RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic Associated Diarrhoea (AAD) and Clostridioides Difficile Infection (CDI) are of major concern in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. METHODS: A multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (the ECLISP) trial, was conducted in three tertiary spinal cord injury centre in the UK to assess the efficacy of consuming a probiotic beverage containing at least 6.5 × 109 live Lactobacillus casei Shirota (LcS) in preventing AAD and CDI and in patients with SCI and to determine whether proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and under nutrition-risk are risk factors for AAD/CDI. LcS or placebo was given once daily for the duration of an antibiotic course and continued for 7 days thereafter. Follow up was set at 7 and 30 days after the antibiotic course finished. The primary outcome was occurrence of AAD up to 30 days after finishing LcS/placebo. This trial is completed and registered (ISRCTN:13119162). FINDINGS: Between November 2014, and November 2019, 359 consenting adult SCI patients (median age: 53.3; range: 18-88 years), from 3 SCI centres responsible for providing approximate 45-50% of UK SCI service, with a requirement for antibiotics due to infection were randomly allocated to receive LcS (n = 181) or placebo (n = 178). Overall, no statistical difference was seen in occurrence of the primary outcomes of AAD at 30 days follow up (45% v 42.1%, RR: 1.071, 0.8-1.4, p = 0.639). In the secondary analyses LcS was associated with a lower risk of AAD at 7 (19% v 35.7%, RR: 0.53, 0.29-0.99, p = 0.040) and 30 days follow up (28% v 52.2%, RR: 0.54, 0.32-0.91, p = 0.015) in the participants who took PPI regularly. Under nutrition-risk was associated with an increased risk of AAD at 7 (RR: 1.76, 1.28-2.44) and 30 days follow up (RR: 1.69, 1.30-2.0). No intervention-related adverse events were reported during the study. INTERPRETATION: The present study indicates that LcS could not prevent AAD/CDI in unselected SCI patients. LcS might have the potential to prevent AAD in the higher risk group of patients on regular PPI. Confirmatory studies are needed to allow translation of this apparent therapeutic success into improved clinical outcomes. FUNDING: Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To estimate UK prevalence and incidence of clinically significant carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), and to determine epidemiological characteristics, laboratory methods and infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in acute care facilities. METHODS: A 6 month survey was undertaken in November 2013-April 2014 in 21 sentinel UK laboratories as part of the European Survey on Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE) project. Up to 10 consecutive, non-duplicate, clinically significant and carbapenem-non-susceptible isolates of Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae were submitted to a reference laboratory. Participants answered a questionnaire on relevant laboratory methods and IPC measures. RESULTS: Of 102 isolates submitted, 89 (87%) were non-susceptible to ≥1 carbapenem, and 32 (36%) were confirmed as CPE. CPE were resistant to most antibiotics, except colistin (94% susceptible), gentamicin (63%), tigecycline (56%) and amikacin (53%). The prevalence of CPE was 0.02% (95% CIâ=â0.01%-0.03%). The incidence of CPE was 0.007 per 1000 patient-days (95% CIâ=â0.005-0.010), with north-west England the most affected region at 0.033 per 1000 patient-days (95% CIâ=â0.012-0.072). Recommended IPC measures were not universally followed, notably screening high-risk patients on admission (applied by 86%), using a CPE 'flag' on patients' records (70%) and alerting neighbouring hospitals when transferring affected patients (only 30%). Most sites (86%) had a laboratory protocol for CPE screening, most frequently using chromogenic agar (52%) or MacConkey/CLED agars with carbapenem discs (38%). CONCLUSIONS: The UK prevalence and incidence of clinically significant CPE is currently low, but these MDR bacteria affect most UK regions. Improved IPC measures, vigilance and monitoring are required.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , beta-Lactamases/genética , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Escherichia coli/genética , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Controle de Infecções , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Identification of the causative organisms in suspected bacterial keratitis traditionally involves collecting multiple corneal scrapes, which are plated directly onto different solid agar culture media. Difficulties have been reported with this practice, so the development of a simpler diagnostic method in suspected bacterial keratitis would be useful. It is unclear whether a single corneal scrape sent to the microbiology laboratory in a liquid transport culture medium (indirect method) is as reliable for the diagnosis of bacterial keratitis as inoculation of multiple scrapes directly onto agar plates (direct method). To investigate this, bacterial recovery was assessed following transfer and transport of different concentrations and types of bacteria from an artificially contaminated surgical blade into brain heart infusion (BHI). Bacterial recovery rates between the proposed (indirect) and standard (direct) method were then compared after the in vitro inoculation of pig corneas and following specimen collection in patients with presumed bacterial ulcerative keratitis. Recovery of bacteria from contaminated surgical blades was found to be the same from both solid and liquid culture media. There was no significant difference in the numbers of positive cultures from solid (direct) and liquid (indirect) culture media, both in the experimental pig cornea inoculation study (P = 0.34) and in experiments with patients with clinical infections (P = 0.4), with an 85.2% agreement between methods (kappa = 0.61, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, therefore, the collection of two corneal scrapes, one used for Gram staining and the other transported in BHI followed by plating and subculturing in an enrichment medium, provides a simple method for the investigation of presumed bacterial keratitis.