Comparison of Immunohistochemistry, Next-generation Sequencing and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Detection of MTAP Loss in Pleural Mesothelioma.

9p21 deletions involving MTAP/CDKN2A genes are detected in diffuse pleural mesotheliomas (DPM) but are absent in benign mesothelial proliferations. Loss of MTAP expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is well accepted as a surrogate for 9p21 deletion to support a diagnosis of DPM. Accurate interpretation can be critical in the diagnosis of DPM, but variations in antibody performance may impact interpretation. The objectives of this study were to compare the performance of MTAP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) EPR6893 and 1813 and to compare MTAP expression by IHC with 9p21 copy number status in DPM. Cytoplasmic expression of MTAP IHC with mAbs EPR6893 (ab126770; Abcam) and 1813 (NBP2-75730, Novus Biologicals) was evaluated in 56 DPM (47 epithelioid, 7 biphasic, and 2 sarcomatoid) profiled by targeted next-generation sequencing. 9p21 Copy number status was assessed by Fraction and Allele-Specific Copy Number Estimates from Tumor Sequencing (FACETS) analysis and also by CDKN2A fluorescence in situ hybridization in discrepant cases when material was available. MTAP mAb 1813 showed stronger immunoreactivity, more specific staining, and no equivocal interpretations compared to mAb EPR6893 which showed equivocal staining in 19 (34%) of cases due to weak or heterogenous immunoreactivity, lack of definitive internal positive control, and/or nonspecific background staining. MTAP expression with mAb 1813 showed near perfect agreement with 9p21 copy number by combined FACETS/fluorescence in situ hybridization calls (κ = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99; P < .001). MTAP IHC with mAb 1813 was 96% sensitive, 86% specific, and 93% accurate for 9p21 homozygous deletion. The findings of this study suggest that interpretation of MTAP IHC is improved with mAb 1813 because mAb EPR6893 was often limited by equivocal interpretations. We show that MTAP IHC and molecular assays are complementary in detecting 9p21 homozygous deletion. MTAP IHC may be particularly useful for low tumor purity samples and in low-resource settings.

Immunohistochemical Detection of Cancer-Testis Antigen PRAME.

Cancer-testis (CT) antigens were identified by their ability to elicit T- or B-cell immune responses in the autologous host. They are typically expressed in a wide variety of neoplasms and in normal adult tissues are restricted to testicular germ cells. PReferentially expressed Antigen of Melanoma (PRAME) is a member of the family of nonclassical CT antigens being expressed in a few other normal tissues besides testis. Interestingly, knowledge about the protein expression of many CT antigens is still incomplete due to the limited availability of reagents for their immunohistochemical detection. Here, we tested several commercially available serological reagents and identified a monoclonal antibody suitable for the immunohistochemical detection of PRAME in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. We also tested a wide array of normal and neoplastic tissues. PRAME protein expression in normal tissues is congruent with original molecular data being present in the testis, and at low levels in the endometrium, adrenal cortex, and adult as well as fetal ovary. In tumors, there is diffuse PRAME immunoreactivity in most metastatic melanomas, myxoid liposarcomas, and synovial sarcomas. Other neoplasms such as seminomas and carcinomas of various origins including endometrial, serous ovarian, mammary ductal, lung, and renal showed an intermediate proportion of cases and variable extent of tumor cells positive for PRAME protein expression. As seen with other CT antigens, hepatocellular and colorectal carcinoma, Leydig cell tumors, mesothelioma, and leiomyosarcoma are poor expressers of PRAME.

Identification of Immunohistochemical Reagents for In Situ Protein Expression Analysis of Coronavirus-associated Changes in Human Tissues.

We studied the suitability of commercially available monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for the immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) in standard archival specimens. Antibodies were screened on HEK293 cells transfected with viral nucleoprotein, S1 subunit and S2 subunit of spike protein and on untransfected cells, as well as a panel of normal tissue. Lung tissue with presence of SARS-CoV2 confirmed by in situ hybridization (ISH) was also used. A total of 7 mAbs were tested: (1) mAb 001 (Sino Biological, 40143-R001), (2) mAb 007 (Sino Biological, 40150-R007), (3) mAb 019 (Sino Biological, 40143-R019), (4) mAb 1A9 (GeneTex, GTX632604), (5) mAb ABM19C9 (Abeomics, 10-10007), (6) FIPV3-70 (Santa Cruz, SC-65653), and (7) mAb 6F10 (BioVision, A2060). Only 2 mAbs, clone 001 to the nucleoprotein and clone 1A9 to the S2 subunit spike protein displayed specific immunoreactivity. Both clones showed strong staining in the acute phase of COVID-19 pneumonia, mostly in areas of acute diffuse alveolar damage, but were not completely congruent. Viral protein was also found in kidney tubules, endothelia of multiple organs and a nasal swab of a patient with persistent SARS-CoV2 infection. The other tested reagents were either poorly reactive or demonstrated nonspecific staining in tissues and lesions not infected by SARS-CoV2. Our study demonstrates that rigid specificity testing is mandatory for the evaluation of mAbs to SARS-CoV2 and that clones 001 to nucleoprotein and 1A9 to S2 subunit spike protein are useful for the in situ detection of SARS-CoV2.

Proteomic analysis shows that the main constituent of subepidermal localised cutaneous amyloidosis is not galectin-7.

Lichen or macular localised cutaneous amyloidoses have long been described as keratinic amyloidoses and believed to be due to the deposition of cytokeratin peptides originating from epidermis in the dermal papillae. However, recently it was suggested that galectin-7 is the causative protein for this type of amyloidosis. This was based on the detection of galectin-7 in a biopsy from a patient diagnosed with Bowen's disease and localised cutaneous amyloidosis. In this study we report mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of the protein composition of localised cutaneous amyloid deposits from seven patients using laser microdissection and show that basal keratins are the main constituents of the amyloid deposits. Galectin-7 was not present in the dermal amyloid deposits and was only present in the overlying Congo red negative epidermis.

Molecular epidemiology of IDH2 hotspot mutations in cancer and immunohistochemical detection of R172K, R172G, and R172M variants.

IDH1/2 hotspot mutations occur in glioma, cholangiocarcinoma, chondrosarcoma, sinonasal carcinoma, and T-cell lymphoma and have diagnostic, prognostic, and/or therapeutic value. Availability of immunohistochemistry (IHC) protocols for specific IDH2 mutation detection is limited. A targeted exome sequencing assay MSK-IMPACT cohort comprising >38,000 cancer cases was explored for the presence of IDH1/2 mutations in solid malignancies and select T-cell lymphomas. Seventy-four formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded IDH1/2-mutated (n = 62) and wild-type (n = 12) samples were used for testing and optimization of anti-IDH2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) 14H7, 3C11, and MMab1 targeting R172K, R172G, and R172M mutant proteins, respectively. IDH1/2 mutations were common in glioma (26.8% and 1.6%), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (23.1% and 5.7%), chondrosarcoma (19.4% and 10.7%), sinonasal undifferentiated/large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (0% and 84.2%), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (0% and 22%), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (0 and 5.1%). In other cancers, IDH2 mutations were rare. IDH2 R172 variants included R172K (39%), R172S (29%), R172W (12%), R172G (10%), R172M (5%), and R172T (4%). 14H7, 3C11, and MMab1 detected all IDH2 R172K, R172G, and R172M, respectively, and produced a crisp, granular cytoplasmic staining pattern. 3C11 was also positive in 5 of 6 IDH1 R132G mutants showing a homogeneous, smooth cytoplasmic staining. All 3 mAbs were negative in other IDH1/2 mutant or wild-type cases. IHC using mAbs 14H7, 3C11, and MMab1 can facilitate molecular diagnosis as a reliable, fast, and inexpensive alternative for specific IDH2 variant detection. Given the distinct distribution of IDH2 R172 mutations in cancers, these mAbs could also serve as useful pathologic diagnostic markers.