Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Crit Care ; 22(1): 141, 2018 05 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29843808

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We examined whether long-term use of selective digestive tract decontamination (SDD) was effective in reducing intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infection and antibiotic consumption while decreasing colistin-, tobramycin-, and most of the antibiotic-resistant colonization rates in a mixed ICU with a high endemic level of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB). METHODS: In this cohort study, which was conducted in a 30-bed medical-surgical ICU, clinical outcomes before (1 year, non-SDD group) and after (4 years) implementation of SDD were compared. ICU patients who were expected to require tracheal intubation for > 48 hours were given a standard prophylactic SDD regimen. Oropharyngeal and rectal swabs were obtained on admission and once weekly thereafter. RESULTS: ICU-acquired infections occurred in 110 patients in the non-SDD group and in 258 in the SDD group. A significant (P <  0.001) reduction of infections caused by MDRB (risk ratio [RR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.23-0.41) was found after SDD and was associated with low rates of colistin- and tobramycin-resistant colonization. Colistin- and tobramycin-acquired increasing rate of ICU colonization resistance by 1000 days, adjusted by the rate of resistances at admission, was nonsignificant (0.82; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.95; 1.13; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.70, respectively). SDD was also a protective factor for ICU-acquired infections caused by MDR gram-negative pathogens and Acinetobacter baumannii in the multivariate analysis. In addition, a significant (P <  0.001) reduction of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.32-0.59) and secondary bloodstream infection (BSI) (RR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.52) was found. A decrease in antibiotic consumption was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with SDD during 4 years was effective in an ICU setting with a high level of resistance, with clinically relevant reductions of infections caused by MDRB, and with low rates of colistin- and tobramycin-resistant colonization with nonsignificant increasing rate of ICU colonization resistance by 1000 days, adjusted by the rate of resistances at ICU admission. In addition, VAP and secondary BSI rates were significantly lower after SDD. Notably, a decrease in antimicrobial consumption was also observed.


Assuntos
Descontaminação/normas , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/fisiologia , Trato Gastrointestinal/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Coortes , Colistina/administração & dosagem , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Descontaminação/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Proteção , Espanha , Tobramicina/administração & dosagem , Tobramicina/uso terapêutico
2.
Crit Care Med ; 37(5): 1624-33, 2009 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19325481

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of the "Candida score" (CS) for discriminating between Candida species colonization and invasive candidiasis (IC) in non-neutropenic critically ill patients. A rate of IC <5% in patients with CS <3 was the primary end point. DESIGN: Prospective, cohort, observational study. SETTING: Thirty-six medical-surgical intensive care units of Spain, Argentina, and France. PATIENTS: A total of 1,107 non-neutropenic adult intensive care unit patients admitted for at least 7 days between April 2006 and June 2007. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical data, surveillance cultures for fungal growth, and serum levels of (1-3)-beta-d-glucan and anti-Candida antibodies (in a subset of patients) were recorded. The CS was calculated as follows (variables coded as absent = 0, present = 1): total parenteral nutrition x1, plus surgery x1, plus multifocal Candida colonization x1, plus severe sepsis x2. A CS >or=3 accurately selected patients at high risk for IC. The colonization index was registered if >or=0.5. The rate of IC was 2.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-3.54) among patients with CS <3, with a linear association between increasing values of CS and IC rate (p 7 days, with a CS <3 and not receiving antifungal treatment, the rate of IC was <5%. Therefore, IC is highly improbable if a Candida-colonized non-neutropenic critically ill patient has a CS <3.


Assuntos
Candida albicans/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Candidíase/diagnóstico , Fungemia/diagnóstico , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Imunocompetência , Antifúngicos/administração & dosagem , Candida albicans/efeitos dos fármacos , Candidíase/tratamento farmacológico , Candidíase/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Estado Terminal/terapia , Feminino , Fungemia/tratamento farmacológico , Fungemia/mortalidade , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Análise de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA