Incidence, associated disease burden and healthcare utilization due to Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection in European hospitals: the COMBACTE-NET ARTHR-IS multi-centre study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence, associated disease burden and healthcare utilization due to Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections (SA-PJI) after primary hip and knee arthroplasty in European centres. METHODS: This study was conducted in patients who underwent primary hip and knee arthroplasty in 19 European hospitals between 2014 and 2016. The global incidence of PJI and SA-PJI was calculated. The associated disease burden was measured indirectly as infection-related mortality plus loss of function. For healthcare utilization, number and duration of hospitalizations, number and type of surgical procedures, duration of antibiotic treatments, and number of outpatient visits were collected. Subgroup and regression analyses were used to evaluate the impact of SA-PJI on healthcare utilization, controlling for confounding variables. RESULTS: The incidence of PJI caused by any micro-organism was 1.41%, and 0.40% for SA-PJI. Among SA-PJI, 20.7% were due to MRSA with substantial regional differences, and were more frequent in partial hip arthroplasty (PHA). Related deaths and loss of function occurred in 7.0% and 10.2% of SA-PJI cases, respectively, and were higher in patients with PHA. Compared with patients without PJI, patients with SA-PJI had a mean of 1.4 more readmissions, 25.1 more days of hospitalization, underwent 1.8 more surgical procedures, and had 5.4 more outpatient visits, controlling for confounding variables. Healthcare utilization was higher in patients who failed surgical treatment of SA-PJI. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that the SA-PJI burden is high, especially in PHA, and provided a solid basis for planning interventions to prevent SA-PJI.

Plantar pressure distribution and wearing characteristics of three forefoot offloading shoes in healthy adult subjects.

Forefoot offloading shoes are used to reduce pressure on specific regions of the foot. Aim of the pressure reduction is to aid healing of the soft and bony tissues and prevent complications by treating foot disorders. A great variety of forefoot offloading shoes are available. In a first step to investigate the appropriate use of these footwear in orthopedic settings, we studied plantar pressure distribution and wearing characteristics of three forefoot offloading shoes namely the Mailand, OrthoWedge and Podalux in a healthy population. Twenty subjects walked in a randomized order wearing three forefoot offloading shoes and a reference shoe for six minutes. The Pedar system was used to measure the pressure in 7 regions. Peak pressure and pressure time integral were analyzed as measures of pressure distribution. Furthermore, wearing characteristics were addressed using a Numeric Rating Scale. Pressure distribution and wearing characteristics of the forefoot offloading shoes were compared to a reference shoe. The Mailand and OrthoWedge shoes significantly reduced peak pressure with more than 80% under the hallux and more than 45% under MTH1 (p<.001). The Podalux did not show significant peak pressure reduction under the forefoot compared to the reference shoe. Under the lesser toes, the MTH4-5 region and heel region the Podalux shoe showed even a significant increase in peak pressure (p=.001). Looking at wearing characteristics, the Podalux and reference shoe scored significantly better than the other two forefoot offloading shoes (p<.01). In this study the differences between different forefoot offloading shoes was assessed. The Mailand and OrthoWedge shoes gave the best pressure reduction in the forefoot but are less comfortable in use. The Podalux rocker shoe showed opposite results. Next step is a patient study to compare our results in a patient population.

Antibiotic prophylaxis is not indicated prior to dental procedures for prevention of periprosthetic joint infections

Background and purpose: To minimize the risk of hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (HPJI), international and Dutch guidelines recommended antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental procedures. Unclear definitions and contradictory recommendations in these guidelines have led to unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions. To formulate new guidelines, a joint committee of the Dutch Orthopaedic and Dental Societies conducted a systematic literature review to answer the following question: can antibiotic prophylaxis be recommended for patients (with joint prostheses) undergoing dental procedures in order to prevent dental HPJI? Methods - The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), reviews, and observational studies up to July 2015. Studies were included if they involved patients with joint implants undergoing dental procedures, and either considered HPJI as an outcome measure or described a correlation between HPJI and prophylactic antibiotics. A guideline was formulated using the GRADE method and AGREE II guidelines. Results - 9 studies were included in this systematic review. All were rated "very low quality of evidence". Additional literature was therefore consulted to address clinical questions that provide further insight into pathophysiology and risk factors. The 9 studies did not provide evidence that use of antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the incidence of dental HPJI, and the additional literature supported the conclusion that antibiotic prophylaxis should be discouraged in dental procedures. Interpretation - Prophylactic antibiotics in order to prevent dental HPJI should not be prescribed to patients with a normal or an impaired immune system function. Patients are recommended to maintain good oral hygiene and visit the dentist regularly

Determination of dabigatran and rivaroxaban by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and coagulation assays after major orthopaedic surgery.

Major orthopaedic surgery is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended as thromboprophylactic agents after orthopaedic surgery. Although routine monitoring of DOACs in general is not required, measuring DOAC concentration may be necessary in clinical settings. The effects of DOACs on routine coagulation assays in spiked material are studied extensively, however, few data are available on DOAC concentration in patients after major orthopaedic surgery. We measured trough and peak DOAC concentrations with UPLC-MS/MS and routine coagulation tests in a prospective study including 40 patients receiving thromboprophylactic treatment with dabigatran 220mg od and 40 patients receiving rivaroxaban 10mg od after major orthopaedic surgery. For rivaroxaban, the median trough concentration with UPLC-MS/MS was 17.1ng/mL and median peak concentration was 149ng/mL. The anti-Xa assay displayed a good correlation, but a positive bias in comparison to the reference method. Furthermore, trough levels were mostly below the LOD of the anti-Xa assay. For dabigatran, the median trough concentration with UPLC-MS/MS was 12.1ng/mL, and median peak level was 80.8ng/mL. A positive bias was found when results from coagulation assays were compared to UPLC-MS/MS data. However, the addition of glucuronidated metabolites to dabigatran concentration UPLC-MS/MS data generally resolved most of this bias. Age was found to have a significant influence on dabigatran pharmacokinetics, irrespective of kidney function, whereas no effect of age was found during rivaroxaban treatment. In both treatment groups, female subjects displayed faster pharmacokinetics in comparison to male subjects, although not reaching significance. We conclude that UPLC-MS/MS is the method of choice to measure trough concentrations of DOACs in patients after orthopaedic surgery. Current coagulation assays are not suited for this purpose. We found large heterogeneity in both peak and trough concentrations of DOACs, and showed that pharmacokinetics of novel oral anticoagulants may be influenced by age and gender. Whether patients with high or low trough concentrations are at increased risk for bleeding or thromboembolic events respectively remains to be established.

Bacterial survival in the interfacial gap in gentamicin-loaded acrylic bone cements.

Clinical experience indicates the beneficial effects of antibiotic-loaded bone cement. Although in vitro studies have shown the formation of a biofilm on its surface they have not considered the gap between the cement and the bone. We have investigated bacterial survival in that gap. Samples with gaps 200 microm wide were made of different bone cements. These were stored dry ('pre-elution') or submersed in phosphate-buffered saline to simulate the initial release of gentamicin ('post-elution'). The gaps were subsequently inoculated with bacteria, which had been isolated from infected orthopaedic prostheses and assessed for their sensitivity to gentamicin. Bacterial survival was measured 24 hours after inoculation. All the strains survived in plain cements. In the pre-elution gentamicin-loaded cements only the most gentamicin-resistant strain, CN5115, survived, but in post-elution samples more strains did so, depending on the cement tested. Although high concentrations of gentamicin were demonstrated in the gaps only the gentamicin-sensitive strains were killed. This could explain the increased prevalence of gentamicin-resistant infections which are seen clinically.

Backgrounds of antibiotic-loaded bone cement and prosthesis-related infection.

Antibiotic-loaded bone cement has been in use for over 30 years for the fixation of total joint arthroplasties, although its mechanism of action is still poorly understood. This review presents the backgrounds of bone cements, prosthesis-related infection and antibiotic-loaded bone cements. It is shown that antibiotic-loaded bone cement has a significant effect on bacteria, particularly in animal and clinical studies. However, recently, antimicrobial resistance among bacteria has been ascribed to the antibiotic-loaded bone cement. The unresolved issues both regarding the action of antibiotic-loaded bone cement and the nature of the antimicrobial resistance necessitate further research into the interaction of antibiotic-loaded bone cement and bacteria.