Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
JAMA ; 327(15): 1456-1468, 2022 04 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35381069

RESUMO

Importance: Corticosteroids improve strength and function in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. However, there is uncertainty regarding the optimum regimen and dosage. Objective: To compare efficacy and adverse effects of the 3 most frequently prescribed corticosteroid regimens in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Double-blind, parallel-group randomized clinical trial including 196 boys aged 4 to 7 years with Duchenne muscular dystrophy who had not previously been treated with corticosteroids; enrollment occurred between January 30, 2013, and September 17, 2016, at 32 clinic sites in 5 countries. The boys were assessed for 3 years (last participant visit on October 16, 2019). Interventions: Participants were randomized to daily prednisone (0.75 mg/kg) (n = 65), daily deflazacort (0.90 mg/kg) (n = 65), or intermittent prednisone (0.75 mg/kg for 10 days on and then 10 days off) (n = 66). Main Outcomes and Measures: The global primary outcome comprised 3 end points: rise from the floor velocity (in rise/seconds), forced vital capacity (in liters), and participant or parent global satisfaction with treatment measured by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM; score range, 0 to 100), each averaged across all study visits after baseline. Pairwise group comparisons used a Bonferroni-adjusted significance level of .017. Results: Among the 196 boys randomized (mean age, 5.8 years [SD, 1.0 years]), 164 (84%) completed the trial. Both daily prednisone and daily deflazacort were more effective than intermittent prednisone for the primary outcome (P < .001 for daily prednisone vs intermittent prednisone using a global test; P = .017 for daily deflazacort vs intermittent prednisone using a global test) and the daily regimens did not differ significantly (P = .38 for daily prednisone vs daily deflazacort using a global test). The between-group differences were principally attributable to rise from the floor velocity (0.06 rise/s [98.3% CI, 0.03 to 0.08 rise/s] for daily prednisone vs intermittent prednisone [P = .003]; 0.06 rise/s [98.3% CI, 0.03 to 0.09 rise/s] for daily deflazacort vs intermittent prednisone [P = .017]; and -0.004 rise/s [98.3% CI, -0.03 to 0.02 rise/s] for daily prednisone vs daily deflazacort [P = .75]). The pairwise comparisons for forced vital capacity and TSQM global satisfaction subscale score were not statistically significant. The most common adverse events were abnormal behavior (22 [34%] in the daily prednisone group, 25 [38%] in the daily deflazacort group, and 24 [36%] in the intermittent prednisone group), upper respiratory tract infection (24 [37%], 19 [29%], and 24 [36%], respectively), and vomiting (19 [29%], 17 [26%], and 15 [23%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, treatment with daily prednisone or daily deflazacort, compared with intermittent prednisone alternating 10 days on and 10 days off, resulted in significant improvement over 3 years in a composite outcome comprising measures of motor function, pulmonary function, and satisfaction with treatment; there was no significant difference between the 2 daily corticosteroid regimens. The findings support the use of a daily corticosteroid regimen over the intermittent prednisone regimen tested in this study as initial treatment for boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01603407.


Assuntos
Glucocorticoides , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne , Prednisona , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/tratamento farmacológico , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Prednisona/efeitos adversos , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Pregnenodionas/efeitos adversos
2.
Neurology ; 93(17): e1597-e1604, 2019 10 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31594858

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We performed a prospective, cross-sectional analysis of neurodevelopmental concerns and psychosocial adjustment in relation to DMD mutations in young steroid-naive boys with dystrophinopathy. METHODS: We evaluated 196 steroid-naive boys with dystrophinopathy who were enrolled in the Finding the Optimal Regimen for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy trial. The neurodevelopmental concerns and psychosocial adjustment challenges were analyzed in relation to DMD mutation. A parent or legal guardian reported neurodevelopmental concerns in 4 domains (speech, learning and attentional difficulties, and autism spectrum disorder [ASD]) and completed the Personal Adjustment and Role Skills Scale to assess psychosocial adjustment. We also assessed whether boys of DMD carrier mothers were more vulnerable to speech delay and learning difficulties. RESULTS: We found that 39% of boys were reported to have speech delay with a mean age of speaking at 28 months (range 7-66 months). Learning difficulties were reported in 28% of participants. Inattentive-overactive and oppositional-defiant behavior was reported in 8% and 5% of participants, respectively. Psychosocial adjustment challenges were reported in 4% of participants. An ASD diagnosis was reported in 3 participants. Speech delay and learning difficulties were more common in boys with mutations downstream of DMD exon 45. Neurodevelopmental concerns were not associated with DMD deletion, duplication, or point mutation subtype. Boys of DMD carrier mothers did not have longer speech delay or more learning difficulties. CONCLUSION: Our data support evidence for a relationship between neurodevelopmental concerns and DMD mutation. A longitudinal assessment of developmental trajectory is necessary to evaluate how specific DMD mutations affect brain function.


Assuntos
Distrofina/genética , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/complicações , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/genética , Mutação , Transtornos do Neurodesenvolvimento/complicações , Transtornos do Neurodesenvolvimento/genética , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Masculino , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/tratamento farmacológico , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/psicologia , Transtornos do Neurodesenvolvimento/psicologia , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapêutico , Esteroides/uso terapêutico
3.
Trials ; 19(1): 291, 2018 May 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29793540

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Trials in rare diseases have many challenges, among which are the need to set up multiple sites in different countries to achieve recruitment targets and the divergent landscape of clinical trial regulations in those countries. Over the past years, there have been initiatives to facilitate the process of international study set-up, but the fruits of these deliberations require time to be operationally in place. FOR-DMD (Finding the Optimum Steroid Regimen for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy) is an academic-led clinical trial which aims to find the optimum steroid regimen for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for 5 years (July 2010 to June 2015), anticipating that all sites (40 across the USA, Canada, the UK, Germany and Italy) would be open to recruitment from July 2011. However, study start-up was significantly delayed and recruitment did not start until January 2013. METHOD: The FOR-DMD study is used as an example to identify systematic problems in the set-up of international, multi-centre clinical trials. The full timeline of the FOR-DMD study, from funding approval to site activation, was collated and reviewed. Systematic issues were identified and grouped into (1) study set-up, e.g. drug procurement; (2) country set-up, e.g. competent authority applications; and (3) site set-up, e.g. contracts, to identify the main causes of delay and suggest areas where anticipatory action could overcome these obstacles in future studies. RESULTS: Time from the first contact to site activation across countries ranged from 6 to 24 months. Reasons of delay were universal (sponsor agreement, drug procurement, budgetary constraints), country specific (complexity and diversity of regulatory processes, indemnity requirements) and site specific (contracting and approvals). The main identified obstacles included (1) issues related to drug supply, (2) NIH requirements regarding contracting with non-US sites, (3) differing regulatory requirements in the five participating countries, (4) lack of national harmonisation with contracting and the requirement to negotiate terms and contract individually with each site and (5) diversity of languages needed for study materials. Additionally, as with many academic-led studies, the FOR-DMD study did not have access to the infrastructure and expertise that a contracted research organisation could provide, organisations often employed in pharmaceutical-sponsored studies. This delay impacted recruitment, challenged the clinical relevance of the study outcomes and potentially delayed the delivery of the best treatment to patients. CONCLUSION: Based on the FOR-DMD experience, and as an interim solution, we have devised a checklist of steps to not only anticipate and minimise delays in academic international trial initiation but also identify obstacles that will require a concerted effort on the part of many stakeholders to mitigate.


Assuntos
Lista de Checagem , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/métodos , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Raras/tratamento farmacológico , Projetos de Pesquisa , Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Orçamentos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/economia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Contratos , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/economia , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/diagnóstico , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/economia , Seleção de Pacientes , Doenças Raras/diagnóstico , Doenças Raras/economia , Projetos de Pesquisa/legislação & jurisprudência , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Esteroides/provisão & distribuição , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 58: 34-39, 2017 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28450193

RESUMO

Despite corticosteroids being the only treatment documented to improve strength and function in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) corticosteroid prescription is inconsistent and in some countries, corticosteroids are not prescribed. We are conducting a clinical trial that (1) compares the 3 most frequently prescribed corticosteroid regimes; (2) standardizes treatment of DMD complications; and (3) standardizes prevention of corticosteroid side effects. Investigators at 38 sites in 5 countries plan to recruit 300 boys aged 4-7 who are randomly assigned to one of three regimens: daily prednisone; daily deflazacort; or intermittent prednisone (10days on/10days off). Boys are followed for a minimum of 3years to assess the relative effectiveness and adverse event profiles of the different regimens. The primary outcome is a 3-dimensional variable consisting of log-transformed time to rise from the floor, forced vital capacity, and subject/parent satisfaction with treatment, each averaged over all post-baseline visits. The study protocol includes evidence- and consensus-based treatment of DMD complications and of corticosteroid side effects. This study seeks to establish a standard corticosteroid regimen for DMD. Since all new interventions for DMD are being developed as add-on therapies to corticosteroids, defining the optimum regimen is of importance for all new treatments.


Assuntos
Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/tratamento farmacológico , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Pregnenodionas/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Avaliação da Deficiência , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Testes de Função Cardíaca , Humanos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Força Muscular , Satisfação do Paciente , Prednisona/efeitos adversos , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Pregnenodionas/administração & dosagem , Pregnenodionas/efeitos adversos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Projetos de Pesquisa , Capacidade Vital
5.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 24(5): 916-21, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12748094

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fabry disease (FD) is an inborn error of glycosphingolipid metabolism. To date, no specific neuroimaging features have been elucidated to help in making the diagnosis of this disorder. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the finding of T1 shortening in the lateral pulvinar is a useful finding in the imaging diagnosis of FD and to deduce the relationship of this finding to the pathophysiology of the disease. METHODS: We studied T1- and T2-weighted images obtained in ten patients (nine male and one female) with FD with an age range of 19-59 years. The images were examined for anatomic aberrations and areas of abnormal signal intensity (SI) in both gray matter and white matter. The SI of deep gray matter was evaluated qualitatively and semiquantitatively, relative to the SI of CSF or the genu of the corpus callosum. Gradient echo MR images and axial noncontrast CT images were available for one patient. RESULTS: Seven of 10 patients showed small areas of T2 prolongation in the white matter of the cerebral hemispheres. Despite the known propensity for vascular disease in these patients, only one had cortical infarction. Bilateral T1 shortening in the lateral pulvinar was recognized in at least seven patients, all over the age of 30 years, who also had small areas of T2 prolongation in the white matter. CT and gradient echo images in one patient revealed no evidence of calcification or metallic deposits in the pulvinar. CONCLUSION: Bilateral T1 shortening in the lateral pulvinar is a common finding in FD and may be useful in suggesting this diagnosis.


Assuntos
Doença de Fabry/diagnóstico , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Pulvinar/patologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
6.
J Genet Couns ; 11(2): 121-46, 2002 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12735292

RESUMO

The objective of this document is to provide health care professionals with recommendations for genetic counseling and testing of individuals with a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of Fabry disease, with a family history of Fabry disease, and those identified as female carriers of Fabry disease. These recommendations are the opinions of a multicenter working group of genetic counselors, medical geneticists, and other health professionals with expertise in Fabry disease counseling, as well as an individual with Fabry disease who is a founder of a Fabry disease patient advocacy group in the United States. The recommendations are U.S. Preventive Task Force Class III, and they are based on clinical experience, a review of pertinent English-language articles, and reports of expert committees. This document reviews the genetics of Fabry disease, the indications for genetic testing and interpretation of results, psychosocial considerations, and references for professional and patient resources. These recommendations should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of management, nor does use of such recommendations guarantee a particular outcome. The professional judgment of a healthcare provider, familiar with the facts and circumstances of a specific case, will always supersede these recommendations.


Assuntos
Doença de Fabry/genética , Aconselhamento Genético/normas , Adulto , Doença de Fabry/diagnóstico , Feminino , Testes Genéticos/normas , Heterozigoto , Humanos , Menores de Idade , Defesa do Paciente , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA