RESUMO
Classical galactosemia (CG) is an autosomal recessive disorder of galactose metabolism. Despite early initiation of a galactose-restricted diet, patients develop long-term complications including cognitive impairment. There is an ongoing debate whether the cognitive impairment in CG is stable throughout life or progresses with age. Earlier cross-sectional and longitudinal studies regarding intelligence suggest stability, but longitudinal neuropsychological studies focusing on specific cognitive functions are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess cognitive change over time in adult CG-patients. Ten adult patients with normal to borderline intelligence (mean age 33 years, range 22-49; IQ≥70 or independent work- or living situation) were assessed twice with a mean time interval of 3 years and 9 months (range 1023-1575 days). The neuropsychological assessments covered information processing speed, executive functioning, verbal fluency, and visuospatial functioning. Results showed that there was no significant decline or improvement in test scores on all neuropsychological measures except a decline on the Trail Making Test-A (p = 0.048). However, this group-level difference was subject to "regression to the mean" and was not endorsed by significant change in test scores measuring the same cognitive domain. Moreover, no specific pattern of reliable change (RCI > -1.96) was present on specific measures or within individual patients. This explorative study performed in 10 adult CG-patients with normal to borderline intelligence revealed no cognitive change on several cognitive domains. This implies that the subset of adults with a normal to borderline IQ in their early and middle adulthood are cognitively stable.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Classical galactosemia (CG) is an inborn error of galactose metabolism. Many CG patients suffer from long-term complications including poor cognitive functioning. There are indications of social dysfunction but limited evidence in the literature. Therefore, this study aims to improve our understanding of social competence in CG by investigating social cognition, neurocognition and emotion regulation. METHODS: A comprehensive (neuro)psychological test battery, including self and proxy questionnaires, was administered to CG patients without intellectual disability. Social cognition was assessed by facial emotion recognition, Theory of Mind and self-reported empathy. Standardised results were compared to normative data of the general population. RESULTS: Data from 23 patients (aged 8-52) were included in the study. On a group level, CG patients reported satisfaction with social roles and no social dysfunction despite the self-report of lower social skills. They showed deficits in all aspects of social cognition on both performance tests (emotion recognition and Theory of Mind) and self-report questionnaires (empathy). Adults had a lower social participation than the general population. Parents reported lower social functioning, less adaptive emotion regulation and communication difficulties in their children. Individual differences in scores were present. CONCLUSION: This study shows that CG patients without intellectual disability are satisfied with their social competence, especially social functioning. Nevertheless, deficits in social cognition are present in a large proportion of CG patients. Due to the large variability in scores and discrepancies between self- and proxy-report, an individually tailored, comprehensive neuropsychological assessment including social cognition is advised in all CG patients. Treatment plans need to be customised to the individual patient.