RESUMO
AIMS: Mitiperstat is a novel, highly potent myeloperoxidase inhibitor being evaluated in patients with cardio-metabolic disease (phase 2). These patients often have impaired renal function, which may affect mitiperstat pharmacokinetics. This study assessed mitiperstat pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability in participants with severe renal impairment and normal renal function, to inform inclusion of participants with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 in phase 3. METHODS: Participants with severe renal impairment (eGFR ≥15 and <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) who were not on dialysis (n = 10) and group-matched controls (eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 10) received a single mitiperstat 2.5 mg oral tablet. Blood samples were collected at intervals for 2 weeks and urine samples for 24 h post-dose. RESULTS: Total apparent mitiperstat clearance was 10.83 L/h in the severe renal impairment cohort and 25.62 L/h in the control cohort. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve was 2.37-fold higher (90% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79, 3.12) in the severe renal impairment cohort than in the control cohort, with longer elimination half-life and similar maximum concentration. Non-renal clearance was similar between the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Mitiperstat apparent clearance was approximately twofold lower in individuals with severe renal impairment than in those with normal renal function. Lower clearance was driven by reduced renal clearance; non-renal clearance was similar. Mitiperstat was generally well tolerated by participants with severe renal impairment and normal renal function. These findings, together with efficacy and safety/tolerability data from phase 2b, will guide the dosing regimen for phase 3.
RESUMO
AIMS: Early clinical studies have indicated that the pharmacokinetics of Atuliflapon (AZD5718) are time and dose dependent. The reason(s) for these findings is(are) not fully understood, but pre-clinical profiling suggests that time-dependent CYP3A4 inhibition cannot be excluded. In clinical practice, Atuliflapon will be co-administered with CYP3A4 substrates; thus, it is important to determine the impact of Atuliflapon on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of CYP3A4 substrates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Atuliflapon on the pharmacokinetics of a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate, midazolam, and to explore if the time-/dose-dependent effect seen after repeated dosing could be an effect of change in CYP3A4 activity. METHODS: Open-label, fixed-sequence study in healthy volunteers to assess the PK of midazolam alone and in combination with Atuliflapon. Fourteen healthy male subjects received single oral dose of midazolam 2 mg on days 1 and 7 and single oral doses of Atuliflapon (125 mg) from days 2 to 7. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to assess this drug-drug interaction. RESULTS: Mean midazolam values of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) to infinity were increased by 39% and 56%, respectively, when co-administered with Atuliflapon vs. midazolam alone. The PBPK model predicted a 27% and 44% increase in AUC and a 23% and 35% increase in Cmax of midazolam following its co-administrations with two predicted therapeutically relevant doses of Atuliflapon. CONCLUSIONS: Atuliflapon is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4; this was confirmed by the validated PBPK model. This weak inhibition is predicted to have a minor PK effect on CYP3A4 metabolized drugs.