Genotyping strategies for tissues fixed with various embalming fluids for human identification, databasing, and traceability.

Within anatomical willed body programs and skeletal collections, whole bodies and their disassociated limbs and organs are identified and tracked. However, if these tracking mechanisms fail, DNA recovered from the formalin-fixed tissues/organs could provide an additional layer of quality assurance. Embalming fluids preserve biological tissues; however, they also damage, fragment, and cross-link DNA and protein molecules. This project investigated the success of STR-typing from various soft tissue and bone samples that were fixed with embalming solutions with a range of formaldehyde concentrations. Formalin-fixed samples dissected from five cadavers, including skin, muscle, bone, heart, and kidney were used in Phase 1 of this study. In Phase 2, an additional 57 tissue samples from various embalmed organs and body parts were collected to demonstrate long-term fixation and direct applicability within a body donor program. DNA was extracted from the samples using the QIAamp® FFPE Tissue Kit (QIAGEN), quantified with the Investigator® QuantiPlex® Pro RGQ qPCR Kit (QIAGEN), and amplified using the Investigator® 24plex and 26plex QS Kits and the Investigator® DIPplex Kit (QIAGEN). The results show the DNA was severely damaged, degraded, and often in low amounts (after one year post-embalming). Sampling from skin and muscle tissues embalmed with ~2.5%-5% formaldehyde solutions appears to be the best strategy for identification, while also maintaining the preservation of the tissues. The results of this project can provide informative data when determining which genotyping strategy may be best suited for the identification, re-association, and establishment of a database for the provenance of formalin-fixed human remains.

Assessment of the ForenSeq mtDNA control region kit and comparison of orthogonal technologies.

The ForenSeq® mtDNA Control Region Kit, MiSeq FGx®, and Universal Analysis Software (UAS) were assessed to better define the performance and limitations of the system with forensically relevant samples to provide data for its transition into practice. A total of six MiSeq FGx sequencing runs of ForenSeq mtDNA Control Region kit, three runs of additional orthogonal sequencing chemistries, and Sanger sequencing results for 14 samples were used to test for concordance. Sensitivity, reproducibility, mixture detection studies, as well as studies to measure the performance of amplification and sequencing controls were performed. The use and reliability of the UAS for data analysis was also examined. With a variety of sample types and controls representing many mitochondrial haplotypes, the recently developed mtDNA Control Region Kit, with the MiSeq FGx and UAS, was found to be fit for purpose as reliable, reproducible, and robust. Sensitivity down to 1 pg of input genomic DNA was demonstrated, which allows the system to offer low limits of detection for better interrogation of potential heteroplasmy in samples. Concerns for implementing next generation sequencing (NGS) for mtDNA in laboratories were addressed in this research, including initial template quantification and confirmation of haplotypes generated by UAS software regarding length-based polymorphisms. To improve performance with forensic samples, laboratories could implement mitochondrial-specific qPCR assays for quantification and perform the optional manual normalization protocol. Additional optimization on sample multiplexing can provide methods that either increase sensitivity or cost efficiency of the assay.

Review of direct PCR and Rapid DNA approaches to streamline sexual assault kit testing.

Crime laboratories have been faced with large casework backlogs due to lengthy processing times, limited resources and scientists, and rising crime rates. Evidence related to sexual assault crimes, specifically sexual assault kits (SAKs), heavily contribute to the reported backlogs. Although more sensitive, faster chemistries and automated techniques have been implemented over the years, the traditional STR workflow remains relatively unchanged. Enhanced workflows such as direct PCR and Rapid DNA have the potential to streamline the processing of forensic evidence items including those commonly submitted in SAKs, but the FBI QAS guidelines restrict CODIS-approved labs from implementing these methods for forensic samples. Recent studies have shown decreased turnaround times and improved or comparable profiling success with both approaches. However, review of the literature shows a lack of in-depth research comparing traditional DNA workflows to faster and more sensitive direct PCR and/or Rapid DNA approaches for evidentiary samples, especially for SAKs. By providing the forensic science and criminal justice communities with the strengths and limitations of direct PCR and Rapid DNA methods, stakeholders and policy makers may be better informed.

The performance of quality controls in the Investigator® Quantiplex® Pro RGQ and Investigator® 24plex STR kits with a variety of forensic samples.

Forensic DNA laboratories process database reference samples on FTA® cards or buccal swabs, which commonly contain adequate amounts of quality DNA resulting in full STR profiles and high first-pass rates. However, some reference samples and many forensic casework samples are exposed to a variety of insults that may lead to low quantities of DNA, DNA degradation, DNA mixtures, and/or PCR inhibition, posing a challenge to downstream genotyping success. The inclusion of multiple amplification targets and internal PCR controls (IPCs) in DNA quantification kits, and quality sensors within STR amplification kits can aid in the accurate interpretation of sample/profile quality, and guide more efficient rework strategies when needed. In order to assess the effectiveness of these quality systems we subjected database-type samples (buccal swabs and blood or saliva on FTA® cards), mock casework samples (low-template, degraded, inhibited, DNA mixtures), and authentic post-coital samples to various challenging conditions. Concordance between the quality flags in the Investigator® Quantiplex® Pro RGQ kit (QIAGEN), the QS markers in QIAGEN's Investigator® 24plex QS kit, and overall STR profile quality was evaluated for all casework-type samples. To assess the value of the QS markers in the Investigator® 24plex QS and GO! STR kits, samples with partial or failed STR profiles were reworked based on the quality of the electropherogram first with the QS markers redacted, and second in conjunction with the QS markers. Results from each of the rework approaches were compared to determine which strategy, if any, improved the STR profile quality and the number of reportable alleles. The QS markers in the 24plex STR kits correctly confirmed sample quality in 99.9% of databasing samples and 98% of mock casework samples. Quality flags during DNA quantification were concordant with downstream STR profiles for the majority (77%) of the mock casework samples. Additionally, when samples with partial STR profiles were reworked, more loci were obtained for 80% of the samples regardless of the rework strategy used. However, the most notable improvement in STR completeness was observed in inhibited samples that were reworked based on the information provided by the STR quality sensors, with an average increase of 56% reportable alleles.

A Powder-free DNA Extraction Workflow for Skeletal Samples.

The processing of skeletal material poses several challenges for forensic laboratories. Current methods can be laborious, time-consuming, require dedicated equipment, and are vulnerable to contamination. In this study, various sample mass (1 × 50 mg, 3 × 50 mg, and 1 × 150 mg chip(s)) and incubation times (2, 4, and 16 h) were tested using the PrepFiler® BTA™ Forensic DNA Extraction Kit to digest whole bone chips in lieu of powdering. The most effective method was then applied to bones and tooth fragments collected from contemporary human cadavers exposed to various environmental conditions using an automated platform. Over a third of the samples tested generated full DNA profiles without having to powder the bone/tooth fragment or further alter the manufacturer's protocol. However, for most samples resulting in incomplete STR profiles due to low amounts of DNA, slightly better results were achieved with powdered tissue. Overall, this work demonstrates the potential use of a faster, nonpowdering DNA extraction method for processing skeletal samples as an effective first-pass screening tool.

The effects of extra PCR cycles when amplifying skeletal samples with the GlobalFiler® PCR Amplification Kit.

When samples with low amounts of DNA are amplified using short tandem repeats (STRs), stochastic effects such as allele and locus dropout or drop-in, allele imbalance, and increased stutter often occur making data interpretation more difficult. The most common approach to improving STR results from low template samples is to increase the number of PCR cycles. Although more alleles may be recovered, stochastic effects may be exaggerated resulting in more complicated STR profiles. This work reports the effect of additional PCR cycles (29 vs. 30, 31, and 32) on STR success from environmentally challenged bone and tooth samples using the GlobalFiler® DNA Amplification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). In addition, we compared the efficiency of two DNA extraction kits for skeletal samples: QIAamp® DNA Investigator (QIAGEN) and PrepFiler® BTA™ Forensic DNA Extraction (Thermo Fisher Scientific) kits. Results showed that more DNA was recovered from samples using the PrepFiler® BTA™ kit; but regardless of the extraction method, the number of alleles detected and the peak heights both increased with an increase in PCR cycle number. Although more alleles were reported in almost all samples, the most notable improvement was observed in samples with the DNA template < 120 pg. A general increase in the number of PCR artifacts was detected in STR profiles generated using 30-32 cycles. Overall, this study provides supporting evidence that STR profile completeness and quality may be improved when low template skeletal samples are amplified with extra PCR cycles (up to 32 cycles) using the GlobalFiler® DNA Amplification Kit.

Evaluation Of A Powder-Free DNA Extraction Method For Skeletal Remains.

Bones are often recovered in forensic investigations, including missing persons and mass disasters. While traditional DNA extraction methods rely on grinding bone into powder prior to DNA purification, the TBone Ex buffer (DNA Chip Research Inc.) digests bone chips without powdering. In this study, six bones were extracted using the TBone Ex kit in conjunction with the PrepFiler® BTA™ DNA extraction kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) both manually and via an automated platform. Comparable amounts of DNA were recovered from a 50 mg bone chip using the TBone Ex kit and 50 mg of powdered bone with the PrepFiler® BTA™ kit. However, automated DNA purification decreased DNA yield (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, short tandem repeat (STR) success was comparable across all methods tested. This study demonstrates that digestion of whole bone fragments is an efficient alternative to powdering bones for DNA extraction without compromising downstream STR profile quality.