Protamine use in transcarotid arterial revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: The literature suggests that heparin reversal with protamine in transcarotid arterial revascularization (TCAR) decreases postoperative bleeding complications without an increase in stroke or death. However, the dosing of protamine in TCAR has not yet been evaluated. We aimed to evaluate our experience with intraoperative heparin reversal with protamine. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study that evaluated the heparin and protamine doses used during TCAR. All adult patients who underwent TCAR between 9/1/2019 and 4/2/2021 were included. Demographic data was obtained from the Vascular Quality Initiative and protamine/heparin doses were obtained from a chart review. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the association between the protamine/heparin dose ratio and other variables. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included. The average protamine/heparin dose ratio used was 0.96 ± 0.12 mg/U; seven had a ratio less than 0.8 mg/U, and one was greater than 1.2 mg/U. Two patients experienced bleeding complications, which were managed non-operatively. No patient with a protamine/heparin ratio greater than 0.8 mg/U had postoperative bleeding. Postoperative bradycardia was observed in 32.3% of patients and hypotension in 35%, with 19% requiring vasopressors. No relationship was identified between the protamine/heparin ratio and bleeding, bradycardia, or hypotension. No 30-day myocardial infarction, stroke or death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a near 1:1 ratio of a protamine/heparin dosing regimen for the reversal of heparin during TCAR, with postoperative bleeding complications similar to those reported in the literature. However, patients who received a lower protamine/heparin ratio did not experience bleeding complications. In the era of protamine shortages, a future larger-scale study is needed to evaluate the impact of a lower protamine dose on postoperative complications.

Implementation of a Dedicated Orthopaedic Trauma Room in Hip and Femur Fracture Care: A 17-Year Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of implementing a dedicated orthopaedic trauma room (DOTR) on hip and femur fracture care. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: Level 1 trauma center. Patients: 2928 patients with femoral neck, pertrochanteric, and femoral shaft and distal femur (FSDF) fractures. INTERVENTION: Implementation of a DOTR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital length of stay (LOS), emergency department (ED) LOS, intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and time to operating room (TTOR). RESULTS: Implementation of a DOTR resulted in significant improvement in TTOR for all patient groups ( P < 0.05). We found shorter TTOR for pertrochanteric ( P < 0.001), femoral neck ( P = 0.039), and FSDF groups ( P = 0.046). Total hospital LOS was shorter for patients with pertrochanteric ( P < 0.001) and femoral neck fractures ( P = 0.044). Patients with pertrochanteric hip fractures demonstrated shorter ICU LOS ( P < 0.001). No LOS improvements were observed among patients in the FSDF group. ED LOS was significantly longer in all patient groups ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a DOTR was associated with shorter TTOR, shorter hospital and ICU LOS, and longer ED LOS. There was a greater number of patients transferred into the investigating institution and fewer patients transferred out. These data support the utility of a DOTR as it relates to an improvement in hospital stay-related outcomes in patients with fractures of the hip and femur. Our results suggest that a DOTR in a Level I trauma hospital is associated with improvement in patient care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The association of psychiatric and neurological comorbidities with outcomes in traumatic injury patients.

INTRODUCTION: Mental illness is a well-known risk factor for injury and injury recidivism. The impact of pre-existing psychiatric illness on trauma outcomes, however, has received less attention. Our study examines the relationship of pre-existing psychiatric illness on trauma outcomes including length of stay, cost, and mortality. METHODS: Patient data were obtained from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient Database. All patients admitted for trauma in the Detroit metropolitan area from 1/1/2006 to 12/31/2014 were included. The relationship between individual psychiatric comorbidities (depression, psychosis, and other neurological disorders) and outcomes were evaluated with logistic regression (mortality) and generalized linear modeling (length of stay and cost). RESULTS: Over 260,000 records were reviewed. Approximately one-third (29.9%) of patients had one or more psychiatric diagnoses. Patients with depression had longer hospital stays (RR = 1.12, p < 0.001) and higher costs (RR = 1.07, p < 0.001), but also lower mortality (OR = 0.69, p < 0.001). Patients with psychosis had longer stays (RR = 1.18, p < 0.001), higher costs (RR = 1.02, p = 0.002), and lower mortality (OR = 0.61, p < 0.001). Patients with other neurological comorbidities had higher mortality (OR = 1.23, p < 0.001), longer stays (RR = 1.29, p < 0.001), and higher costs (RR = 1.10, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with a psychiatric disorder required longer care and incurred greater costs, whereas mortality was higher for only those with a neurological disorder. Identifying patients' psychiatric comorbidities at the time of admission for trauma may help optimize treatment. Addressing these conditions may help reduce the cost of trauma care.

Opioid prescribing trends: Changes after focused hospital resident education and after subsequent adoption of new state regulations.

OBJECTIVE: We examined changes in opioid prescriptions after outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) before and after (1) an educational intervention for surgical residents and (2) subsequent changes in state regulations for handling these prescriptions. DESIGN: A single-institution retrospective review evaluated opioids prescribed on discharge in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) over three periods: Period 1, prior to educational intervention (October 1, 2017 to January 31, 2018); Period 2, after intervention and before regulation changes occurred (February 1, 2018 to May 31, 2018); and Period 3, after changes in regulations went into effect (June 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018). SETTING: A large urban teaching hospital in Detroit, Michigan. PATIENTS: All adults receiving outpatient LC during one of the study periods. Patients with a history of regular opioid use prior to surgery were excluded. There were 49 patients in Period 1, 57 in Period 2, and 51 in Period 3. INTERVENTIONS: All general surgery residents participated in an education session focusing on problems related to opioid addiction, prescribing trends, and multimodal pain control options in February 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean MME per patient was compared between time periods. RESULTS: Average MME was reduced from 87.11 in Period 1 to 65.96 in Period 2 to 51.80 in Period 3. Analysis of variance showed MME differed significantly among the periods. Scheffe post hoc t-tests showed MME prescribed during Periods 2 and 3 were each significantly lower than Period 1, whereas Periods 2 and 3 did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: MME prescribed after outpatient LC significantly decreased after the educational intervention and remained low after state mandate went into effect.

Associations between cardiovascular comorbidities and mortality, length of hospital stay, and total charges among traumatic injury patients.

PURPOSE: Cardiovascular conditions are highly prevalent and particularly common in subsets of the population at high risk for traumatic injury. This study evaluates the extent to which cardiovascular comorbidity may increase risks of negative outcomes in patients receiving trauma treatment. METHODS: Clinical data for all patients admitted for traumatic injury (defined by ICD-9 diagnosis codes) of all levels of severity between the years of 2006 and 2014 in the Detroit USA metropolitan area were obtained from the State Inpatient Database for Michigan. The association between four types of cardiovascular comorbidity (hypertension, congestive heart failure, pulmonary circulation disorders, and valvular heart disease), and three outcomes (mortality, length of hospital stay, and total charges), was assessed using generalized linear modeling, both alone and after controlling for injury severity, injury region, and demographic factors. RESULTS: All four comorbidities examined were related to worse outcomes on all three dimensions. The greatest magnitude of estimated effects with each outcome was associated with pulmonary circulation disorders (mortality OR = 2.99, length of stay IRR = 1.69, hospital charges IRR = 1.76), and the smallest magnitude of estimated effects was associated with hypertension (mortality OR = 1.20, length of stay IRR = 1.20, hospital charges IRR = 1.18). After adjustment for the presence of multiple comorbidities, injury severity and region, age, gender, and race, all effect estimates remained significant and in the same direction, except valvular heart disease which was unrelated to mortality, and hypertension was related to lower risk of mortality (OR = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular comorbidities are related to higher risk of negative outcomes among patients hospitalized due to traumatic injury. Screening for these comorbidities on admission may help to improve patient outcomes.

Malfunctioning temporary hemodialysis catheters in patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019.

OBJECTIVE: The hypercoagulability seen in patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) likely contributes to the high temporary hemodialysis catheter (THDC) malfunction rate. We aim to evaluate prophylactic measures and their association with THDC patency. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of our institutions COVID-19 positive patients who required placement of a THDC between February 1 to April 30, 2020, was performed. The association between heparin locking, increased dosing of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis and systemic anticoagulation on THDC patency was assessed. Proportional hazards modeling was used to perform a survival analysis to estimate the likelihood and timing of THDC malfunction with the three different prophylactic measures. We also determined the mortality, rate of THDC malfunction and its association with d-dimer levels. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients with a mortality rate of 71% were identified. THDC malfunction occurred in 31.3% of patients. Thirty-seven patients (77.1%) received heparin locking, 22 (45.8%) received systemic anticoagulation, and 38 (79.1%) received VTE prophylaxis. Overall, the rate of THDC malfunction was lower at a trend level of significance, with heparin vs saline locking (24.3% vs 54.6%; P = .058). The likelihood of THDC malfunction in the heparin locked group is lower than all other groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.45]; P = .005). The rate of malfunction in patients with subcutaneous heparin (SQH) 7500 U three times daily is significantly lower than of the rate for patients receiving none (HR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.001-0.74; P = .032). A trend level significant association was found for SQH 5000 U vs none (P = .417) and SQH 7500 vs 5000 U (P = .059). Systemic anticoagulation did not affect the THDC malfunction rate (P = .240). Higher d-dimer levels were related to greater mortality (HR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.16-9.28; P = .025), but were not significantly associated with THDC malfunction (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.42, 7.71; P = .434). CONCLUSIONS: Locking THDCs with heparin is associated with a lower malfunction rate. Prospective randomized studies will be needed to confirm these findings to recommend locking THDC with heparin in patients with COVID-19. Increased VTE prophylaxis suggested a possible association with improved THDC patency, although the comparison lacked sufficient statistical power.

Associations of Alcohol and Drug Misuse with Hospital Outcomes in Traumatic Injury Patients.

Background: Traumatic injury is one of the most common causes of mortality worldwide. Previous research suggests that alcohol and drug misuse can increase the risk of experiencing these injuries. Method: Data on all hospital admissions due to traumatic injury in the Detroit metropolitan area between 2006 and 2014 were obtained from the Michigan State Inpatient Database. Patients with no recorded substance misuse comorbidity were compared with those who had (a) alcohol misuse comorbidity only, (b) drug misuse comorbidity only, and (c) both alcohol and drug misuse comorbidities. Outcomes examined included in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and total cost of care. Results: Generalized linear modeling was used to examine the relationship between substance misuse comorbidities and each of the three outcomes. Lower mortality was related to drug and drug/alcohol misuse. Longer length of stay was related to alcohol, drug, and alcohol/drug misuse. Total costs were higher for patients with comorbid alcohol misuse, but lower for those with comorbid drug misuse. These patterns of results were not changed after controlling for differences in background demographics and injury characteristics. Discussion: Alcohol and drug misuse were highly prevalent in trauma patients, in comparison to estimate for the US population as a whole. The relationship between substance misuse comorbidity and outcomes among trauma patient is not straightforward. Substance misuse of all types was related to longer hospitalization, but its association with cost and mortality was mixed. Assessment of substance misuse background at intake may help optimize care for trauma patients.

Between-hospital and between-neighbourhood variance in trauma outcomes: cross-sectional observational evidence from the Detroit metropolitan area.

OBJECTIVE: Disparities in treatment outcomes for traumatic injury are an important concern for care providers and policy makers. Factors that may influence these disparities include differences in risk exposure based on neighbourhood of residence and differences in quality of care between hospitals in different areas. This study examines geographical disparities within a single region: the Detroit metropolitan area. DESIGN: Data on all trauma admissions between 2006 and 2014 were obtained from the Michigan State Inpatient Database. Admissions were grouped by patient neighbourhood of residence and admitting hospital. Generalised linear mixed modelling procedures were used to determine the extent of shared variance based on these two levels of categorisation on three outcomes. Patients with trauma due to common mechanisms (falls, firearms and motor vehicle traffic) were examined as additional subgroups. SETTING: 66 hospitals admitting patients for traumatic injury in the Detroit metropolitan area during the period from 2006 to 2014. PARTICIPANTS: 404 675 adult patients admitted for treatment of traumatic injury. OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital mortality, length of stay and hospital charges. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated that there was substantial shared variance in outcomes based on hospital, but not based on neighbourhood of residence. Among all injury types, hospital-level differences accounted for 12.5% of variance in mortality risk, 28.5% of variance in length of stay and 32.2% of variance in hospital charges. Adjusting the results for patient age, injury severity, mechanism and comorbidities did not result in significant reduction in the estimated variance at the hospital level. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, geographical disparities in trauma treatment outcomes were more strongly attributable to differences in access to quality hospital care than to risk factors in the neighbourhood environment. Transfer of high-risk cases to hospitals with greater institutional experience in the relevant area may help address mortality disparities in particular.

Associations of race, mechanism of injury, and neighborhood poverty with in-hospital mortality from trauma: A population-based study in the Detroit metropolitan area.

Health disparities based on race and socioeconomic status are a serious problem in the US health care system, but disparities in outcomes related to traumatic injury have received relatively little attention in the research literature.This study uses data from the State Inpatient Database for Michigan including all trauma-related hospital admissions in the period from 2006 to 2014 in the Detroit metropolitan area (N = 407,553) to examine the relationship between race (White N = 232,109; African American N = 86,356, Hispanic N = 2709, Other N = 10,623), socioeconomic background, and in-hospital trauma mortality.Compared with other groups, there was a higher risk of mortality after trauma among African Americans (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20, P < .001), people living in high-poverty neighborhoods (OR = 1.01, P < .001), and those enrolled in public health insurance programs (OR = 1.53, P < .001). African American patients were more likely to have had traumatic injuries caused by certain mechanisms with higher risk of death (P < .001). After controlling for mechanism alone in multiple logistic regression, African American race remained a significant predictor of mortality risk (OR = 1.12, P < .001). After additionally controlling for the socioeconomic factors of insurance status and neighborhood poverty levels, there were no longer any significant differences between racial groups in terms of mortality (OR = 0.99, P = .746).These results suggest that in this population the racial inequalities in mortality outcomes were fully mediated by differences between groups in the pattern of injuries suffered and differences in risk based on socioeconomic factors.

Risk factors for recurrent neurotrauma: a population-based study in Southeastern Michigan.

INTRODUCTION: Studies have shown an increased risk of traumatic brain injury (TBI) for individuals who suffer an initial TBI. The current study hypothesized that individuals with recurrent neurotrauma would originate from populations considered 'vulnerable', i.e. low income and/or with psychiatric comorbidities. METHODS: Data from the Michigan State Inpatient Database from 2006 to 2014 for the Detroit metropolitan area enlisted a study population of 50 744 patients with neurotrauma. Binary logistic regression was used to assess risk factors associated with admission for subsequent neurotrauma compared with single neurotrauma admission. RESULTS: Patients with repeated neurotrauma admissions were similar to those with one-time trauma in terms of age at first admission and neighbourhood income levels. However, patients with repeated neurotrauma admissions were more likely to be male (p < .001) and African-American (p < .001). Comorbid alcohol use and drug use were 39% and 15% less likely to be readmitted with neurotrauma, respectively. Comorbid conditions associated with greater risk of repeat neurotrauma included depression, psychosis, and neurological disorders, increasing risk by 38%, 22%, and 58%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study validated the hypothesis that comorbid psychiatric conditions are a significant risk factor for recurrent neurotrauma and validate prior studies showing gender and race as significant risk factors.

Changes in trauma admission rates and mechanisms during recession and recovery: evidence from the Detroit metropolitan area.

OBJECTIVES: Although individual socioeconomic status has been linked with risk of traumatic injury, there has been relatively little research into the question of how economic changes may impact trauma admission rates in neighborhoods with different socioeconomic backgrounds. METHODS: This study pairs ZIP code-level data on trauma admissions with county-level data on unemployment to assess differences in the type of changes experienced in more and less affluent neighborhoods of the Detroit metropolitan area between 2006 and 2014. RESULTS: Conditional linear growth curve modeling results indicate that trauma admission rates decreased during the "great recession" of 2008-2010 in neighborhoods with the highest unemployment levels, but increased during the same period of time in neighborhoods with lower unemployment. Consequently, citywide disparities in trauma incidence decreased during the recession and widened again as the economy began to improve. CONCLUSION: Trauma risks and demand for trauma care may shift geographically in relation to broader economic changes. Health care policy and planning should consider these dynamics when anticipating changing demands and needs for efforts at prevention.

Head injury on Warfarin: likelihood of delayed intracranial bleeding in patients with negative initial head CT.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the likelihood that head injured patients on Warfarin with a negative initial head CT will have a positive repeat head CT. A retrospective chart review of our institution's trauma registry was performed for all patients admitted for blunt head trauma and on Warfarin anti-coagulation from January 2009 to April 2014. Inclusion criteria included patients over 18 years of age with initial GCS ≥ 13, INR greater than 1.5 and negative initial head CT. Initial CT findings, repeat CT findings and INR were recorded. Interventions performed on patients with a delayed bleed were also investigated. RESULTS: 394 patients met the study inclusion criteria. 121 (31%) of these patients did not receive a second CT while 273 patients (69%) underwent a second CT. The mean INR was 2.74. Six patients developed a delayed bleed, of which two were clinically significant. No patients had any neurosurgical intervention. Our results demonstrate a low rate of delayed bleeding. The utility of repeat head CT in the neurologically stable patient is thus questioned. Patients who have an abnormal baseline neurological status and those with INR >3 may represent a subgroup of patients in whom repeat head CT should be performed.

A novel modality for intraoperative margin assessment and its impact on re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery.

BACKGROUND: A single center retrospective chart review was performed examining the ability of a novel radiofrequency probe (Margin Probe; Dune Medical Devices, Caesarea, Israel) for intraoperative margin assessment to reduce the number of reexcisions in breast-conserving surgery. METHODS: Reexcision rates were evaluated in one-hundred and twenty consecutive patients before and after the institution of the device. Utility of the device was evaluated by comparing intraoperative feedback with postoperative pathology reports. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty patient subjects were reviewed in total. There was a significant decrease in the re-lumpectomy rate (50%, p = 0.039) in the device group without increasing the total volume of tissue resected. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the MarginProbe device as an adjunct to the standard of care resulted in reduction of positive margins after lumpectomy and the number of re-excisions, significantly improving outcomes in breast-conserving surgery at our institution.

Family Interdependence, Spiritual Perspective, Self-Transcendence, and Depression Among Korean College Students.

The purpose of this study was to examine the mechanisms that might account for the effects of spirituality and self-transcendence on Korean college students' depression among 197 Korean fathers, mothers, and children. A structural equation analysis indicated that spiritual perspective related to lower depression through the mediating pathway of self-transcendence for individuals. Mothers' spiritual perspective and self-transcendence related to their children's depression through the mediating pathway of their own depression, but the same was not true for fathers. Findings help explicate the intergenerational transmission of depression and important predictors of depression related to spirituality.

Spiritual Struggles and Interleukin-6: Assessing Potential Benefits and Potential Risks.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between spiritual struggles and levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) with a subsample (N = 943) of participants who took part in a nationwide survey. This study, which was completed in 2014, was conducted in the United States. Spiritual struggles refer to difficulties that a person may encounter with his or her faith and include having a troubled relationship with God, encountering difficulties with religious others, and being unable to find a sense of ultimate meaning in life. Based on the notion that spiritual struggles may be associated with personal growth as well physical health problems, it was hypothesized that there is a nonlinear relationship between the two: levels of IL-6 will decline at relatively low levels of spiritual struggles, but levels of IL-6 will increase as spiritual struggles become more severe. The findings support this hypothesis and suggest there is a quadratic relationship between spiritual struggles and IL-6. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

The Prevalence and Antecedents of Religious Beliefs About Health Control in the US Population: Variations by Race and Religious Background.

The ways in which religious beliefs influence beliefs about health have important implications for motivation to engage in positive health behaviors and comply with medical treatment. This study examines the prevalence of two health-related religious beliefs: belief in healing miracles and deferral of responsibility for health outcomes to God. Data came from a representative nationwide US survey of religion and health (N = 3010). Full-factorial ANOVA indicated that there were significant differences in both dimensions of belief by race, by religious background, and by the interaction between the two. Black people believed religion played the largest role in health regardless of religious background. Among White and Hispanic groups, Evangelical Protestants placed more responsibility for their health on God in comparison with other religious groups. ANCOVA controlling for background factors socioeconomic status, health, and religious involvement partially explained these group differences.

Externalizing religious health beliefs and health and well-being outcomes.

Certain religious beliefs related to perceptions of internal or external health control (including belief in the existence of miraculous healing, and beliefs deferring responsibility for health outcomes from the self and onto God) may be related to health behaviors and in turn to health outcomes. Using data from a nationally representative US survey of religion and health (N = 2948) this study evaluates a series of two structural equation models of the relationships between religious activity, externalizing religious health beliefs (belief in healing miracles and divine health deferral), health outcomes, and life satisfaction. Believing in healing miracles was related to greater divine health deferral. Greater divine health deferral was associated with poorer symptoms of physical health. Belief in miracles was related to greater life satisfaction. Comparison of coefficients across models indicated that externalizing beliefs had a significant suppressor effect on the relationship between religious activity and physical symptoms, but did not significantly mediate its relationship with life satisfaction. Religious beliefs emphasizing divine control over health outcomes may have negative consequences for health outcomes, although the same beliefs may contribute to a better sense of life satisfaction.

Health and Well-Being Among the Non-religious: Atheists, Agnostics, and No Preference Compared with Religious Group Members.

Although recent research suggests that the proportion of the US population identifying as non-religious has been rapidly expanding over the course of the last decade, relatively little research has examined the implications of this development for health and well-being. This study uses data from a large representative survey study of religion and health in the adult US population (N = 3010) to examine group differences among religious group members (N = 2401) and three categories of non-religious individuals: atheists (N = 83), agnostics (N = 189), and those stating no religious preference (N = 329). MANCOVA was used to analyze group differences on five outcome dimensions, incorporating 27 outcome variables. Religious non-affiliates did not differ overall from affiliates in terms of physical health outcomes (although atheists and agnostics did have better health on some individual measures including BMI, number of chronic conditions, and physical limitations), but had worse positive psychological functioning characteristics, social support relationships, and health behaviors. On dimensions related to psychological well-being, atheists and agnostics tended to have worse outcomes than either those with religious affiliation or those with no religious preference. If current trends in the religious composition of the population continue, these results have implications for its future healthcare needs.

Classes of Individual Growth Trajectories of Religious Coping in Older Adulthood: Patterns and Predictors.

For many individuals, religion provides important cognitive resources for coping with stressors, especially in older adulthood. Although older adults are thought to make more use of these coping strategies than those at younger ages, less is known about how patterns of use change during the span of older adulthood. In a largely Christian sample of U.S. older adults, positive and negative religious coping were measured between 2 and 5 times over a period of 11 years (N = 1,075). Growth mixture modeling extracted latent classes of growth. The optimal solution for positive coping indicated a five-class structure (high, stable; high, declining moderately; high, declining rapidly; low, increasing; and low, stable) and the optimal negative coping solution had three classes (low, declining; low, increasing; and high, declining). Nominal logistic regression examined the relationship of individual characteristics with latent class. Education, religious commitment, religious attendance, and religious doubt were related to positive coping trajectory class. Only religious doubt was related to negative coping class.

Forms of Attrition in a Longitudinal Study of Religion and Health in Older Adults and Implications for Sample Bias.

The use of longitudinal designs in the field of religion and health makes it important to understand how attrition bias may affect findings in this area. This study examines attrition in a 4-wave, 8-year study of older adults. Attrition resulted in a sample biased toward more educated and more religiously involved individuals. Conditional linear growth curve models found that trajectories of change for some variables differed among attrition categories. Ineligibles had worsening depression, declining control, and declining attendance. Mortality was associated with worsening religious coping styles. Refusers experienced worsening depression. Nevertheless, there was no evidence of bias in the key religion and health results.