A Call to Action for a Programmatic Approach to Addressing Health Disparities and Cultural Competency in Pharmacy Education.

Pharmacy has recognized the importance of education in health disparities and cultural competency (HDCC) for two decades. More recently, there has been emphasis on incorporating equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in pharmacy programs. While many institutions identify a need to incorporate a programmatic approach to HDCC education to meet the growing needs of a diverse population, pharmacy curricula continue to lack a holistic, programmatic approach. More than ever, Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students should graduate with the knowledge, values, and skills to provide culturally appropriate care for a diverse patient population. This commentary advocates for a holistic, programmatic approach to integrating HDCC education and serves as a call to action for curricular development. It is hoped that this commentary will also set the foundation for additional scholarly work and recommendations regarding a programmatic approach.

Strategies for Incorporating Health Disparities and Cultural Competency Training into the Pharmacy Curriculum and Co-curriculum.

Objective. To identify and review strategies reported in the literature for strengthening instruction about both health disparities and cultural competency (HDCC) within various portions of the Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum and co-curriculum.Findings. The classroom strategies reported in the literature for incorporating HDCC into the PharmD curriculum involved teaching a single course or series of courses in HDCC. Activities found to be effective in teaching HDCC were those that involved case-based and community engagement exercises. Recommendations for incorporating HDCC into the experiential education included preceptor development in areas of HDCC to assess student understanding of health disparities concepts, increasing student engagement with diverse patient populations, and implementation of cross-cultural communication models at clinical sites. Co-curricular and interprofessional (IPE) portions of pharmacy training were found to permit greater methodological flexibility for incorporating training in HDCC, as they often confronted fewer time or space constraints than classroom endeavors. Documented methods for teaching HDCC within co-curricular and IPE experiences included service learning, study abroad, symposia, and forums.Summary. There is a paucity of literature describing processes for incorporation of health disparities and cultural competency education and training into the PharmD program. Findings suggest that conceptual frameworks for HDCC should be used throughout the pharmacy curriculum, with learning activities mapped to relevant pharmacy education standards to ensure coverage of important practice competencies. Best practices also involve the use of contemporary tools, strategies, and resources from a cross-section of disciplines that provide opportunities for learners to correct misconceptions and biases through active situational problem-solving.

A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools Measuring Cultural Competence Outcomes Relevant to Pharmacy Education.

Objective. To identify and describe validated assessment tools that measure cultural competence and are relevant to pharmacy education.Methods. A systematic approach was used to identify quantitative cultural competence assessment tools relevant to pharmacy education. A systematic search of the literature was conducted using the OVID and EBSCO databases and a manual search of journals deemed likely to include tools relevant to pharmacy education. To be eligible for the review, the tools had to be developed using a study sample from the United States, have at least one peer-reviewed validated publication, be applicable to the pharmacy profession, and be published since 2010.Results. The systematic literature and manual search identified 27 tools. Twelve assessment tools met the criteria to be included in the summary and their relevancy to pharmacy education is discussed.Conclusion. A review of literature demonstrates that assessment tools vary widely and there is no one tool that can effectively assess all aspects of cultural competence in pharmacy students or the Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum. As cultural competence is a priority within the accreditation standards for pharmacy education, PharmD programs are encouraged to develop additional tools that measure observed performance.

Current State of and Opportunities for Enhancing Peer Evaluation Practices Across the Pharmacy Academy.

Objective. To examine and summarize policies and procedures for peer evaluation of teaching/instructional coaching (PET/IC) programs within departments, schools, and colleges of pharmacy and to identify opportunities for improving these based on best practices.Methods. A survey was sent to all Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE)-accredited pharmacy programs to collect information regarding procedures to support and evaluate PET/IC programs across institutions. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the general features of PET/IC programs, and inferential statistics were used to make group comparisons based on institutional control (public, private) and institution age (0-10 years, older than 10 years).Results. Surveys for 91 institutions were completed (response rate=64.5%). Most institutions (78.4%) reported having a PET/IC program. Most institutions with PET/IC programs reported using a combination of formative and summative evaluations (57.4%). The top purposes for PET/IC programs were faculty development (35.8%) and improving teaching (35.8%). Almost half of the PET/IC programs (46.3%) were mandatory for all faculty at the institutions. Most institutions (66.7%) had one standardized instrument used in their PET/IC program. Few institutions (11.9%) reported evaluating or being in the process of evaluating the effectiveness or success of their PET/IC program. Private institutions were more likely to incentivize observers than public institutions (17.1% vs 0).Conclusion. Overall, PET/IC programs are needed to assess and provide feedback to instructors about their teaching practices. While most institutions report having a PET/IC program, wide variability exists in how the programs are implemented. Opportunities exist for institutions to evaluate the effectiveness of their program and identify best practices.

Introduction to Implementing Health Disparities and Cultural Competence Content in the Doctor of Pharmacy Curriculum.

The 2013 American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) White Paper by O'Connell and colleagues introduced instructional approaches and resources for assessing health disparities and cultural competency training within the pharmacy curriculum. Instructional standards, such as the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2016, have been updated to state the importance of teaching "cultural awareness" and exposure to "diverse populations" within pharmacy curricula. There remains a gap in understanding how various programs should implement these concepts. To ensure that the knowledge students learn is meaningful, it is critical for approaches to HDCC education to be intentional, integrative, and comprehensive. Without this type of approach, students may lose key skills and be unable to deliver culturally responsive, patient-centered care upon graduation. In this theme issue, three papers will introduce areas for HDCC inclusion and explore how these topics are currently being covered in pharmacy education. Recommendations on best practices are provided.

Engaging in Authentic Allyship as Part of Our Professional Development.

Educational institutions increasingly recognize the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts to combat and dismantle structures that sustain inequities. However, successful DEI work hinges on individuals being authentic allies and incorporating allyship into their professional development. Allyship involves members of dominant groups recognizing their privilege and engaging in actions to create inclusivity and equitable spaces for all. Individuals from dominant groups with desires to actively support others from marginalized groups are often unsure how to fight oppression and prejudice. Our goal as faculty with diverse perspectives and heterogeneous intersectional identities is to provide readers with the tools to develop as an authentic ally through educating themselves about the identities and experiences of others, challenging their own discomfort and prejudices, dedicating the time and patience to learning how to be an ally, and taking action to promote change toward personal, institutional, and societal justice and equality. Ultimately, each person must advocate for change because we all hold the responsibility. When everyone is an authentic ally, we all thrive and rise together.

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) Antagonists and Their Use in Migraines.

Migraine is highly prevalent and associated with a large socio-economic burden in the United States. Current preventive medications have variable efficacy and their use is often limited by intolerable side effects. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has been identified as an integral part of migraine pathophysiology. There are currently seven CGRP antagonists under investigation, all of which are undergoing or have completed phase 3 clinical trials. Three of the investigated CGRP antagonists are approved for use within and outside of the United States. The trials have resulted in positive efficacy and safety data. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the seven CGRP antagonists and their future place in therapy.