Carotid intimamedia thickness in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia.

Background and aims: Severe hypertriglyceridemia (HTG), defined as plasma triglyceride (TG) concentration > 10 mmol/L, is relatively uncommon, and its implications for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk remain somewhat unclear. We evaluated the association between severe HTG and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), a marker for ASCVD. Methods: We studied three clinical cohorts: 88 patients with severe HTG (mean TG level 20.6 mmol/L), 271 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) as a contrast group, and 70 normolipidemic controls. Carotid IMT was measured using standardized ultrasound imaging. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare mean IMT values, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to adjust for confounding variables, specifically age and sex, as well as Spearman pairwise correlation analysis between variables. Results: Unadjusted mean carotid IMT was greater in severe HTG and FH groups compared to controls, however, this was no longer significant for severe HTG after adjustment for age and sex. In contrast, adjusted carotid IMT remained significantly different between the FH and control groups. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that extreme TG elevations in severe HTG patients are not significantly associated with carotid IMT, in contrast to the increased IMT seen in FH patients. These findings add perspective to the complex relationship between severe HTG and ASCVD risk.

Consideration and Application of Lipoprotein(a) in the Risk Assessment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults.

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is an low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle in which apolipoprotein (apo) B is covalently bound to a plasminogen-like molecule called apo(a). A High level of Lp(a) has been demonstrated to be an independent, causal, and prevalent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), as well as aortic valve disease, through mechanisms that promote atherogenesis, inflammation, and thrombosis. With reliable and accessible assays, Lp(a) level has been established to be associated linearly with the risk for ASCVD. The 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Dyslipidemia Guidelines recommend measuring an Lp(a) level once in a person's lifetime as part of the initial lipid screening. The aim of this review is to provide an update and overview of the utility and application of Lp(a) level in the assessment and treatment of adults at risk for ASCVD, consistent with this guideline recommendation.

La lipoprotéine(a), ou Lp(a), est une lipoprotéine de basse densité dans laquelle l'apolipoprotéine B est liée de manière covalente à une molécule semblable au plasminogène, l'apolipoprotéine(a). On a démontré qu'un taux élevé de Lp(a) est un facteur de risque indépendant, causal et fréquent d'athérosclérose cardiovasculaire (ASCV) et de valvulopathie aortique, en raison de mécanismes qui favorisent l'athérogénèse, l'inflammation et la thrombose. Des épreuves fiables et accessibles ont permis d'établir que le taux de Lp(a) était associé de façon linéaire à un risque d'ASCV. Dans ses lignes directrices de 2021 sur la prise en charge de la dyslipidémie, la Société cardiovasculaire du Canada recommande de mesurer le taux de Lp(a) une fois au cours de la vie d'une personne, dans le cadre du dépistage initial des lipides. Le présent article vise à fournir une mise à jour et un compte rendu de l'utilité et de l'application du taux de Lp(a) dans l'évaluation et le traitement des adultes présentant un risque d'ASCV, conformément à cette recommandation issue des lignes directrices.

Olezarsen, Acute Pancreatitis, and Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Familial chylomicronemia syndrome is a genetic disorder associated with severe hypertriglyceridemia and severe acute pancreatitis. Olezarsen reduces the plasma triglyceride level by reducing hepatic synthesis of apolipoprotein C-III. METHODS: In a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned patients with genetically identified familial chylomicronemia syndrome to receive olezarsen at a dose of 80 mg or 50 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 53 weeks. There were two primary end points: the difference between the 80-mg olezarsen group and the placebo group in the percent change in the fasting triglyceride level from baseline to 6 months, and (to be assessed if the first was significant) the difference between the 50-mg olezarsen group and the placebo group. Secondary end points included the mean percent change from baseline in the apolipoprotein C-III level and an independently adjudicated episode of acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients underwent randomization; 22 were assigned to the 80-mg olezarsen group, 21 to the 50-mg olezarsen group, and 23 to the placebo group. At baseline, the mean (±SD) triglyceride level among the patients was 2630±1315 mg per deciliter, and 71% had a history of acute pancreatitis within the previous 10 years. Triglyceride levels at 6 months were significantly reduced with the 80-mg dose of olezarsen (-43.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -69.1 to -17.9; P<0.001) but not with the 50-mg dose (-22.4%; 95% CI, -47.2 to 2.5; P = 0.08). The difference in the mean percent change in the apolipoprotein C-III level from baseline to 6 months in the 80-mg group as compared with the placebo group was -73.7% (95% CI, -94.6 to -52.8) and between the 50-mg group as compared with the placebo group was -65.5% (95% CI, -82.6 to -48.3). By 53 weeks, 11 episodes of acute pancreatitis had occurred in the placebo group, and 1 episode had occurred in each olezarsen group (rate ratio [pooled olezarsen groups vs. placebo], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.66). Adverse events of moderate severity that were considered by a trial investigator at the site to be related to the trial drug or placebo occurred in 4 patients in the 80-mg olezarsen group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome, olezarsen may represent a new therapy to reduce plasma triglyceride levels. (Funded by Ionis Pharmaceuticals; Balance ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04568434.).

Link among apolipoprotein E E4, gait, and cognition in neurodegenerative diseases: ONDRI study.

INTRODUCTION: Apolipoprotein E E4 allele (APOE E4) and slow gait are independently associated with cognitive impairment and dementia. However, it is unknown whether their coexistence is associated with poorer cognitive performance and its underlying mechanism in neurodegenerative diseases. METHODS: Gait speed, APOE E4, cognition, and neuroimaging were assessed in 480 older adults with neurodegeneration. Participants were grouped by APOE E4 presence and slow gait. Mediation analyses were conducted to determine if brain structures could explain the link between these factors and cognitive performance. RESULTS: APOE E4 carriers with slow gait had the lowest global cognitive performance and smaller gray matter volumes compared to non-APOE E4 carriers with normal gait. Coexistence of APOE E4 and slow gait best predicted global and domain-specific poorer cognitive performances, mediated by smaller gray matter volume. DISCUSSION: Gait slowness in APOE E4 carriers with neurodegenerative diseases may indicate extensive gray matter changes associated with poor cognition. HIGHLIGHTS: APOE E4 and slow gait are risk factors for cognitive decline in neurodegenerative diseases. Slow gait and smaller gray matter volumes are associated, independently of APOE E4. Worse cognition in APOE E4 carriers with slow gait is explained by smaller GM volume. Gait slowness in APOE E4 carriers indicates poorer cognition-related brain changes.

Evolocumab Treatment in Pediatric Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Pooled Data From Three Open-Label Studies.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) have an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and difficulty meeting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated pooled safety and efficacy data from 3 studies in pediatric patients with HoFH treated with the PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) monoclonal antibody inhibitor evolocumab. METHODS: Patients with HoFH aged 10 to 17 years received treatment with open-label evolocumab 420 mg subcutaneously monthly or biweekly in the TAUSSIG, RAMAN, or HAUSER-OLE clinical studies. All patients received background statins with or without ezetimibe. Study duration ranged from 12 to 260 weeks. The primary end point was treatment-emergent adverse events per 100 patient-years. Efficacy end points were changes from baseline to week 12 in lipids and PCSK9. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients in the pooled analysis, 69.2% were males, median age was 13.0 years, and 79.5% (31/39) had genotyped HoFH with LDLR pathogenic variants. Overall, median exposure to evolocumab was 18.2 (Q1, Q3: 3.0, 18.5) months. Treatment-emergent adverse events with an exposure-adjusted patient incidence rate of ≥5% were upper respiratory tract infection (6.6%), influenza (5.2%), and acne (5.0%) per 100 patient-years. Exposure-adjusted patient incidence of serious treatment-emergent adverse events was 13.3% per 100 patient-years. Excluding 4 patients receiving lipoprotein apheresis, week 12 median percentage change from baseline in LDL-C was -2.9% (Q1, Q3: -21.7, 1.5); however, 42.9% (15/35) of patients achieved ≥15% reduction in LDL-C from baseline. Residual LDLR (LDL receptor) activity was not associated with a reduction in LDL-C. CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled data analysis from 3 studies in pediatric patients with HoFH, evolocumab was well tolerated, with no new safety signals reported. These safety findings are consistent with findings from previous studies of evolocumab. Patients showed marked variability in LDL-C reduction. Results from this pooled analysis support guidelines suggesting a trial of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy regardless of estimated residual LDLR function. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01624142, NCT03403374, and NCT02624869.

Lipoprotein(a) in Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Background: Low density lipoprotein (LDL) and Lipoprotein (Lp)(a) are proatherogenic apolipoprotein (apo) B-containing members of the non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) family of particles. Elevated plasma levels of LDL cholesterol (C), non-HDL-C, and apo B are defining features of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), but reports of elevated plasma Lp(a) concentration are inconsistent. Methods: We performed retrospective chart reviews of 256 genetically characterized patients with hypercholesterolemia and 272 control subjects from the Lipid Genetics Clinic at University Hospital in London, Ontario. We evaluated pairwise correlations between plasma levels of Lp(a) and those of LDL-C, non-HDL-C and apo B. Results: Mean Lp(a) levels were not different between individuals with hypercholesterolemia and control subjects. No correlations were found between Lp(a) and LDL-C or non-HDL-C levels in controls or patients with hypercholesterolemia; all r values < 0.079 and all P values > 0.193. Borderline weak correlations between Lp(a) and apo B were identified in patients r = 0.103; P = 0.112) and controls (r = 0.175; P = 0.005). Results were similar across genotypic subgroups. Conclusions: Lp(a) levels are independent of LDL-C and non-HDL-C; in particular Lp(a) levels are not increased in patients with hypercholesterolemia and molecularly proven HeFH. Apo B was only weakly associated with Lp(a). Elevated Lp(a) does not cause FH in our clinic patients. Genetic variants causing HeFH that raise LDL-C do not affect Lp(a), confirming that these lipoproteins are metabolically distinct. Lp(a) cannot be predicted from LDL-C and must be determined separately to evaluate its amplifying effect on atherosclerotic risk in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Introduction: Les lipoprotéines de faible densité (LDL) et les lipoprotéines (Lp)(a) sont des éléments contenant des apolipoprotéines (apo)B proathérogènes de la famille des particules non à lipoprotéines de haute densité (non-HDL). Des concentrations plasmatiques élevées de cholestérol LDL, de cholestérol non-HDL et d'apoB sont des caractéristiques déterminantes de l'hypercholestérolémie familiale de type hétérozygote (HFHe), mais les documents qui portent sur les concentrations plasmatiques élevées de Lp(a) sont contradictoires. Méthodes: Nous avons effectué des revues rétrospectives de dossiers de 256 patients ayant les caractéristiques génétiques de l'hypercholestérolémie, et 272 témoins de la clinique de dyslipidémies génétiques de l'Hôpital universitaire de London, en Ontario. Nous avons évalué les corrélations par paires entre les concentrations plasmatiques de Lp(a) et celles du cholestérol LDL, du cholestérol non-HDL et de l'apoB. Résultats: Les concentrations moyennes de Lp(a) n'étaient pas différentes entre les individus atteints d'hypercholestérolémie et les témoins. Aucune corrélation n'a été observée entre les concentrations de Lp(a) et de cholestérol LDL ou de cholestérol non­HDL des témoins ou des patients atteints d'hypercholestérolémie ; toutes valeurs r < 0,079 et toutes valeurs P > 0,193. Nous avons relevé des corrélations limites faibles entre les concentrations de Lp(a) et d'apoB chez les patients r = 0,103 ; P = 0,112) et les témoins (r = 0,175 ; P = 0,005). Les résultats étaient similaires dans tous les sous-groupes génotypiques. Conclusions: Les concentrations de Lp(a) sont indépendantes des concentrations de cholestérol LDL et de cholestérol non­HDL ; notamment les concentrations de Lp(a) n'augmentent pas chez les patients atteints d'hypercholestérolémie et de HFHe moléculairement prouvée. L'apoB n'était que faiblement associée aux concentrations de Lp(a). Les concentrations élevées de Lp(a) ne causaient pas la HF chez les patients de notre clinique. Les variants génétiques causant la HFHe qui font augmenter les concentrations de cholestérol LDL n'affectent pas les concentrations de Lp(a), ce qui confirme que ces lipoprotéines sont distinctes sur le plan métabolique. Puisqu'on ne peut prédire les concentrations de Lp(a) à partir des concentrations de cholestérol LDL, elles doivent être déterminées séparément pour évaluer leur effet amplificateur sur le risque athérosclérotique des patients atteints d'hypercholestérolémie.

Sex differences in the presentation, treatment and outcomes of patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare, autosomal semi-dominant lipid metabolism disorder characterized by extremely high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and premature cardiovascular disease. The objective of this study was to investigate sex-differences in the treatment and outcomes of patients with HoFH. METHODS: We examined clinical characteristics, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and cardiovascular events using descriptive statistics of patients in the Canadian HoFH registry. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke. Sex differences between continuous and categorical variables were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's Exact test, respectively. RESULTS: This study included 48 patients (27 (56%) female). The median age at diagnosis in females was 14.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 9.0-30.0) and in males was 8.0 (IQR 2.0-23.0) (p = 0.07). Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between both sexes. The median baseline LDL-C was 12.7 mmol/L (10.0-18.3) in females and 15.3 (10.5-20.0) in males (p = 0.51). Follow up LDL-C levels were 7.6 mmol/L (IQR 4.8-11.0) in females and 6.3 (IQR 4.6-7.5) in males (p = 0.1). Most patients were taking 3 or more LLTs, with comparable proportions in both sexes (p = 0.26). Apheresis was similar in both sexes, 14 (51.8%) vs. 10 (47.6%) (p = 0.2). Over a mean of 10 years of follow-up, MACE occurred in 3 females (11.1%) and 4 males (19.1%) (p = 0.2). CONCLUSION: Lipid levels and treatment were similar between sexes. MACE occurred in similar proportions between sexes, indicating that HoFH offsets the inherently lower cardiovascular risk in pre-menopausal females. Further investigation into sex-differences in HoFH in larger sample sizes is warranted.

Recommendations for statin management in primary prevention: disparities among international risk scores.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Statin recommendations in primary prevention depend upon risk algorithms. Moreover, with intermediate risk, risk enhancers and de-enhancers are advocated to aid decisions. The aim of this study was to compare algorithms used in North America and Europe for the identification of patients warranting statin or consideration of risk enhancers and de-enhancers. METHODS: A simulated population (n = 7680) equal in males and females, with/without smoking, aged 45-70 years, total cholesterol 3.5-7.0 mmol/L, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 0.6-2.2 mmol/L, and systolic blood pressure 100-170 mmHg, was evaluated. High, intermediate, and low risks were determined using the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE), four versions of Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2), and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) algorithm (0-1000 Agatston Units). RESULTS: Concordance for the three levels of risk varied from 19% to 85%. Both sexes might be considered to have low, intermediate, or high risk depending on the algorithm applied, even with the same burden of risk factors. Only SCORE2 (High Risk and Very High Risk versions) identified equal proportions of males and females with high risk. Excluding MESA, the proportion with moderate risk was 25% (SCORE2, Very High Risk Region), 32% (FRS), 39% (PCE), and 45% (SCORE2, Low Risk Region). CONCLUSION: Risk algorithms differ substantially in their estimation of risk, recommendations for statin treatment, and use of ancillary testing, even in identical patients. These results highlight the limitations of currently used risk-based approaches for addressing lipid-specific risk in primary prevention.

Increased FH-Risk-Score and Diabetes Are Cardiovascular Risk Equivalents in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic condition causing premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). It is well established that patients with FH should be treated with statin therapy. However, there exists discordance concerning low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering goals in the management of these patients between different guidelines worldwide. The objective was to compare the 10-year ASCVD risk of different subgroups of patients with and without FH including those with diabetes or a history of ASCVD and patients with FH within different FH-Risk-Score categories. METHODS: This multinational observational study used data from 3 different prospective cohorts. A total of 3383 FH and 6917 non-FH controls matched for age and sex were included (104 363 person-years of follow-up). The 10-year incident ASCVD risk was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, whereas the relative risk was estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: FH patients with a high (score >20%) FH-Risk-Score (hazard ratio, 8.45 [95% CI, 6.69-10.67]; P<0.0001), FH patients with diabetes (hazard ratio, 7.67 [95% CI, 4.82-12.21]; P<0.0001), and non-FH patients with ASCVD (hazard ratio, 6.78 [95% CI, 5.45-8.42]; P<0.0001) had a significantly higher incident ASCVD risk over 10 years than the reference group (non-FH without ASCVD or diabetes). The observed 10-year risks in these groups were 32.1%, 30.8%, 30.0%, and 5.1%, respectively. The 10-year ASCVD risk associated with both FH and ASCVD was extremely high (observed risk of 50.7%; hazard ratio, 14.53 [95% CI, 12.14-17.38]; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study strongly suggests that the observed risk of FH patients with diabetes, history of ASCVD, and FH-Risk-Score >20% is as high or higher than non-FH individuals with a history of ASCVD. More aggressive management should be recommended for these patients.

Association of plasma biomarkers with cognition, cognitive decline, and daily function across and within neurodegenerative diseases: Results from the Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated whether novel plasma biomarkers are associated with cognition, cognitive decline, and functional independence in activities of daily living across and within neurodegenerative diseases. METHODS: Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NfL), phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181 and amyloid beta (Aß)42/40 were measured using ultra-sensitive Simoa immunoassays in 44 healthy controls and 480 participants diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease/mild cognitive impairment (AD/MCI), Parkinson's disease (PD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD) spectrum disorders, or cerebrovascular disease (CVD). RESULTS: GFAP, NfL, and/or p-tau181 were elevated among all diseases compared to controls, and were broadly associated with worse baseline cognitive performance, greater cognitive decline, and/or lower functional independence. While GFAP, NfL, and p-tau181 were highly predictive across diseases, p-tau181 was more specific to the AD/MCI cohort. Sparse associations were found in the FTD and CVD cohorts and for Aß42/40 . DISCUSSION: GFAP, NfL, and p-tau181 are valuable predictors of cognition and function across common neurodegenerative diseases, and may be useful in specialized clinics and clinical trials.

Genetic variation in apolipoprotein A-V in hypertriglyceridemia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While biallelic rare APOA5 pathogenic loss-of-function (LOF) variants cause familial chylomicronemia syndrome, heterozygosity for such variants is associated with highly variable triglyceride phenotypes ranging from normal to severe hypertriglyceridemia, often in the same individual at different time points. Here we provide an updated overview of rare APOA5 variants in hypertriglyceridemia. RECENT FINDINGS: Currently, most variants in APOA5 that are considered to be pathogenic according to guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics are those resulting in premature termination codons. There are minimal high quality functional data on the impact of most rare APOA5 missense variants; many are considered as variants of unknown or uncertain significance. Furthermore, particular common polymorphisms of APOA5 , such as p.Ser19Trp and p.Gly185Cys in Caucasian and Asian populations, respectively, are statistically overrepresented in hypertriglyceridemia cohorts and are sometimes misattributed as being causal for chylomicronemia, when they are merely risk alleles for hypertriglyceridemia. SUMMARY: Both biallelic and monoallelic LOF variants in APOA5 are associated with severe hypertriglyceridemia, although the biochemical phenotype in the monoallelic state is highly variable and is often exacerbated by secondary factors. Currently, with few exceptions, the principal definitive mechanism for APOA5 pathogenicity is through premature truncation. The pathogenic mechanisms of most missense variants in APOA5 remain unclear and require additional functional experiments or family studies.

Polygenic risk for triglyceride levels in the presence of a high impact rare variant.

BACKGROUND: Elevated triglyceride (TG) levels are a heritable and modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and have well-established associations with common genetic variation captured in a polygenic risk score (PRS). In young adulthood, the 22q11.2 microdeletion conveys a 2-fold increased risk for mild-moderate hypertriglyceridemia. This study aimed to assess the role of the TG-PRS in individuals with this elevated baseline risk for mild-moderate hypertriglyceridemia. METHODS: We studied a deeply phenotyped cohort of adults (n = 157, median age 34 years) with a 22q11.2 microdeletion and available genome sequencing, lipid level, and other clinical data. The association between a previously developed TG-PRS and TG levels was assessed using a multivariable regression model adjusting for effects of sex, BMI, and other covariates. We also constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves using logistic regression models to assess the ability of TG-PRS and significant clinical variables to predict mild-moderate hypertriglyceridemia status. RESULTS: The TG-PRS was a significant predictor of TG-levels (p = 1.52E-04), along with male sex and BMI, in a multivariable model (pmodel = 7.26E-05). The effect of TG-PRS appeared to be slightly stronger in individuals with obesity (BMI ≥ 30) (beta = 0.4617) than without (beta = 0.1778), in a model unadjusted for other covariates (p-interaction = 0.045). Among ROC curves constructed, the inclusion of TG-PRS, sex, and BMI as predictor variables produced the greatest area under the curve (0.749) for classifying those with mild-moderate hypertriglyceridemia, achieving an optimal sensitivity and specificity of 0.746 and 0.707, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that in addition to significant effects of sex and BMI, genome-wide common variation captured in a PRS also contributes to the variable expression of the 22q11.2 microdeletion with respect to elevated TG levels.