women's health genetics was easily implemented across institutions and led to increased knowledge.

Advances in genetic prenatal diagnosis and screening.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prenatal diagnostic and screening tests are routinely offered to all women in pregnancy. Advances in technology have led to an expansion in available testing. As technology improves, women are facing increasingly complex decisions regarding the quantity and quality of information they wish to have regarding their fetus. RECENT FINDINGS: Professional guidelines support the use of chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-tier test in place of standard karyotype for the evaluation of fetal chromosomes when one or more anomaly is detected by ultrasound. These same guidelines indicate that either chromosomal microarray analysis or standard karyotype can be offered for prenatal diagnosis with a phenotypically normal fetus. Additionally, recent work continues to validate the use of noninvasive prenatal testing for the detection of aneuploidy in the high-risk population. This testing utilizes cell-free DNA in the maternal circulation to predict fetal karyotype with greater sensitivity and specificity than maternal serum screening or first trimester screening. Data continue to accumulate supporting noninvasive prenatal testing use in an all-risk or low-risk population. Additionally, noninvasive prenatal testing is clinically available to screen for a select number of microdeletion syndromes, broadening the scope of population-based screening to include conditions not previously evaluated, although there are limited data available regarding this application. SUMMARY: As prenatal diagnosis becomes increasingly complex, there is a need for the education of both patients and providers regarding the benefits and limitations of the testing strategies available to them.

A single center's experience with noninvasive prenatal testing.

PURPOSE: Massively parallel sequencing to detect fetal aneuploidy has high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in high-risk populations. The purpose of our study was to review our institution's experience with the use of noninvasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy screening. METHODS: This was a descriptive study of patients who had undergone noninvasive prenatal testing between January and September 2012 at the UNC Prenatal Diagnosis unit. RESULTS: Two hundred and eight women had undergone noninvasive prenatal testing during the study period. The majority of patients were white (62.9%) and of advanced maternal age (71.2%). The fetal fraction was below the threshold in three obese patients (1.4%). An abnormal noninvasive prenatal test (aneuploidy detected or "unclassified" result) was reported in 6.3% (13/208) of the patients. Noninvasive prenatal testing had a combined sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 99.5% for detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13. There were "unclassified" results in 11.1% (5/45) of the patients. Over the study period, the number of patients requesting noninvasive prenatal testing increased monthly. The rate of amniocenteses significantly declined (8.1% before vs. 5.3% after noninvasive prenatal testing, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: An increase in uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing and a significant decline in amniocentesis procedures were observed. The rates of "unclassified," false-positive, and false-negative results were higher than anticipated based on published preclinical trials.

Holoprosencephaly-polydactyly/pseudotrisomy 13: a presentation of two new cases and a review of the literature.

Patients with a combination of holoprosencephaly and polydactyly, but with apparently normal chromosomes, may be clinically diagnosed with holoprosencephaly-polydactyly syndrome (HPS), also termed pseudotrisomy 13. However, the criteria for HPS have been controversial since the advent of the diagnostic term, and a clear understanding of the condition lacks definitive delineation. We review the historical and current perspectives on the condition and analyze findings in 40 patients with apparent HPS, including cases from the literature and two previously unreported patients. Overall, our analysis suggests previously unrecognized trends in patients diagnosed with HPS. Specifically, there appears to be a higher prevalence of visceral anomalies, most significantly cardiac and genitourinary, but also with increased gastrointestinal, pulmonary, adrenal, skeletal, and renal abnormalities, in patients with HPS. Although these visceral anomalies may not be essential for the identification of HPS, clinicians should be aware of the presence of such characteristics in these patients to optimize management and help establish etiologies.