The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) guideline for the approach to suspected antibiotic allergy.

OBJECTIVES: Prudent handling of reported antibiotic allergies is an important aspect of antibiotic stewardship. The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) constituted a multidisciplinary expert committee to provide evidence-based recommendations for bedside decision-making in antibiotic therapy in patients that report an antibiotic allergy. METHODS: The guideline committee generated 12 key questions, most of which were population, intervention, comparison, and outcome questions relevant to both children and adults with suspected antibiotic allergies. For each question, a systematic literature search was performed and reviewed for the best available evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The quality of evidence was graded from very low to high, and recommendations were formulated in structured discussions as strong or weak. RESULTS: Sixty recommendations were provided for suspected allergy to ß-lactam antibiotics (BLAs) and non-ß-lactam antibiotics. Owing to the absence of randomized controlled trials in this field, the underlying evidence was predominantly graded as low or very low. Available data support that a detailed allergy history should always be performed and critically appraised. When cross-allergy between BLA groups is not to be expected due to the absence of molecular similarity of the side chains, the patient can be safely exposed to the alternative BLA. An exception to this rule is severe delayed-type reactions in which re-exposure to a BLA should only be considered after consultation with a multidisciplinary team. CONCLUSIONS: Accumulated scientific data now support a more liberal approach that better balances the benefits of treatment with first choice and usually smaller spectrum antibiotics with appropriate avoidance of antibiotics in case of a truly high risk of a (severe) allergic reaction. In The Netherlands, a formal guideline was developed that provides recommendations for the approach toward suspected allergy to BLA and frequently used non-ß-lactam antibiotics, thereby strongly supporting antimicrobial stewardship.

Cues to improve antibiotic-allergy registration: A mixed-method study.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 2% of patients in primary care practice and up to 25% of hospital patients are registered as being allergic to an antibiotic. However, up to 90% of these registrations are incorrect, leading to unnecessary prescription of 2nd choice antibiotics with the attendant loss of efficacy, increased toxicity and antibiotic resistance. To improve registration, a better understanding is needed of how incorrect labels are attributed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the quality of antibiotic allergy registration in primary care and identify determinants to improve registration of antibiotic allergies. DESIGN: Registration of antibiotic allergies in primary care practices were analysed for 1) completeness and 2) correctness. To identify determinants for improvement, semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers from four healthcare domains were conducted. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 300 antibiotic allergy registrations were analysed for completeness and correctness. Thirty-four healthcare providers were interviewed. MAIN MEASURES: A registration was defined as complete when it included a description of all symptoms, time to onset of symptoms and the duration of symptoms. It was defined as correct when the conclusion was concordant with the Salden criteria. Determinants of correct antibiotic allergy registrations were divided into facilitators or obstructers. KEY RESULTS: Rates of completeness and correctness of registrations were 0% and 29.3%, respectively. The main perceived barriers for correct antibiotic allergy registration were insufficient knowledge, lack of priority, limitations of registration features in electronic medical records (EMR), fear of medical liability and patients interpreting side-effects as allergies. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of antibiotic allergy registrations can be improved. Potential interventions include raising awareness of the consequences of incomplete and the importance of correct registrations, by continued education, and above all simplifying registration in an EMR by adequate ICT support.

Implementation of a clinical decision rule for selecting empiric treatment for invasive aspergillosis in a setting with high triazole resistance.

World-wide, emerging triazole resistance increasingly complicates treatment of invasive aspergillosis (IA). In settings with substantial (>10%) prevalence of triazole resistance, empiric combination therapy with both a triazole and liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) can be considered because of the low yields of susceptibility testing. To avoid toxicity while optimizing outcome, a strategy with monotherapy would be preferable. A newly designed treatment algorithm based on literature and expert consensus provided guidance for empiric monotherapy with either voriconazole or LAmB. Over a four and a half year period, all adult patients in our hospital treated for IA were included and patient data were collected. An independent committee reviewed the attributability of death to IA for each patient. Primary outcomes were 30- and 100-day crude mortality and attributable mortality. In total, 110 patients were treated according to the treatment algorithm. Fifty-six patients (51%) were initially treated with voriconazole and 54 patients (49%) with LAmB. Combined attributable and contributable mortality was 13% within 30 days and 20% within 100 days. Treatment switch to LAmB was made in 24/56 (43%) of patients who were initially treated with voriconazole. Combined contributable and attributable 100-day mortality in this subgroup was 21% and was not increased when compared with patients initially treated with LAmB (P = 0.38). By applying a comprehensive clinical decision algorithm, an antifungal-sparing regime was successfully introduced. Further research is warranted to explore antifungal treatment strategies that account for triazole-resistance. LAY SUMMARY: Due to resistance of Aspergillus against triazoles, combination therapy with liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) is applied more often as primary therapy against invasive aspergillosis. This study presents the results of a decision tool which differentiated between triazole or LAmB monotherapy.

Outpatient parenteral antifungal therapy (OPAT) for invasive fungal infections with intermittent dosing of liposomal amphotericin B.

Triazole resistant A. fumigatus has been documented in many parts of the world. In the Netherlands, incidence is now above 10% and results in the need for long-term parenteral therapy with liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB). The long terminal half-life of LAmB suggests that intermittent dosing could be effective, making the application of outpatient antifungal therapy (OPAT) possible. Here, we report our experience with the use of OPAT for Invasive Fungal Infections (IFI). All adult patients treated with LAmB with a 2 or 3 times weekly administration via the outpatient departments in four academic tertiary care centers in the Netherlands and Belgium since January 2010 were included in our analysis. Patient characteristics were collected, as well as information about diagnostics, therapy dose and duration, toxicity, treatment history and outcome of the IFI. In total, 18 patients were included. The most frequently used regimen (67%) was 5 mg/kg 3 times weekly. A partial response to the daily treatment prior to discharge was confirmed by CT-scan in 17 (94%) of patients. A favorable outcome was achieved in 13 (72%) patients. Decrease in renal function occurred in 10 (56%) cases but was reversible in all and was treatment limiting in one patient only. The 100-day mortality and 1-year mortality after initiation of OPAT were 0% and 6%, respectively. In a selected population, and after confirmation of initial response to treatment, our data support the use of OPAT with LAmB for treatment of IFI in an intermittent dosing regimen.

Using local clinical and microbiological data to develop an institution specific carbapenem-sparing strategy in sepsis: a nested case-control study.

Background: From a stewardship perspective it is recommended that antibiotic guidelines are adjusted to the local setting, accounting for the local epidemiology of pathogens. In many settings the prevalence of Gram-negative pathogens with resistance to empiric sepsis therapy is increasing. How and when to escalate standard sepsis therapy to a reserve antimicrobial agent, is a recurrent dilemma. The study objective was to develop decision strategies for empiric sepsis therapy based on local microbiological and clinical data, and estimate the number needed to treat with a carbapenem to avoid mismatch of empiric therapy in one patient (NNTC). Methods: We performed a nested case control study in patients (> 18 years) with Gram-negative bacteremia in 2013-2016. Cases were defined as patients with Gram-negative bacteremia with in vitro resistance to the combination 2nd generation cephalosporin AND aminoglycoside (C-2GC + AG). Control patients had Gram-negative bacteremia with in vitro susceptibility to cefuroxime AND/OR gentamicin, 1:2 ratio. Univariate and multivariable analysis was performed for demographic and clinical predictors of resistance. The adequacy rates of empiric therapy and the NNTC were estimated for different strategies. Results: The cohort consisted of 486 episodes of Gram-negative bacteremia in 450 patients. Median age was 66 years (IQR 56-74). In vitro resistance to C-2GC + AG was present in 44 patients (8.8%). Independent predictors for resistance to empiric sepsis therapy were hematologic malignancy (adjusted OR 4.09, 95%CI 1.43-11.62, p < 0.01), previously cultured drug resistant pathogen (adjusted OR 3.72. 95%CI 1.72-8.03, p < 0.01) and antibiotic therapy during the preceding 2 months (adjusted OR 12.5 4.08-38.48, p < 0.01). With risk-based strategies, an adequacy rate of empiric therapy of 95.2-99.3% could be achieved. Compared to treating all patients with a carbapenem, the NNTC could be reduced by 82.8% (95%CI 78.5-87.5%) using the targeted approaches. Conclusions: A risk-based approach in empiric sepsis therapy has the potential to better target the use of reserve antimicrobial agents aimed at multi-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. A structured evaluation of the expected antimicrobial consumption and antibiotic adequacy rates is essential to be able to weigh the costs and benefits of potential antibiotic strategies and select the most appropriate approach.