Posthospital Multidisciplinary Care for AKI Survivors: A Feasibility Pilot.

Rationale & Objective: Innovative models are needed to address significant gaps in kidney care follow-up for acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors. Study Design: This quasi-experimental pilot study reports the feasibility of the AKI in Care Transitions (ACT) program, a multidisciplinary approach to AKI survivor care based in the primary care setting. Setting & Participants: The study included consenting adults with stage 3 AKI discharged home without dialysis. Interventions: The ACT intervention included predischarge education from nurses and coordinated postdischarge follow-up with a primary care provider and pharmacist within 14 days. ACT was implemented in phases (Usual Care, Education, ACT). Outcomes: The primary outcome was feasibility. Secondary outcomes included process and clinical outcomes. Results: In total, 46 of 110 eligible adults were enrolled. Education occurred in 18/18 and 14/15 participants in the Education and ACT groups, respectively. 30-day urine protein evaluation occurred in 15%, 28%, and 87% of the Usual Care, Education, and ACT groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Cumulative incidence of provider (primary care or nephrologist) and laboratory follow-up at 14 and 30 days was different across groups (14 days: Usual care 0%, Education 11%, ACT 73% [P < 0.01]; 30 days: 0%, 22%, and 73% [P < 0.01]). 30-day readmission rates were 23%, 44%, and 13% in the Usual Care, Education, and ACT groups, respectively (P = 0.13). Limitations: Patients were not randomly assigned to treatment groups. The sample size limited the ability to detect some differences or perform multivariable analysis. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility of multidisciplinary AKI survivor follow-up beginning in primary care. We observed a higher cumulative incidence of laboratory and provider follow-up in ACT participants. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04505891). Plain-Language Summary: Abrupt loss of kidney function in hospitalized patients, acute kidney injury (AKI), increases the chances of long-term kidney disease and a worse health care experience for patients. One out of 3 people who experience AKI do not get the follow-up kidney care they need. We performed a pilot study to test whether a program that facilitates structured AKI follow-up in primary care called the AKI in Care Transitions (ACT) program was possible. ACT brings together the unique expertise of nurses, doctors, and pharmacists to look at the patient's kidney health plan from all angles. The study found that the ACT program was possible and led to more complete kidney care follow-up after discharge than the normal approach to care.

Glucagon fill rates and cost among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in the United States, 2011-2021.

AIMS: To characterize glucagon fill rates and costs among youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). METHODS: Claims-based analysis of commercially-insured youth with T1DM included in OptumLabs® Data Warehouse between 2011 and 2021. Glucagon fill rates and costs were calculated overall and by formulation (injectable, intranasal, autoinjector, and pre-filled syringe). Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with glucagon fills were examined using Cox regression. RESULTS: We identified 13,267 children with T1DM (76.4% non-Hispanic White). Over mean follow-up of 2.81 years (SD 2.62), 70.0% filled glucagon, with stable fill rates from 2011 to 2021. Intranasal glucagon had rapid uptake following initial approval, and it accounted for almost half (46.6%) of all glucagon fills by 2021. Family income was positively associated with glucagon fills in a stepwise fashion (HR 1.39 [95% CI 1.27-1.52] for annual household income ≥$200,000 vs. <$40,000), while Black race was negatively associated with fills (HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.76-0.91]) compared to White race). Annual mean out-of-pocket costs ranged from $21-$68 (IQR $29-$44). CONCLUSION: Roughly 30% of commercially-insured youth with T1DM may lack access to unexpired glucagon, with significant disparities among Black and low-income patients. Health systems, clinicians, schools, and caregivers should work together to ensure children have reliable access to this critical medication.

Glucagon prescribing and prevention of hospitalization for hypoglycemia in a large health system.

AIMS: To examine glucagon prescribing trends among patients at high risk of severe hypoglycemia and assess if a glucagon prescription is associated with lower rates of severe hypoglycemia requiring hospital care. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of electronic health records from a large integrated healthcare system between May 2019 and August 2021. We included adults (≥18 years) with type 1 diabetes or with type 2 diabetes treated with short-acting insulin and/or recent history of hypoglycemia-related emergency department visit or hospitalization. We calculated rates of glucagon prescribing overall and by patient characteristics. We then matched 1:1 those who were and were not prescribed glucagon and assessed subsequent hypoglycemia-related hospitalization. RESULTS: Of 9,200 high risk adults, 2063 (22.4%) were prescribed glucagon. Among patients more likely to be prescribed glucagon were those younger, female, White, living in urban areas, with prior severe hypoglycemia, and with a recent endocrinology specialist visit. In the matched cohort (N = 1707 per arm), 62 prescribed glucagon and 33 not prescribed glucagon were hospitalized for hypoglycemia (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.71, 95% CI 1.10-2.66; P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Glucagon prescribing was infrequent with significant racial and rural disparities. Patients with glucagon prescriptions did not have lower rates of hospitalization for hypoglycemia.

Gaps in glucagon fills among commercially insured patients receiving a glucagon prescription.

Glucagon is critically underutilized, and we explored whether this is due to inadequate glucagon prescribing or the patient's inability to fill prescriptions. Of 216 commercially insured, high-risk individuals with diabetes who were prescribed glucagon in our healthcare system, 142 (65.4%) had a claim indicating its fill within 30 days.

Comprehensive Acute Kidney Injury Survivor Care: Protocol for the Randomized Acute Kidney Injury in Care Transitions Pilot Trial.

BACKGROUND: Innovative care models are needed to address gaps in kidney care follow-up among acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors. We developed the multidisciplinary AKI in Care Transitions (ACT) program, which embeds post-AKI care in patients' primary care clinic. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this randomized pilot trial is to test the feasibility and acceptability of the ACT program and study protocol, including recruitment and retention, procedures, and outcome measures. METHODS: The study will be conducted at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, a tertiary care center with a local primary care practice. Individuals who are included have stage 3 AKI during their hospitalization, do not require dialysis at discharge, have a local primary care provider, and are discharged to their home. Patients unable or unwilling to provide informed consent and recipients of any transplant within 100 days of enrollment are excluded. Consented patients are randomized to receive the intervention (ie, ACT program) or usual care. The ACT program intervention includes predischarge kidney health education from nurses and coordinated postdischarge laboratory monitoring (serum creatinine and urine protein assessment) and follow-up with a primary care provider and pharmacist within 14 days. The usual care group receives no specific study-related intervention, and any aspects of AKI care are at the direction of the treating team. This study will examine the feasibility of the ACT program, including recruitment, randomization and retention in a trial setting, and intervention fidelity. The feasibility and acceptability of participating in the ACT program will also be examined in qualitative interviews with patients and staff and through surveys. Qualitative interviews will be deductively and inductively coded and themes compared across data types. Observations of clinical encounters will be examined for discussion and care plans related to kidney health. Descriptive analyses will summarize quantitative measures of the feasibility and acceptability of ACT. Participants' knowledge about kidney health, quality of life, and process outcomes (eg, type and timing of laboratory assessments) will be described for both groups. Clinical outcomes (eg, unplanned rehospitalization) up to 12 months will be compared with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: This study received funding from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality on April 21, 2021, and was approved by the Institutional Review Board on December 14, 2021. As of March 14, 2023, seventeen participants each have been enrolled in the intervention and usual care groups. CONCLUSIONS: Feasible and generalizable AKI survivor care delivery models are needed to improve care processes and health outcomes. This pilot trial will test the ACT program, which uses a multidisciplinary model focused on primary care to address this gap. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05184894; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05184894. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48109.

Glucagon Prescribing and Costs Among U.S. Adults With Diabetes, 2011-2021.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize contemporary trends in glucagon fill rates and expenditures in a nationwide cohort of adults with diabetes overall and by key demographic and clinical characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we examined 1) glucagon fill rates per 1,000 person-years and 2) patient out-of-pocket and health plan costs per filled glucagon dose among adults with diabetes included in OptumLabs Data Warehouse between 1 January 2011 and 31 March 2021. RESULTS: The study population comprised 2,814,464 adults with diabetes with a mean age of 62.8 (SD 13.2) years. The overall glucagon fill rate decreased from 2.91 to 2.28 per 1,000 person-years (-22%) over the study period. In groups at high risk for severe hypoglycemia, glucagon fill rates increased from 22.46 to 36.76 per 1,000 person-years (64%) among patients with type 1 diabetes, 11.64 to 16.63 per 1,000 person-years (43%) among those treated with short-acting insulin, and 16.08 to 20.12 per 1,000 person-years (25%) among those with a history of severe hypoglycemia. White patients, women, individuals with high income, and commercially insured patients had higher glucagon fill rates compared with minority patients, males, individuals with low income, and Medicare Advantage patients, respectively. Total cost per dosing unit increased from $157.97 to $275.32 (74%) among commercial insurance beneficiaries and from $150.37 to $293.57 (95%) among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: Glucagon fill rates are concerningly low and declined between 2011 and 2021 but increased in appropriate subgroups with type 1 diabetes, using short-acting insulin, or with a history of severe hypoglycemia. Fill rates were disproportionately low among minority patients and individuals with low income.

Pharmacist-provider collaborative visits after hospital discharge in a comprehensive acute kidney injury survivor model.

BACKGROUND: Postdischarge follow-up in primary care is an opportunity for pharmacists to re-evaluate medication use in acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors. Of the emerging AKI survivor care models described in literature, only one involved a pharmacist with limited detail about the direct impact. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe pharmacist contributions to a comprehensive postdischarge AKI survivorship program in primary care (the AKI in Care Transitions [ACT] program). METHODS: The ACT program was piloted from May to December of 2021 at Mayo Clinic as a bundled care strategy for patients who survived an episode of AKI and were discharged home without the need for hemodialysis. Patients received education and care coordination from nurses before discharge and later completed postdischarge laboratory assessment and clinician follow-up in primary care. During the follow-up encounter, patients completed a 30-minute comprehensive medication management visit with a pharmacist focusing on AKI survivorship considerations. Medication therapy recommendations were communicated to a collaborating primary care provider (PCP) before a separate 30-minute visit with the patient. PCPs had access to clinical decision support with evidence-based post-AKI care recommendations. Medication-related issues were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: Pharmacists made 28 medication therapy recommendations (median 3 per patient, interquartile range 2-3) and identified 14 medication discrepancies for the 11 patients who completed the pilot program, and 86% of the medication therapy recommendations were acted on by the PCP within 7 days. Six recommendations were made to initiate renoprotective medications, and 5 were acted on (83%). CONCLUSION: During the pilot phase of a multifaceted transitional care program for AKI survivors, pharmacists' successfully identified and addressed multiple medication therapy problems, including for renally active drugs. These results demonstrate the potential for pharmacist-provider collaborative visits in primary care to improve safe and effective medication use in AKI survivors.

Evaluation of an Enhanced Primary Care Team Model to Improve Diabetes Care.

PURPOSE: Primary care practices manage most patients with diabetes and face considerable operational, regulatory, and reimbursement pressures to improve the quality of this care. The Enhanced Primary Care Diabetes (EPCD) model was developed to leverage the expertise of care team nurses and pharmacists to improve diabetes care. METHODS: Using a retrospective, interrupted-time series design, we evaluated the EPCD model's impact on D5, a publicly reported composite quality measure of diabetes care: glycemic control, blood pressure control, low-density lipoprotein control, tobacco abstinence, and aspirin use. We examined 32 primary care practices in an integrated health care system that cares for adults with diabetes; practices were categorized as staff clinician practices (having physicians and advanced practice providers) with access to EPCD (5,761 patients); resident physician practices with access to EPCD (1,887 patients); or staff clinician practices without access to EPCD (10,079 patients). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients meeting the D5 measure, compared between a 7-month preimplementation period and a 10-month postimplementation period. RESULTS: After EPCD implementation, staff clinician practices had a significant improvement in the percentage of patients meeting the D5 composite quality indicator (change in incident rate ratio from 0.995 to 1.005; P = .01). Trends in D5 attainment did not change significantly among the resident physician practices with access to EPCD (P = .14) and worsened among the staff clinician practices without access to EPCD (change in incident rate ratio from 1.001 to 0.994; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the EPCD team model was associated with an improvement in diabetes care quality in the staff clinician group having access to this model. Further study of proactive, multidisciplinary chronic disease management led by care team nurses and integrating clinical pharmacists is warranted.

Development and Feasibility of a Multidisciplinary Approach to AKI Survivorship in Care Transitions: Research Letter.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors are at heightened risk for poor short- and long-term health outcomes. Even among those who recover after an AKI episode, the risk for chronic kidney disease is 4- to 6-fold higher than in patients without AKI, underscoring the importance of identifying methods to improve AKI survivorship. Objective: The purpose of this report was to describe the development and feasibility of a novel multidisciplinary approach to caring for AKI survivors at care transitions (ACT). Design: Observational process improvement initiative. Setting: Single academic medical center in the United States. Patients: The studied population was adults with stage 3 AKI not discharging on dialysis who were established with a primary care provider (PCP) at our institution. Methods: An electronic health record tool was developed prior to implementation to identify AKI survivors. The ACT program encompassed engaging patients in the hospital, delivering education by nephrology-trained nurses before discharge, completing recommended laboratory testing after discharge, and conducting structured kidney-focused follow-up with a pharmacist and a PCP within 7 to 14 days after discharge. Patients could be referred for nephrology evaluation at the discretion of the PCP. Results: Preliminary data demonstrated that most AKI survivors of interest could be identified, educated, and followed up with this model. This strategy appeared feasible, scalable, and maximized the unique expertise of each member of the multidisciplinary team. Limitations: Small sample size, future assessment of process, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes needed. Conclusions: The multidisciplinary ACT workflow supported by clinical decision support was feasible and addressed gaps in existing care transition models. Team-based care delivery in primary care appears to be a mechanism to extend the capacity for kidney health monitoring for AKI survivors.

Contexte: Les patients qui survivent à un épisode d'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA) courent un risque plus élevé de mauvais résultats cliniques à court et à long terme. Même chez les patients qui se rétablissent, le risque de progression vers l'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) demeure de quatre à six fois plus élevé que chez les patients n'ayant jamais eu d'épisode d'IRA. Il est donc essentiel d'identifier des méthodes permettant d'améliorer la survie à un épisode d'IRA. Objectif: L'objectif de cette étude était de décrire l'élaboration et la faisabilité d'une nouvelle approche multidisciplinaire pour la prise en charge des survivants d'un épisode d'IRA en transition de soins (Approche multidisciplinaire en Transition de Soins­AmTS). Type d'étude: Initiative d'amélioration des processus menée par observation. Cadre: Un seul centre médical universitaire aux États-Unis. Sujets: La population étudiée était constituée d'adultes atteints d'IRA de stade 3 sans traitements de dialyse à leur sortie et qui avaient été mis en contact avec un fournisseur de soins primaires (FSP) dans l'établissement. Méthodologie: Avant la mise en œuvre de l'intervention, un outil de dossier de santé électronique a été développé pour identifier les survivants à un épisode d'IRA. Le programme de l'AmTS comprenait la participation des patients pendant leur séjour à l'hôpital, une formation donnée par des infirmières formées en néphrologie avant le congé, les tests de laboratoire recommandés après la sortie de l'hôpital et un suivi structuré axé sur la santé rénale avec un pharmacien et un FSP dans les 7 à 14 jours suivant la sortie de l'hôpital. Il a été laissé à la discrétion des FSP d'aiguiller ou non leurs patients pour une évaluation en néphrologie. Résultats: Des données préliminaires ont démontré qu'il était possible d'identifier, d'informer et d'assurer le suivi de la plupart des sujets d'intérêt (des survivants à un épisode d'IRA) avec ce modèle. Cette stratégie a semblé réalisable, évolutive et apte à optimiser l'expertise individuelle des membres de l'équipe multidisciplinaire. Limites: Faible taille de l'échantillon; une évaluation future du processus, des résultats cliniques et des résultats rapportés par les patients est nécessaire. Conclusion: Le processus de cette AmTS soutenue par une aide à la prise de décision clinique s'est avéré réalisable et a permis de combler les lacunes des modèles de transition des soins existants. Dans le contexte des soins primaires, la prestation de soins en équipe semble être un mécanisme permettant d'étendre la capacité de surveillance de la santé rénale des survivants à un épisode d'IRA.

Pain Associated With Continuous Intravenous Infusion of Bumetanide: A Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Bumetanide can induce generalized musculoskeletal pain when administered as a continuous infusion, an effect that may be underrecognized. The purpose of this case series is to educate health care providers about the incidence and presentation of pain associated with bumetanide infusions, adding to the existing literature describing this adverse event. CLINICAL FINDINGS: Of 40 critically ill patients, 15 (38%) had increased pain scores after initiation of a continuous infusion of bumetanide, with symptoms commonly occurring 12 to 24 hours after initiation of the infusion. Reported descriptions of the pain included generalized aching, soreness, burning, allodynia, headaches, and exacerbation of underlying pain in localized areas. Increases in patient-reported pain correlated directly with initiation of the continuous infusion of bumetanide. DIAGNOSIS: Four of the 15 bumetanide-associated pain events (27%) were recognized as such by the health care team. INTERVENTIONS: Bumetanide was promptly discontinued in the 4 identified cases. The 11 patients (73%) whose pain was not recognized as related to bumetanide remained on a continuous infusion of bumetanide and received pain medications including opioids. Infusions were stopped when patients transitioned to dialysis (n = 8 [53%]), began receiving comfort care (n = 5 [33%]), or completed diuresis therapy (n = 2 [13%]). OUTCOMES: For all patients, pain symptoms resolved within 24 to 48 hours after discontinuation of bumetanide infusion with no significant electrolyte abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Bumetanide-induced pain is more common than previously described. Early recognition of this adverse event can prevent patient discomfort and escalation of treatment.

Using medication containers during pharmacist transitional care visits and impact on medication discrepancies identified and hospital readmission risk.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of having patients present to a pharmacist-clinician collaborative (PCC) visit after hospital discharge with their medication containers on risk of 30-day readmission. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study from July 1, 2013 to June 18, 2018 at 5 primary care clinic sites. We included adult patients on at least 10 total medications at hospital discharge who did and did not present to the PCC visit with medication containers. Patients in both groups met with a pharmacist for 30 minutes, immediately followed by a clinician visit. Thirty-day risk of readmission was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: A total of 724 qualifying patients presented for a PCC visit with their medication containers within 30 days of hospital discharge, whereas 636 did not. After adjusting for significant differences in baseline characteristics, there was no statistically significant difference in hospital readmission risk between the groups at 30 days after the visit (hazard ratio 0.94 [95% CI 0.68-1.29], P = 0.69). When patients brought their medication containers, pharmacists identified more medication discrepancies (mean ± SD, 2.2 ± 2.1 vs. 1.5 ± 1.7, P < 0.001) and made more medication therapy recommendations (1.8 ± 1.3 vs. 1.5 ± 1.2, P < 0.001) to the clinician. CONCLUSION: The presence of medication containers did not affect the risk of hospital readmission, although, it did allow pharmacists to identify more medication discrepancies and medication problems. These findings support instructing patients to bring their medication containers to transitional care visits to resolve medication-related issues.

Impact of collaborative clinician visits on postdischarge total cost of care in a polypharmacy population.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of a collaborative intervention by pharmacists and primary care clinicians on total cost of care, including costs of inpatient readmissions, emergency department visits, and outpatient care, at 30, 60, and 180 days after hospital discharge in a population of patients at high risk for readmission due to polypharmacy. METHODS: A retrospective study of cost outcomes in a cohort of adult patients discharged from a single institution from July 1, 2013 to March 25, 2016, was conducted. All patients had at least 10 medications listed on their discharge list, including at least 1 drug frequently associated with adverse events leading to hospital readmission. About half of the cohort (n = 496) attended a postdischarge visit involving both a pharmacist and a primary care clinician (a physician, physician assistant, or licensed nurse practitioner); this was designated the pharmacist/clinician collaborative (PCC) group. The remainder of the cohort (n = 500) attended a visit without pharmacist involvement; this was designated as the usual care (UC) group. Costs were compared using a quantile regression to assess the potential heterogeneous impacts of the PCC intervention across different parts of the cost distribution. All outcomes were adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: At 30 days post index discharge, there was a significant decrease in total costs in the 10th and 90th cost quantiles in the PCC cohort vs the UC cohort, without a statistically significant decrease in the 25th, 50th or 75th quantiles. The difference was significant in the 75th and 90th quantiles at 60 days and in the 25th, 50th, and 75th quantiles at 180 days. There was a nonsignificant cost reduction in all other quantiles. CONCLUSION: Medically complex patients had a significantly lower total cost of care in approximately half of the adjusted cost quantiles at 30, 60, and 180 days after hospital discharge when they had a PCC visit. PCC visits can improve patient clinical outcomes while improving cost metrics.

Effect of Postdismissal Pharmacist Visits for Patients Using High-Risk Medications.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a pharmacist visit after hospital dismissal for patients taking at least 1 medication that places patients at high risk for emergent hospital admissions (termed high-risk medication) would decrease the risk of hospital readmission at 30 days compared with usual care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study at a tertiary care center conducted from July 26, 2013, through April 1, 2016. We reviewed outcomes among patients who did or did not have a post-hospital dismissal pharmacist visit immediately before a clinician visit. We included patients who were at least 18 years old and were taking at least 10 total medications at hospital dismissal, 1 or more of which were high-risk medications. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the risk of 30-day readmission between the groups. RESULTS: The study cohort included 502 patients in each group (pharmacist + clinician group and clinician-only group). After adjusting for differences in background demographic characteristics, patients in the pharmacist + clinician group were significantly less likely to be readmitted to the hospital within 30 days postdismissal compared with the clinician-only group (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35-0.69; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Patients seen by a pharmacist immediately before a clinician visit after hospital dismissal had a lower risk of readmission than patients who had a clinician-only visit. Patients taking high-risk medications for hospital admissions are ideal candidates for pharmacist involvement.