Evaluation of sunobinop for next-day residual effects in healthy participants.

Sunobinop is a novel, potent, selective partial agonist at nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) receptors. The primary objective of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to assess the next-day residual effects of an evening dose of sunobinop in healthy participants. Participants were randomized into 1 of 5 treatment sequences. Treatment consisted of 1 dose each of sunobinop 0.2, 0.6, 2, and 6 mg suspension and placebo suspension. Key pharmacodynamic (PD) measures included the digit symbol substitution test (DSST), Karolinska sleepiness scale (KSS), and body sway. The randomized safety population consisted of 25 participants. The DSST, KSS, and body sway showed dose-dependent effects following the administration of sunobinop, with no significant differences versus placebo at sunobinop doses <2 mg. At sunobinop 2 mg, PD effects were relatively small in magnitude and inconsistent. The last timepoint where significant differences between sunobinop 2 mg and placebo on the DSST, KSS, and body sway were observed was at 12 h, 16.5 h, and 13.5 h postdose, respectively. Sunobinop 6 mg resulted in larger and consistent PD effects, with significant differences from placebo at all timepoints up to 16.5-18 h postdose. Somnolence was the most frequently reported adverse event (AE), and all AEs were mild-to-moderate. No deaths occurred during the study or discontinuations due to an AE. Overall, a nighttime oral dose of sunobinop up to 2 mg was safe and generally well tolerated in healthy participants with limited next-day residual effects that were consistent with other sedative/hypnotic drugs.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Single- and Multiple-Ascending Doses of Sunobinop in Healthy Participants.

Sunobinop is an investigational, potent, selective partial agonist at the nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor in vitro. Three phase 1 studies were conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of escalating single- and multiple-dose administration of sunobinop in healthy participants. Study 1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose study. Study 2 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-ascending dose study. Study 3 was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 4-way crossover study of oral and sublingual sunobinop comparing morning (AM) and bedtime (PM) administration. Seventy participants were included. Systemic exposure (peak plasma concentration [Cmax], area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of last quantifiable concentration [AUC0-t], and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity [AUCinf]) of sunobinop was characterized by dose proportionality from 0.6 to 2 mg and increased less than proportionally from 3 to 30 mg. The PKs of sunobinop were similar, regardless of AM or PM administration, for both the oral and sublingual formulations. The majority of absorbed sunobinop was excreted unchanged in the urine within 8 hours of dosing, thereby showing rapid elimination with no appreciable accumulation following 14 consecutive days of once-daily dosing and suggesting exclusive renal elimination. Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild in severity; 1 severe TEAE occurred and all TEAEs resolved by the end of the studies. Sunobinop was generally well-tolerated and safe across the range of doses evaluated and presents a clinical profile suitable for continued development.

The nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor partial agonist sunobinop promotes non-REM sleep in rodents and patients with insomnia.

The potent and partial agonist sunobinop activates the nociceptin/orphanin-FQ peptide receptor and promotes non-REM sleep in rodents and patients with insomnia.

ArrayTrack: An FDA and Public Genomic Tool.

A robust bioinformatics capability is widely acknowledged as central to realizing the promises of toxicogenomics. Successful application of toxicogenomic approaches, such as DNA microarrays, inextricably relies on appropriate data management, the ability to extract knowledge from massive amounts of data and the availability of functional information for data interpretation. At the FDA's National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR), we are developing a public microarray data management and analysis software, called ArrayTrack that is also used in the routine review of genomic data submitted to the FDA. ArrayTrack stores a full range of information related to DNA microarrays and clinical and nonclinical studies as well as the digested data derived from proteomics and metabonomics experiments. In addition, ArrayTrack provides a rich collection of functional information about genes, proteins, and pathways drawn from various public biological databases for facilitating data interpretation. Many data analysis and visualization tools are available with ArrayTrack for individual platform data analysis, multiple omics data integration and integrated analysis of omics data with study data. Importantly, gene expression data, functional information, and analysis methods are fully integrated so that the data analysis and interpretation process is simplified and enhanced. Using ArrayTrack, users can select an analysis method from the ArrayTrack tool box, apply the method to selected microarray data and the analysis results can be directly linked to individual gene, pathway, and Gene Ontology analysis. ArrayTrack is publicly available online ( http://www.fda.gov/nctr/science/centers/toxicoinformatics/ArrayTrack/index.htm ), and the prospective user can also request a local installation version by contacting the authors.

Oral Abuse Potential, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of Once-Daily, Single-Entity, Extended-Release Hydrocodone (HYD) in Recreational Opioid Users.

OBJECTIVES: A once-daily, extended-release hydrocodone bitartrate tablet with abuse-deterrent properties (Hysingla ER [HYD]) is available for the treatment of chronic pain in appropriate patients. This study evaluated the oral abuse potential and pharmacokinetics (PK) of HYD intact, chewed, or milled to fine particles in comparison with hydrocodone solution or placebo. DESIGN: Single-center, double-blind, randomized, five-period, five-treatment crossover study. SUBJECTS: Healthy adult, nondependent, recreational opioid users. METHODS: Forty subjects received orally administered treatments of hydrocodone 60 mg solution, HYD 60 mg intact, HYD 60 mg chewed, HYD 60 mg milled to fine particles, or placebo, separated by a five- to seven-day washout. Assessments over 36 hours postdose included subjective measures of drug liking and willingness to take drug again (assessed using visual analog scales [VAS]), pupillometry, PK, and safety measures. RESULTS: Following oral administration, HYD intact, HYD chewed, and HYD fine particles led to significantly lower "at this moment" drug liking compared with hydrocodone solution. HYD intact and chewed were significantly different from hydrocodone solution on overall drug liking, take drug again, and good effects. Pupil constriction, as measured by pupillometry, occurred later with HYD intact and HYD chewed than with hydrocodone solution. Across treatments (hydrocodone solution, HYD fine particles, HYD chewed, and HYD intact, respectively), mean C max and rate of absorption (C max /T max ) values decreased, respectively, and median T max values increased, respectively. Safety was consistent with the known effects of opioid agonists. CONCLUSION: HYD demonstrated reduced oral abuse potential compared with hydrocodone solution in healthy adult, nondependent, recreational opioid users.

Effects of buprenorphine on QT intervals in healthy subjects: results of 2 randomized positive- and placebo-controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of transdermal buprenorphine on QTc prolongation at dose levels of 10, 40, and 80 mcg/h, (BTDS 10, BTDS 40, BTDS 80). METHODS: Two randomized, placebo- and positive-controlled, parallel-group, dose-escalating clinical studies evaluated healthy adult subjects randomized to BTDS, placebo, or moxifloxacin in the first study; and to BTDS only, BTDS plus naltrexone, naltrexone alone at the same dose, placebo, or moxifloxacin in the second study. QT intervals were corrected for heart rate using data from each individual subject (QTcI). RESULTS: In the first study (n = 44), the maximum upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for mean placebo-corrected change from baseline in QTcI across 13 time points over 24 h were: 10.0 msec for BTDS 10 (Day 6) and 13.3 msec for BTDS 40 (Day 13); and 17.0 msec (Day 6) and 15.5 msec (Day 13) for moxifloxacin, respectively. Similarly, in the second study (n = 66), the upper bound of the 90% CI for mean placebo-corrected change from baseline for QTcI was under 10 msec at all time points for BTDS 10 (maximum upper bound, 5.63 msec), over 10 msec at 5 time points for BTDS 40 (maximum 11.81 msec) and over 10 msec at all 13 time points for BTDS 80 (maximum, 14.14 msec). Naltrexone administered with BTDS eliminated the QTcI prolongation seen with supratherapeutic BTDS doses (BTDS 40, BTDS 80) administered without naltrexone. CONCLUSIONS: At the therapeutic dose of 10 mcg/h, BTDS has no clinically significant effect on QTc. At supratherapeutic doses of 40 and 80 mcg/h, BTDS treatment produces prolongation of QTcI similar in magnitude to that produced by a 400 mg dose of moxifloxacin. Despite the modest, dose-dependent increase in QTcI noted in these studies, transdermal buprenorphine has not been associated with proarrhythmic effects.

FDA drug labeling: rich resources to facilitate precision medicine, drug safety, and regulatory science.

Here, we provide a concise overview of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labeling, which details drug products, drug-drug interactions, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and more. Labeling data have been collected over several decades by the FDA and are an important resource for regulatory research and decision making. However, navigating through this data is challenging. To aid such navigation, the FDALabel database was developed, which contains a set of approximately 80000 labeling data. The full-text searching capability of FDALabel and querying based on any combination of specific sections, document types, market categories, market date, and other labeling information makes it a powerful and attractive tool for a variety of applications. Here, we illustrate the utility of FDALabel using case scenarios in pharmacogenomics biomarkers and ADR studies.

Dose-Dependent Flux of Buprenorphine Following Transdermal Administration in Healthy Subjects.

Buprenorphine transdermal delivery system (BTDS) applied once every 7 days is indicated for the management of pain that is severe enough to require daily, around-the-clock, long-term opioid treatment and for which alternative treatment options are inadequate. The 7-day flux of buprenorphine from BTDS to systemic circulation was investigated in a phase 1, 2-period crossover study with 3 randomized groups of healthy subjects receiving BTDS containing buprenorphine 5, 10, or 20 mg for 7 days preceded or followed by intravenous buprenorphine infusion (25 µg/h for 24 hours). Residual and absolute bioavailability methods were used to estimate 7-day flux of buprenorphine. Following BTDS administration, mean area under the curve of buprenorphine increased proportionally (12.6, 24.3, and 51.1 ng/[mL · h]), maximum mean plasma concentration rose with increasing dose (176, 191, and 471 pg/mL), and absolute bioavailability was 14% to 16%. Mean residual amount of buprenorphine in the BTDS after 7-day application was 4.50, 8.57, and 17.1 mg. Flux of buprenorphine was approximately 5, 10, and 20 µg/h for BTDS containing 5, 10, and 20 mg buprenorphine, respectively. BTDS was safe and well tolerated following a single 7-day application in healthy subjects. The results of this study demonstrated dose-dependent flux of buprenorphine delivered via transdermal system.

Pharmacokinetic Profile and Sustained 24-hour Analgesia of a Once-daily Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-release Tablet with Abuse-deterrent Properties.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and 24-hour analgesic effectiveness of once-daily, single-entity, extended-release hydrocodone (HYD) with abuse-deterrent properties. METHODS: Four studies were included. Three open-label PK studies had the following designs: single-dose, 5-treatment, 4-period, crossover, dose-proportionality study; HYD 120 mg for 5 days (steady-state study 1); 2-treatment, 2-period, multiple-dose crossover study assessing the relative bioavailability of HYD 30 mg and hydrocodone 7.5 mg/ibuprofen 200 mg administered every 6 hours (steady-state study 2). A long-term, open-label study assessed the safety and effectiveness of HYD 20 to 120 mg in patients during a 52-week maintenance period. FINDINGS: Thirty-one, 25, and 22 healthy subjects completed the dose-proportionality study, steady-state study 1, and steady-state study 2, respectively, while 410 patients with moderate to severe chronic nonmalignant and non-neuropathic pain completed the long-term effectiveness study. Mean systemic exposure and peak plasma concentration were dose proportional after administration of single doses of HYD 20 to 120 mg. Pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable at day 1 and day 5 after administration of HYD 120 mg once daily. Once-daily HYD 30 mg was associated with lower-fluctuating plasma hydrocodone concentrations compared with immediate-release hydrocodone 7.5 mg/ibuprofen 200 mg administered every 6 hours. In the long-term study, pain control was consistent over the 24-hour dosing interval. IMPLICATIONS: Once-daily HYD exhibits linear, dose-proportional PK properties and is associated with a lower variability in plasma hydrocodone concentrations when compared with an immediate-release hydrocodone combination product. Notably, analgesia provided by HYD is sustained during the 24-hour dosing interval. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01400139 (Study 4).

Intranasal Abuse Potential, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of Once-Daily, Single-Entity, Extended-Release Hydrocodone (HYD) in Recreational Opioid Users.

OBJECTIVES: A once-daily, extended-release hydrocodone bitartrate tablet with abuse-deterrent properties (Hysingla ER® [HYD]) is available for the treatment of chronic pain in appropriate patients. This study evaluated the intranasal abuse potential and pharmacokinetics of HYD coarse and fine particles vs hydrocodone powder or placebo. DESIGN: Single-center, double-blind, positive- and placebo-controlled, randomized, four-treatment crossover study. SUBJECTS: Healthy adult, nondependent, recreational opioid users with a history of intranasal abuse. METHODS: During four treatment periods, subjects (N = 31) received hydrocodone powder 60 mg, HYD coarse particles 60 mg, HYD fine particles 60 mg, or placebo, with five-to-seven-day washouts between treatments. Measures over 36 hours postdose included drug-liking and willingness to take drug again, assessed using visual analog scales (VASs), pupillometry, intranasal irritation, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Insufflation of both HYD coarse and fine particles led to lower "At this Moment" Drug Liking VAS peak values compared with hydrocodone powder, but higher values compared with placebo (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Similar results were observed for Overall Drug Liking VAS, Take Drug Again VAS, and Subjective Drug Value. Compared with hydrocodone, insufflation of HYD particles led to reduced miosis and increased nasal irritation. Mean hydrocodone Cmax following insufflation of HYD coarse particles, HYD fine particles, and hydrocodone powder was 27.5, 36.5, and 105.8 ng/mL, respectively; median Tmax was ≥2-fold longer with either HYD particle size than hydrocodone powder; and (Cmax/Tmax) was 9.5, 13.4, and 82.0 ng/mL/h, respectively. Safety was consistent with that of opioid agonists. CONCLUSIONS: HYD demonstrated reduced intranasal abuse potential compared with hydrocodone powder.

Effects of paroxetine, a CYP2D6 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetic properties of hydrocodone after coadministration with a single-entity, once-daily, extended-release hydrocodone tablet.

PURPOSE: A single-entity, once-daily, extended-release formulation of hydrocodone bitartrate (HYD) has been developed for the management of moderate to severe chronic pain. Hydrocodone undergoes cytochrome P-450 (CYP)-mediated metabolism involving the CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 isozymes. CYP3A4 yields norhydrocodone, a major inactive metabolite, whereas CYP2D6 yields hydromorphone, a minor active metabolite. This study examined the influence of the coadministration of paroxetine, a strong selective CYP2D6 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetic properties of hydrocodone (and hydromorphone) in healthy adults. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, 2-period, 2-treatment crossover study, 24 healthy subjects received paroxetine 20 mg or placebo once daily for 12 days and an HYD 20-mg tablet on day 10 of each period. FINDINGS: Hydrocodone mean Cmax and t½ and median Tmax values were similar with paroxetine or placebo coadministration (16.8 vs 15.9 ng/mL, 8.5 vs 8.4 hours, and 18.0 vs 18.0 hours, respectively), as were mean AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ values (342.9 vs 325.3 ng · h/mL and 346.3 vs 328.5 ng · h/mL). The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of the hydrocodone AUC and Cmax values were fully within the predetermined range of 80% to 125%, suggesting that there was no effect of multiple doses of paroxetine on systemic exposure to hydrocodone. Mean hydromorphone AUC0-t and Cmax values were decreased with paroxetine versus placebo (0.64 vs 3.8 ng · h/mL and 0.06 vs 0.19 ng/mL), whereas Tmax values remained similar (18.0 vs 16.1 hours, respectively). The mean hydromorphone AUC0-∞ value could not be calculated. Both regimens were well tolerated; after HYD administration, the numbers of adverse events were similar between the 2 treatment regimens, and all adverse events were mild. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, the coadministration of single-dose HYD with paroxetine at steady state did not alter systemic exposure to hydrocodone, suggesting that HYD can be coadministered with CYP2D6 inhibitors at therapeutic doses, without dosage modification.

Pharmacokinetics of zolpidem from sublingual zolpidem tartrate tablets in healthy elderly versus non-elderly subjects.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic parameters of sedative-hypnotic medications can be influenced by age and gender. OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed pharmacokinetic parameters of zolpidem, formulated as a sublingual zolpidem tartrate tablet (ZST; Intermezzo®), in healthy elderly males and females (mean age 72 years) and in non-elderly males and females (34 years). METHODS: This was a randomized, single-dose, open-label, two-way crossover study evaluating pharmacokinetic parameters of 1.75 and 3.5 mg dosages of ZST in elderly subjects (n = 22), and 3.5 mg dosages of ZST in non-elderly subjects (n = 24). Main outcome measures were pharmacokinetic parameters, including area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum observed concentration (C(max)), time to reach C(max) (T(max)), elimination half-life (T(½)), and apparent oral clearance (CL/F). RESULTS: Dose proportionality in zolpidem exposure was maintained between 1.75 and 3.5 mg doses for both elderly females and males. With administration of the 3.5 mg dose of ZST to elderly and non-elderly subjects, significantly higher systemic exposure was seen in elderly females (C(max) +44.6 %, P < 0.01; AUC +40.4 %) compared with non-elderly females. However, systemic exposure was only modestly higher in elderly males compared with non-elderly males. Greater exposure was seen in elderly females compared to males (C(max) +46.8 %, P < 0.01; AUC +31.4 %). In this study, exposure between non-elderly females and males was equivalent. Changes in T(½) and T(max) values were not observed, with no significant age effect on oral clearance. There were no apparent differences in tolerability among age and gender groups. CONCLUSION: Elderly individuals were found to have higher C(max) and AUC values compared with non-elderly subjects. C(max) and AUC were greater in elderly women compared with elderly men.

Abuse potential of intravenous oxycodone/naloxone solution in nondependent recreational drug users.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Abuse of opioid analgesics has become a public health issue. Some opioid abusers use intravenous administration to increase the magnitude of positive reinforcing effects. Intravenous co-administration of oxycodone with naloxone, an opioid antagonist, may reduce these rewarding effects and discourage abuse. A 2:1 oxycodone:naloxone (OXN) tablet formulation has been studied in the USA for the management of moderate-to-severe chronic pain. Intravenous administration of a 2:1 oxycodone:naloxone solution (sOXN) reflects the oxycodone:naloxone ratio found in laboratory studies of OXN following tampering for intravenous administration. The objective of this study was to characterize abuse-deterrent properties of sOXN. METHODS: This single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, active-controlled, crossover study enrolled nondependent recreational opioid users with experience using multiple (two or more) routes of administration. Following demonstration that subjects could discern between placebo and oxycodone, 24 eligible male and female subjects were randomized to receive intravenous injections of 0.07 mg/kg oxycodone (OXY), 0.07 mg/kg oxycodone and 0.035 mg/kg naloxone solution (sOXN), or matching placebo over three visits. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability were assessed at scheduled times up to 8 h post-dose. Parameters were computed and statistically compared among treatments. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics were similar between OXY and sOXN. Subjects reported significantly fewer rewarding effects with sOXN compared with OXY; differences between sOXN and placebo were generally not significant. sOXN was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Significant reductions in drug liking and other subjective effects following administration of sOXN compared with OXY indicate that naloxone concentrations were sufficient to antagonize the effects of oxycodone when abused by the intravenous route of administration in opioid-experienced drug users.

Gender differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem following sublingual administration.

The effect of dose and gender on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of zolpidem after administration of a buffered zolpidem sublingual tablet (ZST; Intermezzo®, Purdue Pharma L.P., Stamford, CT, USA) was evaluated in healthy non-elderly male and female volunteers. Subjects received a single morning dose of ZST (1.0, 1.75, and 3.5 mg) or placebo in a four-way crossover study. In male and female subjects zolpidem PK were linear, with area under the curve (AUC) proportional to dose, and apparent oral clearance and elimination half-life independent of dose. However, AUC averaged 40% to 50% higher in females than in males receiving the same dose. The gender effect was incompletely explained by body weight. In females, ZST produced PD changes consistent with benzodiazepine agonist effects, particularly at the 3.5-mg dose. For several PD variables, PD effects were significantly related to plasma zolpidem concentrations when data were aggregated across subjects. However, there was variability in response among individuals. In males, PD effects of zolpidem seldom differed from placebo regardless of plasma concentration. The findings confirm that zolpidem clearance is lower in females than in males. PD effects of zolpidem from ZST are greater in female subjects, due to a combination of higher plasma concentrations and greater intrinsic sensitivity.

Abuse potential, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of intranasally administered crushed oxycodone HCl abuse-deterrent controlled-release tablets in recreational opioid users.

The objective of this study was to evaluate abuse potential, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of intranasally administered, crushed reformulated OxyContin® (oxycodone HCl controlled-release) tablets (ORF), relative to crushed original OxyContin® (OC), oxycodone powder (Oxy API), and OC placebo. This randomized, double-blind, positive- and placebo-controlled crossover study enrolled healthy, adult, nonphysically dependent recreational opioid users with recent history of intranasal drug abuse (N = 27). Active treatments contained oxycodone (30 mg). Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (e.g., Overall Drug Liking [ODL], Take Drug Again [TDA], and High Visual Analog Scales [VAS]; Subjective Drug Value [SDV]; pupillometry; intranasal irritation), and safety (e.g., adverse events, vital signs, laboratory tests) were assessed to 24 hours postdose. Crushed ORF administration yielded reduced oxycodone Cmax and increased Tmax versus crushed OC and Oxy API. Peak effects for pharmacodynamic measures were delayed with ORF (1-2 hours) versus OC and Oxy API (0.5-1 hour). ODL, TDA, High VAS, and SDV Emax values were significantly lower (P ≤ .05) and some intranasal irritation ratings were greater for ORF versus OC and Oxy API. No significant or unexpected safety findings were observed. Compared with OC and Oxy API, intranasally administered ORF was associated with lower and delayed peak plasma concentrations, decreased drug-liking, and decreased intranasal tolerability. This suggests that ORF has a decreased potential for intranasal oxycodone abuse. There were no significant or unexpected safety findings. As is true for all abuse potential studies, epidemiological or other appropriate post-marketing studies are required to assess the impact of the reduction in intranasal oxycodone abuse potential observed in the present study on real-world patterns of ORF misuse, abuse, and diversion.

Influence of food on pharmacokinetics of zolpidem from fast dissolving sublingual zolpidem tartrate tablets.

Ingesting food can impact the pharmacokinetics of sedative-hypnotic drugs. A buffered zolpidem sublingual tablet (ZST) recently became available for the treatment of middle-of-the-night awakening. In this randomized, open-label, single-site study, the pharmacokinetic profile of ZST was evaluated when administered while fasting and following a standard high-fat meal (fed state). Healthy adults aged 18-64 years received a single morning dose of 3.5 mg ZST in the fed or fasting state. From 20 min to 3 h post-dose, zolpidem plasma levels were lower in the fed state compared to the fasting state. After 4 h post-dose (corresponding to "morning wake time"), higher zolpidem plasma levels were evident in the fed state. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values for the 0-8 h interval were 160 ng/mL h in the fed state and 203 ng/mL h in the fasting state (P < .001). In the fed versus fasting states, Cmax was 32.0 ng/mL versus 57.3 ng/mL (P < .001), respectively, and Tmax was 3.0 h versus 0.92 h (P < .001), respectively. Together these data suggest that administration of ZST in the fed state is not optimal for maximizing the likelihood of therapeutic benefit and minimizing the probability of residual sedation.

Attractiveness of reformulated OxyContin(R) tablets: assessing comparative preferences and tampering potential.

Reformulated OxyContin® (oxycodone HCl controlled-release or ORF) was developed as a tamper and abuse-deterrent product, to reduce the risk of product abuse, misuse and their consequences. This noninterventional single-session study asked participants who were medically-healthy recreational opioid users, aged 18 years and older, to consider how they would use commonly available supplies to tamper with placebo ORF and placebo original OxyContin (OC) tablets, and how they would assess the attractiveness of tampering and abusing ORF tablets, as compared with other opioid formulations. Participants provided information on past opioid use, and they assessed the properties of five nonhypothetical oxycodone products and two hypothetical oxycodone products. Participants provided feedback on tampering preferences, preferred tamper methods for each product, overall tampering potential and product preferences. We had 30 participants (27 males and 3 females; mean age 35 years, range 18-51) complete both the interview and tampering sessions. Participants judged OC as the most attractive, valuable, desirable and most likely to be tampered with, from among all opioid products studied. By contrast, they rated ORF as the least attractive, least valuable, least desirable, and least likely to be tampered with among all the nonhypothetical opioid products studied. These results suggested that recreational drug abusers view ORF tablets as tamper-deterrent products.

Pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety of intranasal administration of reformulated OxyContin(®) tablets compared with original OxyContin (®) tablets in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Reformulated OxyContin(®) (oxycodone-HCl controlled release) tablets (ORF) became available in the United States in August 2010. The original formulation of OxyContin(®) (oxycodone-HCl controlled release) tablets (OC) used a delivery system that did not provide inherent resistance to crushing and dissolving. The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety of finely crushed ORF tablets, coarsely crushed ORF tablets, and finely crushed OC tablets. METHODS: This randomized, single-blind, single-dose, single-center, six-sequence, triple-treatment, triple-period crossover study enrolled eligible healthy adults (aged 18-55 years inclusive). The study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety of intranasally administered ORF, both finely crushed and coarsely crushed, as well as finely crushed OC tablets. Plasma oxycodone concentrations were quantified and analyzed to determine the maximum observed plasma concentration (C max), time to maximum plasma concentration (t max), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from hour 0 to the last measurable plasma concentration (AUC(last)), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC(∞)). The abuse quotient (AQ), calculated as C(max)/t(max), served as an index of the average rate of increase in drug concentration from dosing to t max. Intranasal tolerability rating scales (discomfort, itching, burning, pain, runny nose, and stuffiness) and intranasal endoscopy were conducted. Safety assessments included adverse events, vital signs, pulse oximetry (SpO2), and electrocardiograms. RESULTS: Of 83 subjects screened and enrolled, 30 were randomized to period 1, with 1 subject subsequently discontinuing due to the subject's choice. Mean C max values for finely crushed ORF (17.1 ng/mL) and coarsely crushed ORF (15.5 ng/mL) were lower than that for finely crushed OC (22.2 ng/mL). Median t max for finely crushed OC (1.0 h) was shorter than that for either finely crushed ORF (2.0 h) or coarsely crushed ORF (3.0 h). Mean AQ values were approximately 66 and 80 % lower, respectively, for finely crushed ORF and coarsely crushed ORF than that for finely crushed OC. Finely crushed ORF, coarsely crushed ORF, and finely crushed OC demonstrated similar total oxycodone exposures (AUC(∞)). Insufflation of ORF produced greater nasal discomfort and stuffiness than finely crushed OC, although the latter produced higher runny nose scores. No significant difference was found in other nasal tolerability measures. The overall safety profile was as expected following opioid administration in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to OC, both finely and coarsely crushed ORF retained some control of oxycodone release. Reduced C(max) and increased t max for ORF resulted in lower AQ scores for ORF compared with OC. ORF was associated with greater intranasal irritation than OC. These data suggest that ORF has a lower intranasal abuse potential than OC.

Comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles of zolpidem buffered sublingual tablet and zolpidem oral immediate-release tablet: results from a single-center, single-dose, randomized, open-label crossover study in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: A zolpidem sublingual tablet (ZST) formulation was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat middle-of-the-night (MOTN) awakening with difficulty returning to sleep. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the zolpidem pharmacokinetic profiles of 3.5-mg ZST and 10-mg immediate-release (IR) oral zolpidem in healthy female and male adults. METHODS: This randomized, open-label crossover study compared the pharmacokinetic profile of ZST with that of IR oral zolpidem in healthy adults. RESULTS: The study enrolled 19 males and 14 females. After 3.5-mg ZST and 10-mg IR, respectively, mean zolpidem plasma concentrations at 15 minutes (22 vs 17 ng/mL, respectively, in females and 18 vs 10 ng/mL in males) and AUCs from zero to 15 minutes (2.3 vs 0.8 ng · h/mL in females and 1.6 vs 0.5 ng · h/mL in males) were substantially greater for ZST, despite the larger absolute IR dose. After 3.5-mg ZST and 10-mg IR, respectively, clearance was lower in females, even after correcting for body weight (2.63 vs 2.88 mL/min/kg in females and 3.63 vs 3.91 mL/min/kg in males). The lag time prior to the start of first-order absorption was notably shorter for ZST than IR in both males (8 vs 21 minutes) and females (5 vs 22 minutes). Both zolpidem formulations were generally well tolerated by both genders. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic exposure of zolpidem was higher in females for both formulations. Plasma levels and AUC were higher, and clearance was lower, in females with both zolpidem formulations. The initial rate of absorption was faster, and initial systemic exposure was greater, with ZST compared with oral IR.