Volatile Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Delirium in Adult Patients Undergoing Cardiac Valve Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of anesthesia regimens on postoperative delirium after on-pump cardiac valve surgery is yet undetermined. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of volatile anesthesia compared with propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on the occurrence of delirium after on-pump cardiac valve surgery. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at a university academic hospital in China, from February 2019 to January 2021. Patients scheduled for on-pump cardiac valve surgery or combined valve with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgeries were randomly assigned to receive anesthesia maintenance with either a volatile anesthetic (sevoflurane or desflurane) or propofol-based TIVA. The primary outcome was the incidence of delirium during the first 7 days after surgery, assessed using the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (ICU). The secondary outcomes included duration of delirium, subtypes of delirium, 30-day mortality, pain score, major morbidity (including cerebral infarction, respiratory failure, and pneumonia), duration of mechanical ventilation, and lengths of ICU and hospital stay. The statistical analysis of the primary outcome variable was by Pearson's χ 2 test. RESULTS: Among the 684 patients analyzed (mean age, 53.8 years; 381 [55.7%] women), 676 were assessed for the primary outcome. Postoperative delirium occurred in 63 of 337 (18.7%) patients receiving volatile anesthesia versus 76 of 339 (22.4%) patients receiving propofol-based TIVA (relative risk, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-1.16; P = .231). There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing on-pump cardiac valve surgery, anesthesia maintenance with a volatile agent did not result in significantly fewer occurrences of postoperative delirium than propofol-based TIVA.

Effect of Volatile Anesthesia Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of volatile anesthesia and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Single-center tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred twenty-four patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: The patients were assigned randomly (1:1) to receive anesthesia maintenance with a volatile anesthetic (sevoflurane or desflurane) or propofol-based TIVA. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications within the first 7 postoperative days. The PPCs occurred in 118 of 262 patients (45.0%) in the volatile anesthesia group compared with 105 of 262 patients (40.1%) in the propofol-based intravenous anesthesia group (relative risk: 1.17 [95% CI 0.96-1.42], p = 0.123). There were no significant differences in the severity of PPCs within 7 days postoperatively, the occurrence and severity grade of PPCs within 30 days, the incidence of hypoxia, and 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, general anesthesia with a volatile anesthetic compared with propofol-based TIVA had not reduced pulmonary complications within the first 7 days after surgery.

Lycium barbarum polysaccharides inhibit ischemia/reperfusion-induced myocardial injury via the Nrf2 antioxidant pathway.

Oxidative stress is considered to be one of main pathophysiological mechanisms in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Lycium barbarum polysaccharides (LBP), the main ingredient of Lycium barbarum, have potential antioxidant activity. We aimed to investigate the effects of LBP on myocardial I/R injury and explore the underlying mechanisms. Myocardial I/R group was treated with or without LBP to evaluate oxidative stress markers and the role of Nrf2 signal pathway. Our results showed that I/R increased infarct size and the activities of creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) when compared with control group. Meanwhile, the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), malondialdehyde (MDA), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were enhanced and the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and catalase (CAT) were decreased. These changes were associated with a significant increase in myocardial apoptosis, ultimately leading to cardiac dysfunction. LBP reduced infarct size (38.4 ± 2 % versus 19.4 ± 1.8 %, p < 0.05), CK and LDH activities and myocardial apoptotic index. Meanwhile, LBP suppressed the production of ROS and restored redox status. Additionally, LBP increased protein level of nuclear Nrf2 in vivo (2.1 ± 0.3 versus 3.8 ± 0.4, p < 0.05) and in vitro (1.9 ± 0.2 versus 3.8 ± 0.1, p < 0.05) and subsequently upregulated heme oxygenase 1 and NADPH dehydrogenase quinone 1 compared to I/R group. Interestingly, Nrf2 siRNA abolished the protective effects of LBP. LBP suppressed oxidative stress damage and attenuated cardiac dysfunction induced by I/R via activation of the Nrf2 antioxidant signal pathway.

The Effect of Propofol Versus Volatile Anesthetics on Persistent Pain After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Sternal incisions can generate persistent and intense post-sternotomy pain. Propofol has been shown to improve postoperative analgesia, but the preventive effect on persistent pain after cardiac surgery is unknown. The hypothesis of the present study was that intraoperative propofol-based anesthesia compared with volatile anesthesia could reduce the risk of chronic pain after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A single-center, two-arm, patient-and-evaluator-blinded, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A single major urban teaching and university hospital. PATIENTS: Five-hundred adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy randomly were assigned. With six withdrawals from the study and five from surgery, 244 in the total intravenous anesthesia group and 245 in the volatile group were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Patients randomly were assigned to receive either propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia or volatile anesthesia during surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcomes were the incidence of pain at three, six, and 12 months after surgery defined as pain score >0 on the numeric rating scale. The secondary outcomes included acute pain, opioid use during the first 72 hours after surgery, and quality of life. The use of propofol did not significantly affect chronic pain at three months (55.4% v 52.9%, difference 2.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.6 to 11.6; p = 0.656), six months (35.5% v 37.5%, difference -2.0%, 95% CI -10.9 to 6.9; p = 0.657), or 12 months (18.2% v 20.7%, difference -2.5%, 95% CI -9.8 to 4.8; p = 0.495) compared with volatile anesthetics. Furthermore, there were no differences in acute pain score; morphine-equivalent consumption during the first 72 hours; and quality of life at three, six, and 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative administration of propofol did not reduce persistent pain after cardiac surgery compared with volatile anesthetics.

Comparison of low and high inspiratory oxygen fraction added to lung-protective ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative lung-protective ventilation strategy has been recommended to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). However, the role of inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) in this protection remains highly uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the effect of intraoperative low (30%) versus high (80%) FiO2 in the context of lung-protective ventilation strategy on PPCs in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, two-arm, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital in China. PATIENTS: A total of ASA I-III 252 patients aged ≥18, who were scheduled for elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 30% or 80% FiO2 during the intraoperative period. All patients received volume-controlled mechanical ventilation with lung-protective ventilation approach, which included a tidal volume of 8 ml kg-1 of predicted body weight, a positive end-expiratory pressure level of 6-8 cmH2O, and repeated recruitment maneuvers. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications within the first 7 postoperative days, consisting of respiratory infection, respiratory failure, bronchospasm, atelectasis, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, and aspiration pneumonitis. The severity grade of PPCs was measured as a key secondary outcome. MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-one patients completed the trial. PPCs occurred in 43 of 125 (34.4%) patients assigned to receive 30% FiO2 compared with 59 of 126 (46.8%) patients receiving 80% FiO2 (relative risk 0.74, 97.5% confidence interval, 0.51-1.02, p = 0.045, > 0.025). The severity of PPCs within the first 7 days following surgery was attenuated significantly in the low (30%) FiO2 group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general anesthesia, an intraoperative lung-protective ventilation strategy with 30% FiO2 compared with 80% FiO2 did not reduce the incidence of PPCs. And the use of 30% FiO2 resulted in less severe pulmonary complications.

PROtective Ventilation with a low versus high Inspiratory Oxygen fraction (PROVIO) and its effects on postoperative pulmonary complications: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are the most common perioperative complications following surgical site infection (SSI). They prolong the hospital stay and increase health care costs. A lung-protective ventilation strategy is considered better practice in abdominal surgery to prevent PPCs. However, the role of the inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) in the strategy remains disputed. Previous trials have focused on reducing SSI by increasing the inhaled oxygen concentration but higher FiO2 (80%) was found to be associated with a greater incidence of atelectasis and mortality in recent research. The trial aims at evaluating the effect of different FiO2 added to the lung-protective ventilation strategy on the incidence of PPCs during general anesthesia for abdominal surgery. METHODS AND DESIGN: PROtective Ventilation with a low versus high Inspiratory Oxygen fraction trial (PROVIO) is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial planning to recruit 252 patients undergoing abdominal surgery lasting for at least 2 h. The patients will be randomly assigned to (1) a low-FiO2 (30% FiO2) group and (2) a high-FiO2 (80% FiO2) group in the lung-protective ventilation strategy. The primary outcome of the study is the occurrence of PPCs within the postoperative 7 days. Secondary outcomes include the severity grade of PPCs, the occurrence of postoperative extrapulmonary complications and all-cause mortality within the postoperative 7 and 30 days. DISCUSSION: The PROVIO trial assesses the effect of low versus high FiO2 added to a lung-protective ventilation strategy on PPCs for abdominal surgery patients and the results should provide practical approaches to intraoperative oxygen management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ChiCTR.org.cn , identifier: ChiCTR18 00014901 . Registered on 13 February 2018.