Transcranial magnetic stimulation study of expiratory muscle weakness in acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Expiratory muscle weakness due to cerebral infarction may contribute to reduced airway clearance in stroke patients. METHODS: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at the vertex and over each hemisphere and magnetic stimulation over the T(10-11) spinal roots (Tw T(10)) and the phrenic nerves bilaterally (BAMPS) were performed in 15 acute ischemic stroke patients (age 68.9 +/- 9.8 years) and 16 matched controls. Surface electrodes recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the rectus abdominis (RA) and external oblique (EO) muscles bilaterally. Respiratory muscle function was assessed by measuring maximum static expiratory pressure (PE(max)) and changes in intragastric (P(gas)) and transdiaphragmatic (P(di)) pressure after voluntary cough, TMS, TwT(10), and BAMPS. Regression models were used to assess determinants of peak voluntary cough flow rates (PCFR). RESULTS: PCFR, cough P(gas), and vertex TMS P(gas) were decreased in stroke patients compared with controls (203.6 +/- 151.1 vs 350.8 +/- 111.7 L/min, p = 0.004; 72.7 +/- 64.5 vs 163.4 +/- 55.8 cm H(2)O, p = 0.0003 and 8.7 +/- 3.3 vs 16.7 +/- 11.5 cm H(2)O, p = 0.023, respectively). There were no differences in TwT(10) P(gas) (25.2 +/- 7.8 vs 29.4 +/- 12.4 cm H(2)O, p = 0.153) or BAMPS P(di) (21.6 +/- 7.2 vs 19.2 +/- 3.4 cm H(2)O, p = 0.163). TMS P(gas) was lower (4.1 +/- 2.8 vs 6.1 +/- 1.9 cm H(2)O, p = 0.023) following TMS of the injured compared with the uninjured hemisphere in stroke patients. Age and gender adjusted PCFR correlated with P(gas) (r = 0.51, p = 0.009) and PE(max) (r = 0.46, p = 0.024). Stroke was an independent determinant of PCFR after adjusting for P(gas) and PE(max) (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Ischemic cortical injury is associated with expiratory muscle weakness and may contribute to cough impairment in stroke patients.

Abdominal muscle and quadriceps strength in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Quadriceps muscle weakness is common in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but is not observed in a small hand muscle (adductor pollicis). Although this could be explained by reduced activity in the quadriceps, the observation could also be explained by anatomical location of the muscle or fibre type composition. However, the abdominal muscles are of a similar anatomical and fibre type distribution to the quadriceps, although they remain active in COPD. Cough gastric pressure is a recently described technique that assesses abdominal muscle (and hence expiratory muscle) strength more accurately than traditional techniques. A study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that more severe weakness exists in the quadriceps than in the abdominal muscles of patients with COPD compared with healthy elderly controls. METHODS: Maximum cough gastric pressure and quadriceps isometric strength were measured in 43 patients with stable COPD and 25 healthy elderly volunteers matched for anthropometric variables. RESULTS: Despite a significant reduction in mean quadriceps strength (29.9 kg v 41.2 kg; 95% CI -17.9 to -4.6; p = 0.001), cough gastric pressure was preserved in patients with COPD (227.3 cm H(2)O v 204.8 cm H(2)O; 95% CI -5.4 to 50.6; p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal muscle strength is preserved in stable COPD outpatients in the presence of quadriceps weakness. This suggests that anatomical location and fibre type cannot explain quadriceps weakness in COPD. By inference, we conclude that disuse and consequent deconditioning are important factors in the development of quadriceps muscle weakness in COPD patients, or that activity protects the abdominal muscles from possible systemic myopathic processes.

Can differences in management processes explain different outcomes between stroke unit and stroke-team care?

BACKGROUND: Stroke units reduce mortality and dependence, but the reasons are unclear. We have compared differences in management and complications of patients with acute stroke who were admitted to a stroke unit or to a general ward as part of a previously reported randomised trial. METHODS: 304 patients had been randomly assigned to stroke units (n=152) or to general wards supported by a specialist stroke team (152). We used a structured format to gather prospective data on the frequency of prespecified interventions in each of the major aspects of stroke care. Observations were undertaken daily for the first week and every week for the next 3 months by independent observers. The effect of differences in management on outcome at 3 months was assessed with the modified Rankin score, dichotomised to good (0-3) and poor (4-6) outcome. FINDINGS: Patients in the stroke unit were monitored more frequently (odds ratio 2.1 [1.3-3.4]) and more patients received oxygen (2.0 [1.3-3.2]), antipyretics (6.4 [1.5-27.5]), measures to reduce aspiration (6.0 [2.3-15.5]), and early nutrition (14.4 [5.1-40.9]) than those in general wards. Complications were less frequent in patients in the stroke unit than those in general wards (0.6 [0.2-0.7]), with fewer patients having progression of stroke, chest infection, or dehydration. Measures to prevent aspiration, early feeding, stroke unit management, and frequency of complications independently affected outcome. INTERPRETATION: Differences in management and complications between the stroke unit and general wards differ substantially, even when specialist support is provided. Such differences could be responsible for the more favourable outcome seen in patients on stroke units than those on general wards.

Subtypes of constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome based on rectal perception.

BACKGROUND: Patients who complain of constipation can be divided into those who have lost the natural call to stool, but develop abdominal discomfort after several days without a bowel movement (no urge); and those who experience a constant sensation of incomplete evacuation (urge). AIMS: To determine whether the two groups differ in symptoms, colonic transit, and perceptual responses to controlled rectal distension. METHODS: Forty four patients with constipation were evaluated with a bowel symptom questionnaire, colonic transit (radiopaque markers), and rectal balloon distension. Stool (S) and discomfort (D) thresholds to slow ramp (40 ml/min) and rapid phasic distension (870 ml/min) were determined with an electronic distension device. Fifteen healthy controls were also studied. RESULTS: All patients had Rome positive irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); 17 were no urge and 27 urge. Mean D threshold to phasic rectal distensions was 28 (3) mm Hg in no urge, 27 (3) mm Hg in urge (NS), but higher in the control group (46 (2) mm Hg; p < 0.01). Sixty seven per cent of no urge and 69% of urge were hypersensitive for D. Slow ramp distension thresholds were higher in no urge (S: 26 (3); D: 45 (4) mm Hg) compared with urge (S: 16 (2); D: 31 (3) mm Hg; p < 0.01), or with controls (S: 15 (1); D: 30 (3); p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Hyposensitivity to slow rectal distension is found in patients with IBS who complain of constipation and have lost the call to stool even though their sensitivity to phasic distension is increased.

Evidence for two distinct perceptual alterations in irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Visceral hyperalgesia has been implicated as a factor contributing to symptom generation in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, previous studies using intestinal balloon distension have used psychophysical procedures which do not provide adequate and unbiased measures of visceral sensitivity. METHODS: Three psychophysical tasks were examined in 45 patients with IBS (positive Rome criteria) and 14 controls using rectal balloon distension with a computerised distension device. Discomfort threshold and tolerance were assessed during an ascending series of phasic pressure stimuli and during an interactive threshold tracking procedure. In addition, stimulus response functions were generated from intensity and unpleasantness ratings of the rectal distensions. RESULTS: Discomfort threshold and tolerance for the ascending stimuli were significantly lower for the patients with IBS compared with the controls. In contrast, discomfort thresholds during the tracking procedure and stimulus response curves for the ascending series were not different between the groups. A factor analysis of the psychophysical data was consistent with the presence of two distinct and unrelated perceptual alterations related to rectal distension: hypervigilance for visceral stimuli, manifested as lowered response criteria for using the descriptor "discomfort"; and rectal hypersensitivity, manifested as a lower discomfort threshold and left shift of the stimulus response curves. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBS as a group have a greater propensity to label visceral sensations negatively and show a lower tolerance for rectal balloon distension. A subgroup of patients also have baseline rectal hypersensitivity, assessed by unbiased measures of discomfort threshold and stimulus intensity judgements.

Repetitive sigmoid stimulation induces rectal hyperalgesia in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Only a fraction of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) show hypersensitivity to rectal distention. The current study sought to determine if repetitive high-pressure stimulation of sigmoid mechanoreceptors modulates perception of rectal pain and discomfort. METHODS: In 14 patients with IBS and 11 healthy controls, perception thresholds for discomfort and pain during rectal sensory tracking and verbal descriptor ratings of the perceived intensity of a rectal tonic stimulus were obtained before and after repetitive high-pressure mechanical sigmoid stimulation. Gastrointestinal and psychological symptoms were assessed by questionnaires. RESULTS: Despite heterogeneity in baseline rectal sensitivity in patients with IBS, after sigmoid stimulation, 100% of patients, regardless of baseline sensitivity, developed rectal hyperalgesia manifested by at least two of the following three criteria: lowered thresholds for pain and discomfort and increased viscerosomatic referral and lower abdominal discomfort outlasting the experimental stimulation. This pattern of responses was not observed in any of the healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IBS, repetitive stimulation of sigmoid splanchnic afferents results in the development of central sensitization manifested as hyperalgesia and increased viscerosomatic referral during rectal distention and as spontaneous rectosigmoid hyperalgesia in the absence of applied stimuli. Repetitive sigmoid contractions may induce rectosigmoid hyperalgesia in patients with IBS.