Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Heart Failure Subtypes.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) improves clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aimed to evaluate the impact of CA on clinical and quality-of-life outcomes across HF subtypes. METHODS: All patients undergoing AF ablation at a tertiary center were enrolled in a prospective registry and included in this study (2013-2021). The primary end point was AF recurrence. Secondary end points included AF-related hospitalizations and quality-of-life outcomes. Patients were categorized according to their HF status: no HF, HFrEF, HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). RESULTS: A total of 7020 patients were included (80% no HF, 8% HFrEF, 7% HFmrEF, and 5% HFpEF). Over 3 years, the cumulative incidence of AF recurrence after ablation was as follows: HFpEF (53%), HFmrEF (41%), HFrEF (41%), and no HF (34%); P<0.01. Multivariable Cox analyses confirmed these findings using no HF group as reference (HFpEF: hazard ratio, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.21-1.78]; HFmrEF: hazard ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.04-1.45]; and HFrEF: hazard ratio, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.01-1.37]; P<0.05 for all). In all groups, CA resulted in a significant reduction of AF-related hospitalization (mean rate per 1 patient-years [before and after CA]; HFpEF [1.8 versus 0.3], HFmrEF [1.1 versus 0.2], HFrEF [1.1 versus 0.2], and no HF [1 versus 0.1]; P<0.01 for each comparison) and significant improvement in quality of life as measured by both the AF symptom severity score and the AF burden score (P<0.01 for the comparison between baseline and follow-up for each score when tested separately). CONCLUSIONS: AF recurrence rates after CA were higher in patients with HF compared with those without HF, with patients with HFpEF being at the highest risk of recurrence. Nonetheless, CA was associated with a significant reduction in AF symptoms, AF-related hospitalization, and HF symptoms in most patients irrespective of HF subtypes.

High initial heart rate score is an independent predictor of new atrial high-rate episodes in pacemaker patients with sinus node dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Heart rate score (HRSc), the percentage of atrial depolarizations in the largest paced and sensed 10-beats/min histogram bin recorded in cardiac devices, is associated with several adverse outcomes, but it remains uncertain whether HRSc independently predicts atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) in patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) undergoing pacemaker (PM) implantation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether initial HRSc after PM implantation predicts new-onset AHREs in patients with SND. METHODS: Patients had Boston Scientific PMs implanted for SND from 2012 to 2021 at Cleveland Clinic, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kyushu Rosai Hospital, and JCHO Kyushu Hospital. Patients were excluded if they had atrial fibrillation before PM implantation or AHREs within 3 months after implantation. Subsequent AHREs after implantation were evaluated and correlated with HRSc. RESULTS: During 48.9 (interquartile range, 25.7-50.4) months, 130 consecutive PM patients (76 ± 10 years; 40% male) had a median initial HRSc of 74% (57%-86%). AHREs defined by >1%, >6 h/d burden, and atrial tachycardia response events >24 hours developed in 27 of 130 (21%), 15 of 130 (12%), and 9 of 130 (7%), respectively. For each definition, patients with HRSc ≥80% had higher occurrence of AHREs than those with HRSc <80% (both P = .008, log-rank test). After adjustment for age, race, comorbidities, left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial diameter, and cumulative percentage of right atrial and right ventricular pacing, initial HRSc ≥80% (hazard ratio, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.35-8.18; P = .009) and male sex (hazard ratio, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.06-6.33; P = .04) independently predicted AHREs. CONCLUSION: HRSc ≥80% is associated with new-onset, device-determined AHREs for patients undergoing PM implantation for SND. HRSc may have prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Comparison of outcomes and required tools between transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: Insight from single high-volume center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Reports of comparison with procedural outcomes for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and pacemaker (PM) transvenous lead extraction (TLE) are old and limited. We sought to compare the safety, efficacy, and procedural properties of ICD and PM TLE and assess the impact of lead age. METHODS: The study cohort included all consecutive patients with ICD and PM TLE in the Cleveland Clinic Prospective TLE Registry between 2013 and 2022. Extraction success, complications, and failure employed the definitions described in the HRS 2017 TLE guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 885 ICD leads, a median implant duration of 8 (5-11) years in 810 patients, and 1352 PM leads of 7 (3-13) years in 807 patients were included. Procedural success rates in ICD patients were superior to those of PM in >20 years leads but similar in ≤20 years leads. In the PM group, the complete success rate of TLE decreased significantly according to the increase of lead age, but not in the ICD group. ICD TLE required more extraction tools compared with PM TLE but cases with older leads required non-laser sheath extraction tools in both groups. The most common injury site in major complication cases differed between ICD and PM TLE, although major complication rates showed no difference in both groups (2.7% vs. 1.6%, p = .12). CONCLUSION: The procedural success rate by TLE is greater for ICD patients than PM patients with leads >20 years old but requires more extraction tools. Common vascular complication sites and the impact of lead age on procedural outcomes and required tools differed between ICD and PM TLE.

Extraction outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads vary by manufacturer and model family.

AIMS: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads is considered challenging. The structure of each ICD leads is variable between manufacturer and model families. The net impact of lead family on the safety and effectiveness of TLE is poorly characterized. We assessed the safety and efficacy of ICD TLE and the impact of manufacturer ICD model family on the outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study cohort included all consecutive patients with ICD who underwent TLE between 2013 and 2022 and are enrolled in the Cleveland Clinic Prospective TLE Registry. A total of 885 ICD leads (median implant duration 8 years) in 810 patients were included. Complete ICD TLE success was achieved in 97.2% of the leads (n = 860) and in 98.0% of the patients (n = 794). Major complications occurred in 22 patients (2.7%). Complete procedural success rate varied by manufacturer and lead family; Medtronic 98.9%, Abbott 95.9%, Boston Scientific 95.0%, Biotronik 91.2%, P = 0.03, and Linox family leads had the lowest, 89.7% P = 0.02. Multivariable predictors of incomplete ICD lead removal included ICD lead age > 10 years and Linox family lead. Multivariable predictors of major complications included ICD lead age > 15 years and longer lead extraction time, and predictors of all-cause mortality within 30 days included lead extraction for infection, end-stage renal disease, and higher New York Heart Association functional class. CONCLUSION: Complete and safe ICD lead removal rate by TLE is extremely high but varied by manufacturer and lead family. Linox family lead and >10 years lead age were independent predictors of incomplete lead removal.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in elderly and very elderly patients: safety, outcomes, and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) risk increases with age. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in the older population. METHODS: All patients undergoing AF ablation (2013-2021) at our institution were enrolled in a prospectively maintained registry. The primary endpoint was AF recurrence. Patients were divided into 3 groups: non-elderly (< 65 years), elderly (65-75 years), and very elderly (> 75 years). Patient surveys at baseline and during follow-up were used to calculate quality of life (QoL) metrics: the AF severity score as well as the AF burden. RESULTS: A total of 7020 patients were included (42% non-elderly, 42% elderly, and 16% very elderly). Periprocedural major complications were low (< 1.5%) and similar in all groups besides pericardial effusion which was more frequent with older age and similar between the elderly and very elderly. At 3 years, AF recurrence for persistent AF (PersAF) was highest in the very elderly group (48%), followed by the elderly group (42%), and was the lowest in the non-elderly group (36%). In paroxysmal AF (PAF), there was no difference in AF recurrence between the elderly and non-elderly, while the very elderly remained associated with a significantly increased risk. Multivariable Cox analysis confirmed these findings (PersAF; elderly: HR = 1.23, P = 0.003; very elderly: HR = 1.44, P < 0.001) (PAF; elderly: HR = 1.04, P = 0.62; very elderly: HR = 1.30, P = 0.01). Catheter ablation resulted in a significant improvement in quality of life, irrespective of age group. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation in elderly and very elderly patients is safe, efficacious, and associated with QoL benefits. Overall, major complications were minimal and did not differ significantly between age groups, with the exception of pericardial effusions which were higher in the elderly and very elderly compared to non-elderly adults. Very elderly patients had a higher rate of AF recurrence when compared with elderly or non-elderly patients. Nevertheless, ablation resulted in a remarkable improvement in QoL and a reduction of AF burden and AF symptoms with a similar magnitude, irrespective of age.

Initial heart rate score predicts new-onset atrial tachyarrhythmias in pacemaker patients.

AIMS: Heart rate score (HRSc), the per cent of atrial paced and sensed event in the largest 10 b.p.m. rate histogram bin of a pacemaker, predicts survival in patients with cardiac devices. No correlation between HRSc and development of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between pacemaker post-implantation HRSc and the incidence of newly developed atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with dual-chamber pacemakers, implanted 2013-17, with the LATITUDE remote monitoring data with ≥600 000 beats of histogram data collected at baseline were included (N = 34 543). Heart rate score was determined from the initial 3-month post-implantation histogram data. Patients were excluded if they had ATAs, defined as atrial high-rate episodes >5 min or >1% of right atrial beats >170 b.p.m. during the initial 3 months post-implantation. New ATAs, after the baseline period, were defined by each of the following: >1, >10, or >25% of atrial beats >170 b.p.m. or atrial tachycardia response (ATR) events >24 h. Patients were followed a median of 2.8 (1.0-4.0) years. The incidence of ATAs increased in proportion to HRSc (log-rank P-value <0.001), and the initial HRSc ≥70% was associated with increased ATAs by all definitions. Patients with initial HRSc ≥70% were older, had a higher percentage of right atrium pacing (%RA pacing), had a lower percentage of right ventricular pacing (%RV pacing), and were more likely programmed with rate-response vs. subjects with HRSc <70%. Initial HRSc (hazard ratio: 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.09; P < 0.0001) independently predicted ATAs after adjusting for age, gender, %RV pacing, and rate-response programming. The %RA pacing and initial HRSc were correlated. CONCLUSION: Heart rate score independently predicts any subsequent duration of ATAs in pacemaker patients.

Clinical predictors of incomplete coronary sinus lead removal during transvenous lead extraction in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Reports of coronary sinus (CS) lead removal include small studies with short implant durations. Procedural outcomes for mature CS leads removed with long duration implantation are unavailable. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the safety, efficacy, and clinical predictors of incomplete CS lead removal by transvenous lead extraction (TLE) in a large long implant duration cardiac resynchronization therapy patient cohort. METHODS: Consecutive patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices in the Cleveland Clinic Prospective TLE Registry who had TLE between 2013 and 2022 were included in the analysis. RESULTS: CS leads (N = 231; implant duration 6.1 ± 4.0 years) removed from 226 patients were included, using powered sheaths for 137 leads (59.3%). Complete CS lead extraction success was achieved in 95.2% of leads (n = 220) and in 95.6% of patients (n = 216). Major complications occurred in 5 patients (2.2%). Patients who had the CS lead extracted first had significantly higher incomplete removal rates than when the other leads were first removed. Multivariable analysis showed that older CS lead age (odds ratio 1.35; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.82; P = .03) and removal of the first CS lead (odds ratio 7.48; 95% confidence interval 1.02-54.95; P = .045) were independent predictors of incomplete CS lead removal. CONCLUSION: The complete and safe lead removal rate of long implant duration CS leads by TLE was 95%. However, CS lead age and the order in which leads were extracted were the independent predictors of incomplete CS lead removal. Therefore, before the CS lead is extracted, physicians should first extract the leads from the other chambers and use powered sheaths.

Real-time visualization of the esophagus and left atrial posterior wall by intra-left atrial echocardiography.

PURPOSE: Localization of the esophagus and the left atrium (LA) posterior wall thickness (LAPWT) should be taken into account when delivering radiofrequency energy. To validate the visualization of the esophagus and analyze LAPWT by ICE advanced into the LA in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing ablation index (AI)-guided pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. METHODS: In 73 patients (mean age, 68 ± 12; paroxysmal AF in 45), a 3-dimensional (3D) esophagus image was created with CARTO SoundstarⓇ and its location was compared with contrast esophagography saved in Carto UNIVU™. LAPWT adjacent to the esophagus was measured at 4 levels: left superior PV (LSPV), intervenous carina (IC), left inferior PV (LIPV), and LIPV bottom. A target AI value was 260 (25 W power) on the esophagus demonstrated by ICE. RESULTS: All patients had the esophagus posterior to the left PV antrum. Creating a 3D esophagus and measurement of LAPWT with ICE was done without any complications. ICE esophagus image was completely overlapped with contrast esophagography. LAPWT (mm) was 2.8 (interquartile range, 2.5-3.2), 2.2 (1.9-2.5), 1.9 (1.8-2.1), and 2.1 (1.9-2.4) for LSPV, IC, LIPV, and LIPV bottom, respectively, while LA roof thickness was 3.2 (2.9-3.6) (P < 0.0001 by ANOVA). No residual conduction gap on the esophagus after the first circumferential PV isolation was found in 64 of 73 (88%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: ICE inserted into the LA can reliably locate and display the esophagus and its relationship to the LA. LAPWT was the thinnest at the LIPV level. AI-guided ablation targeting at AI value 260 on the esophagus seemed to be effective.

Ablation Index-Guided High-Power Radiofrequency Application Shortens the Procedure Time With Similar Outcomes to Conventional Power Application in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Background: The impact of high-power radiofrequency (RF) application in ablation index (AI)-guided atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has not been elucidated. Methods and Results: We investigated 1,333 patients undergoing first AF ablation (median age 68 years; interquartile range [IQR] 61-73 years). The first 301 patients underwent AI-guided conventional power RF application (CP group), whereas the following 1,032 patients underwent high-power RF application (HP group). The minimum AI target values were 400, 360, and 260 at the left atrial anterior wall, posterior wall, and esophagus, respectively. RF power in the CP group was 30-40, 20-25, and 20 W at the anterior wall, posterior wall, and esophagus, respectively, compared with 50, 40, and 25, respectively, in the HP group. Procedure time was shorter in the HP than CP group (median 153 [IQR 129-190] vs. 180 (IQR 152-229) min; P<0.0001). The percentage of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (69% vs. 73%; P=0.07) and all procedure-related complications (2.0% vs. 3.4%; P=0.19) was similar. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed similar recurrence-free survival (RFS) for all AF types. Respective 1-year RFS in the CP and HP groups was 82% and 87% in paroxysmal AF, 78% and 82% in persistent AF, and 59% and 58% in long-standing persistent AF. Conclusions: In AI-guided AF ablation, high-power RF application shortens the procedure time without increasing complications and with similar outcomes.

High-power application is associated with shorter procedure time and higher rate of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation in ablation index-guided atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUNDS: Ablation index (AI) is useful to complete circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF), but the role of radiofrequency power in AI-guided CPVI remains to be elucidated. METHODS: We investigated 60 patients with AF undergoing AI-guided CPVI (mean age, 66 ± 9 years; nonparoxysmal AF in 16). The first 40 patients were randomly assigned to low-power (LP; n = 20) and medium-power (MP; n = 20) groups and the following 20 patients to high-power (HP). In LP, radiofrequency (RF) application was done at 30 W at the anterior and 20 W at the posterior left atrial (LA) wall, while in MP, it was at 40 W at the anterior and 30 W at the posterior LA wall. In HP, 50 W was applied at the anterior, 40 W at posterior LA wall and 30 W on the esophagus. At each ablation point, target AI was 400 at the anterior, 360 at the posterior LA wall, and 260 on the esophagus. RESULTS: The time to complete both-side CPVI was shortest in HP (median, 40 minutes, interquartile range [IQR], 28-63) followed by MP (58 [49-83] minutes, P = .008 vs HP) and LP (84 [72-93] minutes, P = .002 vs MP). Higher RF power application significantly increased first-pass isolation rate (55% in LP, 80% in MP and 85% in HP, P = .002) and decreased LA-PV reconnection rate (10% in LP, 8% in MP, and 0% in HP, P = .03). CONCLUSION: In AI-guided PVI, the HP RF application can shorten the time to complete PVI with a high rate of first-pass isolation and a low rate of LA-PV reconnection.

Abnormal repolarization: A common electrocardiographic finding in patients with epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Recently, certain forms of early repolarization (ER) on electrocardiograms (ECGs) have been considered a possible marker of increased sudden cardiac death risk. The frequency, characteristics, and clinical follow-up with which these forms of ER are present in epilepsy patients, and whether or not abnormal ER contributes to sudden unexplained death in epilepsy patients (SUDEP) is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: The amplitude of J peak and ST-segment morphology after ER on 12-lead ECGs were assessed in 354 epilepsy patients (age, 33 ± 16 years; 54% men) and 140 age- and sex-matched control subjects (age, 31 ± 12 years; 50% men). Abnormal ER prevalence (J-wave amplitude ≥0.1 mV) was greater in epilepsy patients (19.8%) compared with controls (8.6%; P = 0.002) in inferior ECG leads but not in lateral leads ( P = 0.40). ER with a horizontal or descending ST segment was also more prevalent in epilepsy patients ( P < 0.001). After introducing antiepileptic drugs in 36 epilepsy patients, there were no significant ER changes. Similarly, in 64 epilepsy patients with seizure suppression, ER comparison before and after seizure control revealed no significant changes. Male gender was the only significant predictor of abnormal ER in epilepsy patients ( P = 0.03). During a median follow-up of 7 years, SUDEP occurred in two patients, one with abnormal ER. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal ER may be more prevalent in epilepsy patients than in controls and is not altered by antiepileptic drugs or achievement of epilepsy suppression. The relation of abnormal ER to SUDEP remains in need of further study.

Pacing From the Right Ventricular Septum and Development of New Atrial Fibrillation in Paced Patients With Atrioventricular Block and Preserved Left Ventricular Function.

BACKGROUND: Whether pacing from the right ventricular (RV) septum improves prognosis is unclear. Furthermore, the clinical characteristics of patients who develop atrial fibrillation (AF) and cardiovascular events during long-term RV septal pacing have not been described.Methods and Results:We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of AF and cardiovascular events, including cardiac death, heart failure requiring hospitalization, or stroke, for a median of 4.0 years in 123 recipients of dual-chamber pacemakers implanted for atrioventricular block with preserved left ventricular function, who were free from AF before device implantation. AF developed in 30 patients (24%), and multivariable analysis suggested that the cumulative percentage of RV pacing was the only independent predictor of newly developed AF (hazard ratio: 1.19 for each 10% increment; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.41; P=0.01). Furthermore, older age, newly developed AF and a paced QRS duration ≥155 ms at pacemaker implantation were significant predictors of cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: RV septum pacing may induce AF in up to one-quarter of patients paced for atrioventricular block, according to the frequency of pacing. More importantly, in such patients, AF induced by RV pacing and a paced QRS duration ≥155 ms at pacemaker implantation are significantly associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, we recommend pacing from sites producing a paced QRS duration <155 ms and avoiding unnecessary RV pacing. (Circ J 2016; 80: 2302-2309).

Effects of right ventricular pacing sites on blood pressure variation in upright posture: a comparison of septal vs. apical pacing sites.

AIMS: Large variations in blood pressure (BP) in the upright position are a major cause of pacemaker syndrome, observed in up to 80% of patients paced non-physiologically at the right ventricular (RV) apex. We hypothesized that the magnitude of BP variations might be influenced by the RV pacing site. To assess this, we compared haemodynamic findings during supine and upright posture with RV apical vs. septal pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population comprised a retrospective cohort of 24 dual-chamber pacemaker patients with advanced or complete atrioventricular block, in which 11 were randomly chosen from those with RV apical pacing, and 13 randomly chosen from those with septal pacing. Studies were performed during fixed rate VVI and DDD pacing modes with patients in both supine and passive head-up tilt positions. Continuous BP, stroke volume, cardiac index, and total peripheral resistance index were measured non-invasively. During RV apical pacing, there were significant differences of beat-to-beat BP variation after movement from supine to upright posture for both VVI and DDD pacing modes (P < 0.05); however, this was not the case for either mode during RV septal pacing. Further, comparing RV apical to RV septal pacing in the supine position, there were no BP variation differences for either DDD or VVI modes. Conversely, in the upright position BP variation was significantly greater during RV apical vs. RV septal VVI pacing (P = 0.017) but not during DDD pacing. CONCLUSION: During VVI pacing, RV septal pacing exhibited lesser BP variation during upright posture compared with RV apical pacing.

Pacing and sensing interference by air bubble surrounding the non-extended helix of intact active fixation lead.

BACKGROUND: Active fixation pacing leads with silicon cylinder tips have been used for their safety and flexibility. Measurement of baseline sensing/pacing characteristics before fixation of helix helps to identify the optimal pacing site, but we encountered difficulties in making these measurements despite multiple attempts with the model LPA 1200M lead. To identify the cause and overcome this complication, we compared 4 different retractable active fixation lead models, which enabled baseline sensing/pacing measurements before extension of helix. METHODS AND RESULTS: We immersed 4 different lead tips and rings in a 0.18% saline solution, and measured the lead impedance before and after flushing of air bubble visible inside the lead tip. Before evacuation of the air bubble, the impedance of the model LPA 1200M lead was >4,000 Ω in 8 out of 10 measurements, although that of the other leads was within the measurable range. After evacuation of the air bubble, the lead impedance returned to within the measurable range. There was no prominent change in the impedance of the metal cylinder tip lead. CONCLUSIONS: Air bubbles may interfere with the measurement of baseline sensing/pacing characteristics before active fixation of pacing leads with cylindrical silicon tips. In the case of high impedance beyond the measurable range before extension of helix, the measurement should be repeated after fixation into the myocardium before suspecting lead dysfunction.

Atrial pacing site and atrioventricular conduction in patients paced for sinus node disease.

BACKGROUND: Unnecessary ventricular pacing in sinus node disease (SND) must be avoided. To test the hypothesis that in SND, with or without 1st degree atrioventricular (AV) block, cumulative percent ventricular pacing (cum%VP) can be limited by low right atrial septal (LRAS) instead of right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing. METHODS: We studied 102 dual-chamber pacemaker recipients with SND. The PQ interval on 12-lead electrocardiogram and the atrial paced to ventricular sensed interval (Ap-Vs) during LRAS and RAA pacing were measured and compared at implantation, 3 months and 1 year of follow-up. Group 1 included 62 patients with baseline PQ interval <200 milliseconds during LRAS (n = 28) versus RAA (n = 34) pacing. Group 2 included 40 patients with baseline PQ ≥200 milliseconds during LRAS (n = 20) versus RAA (n = 20) pacing. cum%VP were measured at 3 months and 1 year. RESULTS: The characteristics and AV conduction properties were similar and the Ap-Vs interval was significantly shorter in the LRAS than in the RAA pacing group up to 1 year (193 ± 32 milliseconds vs. 220 ± 27 milliseconds in Group 1; P = 0.003, 222 ± 41 milliseconds vs. 281 ± 30 milliseconds in Group 2; P < 0.001). While cumulative percent atrial pacing was consistently similar, cum%VP was significantly smaller during LRAS than RAA pacing (1 ± 1% vs. 8 ± 18% in Group 1; P = 0.03, 7 ± 10% vs. 48 ± 38% in Group 2; P < 0.001). Similar observations were made with or without left atrial (LA) enlargement. CONCLUSION: Compared with RAA, LRAS pacing showed shorter AV interval in SND patients with or without 1st degree AV block and LA enlargement. This beneficial effect persisted through 1-year follow-up, and decreased cum%VP significantly.