Efficacy and safety of olaparib, olaparib plus bevacizumab and niraparib maintenance treatment in Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive advanced ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether maintenance treatment could be safely and effectively performed with olaparib, olaparib plus bevacizumab and niraparib in platinum-sensitive advanced ovarian cancer at multiple institutions in Japan. METHODS: We investigated progression-free survival and adverse events in 117 patients with platinum-sensitive advanced ovarian cancer treated with maintenance therapy. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival of 117 patients was 20.1 months. Patients with germline BRCA pathogenic variants had a significantly better prognosis than the other groups (P < 0.001). Furthermore, in the multivariate analysis, stage IV (P = 0.016) and germline BRCA wild-type (P ≤ 0.001) were significantly associated with worse progression-free survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Regarding adverse events, all three types of maintenance treatment were significantly worse than chemotherapy given before maintenance treatment with respect to renal function (olaparib, P = 0.037; olaparib plus bevacizumab, P < 0.001; and niraparib, P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Maintenance treatment was performed effectively and safely. Renal function deterioration is likely to occur during maintenance treatment, and careful administration is important in platinum-sensitive advanced ovarian cancer.

Relationship Between Hematological Toxicities During Maintenance Treatment and During Chemotherapy Before Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Platinum-sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To determine if maintenance treatment can be performed effectively and safely in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a multi-center study to investigate progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs) in 229 patients receiving maintenance treatment for platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. RESULTS: The median PFS in the 229 patients with maintenance treatment was 14.0 months (95% confidence interval=10.3-17.6 months). The hematological toxicities included ≥grade 3 anemia in 33.2% of cases. Anemia during maintenance treatment was significantly more common than anemia during chemotherapy given before maintenance treatment (p<0.001). Anemia during chemotherapy prior to maintenance treatment significantly increased the risk of anemia during maintenance treatment, compared with other clinical features (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Maintenance treatment can be performed safely and effectively in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. Anemia during chemotherapy given before maintenance treatment significantly increased the risk of developing anemia during maintenance treatment in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer.

Old-fashioned but modern tube cervical esophagostomy.

BACKGROUND: Nasogastric tubes (NGT) are used widely for feeding and decompressions of stomach, but they are associated with several complications and discomfort. When prolonged use of NGT is required, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) should be considered. However, PEG is not feasible for patients with previous gastrectomy. We have performed tube cervical esophagostomy (TCE) for such difficult cases of PEG. METHODS: The current study focused on 7 patients requiring TCE for feeding or decompression from 2004 to 2005 at Tottori Municipal Hospital in Japan. RESULTS: The procedure is relatively simply to perform under local anesthesia and significant complications were not experienced. CONCLUSIONS: Feeding or decompressive TCE is useful alternative procedure in patients where PEG is not feasible or unacceptable.