Value of sarcopenia in the resection of colorectal liver metastases-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Sarcopenia is defined as a decline in muscle function as well as muscle mass. Sarcopenia itself and sarcopenic obesity, defined as sarcopenia in obese patients, have been used as surrogates for a worse prognosis in colorectal cancer. This review aims to determine if there is evidence for sarcopenia as a prognostic parameter in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and CINAHL databases were searched for articles that were selected in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A random effects meta-analysis was conducted. Results: After eliminating duplicates and screening abstracts (n = 111), 949 studies were screened, and 33 publications met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 15 were selected after close paper review, and 10 were incorporated into the meta-analysis, which comprised 825 patients. No significant influence of sarcopenia for OS (odds ratio (OR), 2.802 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.094-1.11); p = 0.4) or DFS (OR, 1.203 (95% CI, 1.162-1.208); p = 0.5) was found, although a trend was defined toward sarcopenia. Sarcopenia significantly influenced postoperative complication rates (OR, 7.905 (95% CI, 1.876-3.32); p = 0.001) in two studies where data were available. Conclusion: Existing evidence on the influence of sarcopenia on postoperative OS as well as DFS in patients undergoing resection for CRLM exists. We were not able to confirm that sarcopenic patients have a significantly worse OS and DFS in our analysis, although a trend toward this hypothesis was visible. Sarcopenia seems to influence complication rates but prospective studies are needed.

Short-term preoperative drainage is associated with improved postoperative outcomes compared to that of long-term biliary drainage in pancreatic surgery.

PURPOSE: The treatment of choice for patients presenting with obstructive cholestasis due to periampullary carcinoma is oncologic resection without preoperative biliary drainage (PBD). However, resection without PBD becomes virtually impossible in patients with obstructive cholangitis or severely impaired liver cell function. The appropriate duration of drainage by PBD has not yet been defined for these patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 170 patients scheduled for pancreatic resection following biliary drainage between January 2012 and June 2018 at the University Hospital Dresden in Germany. All patients were deemed eligible for inclusion, regardless of the underlying disease entity. The primary endpoint analysis was defined as the overall morbidity (according to the Clavien-Dindo classification). Secondary endpoints were the in-hospital mortality and malignancy adjusted overall and recurrence-free survival rates. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were included, of which 45 (26.5%) and 125 (73.5%) were assigned to the short-term (< 4 weeks) and long-term (≥ 4 weeks) preoperative drainage groups, respectively. Surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo classification > 2) occurred in 80 (47.1%) patients, with significantly fewer complications observed in the short-term drainage group (31.1% vs. 52%; p = 0.02). We found that long-term preoperative drainage (unadjusted OR, 3.386; 95% CI, 1.507-7.606; p < 0.01) and periampullary carcinoma (unadjusted OR, 5.519; 95% CI, 1.722-17.685; p-value < 0.01) were independent risk factors for postoperative morbidity, based on the results of a multivariate regression model. The adjusted overall and recurrence-free survival did not differ between the groups (p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: PBD in patients scheduled for pancreatic surgery is associated with substantial perioperative morbidity. Our results indicate that patients who have undergone PBD should be operated on within 4 weeks after drainage.

Cardiovascular outcomes after simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation compared to kidney transplantation alone: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease due to arteriosclerosis is the leading cause of death in type 1 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPKT) compared to kidney transplantation alone (KTA) on survival, cardiovascular function and metabolic outcomes. METHODS: A cohort of 127 insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients with ESRD who underwent either SPKT (n = 100) or KTA (n = 27) between 1998 and 2019 at the University Hospital of Leipzig were retrospectively evaluated with regard to cardiovascular and metabolic function/outcomes as well as survival rates. An additional focus was placed on the echocardiographic assessment of systolic and diastolic cardiac function pretransplant and during follow-up. To avoid selection bias, a 2:1 propensity score matching analysis (PSM) was performed. RESULTS: After PSM, a total of 63 patients were identified; 42 patients underwent SPKT, and 21 patients received KTA. Compared with the KTA group, SPKT recipients received organs from younger donors (p < 0.05) and donor BMI was higher (p = 0.09). The risk factor-adjusted hazard ratio for mortality in SPKT recipients compared to KTA recipients was 0.63 (CI: 0.49-0.89; P < 0.05). The incidence of pretransplant cardiovascular events was higher in the KTA group (KTA: n = 10, 47% versus SPKT: n = 10, 23%; p = 0.06), but this difference was not significant. However, the occurrence of cardiovascular events in the SPKT group (n = 3, 7%) was significantly diminished after transplantation compared to that in the KTA recipients (n = 6, 28%; p = 0.02). The cardiovascular death rate was higher in KTA recipients (19%) than in SPK recipients with functioning grafts (3.3%) and comparable to that in patients with failed SPKT (16.7%) (p = 0.16). In line with pretransplant values, SPKT recipients showed significant improvements in Hb1ac values (p = 0.001), blood pressure control (p = < 0.005) and low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein (LDL/HDL) ratio (p = < 0.005) 5 years after transplantation. With regard to echocardiographic assessment, SPKT recipients showed significant improvements in left ventricular systolic parameters during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Normoglycaemia and improvement of lipid metabolism and blood pressure control achieved by successful SPKT are associated with beneficial effects on survival, cardiovascular outcomes and systolic left ventricular cardiac function. Future studies with larger samples are needed to make predictions regarding cardiovascular events and graft survival.

Pulmonary metastasectomy for metastasized hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection and liver transplantation: a single center experience.

BACKGROUND: The role of surgery in the treatment of metastasized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains uncertain. We here report our single centre experience with pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for metachronous HCC metastases to the lung following curative liver resection (LR) and liver transplantation (LT), respectively. METHODS: Of 270 patients with HCC being treated by LR or LT at the University Hospital of Leipzig between January 1996 and July 2014, PM was performed in the follow up of 10 patients because of metachronous pulmonary HCC metastases. We retrospectively analyzed demographic and clinicopathological factors as well as the outcome after primary and secondary tumor treatment in these patients. RESULTS: Following LR/LT and metastasectomy, respectively, mean overall survival was 4.58 ± 0.84 years and 2.4 ±â€Š0.69 years. Postoperative morbidity after primary and secondary tumor treatment was 30 % and 20 %, respectively. Perioperative 30-day mortality was 0 %. Univariate analysis suggest tumor grading (p < 0.05), and a disease free-intervall > 1 year (p = 0.02) as significant prognostic parameters for survival in our collective. CONCLUSION: PM can be performed safely with a reasonable morbidity even in immunosuppressed patients after LT. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether PM can increase long-term survival in selected patients with resectable metastases and represents an alternative or additive treatment modality to the protein kinase inhibitor sorafenib.

Risk Stratification of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Patients Treated by Open Surgical Repair.

OBJECTIVE: The present study tested scoring models for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) in patients treated by open surgical repair (OSR). Scores were tested in a European population to validate their applicability for predicting outcome. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2013, 92 patients with rAAAs underwent OSR and medical records were reviewed retrospectively. The Edinburgh Rupture Aneurysm Score (ERAS), Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) rAAA risk score, Hardman Index, and Glasgow Aneurysm Score (GAS) were calculated and analyzed according to in hospital mortality. The discriminatory power and calibration of all models were assessed by applying the receiver operating characteristic and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test χ(2). RESULTS: An ERAS ≤ 1 (n = 55), 2 (n = 15) and 3 (n = 16) was associated with a mortality of 27%, 47%, and 69%, respectively. The calibration was the best of all tested scores (χ(2) = 0.44; p = .81) and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.71 (95% CI 0.6-0.82; p = .001). A VSGNE rAAA risk score = 0 (n = 19), 1 (n = 15), 2 (n = 19), 3 (n = 25), and ≥ 4 (n = 9) was associated with a mortality of 11%, 20%, 32%, 72%, and 56%, and an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI 0.66-0.87; p = .001). The calibration was reduced (χ(2) = 6.9; p = .08). The GAS and Hardman Index increased stepwise with increasing in hospital mortality, but were inferior to ERAS and the VSGNE rAAA risk score. The Hardman Index showed the smallest AUC (0.68; 95% CI 0.56-0.80; p = .011) and demonstrated a lack of fit (χ(2) = 8.2; p = .04). The GAS showed good discrimination (AUC = 0.75; 95% CI 0.64-0.85; p < .001) and calibration (χ(2) = 0.85; p = .66); however, the parametric scale of GAS limits its use to classifying patients according to their risk. CONCLUSION: The present study revealed remarkable differences in survival between subgroups (10-70%) and underscores the need for risk stratification. The ERAS was favorable with striking ease of use and high accuracy in predicting outcome.

[Clinical impact of infections with carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae in liver transplant recipients]. / Klinische Bedeutung von Infektionen durch Carbapenem-resistente Enterobakterien bei Lebertransplantierten.

Infections with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are an emerging cause of morbidity and mortality among liver transplant recipients (LTR) worldwide, particularly Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing organisms. Approximately 3 - 13 % of solid organ transplant recipients in CRE-endemic areas develop CRE infections, and the infection site correlates with the transplanted organ. The cumulative 30-day mortality rate of LTR infected with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae is 36 %, and the 180-day mortality rate is 58 %. Awareness of the high vulnerability of LTR to fatal bacterial infection leads to the more frequent use of ultrabroad-spectrum empirical antibiotic therapy, which further contributes to the selection of extreme drug resistance. Moreover, it comprises a relevant risk of failure to initiate adequate empirical treatment due to the fact that culture-based techniques used to identify CRE imply a 48- to 72-hour delay from blood culture collection until administration of the targeted therapy. This vicious circle is difficult to avoid and leads to increased clinical intricacy and narrowed antimicrobial therapeutic options. Because available options are extremely limited, infection prevention measures have gained outstanding importance, particularly in the phase after liver transplant requiring intense immunosuppression early on. Improving clinical outcomes is a major challenge and involves a multi-targeted approach combining strictly applied hygiene measures, active surveillance tests, the use of modern, time-saving methods of molecular biology, and enforced antibiotic stewardship. This article reviews the current literature regarding the incidence and outcome of CRE infections in LTR, and it summarises current preventive and therapeutic recommendations to minimise the threat by CRE in real-life clinical transplant settings.

Management of urologic complications in renal transplantation: a single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Ureterovesical complications subsequent to renal transplantation are associated with a high morbidity leading to graft loss or even death. In the present study, the management of these complications by using interventional and surgical procedures (native pyeloureterostomy [NPUS]/ureteroureterostomy [NUU] vs ureteroneocystostomy [UNC]) was evaluated retrospectively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1994 and 2012, a total of 780 kidney transplantations (690 deceased and 90 living donors) were performed at our institution. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data from patients with urologic complications were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Fifty patients (6.4%) exhibited ureterovesical complications, and 18 patients (36%) were operated on immediately. In 32 (64%) of 50 patients, an interventional procedure was initially performed, with 21 patients (66%) undergoing operation due to therapy failure. NPUS/NUU and UNC were performed in 26 (66.6%) and 13 (33.3%) patients, respectively. Indications for an operation were ureteral stenosis in 12 patients (30.8%), ureteral necrosis and urine leakage in 19 patients (48.7%), and symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux in 8 patients (20.5%). Long-term results were comparable between all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical revision of ureteral complications should be the standard therapy. NPUS/NUU, UNC, and the successful interventional procedures did not differ significantly in terms of long-term results.

Mid- and long-term results after replacement of infected peripheral vascular prosthetic grafts with biosynthetic collagen prosthesis.

AIM: We assess mid- and long-term outcome after prosthetic graft replacement with biosynthetic collagen prosthesis (Omniflow II®) in the presence of graft infection. METHODS: Between December 2010 and January 2012, an analysis of 9 consecutive patients was performed, who underwent replacement of an infected peripheral graft with a biosynthetic prosthesis. Morbidity, in-hospital mortality, primary and secondary patency were analyzed. FDG-PET was performed to diagnose graft infection, and exclude reinfection at long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Graft infection occurred after a median of 12 (range 3-97) months after the initial procedure. Replacement surgery was performed successfully in all 9 patients without intraoperative complications. Microbiological cultures revealed pathogenic infection in 7 cases. In 2 patients, no pathogen was isolated. The morbidity rate was 55.5% with no in-hospital deaths. Early and late bypass occlusion occurred in 2 patients. One high above-knee amputation was performed due to patient deterioration. The median length of stay was 23 (range 12-122) days and after graft replacement 13 (range 10-62) days. The median time of follow up was 23 (range 8-25) months. Primary and secondary patency rates were 66.6% and 78% at 19 months, respectively. FDG-PET was performed in 6 (85.5%) patients after a median follow up period of 19 (range 3-23) months, and excluded graft reinfection in all patients. CONCLUSION: Replacement of infected peripheral prosthetic grafts with the prosthesis (Omniflow II®) has encouraging results. The collagen prosthesis appears to be a promising alternative with a low reocclusion rate and no reinfection.

Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients without cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Data on liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without cirrhosis are sparse. The present study was conducted to evaluate the indications and results of liver resection for HCC with regard to safety and efficacy. METHODS: Data for patients who had liver resection for HCC without cirrhosis between January 1996 and March 2011 were retrieved retrospectively using a prospective database containing information on all patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC. Patient and tumour characteristics were analysed for influence on overall and disease-free survival to identify prognostic factors by univariable and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates after resection with curative intent for HCC without cirrhosis were 84, 66 and 50 per cent respectively. Disease-free survival rates were 69, 53 and 42 per cent respectively. The 90-day mortality rate was 4·5 per cent (5 of 110 patients). Surgical radicality and growth pattern of the tumour were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Disease-free survival after resection with curative intent was independently affected by growth pattern and by the number and size of tumour nodules. CONCLUSION: Liver resection for HCC without cirrhosis carries a low perioperative risk and excellent long-term outcome if radical resection is achieved.