Disposition of Oral Nalbuphine and Its Metabolites in Healthy Subjects and Subjects with Hepatic Impairment: Preliminary Modeling Results Using a Continuous Intestinal Absorption Model with Enterohepatic Recirculation.

Nalbuphine (NAL) is a mixed κ-agonist/µ-antagonist opioid with extensive first-pass metabolism. A phase 1 open-label study was conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of NAL and select metabolites following single oral doses of NAL extended-release tablets in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A, B, and C, respectively) compared to healthy matched subjects. NAL exposures were similar for subjects with mild hepatic impairment as compared to healthy subjects and nearly three-fold and eight-fold higher in subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment, respectively. Datasets obtained for healthy, moderate, and severe hepatic impaired groups were modeled with a mechanistic model that incorporated NAL hepatic metabolism and enterohepatic recycling of NAL and its glucuronidated metabolites. The mechanistic model includes a continuous intestinal absorption model linked to semi-physiological liver-gallbladder-compartmental PK models based on partial differential equations (termed the PDE-EHR model). In vitro studies indicated that cytochromes P450 CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 are the major CYPs involved in NAL oxidation, with glucuronidation mainly catalyzed by UGT1A8 and UGT2B7 isozymes. Complex formation and elimination kinetics of NAL and four main metabolites was well predicted by PDE-EHR. The model is expected to improve predictions of drug interactions and complex drug disposition.

A Continuous Intestinal Absorption Model to Predict Drug Enterohepatic Recirculation in Healthy Humans: Nalbuphine as a Model Substrate.

Nalbuphine (NAL) is a κ-agonist/µ-antagonist opioid being developed as an oral extended formulation (ER) for the treatment of chronic cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and itch in prurigo nodularis. NAL is extensively glucuronidated and likely undergoes enterohepatic recirculation (EHR). The purpose of this work is to develop pharmacokinetic models for NAL absorption and enterohepatic recirculation (EHR). Clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) data sets in healthy subjects from three trials that included IV, oral solution, and ER tablets in fed and fasted state and two published trials were used to parametrize a novel partial differential equation (PDE)-based model, termed "PDE-EHR" model. Experimental inputs included in vitro dissolution and permeability data. The model incorporates a continuous intestinal absorption framework, explicit liver and gall bladder compartments, and compartments for systemic drug disposition. The model was fully PDE-based with well-stirred compartments achieved by rapid diffusion. The PDE-EHR model accurately reproduces NAL concentration-time profiles for all clinical data sets. NAL disposition simulations required inclusion of both parent and glucuronide recirculation. Inclusion of intestinal P-glycoprotein efflux in the simulations suggests that NAL is not expected to be a victim or perpetrator of P-glycoprotein-mediated drug interactions. The PDE-EHR model is a novel tool to predict EHR and food/formulation effects on drug PK. The results strongly suggest that even intravenous dosing studies be conducted in fasted subjects when EHR is suspected. The modeling effort is expected to aid in improved prediction of dosing regimens and drug disposition in patient populations.

A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model evaluating efficacy of nalbuphine extended-release in patients with prurigo nodularis.

AIMS: Population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) models were used to describe the exposure-response (E-R) relationship between nalbuphine exposure and two widely used rating scales for itch: the Numerical Rating Scale for the subject's 'average'; itch experience (NRS-AV) and the Worst Itch (WI-NRS), with 24-h recall. Simulations based on the model E-R relationship were used to support dose selection for Phase 3 clinical trials and were evaluated with a target of reducing the 7-day average of the 24-h WI-NRS by at least 30% from baseline in most of the analysis population. METHODS: Data from two clinical trials (NCT02373215: 9 healthy subjects; NCT02174419: 62 subjects with PN), in patients with prurigo nodularis (PN) with moderate to severe itch who received treatment with either of two doses of nalbuphine extended release (ER) or placebo, were used for the analysis. A two-compartment PK model with serial zero and first-order oral absorption was used to describe drug exposure. A maximum effect ( E max ) model with a placebo effect was used to model the itch response endpoints (NRS-AV, WI-NRS). RESULTS: The PK-PD model predicted the exposure-related reduction in both NRS-AV and WI-NRS over time with approximately 63% and 27% of E max , respectively. Exposures associated with 80% of E max were achieved in about 78% of the patients at 162 mg, twice daily (BID), compared to 35% at 81 mg BID. CONCLUSION: Simulated dose response indicated that 108 and 162 mg BID doses result in the highest proportion of patients achieving at least a 30% reduction in NRS-AV and WI-NRS, respectively.

Pharmacokinetics of nalbuphine hydrochloride extended release tablets in hemodialysis patients with exploratory effect on pruritus.

BACKGROUND: Uremic pruritus is a common and deleterious condition among hemodialysis (HD) patients. Central gating of µ/κ opiate circuitry plays an important role in mediating and countering pruritogenic sensation. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of the mixed µ-antagonist/κ-agonist nalbuphine, administered orally as nalbuphine HCl extended release (ER) tablets in HD patients, and explore its effect on pruritus. METHODS: In this open-label multiple escalating dose study, 15 HD patients with pruritus and 9 matched healthy subjects were enrolled. Nalbuphine HCl ER dose was escalated from 30 mg QD to 240 mg BID over 15 days. A full PK profile was obtained under dialysis and non-dialysis conditions as a function of dose. Clearance during dialysis was determined by sampling dialysate and arterial/venous blood during dialysis. Pruritus severity was assessed twice daily using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Safety monitoring included extensive monitoring of EKG, blood pressure, and pulse oximetry. RESULTS: In HD patients, nalbuphine concentration peaked within 4-9 hours and attained steady state within 2-3 days, with no significant accumulation. Mean half-life was 14.2 hours, mean Cmax and AUCtau ranged between 13 and 83 ng/mL and 118 and 761 ng∙h/mL, respectively, with exposure increasing in a nearly dose-proportional fashion. Exposure in HD patients was about 2-fold higher than in healthy subjects. There was no meaningful difference between exposure on dialysis and non-dialysis days with 1% or less of the dose removed by dialysis. Nalbuphine suppressed itch in a dose-dependent manner, reducing mean VAS score from 4.0 to 1.2 at 180 mg and 0.4 at 240 mg. CONCLUSIONS: Nalbuphine HCl ER tablets can be safely administered to HD patients without dose adjustment up to 240 mg BID and may hold promise in treating uremic pruritus.

A0001 in Friedreich ataxia: biochemical characterization and effects in a clinical trial.

This study tested the ability of A0001 (α-tocopheryl quinone; EPI-A0001), a potent antioxidant, to improve in vitro measures, glucose metabolism, and neurological function in Friedreich ataxia. We used an in vitro study of protection from cell toxicity followed by a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 2 doses of A0001 in 31 adults with Friedreich ataxia. The primary clinical trial outcome was the Disposition Index, a measure of diabetic tendency, from a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test, evaluated 4 weeks into therapy. Secondary neurologic measures included the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale. A0001 potently inhibited cell death in Friedreich ataxia models in vitro. For the clinical trial, mean guanine-adenine-adenine repeat length was 699, and mean age was 31 years. Four weeks after treatment initiation, differences in changes in the Disposition Index between subjects treated with A0001 and placebo were not statistically significant. In contrast, a dose-dependent improvement in the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale score was observed. Patients on placebo improved 2.0 rating scale points, whereas patients on low-dose A0001 improved by 4.9 points (P = .04) and patients on a high dose improved by 6.1 points (P < .01). Although A0001 did not alter the Disposition Index, it caused a dose-dependent improvement in neurologic function, as measured by the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale. Longer studies will assess the reproducibility and persistence of neurologic benefit.

Use of an adaptive study design in single ascending-dose pharmacokinetics of A0001 (α-tocopherylquinone) in healthy male subjects.

A0001 (α-tocopherylquinone) is a potent antioxidant currently in development for the treatment of symptoms associated with inherited mitochondrial disorders. A0001 pharmacokinetics were studied in a single-blind, adaptive design study following a single daily oral dose of placebo (n = 2) or ascending doses of A0001 (n = 8) at 0.25 and 0.5 g under a fasted state or a 0.5- to 6-g dose with a high-fat meal. Dose escalation was based on safety assessment, and proceeding dose levels were selected based on interim pharmacokinetic analyses. A0001 plasma concentration-time profiles were similar across doses, reaching peak concentration within 4 to 6 hours, with concentrations returning to baseline within 24 hours. Exposure was highly dependent on food and dosing frequency. Exposure was nearly 60-fold higher with food but increased subproportionally above 1-g dose; however, the nonproportionality was offset by administering A0001 in divided doses (0.735 g, 3 times per day). The potential for an A0001:vitamin E interaction was also explored, as vitamin E use is prevalent in this patient population, and suggested that a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction is not likely. A0001 was well tolerated with no serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities. These findings suggest that A0001 has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile when administered orally with food.

The "high solubility" definition of the current FDA Guidance on Biopharmaceutical Classification System may be too strict for acidic drugs.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess if the definition of high solubility as proposed in the FDA Guidance on Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) is too strict for highly permeable acidic drugs. METHODS: The solubility and permeability values of 20 (18 acidic and 2 non-acidic) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) were determined. The NSAIDs were grouped into three different sets having acetic acid, propionic acid, or other acidic moieties such as fenamate, oxicam, and salicylate. Two nonacidic NSAIDs (celecoxib and rofecoxib) were also included for comparison purposes. Equilibrium solubility values were determined at pH 1.2, 5.0, 7.4, and in biorelevant media simulating fed intestinal fluid at pH 5.0. For a select number of acids, we also measured solubility values in media simulating gastric and fasted intestinal fluids. Permeability classification was established relative to that of reference drugs in the Caco-2 cell permeability model. Permeability coefficients for all drugs were measured at concentrations corresponding to the lowest and highest marketed dose strengths dissolved in 250 ml volume, and their potential interaction with cellular efflux pumps was investigated. RESULTS: All NSAIDs with different acidic functional groups were classified as highly permeable based on their Caco-2 cell permeability. Only ketorolac appeared to have a potential for interaction with cellular efflux pumps. Solubility classification was based on comparison of equilibrium solubility at pH 1.2, 5.0. and 7.4 relative to marketed dose strengths in 250 ml. The pKa values for the acidic NSAIDs studied were between 3.5 and 5.1. and, as expected, their solubility increased dramatically at pH 7.4 compared to pH 1.2. Only three NSAIDs, ketorolac, ketoprofen. and acetyl salicylic acid, meet the current criteria for high solubility over the entire pH range. However, with the exception of ibuprofen, oxaprozin, and mefenamic acid, the remaining compounds can be classified as Class I drugs (high solubility-high permeability) relative to solubility at pH 7.4. The use of bio-relevant media simulating gastric and intestinal milieu for solubility measurements or increasing the dose volume to 500 ml did not provide for a better boundary for solubility classification. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current definition of solubility, 15 of the 18 acidic NSAIDs in this study will be classified as Class II compounds as the solubility criteria applies to the entire pH range of 1.2 to 7.4, although the low solubility criteria does not hold true over the entire pH range. Whence, of the 18 acidic drugs, 15 can be classified as Class I based on the pH 7.4 solubility alone. This finding is intriguing because these drugs exhibit Class I behavior as their absorption does not seem to be dissolution or solubility limited. It could then be argued that for acidic drugs, the boundaries for solubility are too restrictive. Solubility at pH > 5 (pH in duodenum) may be more appropriate because most compounds are mainly absorbed in the intestinal region. Consideration for an intermediate solubility classification for highly permeable ionizable compounds that reflects physiological conditions seems warranted.