Perioperative Doppler ultrasound assessment of portal vein flow pulsatility in high-risk cardiac surgery patients: a multicentre prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein Doppler ultrasound pulsatility measured by transoesophageal echocardiography is a marker of the haemodynamic impact of venous congestion in cardiac surgery. We investigated whether the presence of abnormal portal vein flow pulsatility is associated with a longer duration of invasive life support and postoperative complications in high-risk patients. METHODS: In this multicentre cohort study, pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound assessments of portal vein flow were performed during anaesthesia before initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass (before CPB) and after separation of cardiopulmonary bypass (after CPB). Abnormal pulsatility was defined as portal pulsatility fraction (PPF) ≥50% (PPF50). The primary outcome was the cumulative time in perioperative organ dysfunction (TPOD) requiring invasive life support during 28 days. Secondary outcomes included major postoperative complications. RESULTS: 373 patients, 71 (22.0%) had PPF50 before CPB and 77 (24.9%) after CPB. PPF50 was associated with longer duration of TPOD (median [inter-quartile range]; before CPB: 27 h [11-72] vs 19 h [8.5-42], P=0.02; after CPB: 27 h [11-61] vs 20 h [8-42], P=0.006). After adjusting for confounders, PPF50 before CPB showed significant association with TPOD. PPF50 after CPB was associated with a higher rate of major postoperative complications (36.4% vs 20.3%, P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal portal vein flow pulsatility before cardiopulmonary bypass was associated with longer duration of life support therapy after cardiac surgery in high-risk patients. Abnormal portal vein flow pulsatility after cardiopulmonary bypass separation was associated with a higher risk of major postoperative complications although this association was not independent of other factors. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03656263.

Coagulation and Transfusion Updates From 2021.

2021 and the COVID 19 pandemic have brought unprecedented blood shortages worldwide. These deficits have propelled national efforts to reduce blood usage, including limiting elective services and accelerating Patient Blood Management (PBM) initiatives. A host of research dedicated to blood usage and management within cardiac surgery has continued to emerge. The intent of this review is to highlight this past year's research pertaining to PBM and COVID-19-related coagulation changes.

The Year in Coagulation: Selected Highlights from 2020.

This is the second annual review in the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia to cover highlights in coagulation for cardiac surgery. The goal of this article is to provide readers with a focused summary from the literature of the prior year's most important coagulation topics. In 2020, this included a discussion covering allogeneic transfusion, antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy, factor concentrates, coagulation testing, mechanical circulatory support, and the effects of coronavirus disease 2019.

Hematologic evaluation of intraoperative autologous blood collection and allogeneic transfusion in cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Acute normovolemic hemodilution is recommended as a technique to reduce allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in cardiac surgery, but its efficacy to reduce non-RBC transfusion has not been consistently demonstrated. We hypothesized that intraoperative large-volume autologous whole blood (AWB) collection and reinfusion improves viscoelastic coagulation parameters. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective observational study of cardiac surgery patients at the University of Maryland Medical Center between December 2017 and August 2019. Rotational thromboelastometry parameters were compared between AWB and control groups (n = 25 in each group) at three time points: T1, baseline; T2, on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) after the cross-clamp removal; and T3, 30-60 minutes after protamine administration. The study's primary outcomes were whole blood viscoelastic coagulation parameters that included EXTEM clotting time (CT), FIBTEM amplitude at 10 minutes, and EXTEM amplitude at 10 minutes (EXTEM-A10 ). Chest tube drainage and allogeneic transfusion were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Reinfusion of AWB after CPB resulted in a significantly shorter EXTEM CT; mean difference, -11.4 seconds (-21.4 to -1.4; P = .03). It also resulted in a greater percentage increase in EXTEM A10 from T2 to T3; mean difference, 7.8% (95% CI, 1.1%-14.5%; P = .02). Statistical significance was not found in 24-hour chest tube drainage. CONCLUSION: Large-volume AWB collection and reinfusion are feasible in selected cardiac surgical patients, and may be associated with prohemostatic effects according to thromboelastometry, warranting further investigation with a prospective randomized study.

Evolution of viscoelastic coagulation testing.

INTRODUCTION: The methods of viscoelastic coagulation testing (VCT) have evolved since the original invention of thrombelastography over 60 years ago, and new generations of devices are clinically used to guide hemostatic interventions at bedside. The utility of VCTs has been demonstrated in several clinical trials, but diagnostic performance of VCT may vary between devices, various transfusion algorithms, and patient populations. AREAS COVERED: Working principles and currently available data on the evolving VCTs for coagulation monitoring in acute care settings are reviewed. The PubMed database was used to search pertinent retrospective, prospective, and meta-analysis data on VCTs. EXPERT OPINION: Point-of-care VCTs provide clinically useful information on platelet count, fibrin polymerization, and other procoagulant factor activities in acute bleeding due to trauma or major surgery, and antithrombotic therapy. The addition of fibrin-specific VCT channel has brought renewed attention to early correction of fibrinogen deficiency using fibrinogen-rich component therapy, and stabilization of fibrin with antifibrinolytic agents. Normal reference ranges vary between devices, and diagnostic and treatment algorithms should be specifically established for each device and indication. There is interest in utilizing VCTs in complex coagulation management relating to hemophilia with inhibitors, but the standardized protocol has not been established.

Reversal of Vasodilatory Shock: Current Perspectives on Conventional, Rescue, and Emerging Vasoactive Agents for the Treatment of Shock.

Understanding the different mechanisms of vasoconstrictors is crucial to their optimal application to clinically diverse shock states. We present a comprehensive review of conventional, rescue, and novel vasoactive agents including their pharmacology and evidence supporting their use in vasodilatory shock. The role of each drug in relation to the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines is discussed to provide a context of how each one fits into the algorithm for treating vasodilatory shock. Rescue agents can be utilized when conventional medications fail, although there are varying levels of evidence on their clinical effectiveness. In addition, novel agents for the treatment of vasodilatory shock have recently emerged such as ascorbic acid and angiotensin II. Ascorbic acid has been used with some success in vasoplegia and is currently undergoing a more rigorous evaluation of its utility. Angiotensin II (Ang-2) is the newest available vasopressor for the treatment of vasodilatory shock. In addition to its catecholamine-sparing properties, it has been shown to hold promising mortality benefits in certain subsets of critically ill patients.

Impact of intraoperative high-volume autologous blood collection on allogeneic transfusion during and after cardiac surgery: a propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative use of allogeneic blood products is associated with higher morbidity, mortality, and hospital costs after cardiac surgery. Blood conservation techniques such as acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) report variable success. We hypothesized that large-volume ANH with limited hemodilution would reduce allogeneic blood transfusion compared to the standard practice. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study of cardiac surgery patients at the University of Maryland Medical Center between January 2014 and September 2017. Using the institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database 91 autologous and 981 control patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, or both were identified. After propensity matching of 13 preoperative characteristics, 84 autologous and 84 control patients were evaluated. Our primary endpoint was avoidance of blood transfusion during index hospitalization, and secondary endpoints were postoperative bleeding and major adverse outcomes. RESULTS: The median harvest volumes in the ANH and control groups were 1100 mL and 400 mL, respectively. Of the ANH group, 25% received any transfusion versus 45.2% of the control group after propensity score matching (p < 0.006). When controlling for preoperative platelet count, the transfusion rate ratios for ANH were 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.88) for RBCs and 0.63 (0.44-0.89) for non-RBC components, which were both found to be statistically significant. There was no difference found in major adverse events. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that large-volume ANH is beneficial in reducing both RBC and non-RBC component usage in cardiac surgery. A further prospective validation is warranted.

Clinical Impact of Protamine Titration-Based Heparin Neutralization in Patients Undergoing Coronary Bypass Grafting Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: A hemostasis management system (HMS) is a point-of-care method for heparin and protamine titration. The authors hypothesized that protamine dosing over the HMS estimate would be associated with elevated activated clotting time (ACT), increased bleeding, and transfusion owing to protamine's anticoagulant activity. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-nine patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were stratified into 3 groups per ratio of actual total administered protamine versus the HMS-derived protamine estimate: (1) low-ratio (≤66% of HMS estimate), (2) moderate-ratio (66%-100% of HMS estimate), and (3) high-ratio (>100% of HMS estimate). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoints were post-protamine ACT, and residual heparin levels on HMS among the 3 groups in addition to bleeding and transfusion. There were 54 (28.6%) patients in the low, 95 (50.3%) in the moderate, and 40 (21.2%) in the high-ratio group. The high-ratio patients who were overdosed with protamine relative to the HMS estimate had elevated ACT, international normalized ratio, and activated partial thromboplastin time values, and subsequently received more red blood cell (RBC) and non-RBC transfusions compared to lower-ratio groups. Higher actual/HMS protamine ratios were associated independently with post-protamine ACT elevations after adjustment for sex, body mass index (BMI), and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time. CONCLUSION: Most patients received the protamine dose sufficiently close to the HMS estimate, but protamine dosing above the HMS estimate occurred in both obese and nonobese patients, which was associated independently with prolonged ACT after adjusting for sex, BMI, and CPB time.