Factors Associated With Inadequate Health Literacy: An Academic Otolaryngology Clinic Population Study.

Objective: To characterize the prevalence of inadequate health literacy among otolaryngology patients and assess the association of individual patient factors with inadequate health literacy. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Tertiary academic medical center otolaryngology clinic. Methods: Adult patients presenting to the clinic were recruited from March to June 2022. Participants completed a validated health literacy questionnaire in the waiting room. Data on age, sex, race, insurance, county of residence, and language were extracted from the electronic medical record, linked to the survey responses, and deidentified for analysis. Logistic regression analyses assessed the association between inadequate health literacy and patient factors. Results: Of 374 participants, the mean age was 54.8 years (SD = 17.8) and most were white (79%) and native English speakers (95%). The median health literacy score was 14.5 (Q1-Q3: 12.0-15.0) and 43 participants (12%) had inadequate health literacy. Bivariate analysis showed the odds of inadequate health literacy were 2.5 times greater for those with public insurance (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-5.20, P = .011), 3.5 times greater for males (95% CI: 1.75-6.92, P < .001), and significantly different among race groups (P = .003). When all factors were evaluated simultaneously with multivariable regression, only sex (P < .001) and race (P = .005) remained significant predictors of inadequate health literacy. There were no significant associations between health literacy and age or rurality. Conclusion: Inadequate health literacy was associated with sex and race, but not with age or rurality. 12% of patients had inadequate health literacy, which may perpetuate disparities in care and necessitate interventions to improve care delivery in otolaryngology.

Examining the roles of travel distance, medical mistrust, and cancer fatalism in the uptake of clinical cancer prevention among women in rural and urban US communities: A secondary data analysis.

Introduction: Rural adults are less likely to receive cancer screening than urban adults, likely due to systematic differences in community- and individual-level factors. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relative contributions of rurality, travel time, medical mistrust, and cancer fatalism in explaining uptake of clinical cancer prevention services. Methods: We conducted a secondary data analysis of 2019-2020 survey data from women, ages 45-65, in rural and urban counties in central Pennsylvania, examining rurality, travel time to a primary care provider, medical mistrust, and cancer fatalism, as well as uptake of guideline-recommended colorectal cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, and preventive check-up. Final models used multivariable logistic regression to assess the relationships among study variables, controlling for participant demographics. Results: Among 474 participants, 48.9 % resided in rural counties. Most participants had received clinical cancer prevention services (colorectal cancer screening: 55.4 %; cervical cancer screening: 82.8 %; preventive check-up in the last year: 75.4 %). Uptake of services was less common among participants with higher medical mistrust (colorectal cancer screening: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.87, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.76-1.00; cervical cancer screening: aOR = 0.79, 95 % CI = 0.63-1.00; last-year check-up: aOR = 0.74, 95 % CI = 0.63-0.88). Conclusions: Patient attitudes, particularly medical mistrust, may contribute to rural/urban disparities in clinical cancer prevention among women. Community- and individual-level interventions are needed to improve cancer outcomes in rural areas.

The role of social cohesion in explaining rural/urban differences in healthcare access and health status among older adults in the mid-Atlantic United States.

Social cohesion can influence health. It is higher among rural versus urban residents, but the burden of chronic disease is higher in rural communities. We examined the role of social cohesion in explaining rural/urban differences in healthcare access and health status. Rural (n = 1080) and urban (n = 1846) adults (ages 50+) from seven mid-Atlantic U.S. states completed an online, cross-sectional survey on social cohesion and health. We conducted bivariate and multivariable analyses to evaluate the relationships of rurality and social cohesion with healthcare access and health status. Rural participants had higher social cohesion scores than did urban participants (rural: mean = 61.7, standard error[SE] = 0.40; urban: mean = 60.6, SE = 0.35; adjusted beta = 1.45, SE = 0.54, p < .01). Higher social cohesion was associated with greater healthcare access: last-year check-up: adjusted odds ratio[aOR] = 1.25, 95% confidence interval[CI] = 1.17-1.33; having a personal provider: aOR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.03-1.18; and being up-to-date with CRC screening: aOR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.10-1.25. In addition, higher social cohesion was associated with improved health status: higher mental health scores (adjusted beta = 1.03, SE = 0.15, p < .001) and lower body mass index (BMI; beta = -0.26, SE = 0.10, p = .01). Compared to urban participants, rural participants were less likely to have a personal provider, had lower physical and mental health scores, and had higher BMI. Paradoxically, rural residents had higher social cohesion but generally poorer health outcomes than did urban residents, even though higher social cohesion is associated with better health. These findings have implications for research and policy to promote social cohesion and health, particularly for health promotion interventions to reduce disparities experienced by rural residents.

Leveraging community engagement to increase the health literacy of youth in rural Pennsylvania: The ACHIEVE program.

PURPOSE: Limited health literacy is prevalent within rural populations and associated with poor health outcomes. This study examined a school-based, community-engaged program called ACHIEVE (Advancing Community Health Innovation through Education, Vision, and Empowerment) for preliminary efficacy in improving knowledge and self-efficacy related to health literacy among youth in rural Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania. METHODS: ACHIEVE was designed using an iterative process that utilized validated sources, educational standards, and community engagement. Five novel health literacy modules were piloted by the program in Huntingdon Area High School and delivered to ∼269 students during the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 school years. To determine the impact of the program, we assessed participants' change in health knowledge and self-efficacy using pre- and post-tests for each module. Responses were collected via anonymous surveys and analyzed using unequal variance t-tests and chi-square tests. FINDINGS: The overall mean difference between pre- and post-tests ranged from 0.07 to 0.67, with a significant increase in participants' assessment scores following 4 out of the 5 program modules (P < .05). Across the 5 modules, both knowledge and self-efficacy domains displayed a significant improvement from pre- to post-test (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that community partnerships in rural communities can be used to create effective community health interventions, such as our health literacy program, which significantly increased high school students' knowledge and self-efficacy.

Hypocalcemia After Thyroidectomy in Patients with Prior Bariatric Surgery: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis from a National Administrative Database.

Background: Studies have suggested that patients with prior gastric bypass may be at increased risk for hypocalcemia following thyroidectomy. Unfortunately, most of these studies are limited to case reports and small series. This study represents the largest sample size to date to assess the incidence of post-thyroidectomy hypocalcemia in patients with a history of bariatric surgery. Methods: The TriNetX Research Network was queried to retrospectively identify patients with prior bariatric surgery who underwent total thyroidectomy between 2011 and 2021. The incidence of hypocalcemia following surgery was compared with patients who underwent total thyroidectomy, and hemithyroidectomy with no history of bariatric surgery. Results: We identified 446 patients with a history of bariatric surgery and subsequent thyroidectomy, 29,346 patients with total thyroidectomy, and 19,603 patients with hemithyroidectomy alone. The one-month incidence of hypocalcemia was 54.7% in those with a history of bariatric surgery who underwent thyroidectomy, 43.9% in those with thyroidectomy alone (relative risk, RR = 1.2 [confidence interval, CI 1.1-1.4], p < 0.001), and 8.1% in those with hemithyroidectomy only (RR = 6.8 [CI 6.1-7.4], p < 0.001). Permanent hypocalcemia was documented in 11.4% of patients with prior bariatric surgery who underwent thyroidectomy, 7.7% of those with thyroidectomy only (RR = 1.5 [CI 1.1-1.9], p = 0.003), and 2.9% of patients with hemithyroidectomy alone (RR = 3.9 [CI 3.0-5.2], p < 0.001). Significant differences persisted after matching demographics, prior need for supplementation, and risk factors for hypocalcemia after thyroidectomy. When stratified by bariatric procedure, patients with a history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (n = 35) had a greater, although not statistically significant, risk of short-term hypocalcemia (51.4%; RR = 1.2 [CI 0.8-1.6], p = 0.37), and a significantly increased risk of permanent hypocalcemia (20.0%; RR = 2.6 [CI 1.3-5.1], p = 0.005) compared with thyroidectomy alone. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (n = 40) was not associated with an increased risk of short-term (40.0%; RR = 0.9 [CI 0.6-1.3], p = 0.62) or permanent (7.5%; RR = 1.0 [CI 0.3-2.9], p = 0.96) hypocalcemia. Conclusions: Prior RYGB, but not SG, may increase the risk of permanent hypocalcemia after thyroidectomy. Additional research is necessary to determine optimal prevention and treatment strategies to reduce morbidity in this population.