[CBT administered via the internet]. / Internetförmedlad psykologisk egenvård.

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) can be administered clinically to individuals and in group settings. More recently, CBT has been administered successfully via the internet (ICBT). We provide a concept aiming at further developing ICBT in a self-care format. We use recent development in user interface (UI) design in order to optimize the user interface and allow easy and flexible use via smartphone, tablet, or computer. Preliminary evidence indicates that an optimized user interface and adjusted information facilitate increased use of training programs compared to a traditional ICBT interface. Our aims are to allow increased availability of evidence-based CBT tools for self-care to improve people's health and recovery from disease. So far, evidence for effects and safe use is indicated for atopic dermatitis, insomnia and high-risk use of alcohol.

Transforming guided internet interventions into simplified and self-guided digital tools - Experiences from three recent projects.

Introduction: Therapist-guided internet interventions are often more efficacious than unguided ones. However, the guidance itself requires clinician time, and some research suggests that self-guided interventions could potentially be equally effective. The concept of digital psychological self-care, self-guided internet interventions based on the use of digital tools and provided within a structured clinical process, is presented. Methods: Three new self-care interventions, a sleep diary-based intervention for insomnia, an alcohol diary-based intervention for problematic alcohol use and an intervention with exposure and mindfulness tools for atopic dermatitis (eczema), were developed. Newly developed digital self-care interventions were compared to the earlier therapist-guided interventions they were based on, using published results from three feasibility trials (n's = 30, 36 and 21) and three randomized trials (n's = 148, 166 and 102). The comparison included type of content, duration, length of written material and within-group effect-sizes. Results: In comparison to the guided interventions, clinician time was greatly reduced and the new interventions involved much less reading for participants. The digital self-care tools also showed within-group effect sizes and response rates on par with the more comprehensive guided internet interventions. Discussion: Preliminary results suggest that some guided internet interventions can be transformed into self-guided digital tools. These three examples show that digital psychological self-care, if provided with telephone interviews before and after the intervention, can be viable alternatives to more comprehensive guided internet interventions. Although these examples are promising, further studies, including randomized experiments, are needed to compare treatment efficacies, and to identify which groups of patients may need more comprehensive guided internet interventions.

Brief digital self-care intervention for health anxiety in a Swedish Medical University Clinic: a prospective single-group feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: In routine psychiatric care in Stockholm, Sweden, a comprehensive therapist-guided intervention for clinically significant health anxiety is implemented. However, there is a need for more easily accessible self-care interventions to improve treatment dissemination. This study aimed to transform an existing therapist-guided digital intervention into a self-care intervention, reducing patient burden and used clinical resources while maintaining quality and safety. DESIGN: An uncontrolled feasibility study. SETTING: Conducted at Karolinska Institutet, a medical university in Sweden, with nationwide recruitment trough online advertisements. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five adults used the self-care intervention and underwent telephone assessments, along with completing self-rated questionnaires. INTERVENTION: The newly developed 8-week self-care intervention was designed to be user-friendly without therapist guidance, and to facilitate high levels of behavioural engagement. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Indicators of quality and safety, including changes in health anxiety severity (primary), clinician time, participant adherence, perceived credibility/satisfaction with the intervention and adverse events, were benchmarked against a previous study of the more comprehensive intervention it was based on. RESULTS: Compared with the original guided intervention, the self-care intervention was condensed in terms of text (up to 70% less reading), duration (8 weeks instead of 12) and number of exercises. Quality indicators were similar to the original version. Most participants worked actively with core components in the self-care intervention. Within-group effects on health anxiety from pretreatment to the 3-month follow-up were large (g=1.37; 95% CI 0.74 to 2.00). No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This brief digital self-care intervention shows potential for increasing access to treatment for individuals with health anxiety while reducing the burden on patients and clinical resources. Future studies should investigate the optimal type of intervention and support for different individuals, and if non-inferiority can be established. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05446766.

Corrigendum to "The effect of user interface on treatment engagement in a self-guided digital problem-solving intervention: A randomized controlled trial" [Internet Interv. 26 (2021) 1-10/100448].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100448.].

A self-guided and monitored digital problem-solving intervention for patients with symptoms of depression or anxiety on the waiting list for treatment in routine psychiatric care: feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: There is often a waiting period for people who seek psychiatric treatment for depression or anxiety. As this delay risks worsening symptoms, an alternative could be to provide an intervention that requires minimal resources during the waiting period. AIMS: The aim was to investigate if a digital problem-solving intervention delivered in a self-guided format with automated features is feasible to provide for patients on the waiting list in routine psychiatric care. METHOD: A total of 12 patients with symptoms of depression or anxiety on the waiting list for treatment in routine psychiatric care were given access to a self-guided and monitored digital problem-solving intervention over 4 weeks. Primary outcome measures were treatment credibility and usability. Secondary outcome measures were behavioural engagement, symptoms of depression and anxiety, and negative effects. RESULTS: A majority of participants rated the intervention as both credible and usable. The intervention was used at least once by nine out of 12 individuals, with an average of 11 logins. The participants did, on average, initiate 2.8 problem-solving attempts and 10.1 solutions. A few participants reached a clinically relevant symptom improvement of depression and anxiety. No serious negative effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The credibility and usability of the intervention was perceived as good, and the behavioural engagement with the intervention was deemed sufficient compared with similar self-guided interventions. A self-guided and monitored digital problem-solving intervention may be a beneficial option for patients waiting for or receiving treatment in routine psychiatric care, and should be further evaluated.

Practical and Emotional Problems Reported by Users of a Self-guided Digital Problem-solving Intervention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis.

BACKGROUND: To better direct assessments and interventions toward the general population during both the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and future crises with societal restrictions, data on the types of practical and emotional problems that people are experiencing are needed. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the types of practical and emotional problems that the general population is experiencing during the COVID-19 pandemic and to construct an empirically derived inventory based on the findings. METHODS: A total of 396 participants, recruited among members of the general public in Sweden who were experiencing practical and/or emotional problems during the pandemic, accessed a self-guided digital problem-solving intervention for a period of 1 week to report and solve the problems they experienced. Prior to accessing the intervention, the participants completed a short self-assessment regarding symptoms of depression and anxiety. Content analysis was used to account for the types of problems participants reported. A set of items for an inventory was later proposed based on the problem categories derived from the analysis. RESULTS: A majority of participants had clinically relevant symptoms of either depression or anxiety. The problems reported were categorized as 13 distinct types of problems. The most common problem was difficulty managing daily activities. Based on the categories, a 13-item inventory was proposed. CONCLUSIONS: The 13 types of problems, and the proposed inventory, could be valuable when composing assessments and interventions for the general population during the ongoing pandemic or similar crises with societal restrictions. The most common problem was of a practical nature, indicating the importance of including examples of such problems within assessments and interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04677270; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04677270.

The effect of user interface on treatment engagement in a self-guided digital problem-solving intervention: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Resources are spent worldwide on the development of digital platforms and their user interfaces (UIs) for digital mental health services (DMHS). However, studies investigating the potential benefits of different UIs for DMHS are currently lacking. To fill this knowledge gap, the aim of this study was to investigate differences in treatment engagement between two different UIs for DMHS. METHODS: A total of 397 participants from the Swedish general public were randomized (1:1) to use a self-guided digital problem-solving intervention during one week, either with an optimized UI (N = 198), based on user experience (UX) design principles and with automated features, or a basic UI (N = 199), analogous with a UI used in Swedish regular health care comprising elementary UI features and less automation. Primary outcome measures were self-rated usability, on the System Usability Scale, and treatment credibility, on the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures included behavioral engagement with the intervention. FINDINGS: There were no significant differences between the UIs in ratings of usability or treatment credibility. However, participants who used the optimized UI were significantly more engaged with the intervention as measured by usage of the intervention at least once (odds ratio 2.54, 95% CI [1.67, 3.85]), total number of generated solutions (mean difference 1.41, 95% CI [0.72, 2.11]), and mean number of generated solutions per initiated problem-solving attempt (mean difference 1.45, 95% CI [1.06, 1.85]). Other findings included participants using the optimized UI rating the intervention as easier to understand, while feeling more overwhelmed, than those using the basic UI. INTERPRETATION: Our findings indicate that an optimized UI based on UX design principles, in comparison to a basic UI comprising elementary UI features, do not affect overall self-rated usability or treatment credibility but increases some measures of behavioral engagement with a digital intervention. FUNDING: Funded by the Government of Sweden, Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.