Optimizing Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Among an Underserved Population: Lessons Learned From a Quality-Improvement Initiative.

Background: Under-represented minorities and those with noncommercial insurance have higher medical comorbidities and complications following elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA). In an effort to bridge this gap, our center implemented a preoperative optimization protocol for TJA in a Medicaid Clinic (Clinic). The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of that protocol and highlight challenges associated with caring for this patient population. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 117 patients undergoing TJA between January 2015 and January 2020. In 2015, the protocol was implemented as a mandatory practice prior to TJA. A contemporary control cohort from the private office was also analyzed. Patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and postoperative complications were collected. Results: Within the clinic group, 52.5% (62) patients identified as Hispanic with 46.6% (55) Spanish-speaking as primary language, compared to 9.3% (11) and 8.5% (10) in the office group (P = .0001), respectively. Clinic group patients were significantly more likely to experience a complication compared to office patients (20 vs 7, respectively). There was no difference in complication or reoperation rate between clinic patients who underwent the optimization protocol and those who did not. Conclusions: The findings from this study highlight the demographic and comorbidities profile of an underserved population, and report on results of a quality improvement initiative among that population, which failed to improve postoperative outcomes. These results underscore the need for further study in this population to improve outcomes and health equity.

2-Octyl-Cyanoacrylate Mesh Dressings for Total Joint Arthroplasty: Dressing Design Influences Risks of Wound Complications.

INTRODUCTION: Recent liquid adhesive skin closure systems with a mesh patch and a 2-octyl cyanoacrylate liquid formula have shown promising results in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Chemical accelerators are typically included to promote the rapid polymerization of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate. The goal of the study is to distinguish designs and wound complication differences between two similar systems. METHODOLOGY: An eighteen-week retrospective study was conducted from July to December 2023, including 207 total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 212 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) cases from four attending surgeons at one institution that used one of two dressing designs. Both dressings had a 2-octyl cyanoacrylate liquid adhesive formula that applied topically to a polyester-based mesh overlaying the wound. Mesh A (used in 274 cases) included an accelerator, a quaternary ammonium salt, on the mesh patch, whereas Mesh B (used in 145 cases) included a similar accelerator within the adhesive applicator. RESULTS: Wound complications (3.2 versus 7.6%; X2 = 3.86; df = 1; P = 0.049), early periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) (0 versus 2.8%; X2 = 7.63; df = 1; P = 0.006), and 90-day reoperations for wound complications (0.4 versus 3.4%; X2 = 6.39; df = 1; P = 0.011) were significantly lower in patients who received Mesh A versus B, respectively. There was no difference in superficial surgical site infections (SSI) (0.7 versus 0%; X2 = 1.06; df = 1; P = 0.302) or allergy rates (3.3 versus 4.1%; X2 = 0.12; df = 1; P = 0.655) between Mesh A and B. CONCLUSION: We observed significantly different performance in wound complications, early postoperative PJI, and 90-day reoperation between the two designs. Having the accelerator in the applicator rather than on the mesh patch, may lead to premature polymerization before bonding appropriately with the mesh to create the desired wound closure and seal.

Complications and Survivorship After Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference by Surgical Approach?

BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) has traditionally been performed through the posterolateral approach (PA). Anterior-based approaches (AA) for rTHA are increasingly being utilized. The purpose of this study was to compare complications and survivorship from re-revision and reoperation after aseptic rTHA performed using an AA versus a PA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent aseptic rTHA either through an AA (Direct Anterior Approach [DAA], Anterior Based Muscle Sparing [ABMS]) or PA from January 2017 to December 2021. There were 116 patients who underwent AA-rTHA (DAA 50, ABMS 66) or PA-rTHA (n = 105). Patient demographics, complications, and postoperative outcomes were collected. RESULTS: The most common indication in both groups was aseptic loosening (n = 26, 22.4% AA, n = 28, 26.7% PA). Acetabular revision alone was most common in the AA group (n = 33, 28.4%), while both components were most commonly revised in the PA groups (n = 47, 44.8%). In all the AA-rTHA group, the index THA was performed through a PA in 51% of patients, while the PA-rTHA group had the index procedure performed via AA in 4.8%. There was no statistically significant difference in re-revision rate between the DAA, ABMS, or PL groups (9.55% versus 5.3% versus 11.4%, respectively, P = 0.11). The most common overall reason for re-revision was persistent instability, with no difference in incidence of post-operative hip dislocation (n = 4, 6.8% DAA, n = 3, 5.3%, n = 10, 9.5% PA; P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates no difference in complication or re-revision survivorship after aseptic rTHA performed through a DAA, AMBS approach, or PA, nor between anterior or posterior-based approaches.

Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Through an Anterior Approach: Survivorship and Risk Factors for Re-Revision.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of anterior-based approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing. Literature on the outcomes of revision THA (rTHA) through an anterior approach, however, is sparse. This study reports the survivorship and risk factors for re-revision in patients undergoing aseptic rTHA through an anterior approach. METHODS: This was a single-institution, retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent aseptic rTHA through an anterior approach (direct anterior, anterior-based muscle sparing) from January 2017 to December 2021, regardless of the original surgical approach. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, conversion THA, and septic revisions. Patient demographics, complications, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to measure survivorship while Cox regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for re-revision of THA. RESULTS: We identified 251 total anterior rTHAs, of which 155 were aseptic anterior revisions. There were 111 patients (111 rTHAs; 63 anterior-based muscle sparing and 48 direct anterior) who met criteria and had a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (range, 2.1 to 6.9). There were a total of 54 (49%) anterior-based index approaches and 57 (51%) posterior index approaches. The most common indications for rTHA were femoral loosening (n = 25, 22.5%), followed by instability (n = 16, 14.4%) and wear or osteolysis (n = 16, 14.4%). At 2 years, the survivorship from reoperation and re-revision was 89% (95% confidence interval: 84 to 95) and 91% (95% confidence interval: 86 to 96), respectively. Reoperation occurred in 14 patients (12.6%) at a mean time of 7.8 months (range, 0.5 to 28.6). Re-revision occurred in 12 patients (10.8%) at a mean time of 7.3 months (range, 0.5 to 28.6). Instability was the most common reason for re-revision (4.5%). Neither index approach type, revision approach type, nor any patient-specific risk factors were identified as predictors of re-revision or reoperation in multivariable regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an acceptable rate of re-revision when aseptic rTHA is performed through an anterior approach, with the most common reason for aseptic re-revision being instability.

How are Oral Antibiotics Being Used in Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Review of the Literature.

While the role and benefit of perioperative intravenous (IV) antibiotics in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is well-established, oral antibiotic use in TJA remains a controversial topic with wide variations in practice patterns. With this review, we aimed to better educate the orthopedic surgeon on when and how oral antibiotics may be used most effectively in TJA patients, and to identify gaps in the literature that could be clarified with targeted research. Extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis (EOAP) use in high-risk primary, aseptic revision, and exchange TJA for infection may be useful in decreasing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates. When prescribing oral antibiotics either as EOAP or for draining wounds, patient factors, type of surgery, and type of infectious organisms should be considered in order to optimally prevent and treat PJI. It is important to maintain antibiotic stewardship by administering the proper duration, dose, and type of antibiotics and by consulting infectious disease when necessary.

Treatment Outcomes of Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) continues to challenge surgeons and patients. The burden of fungal organisms may represent approximately 1% of all PJI. Additionally, fungal PJI is difficult to treat. Most available case series are small and report poor success rates. Fungi are opportunistic pathogens and patients who have fungal PJI are believed to be immunocompromised. Additionally, fungal biofilms are more complex than those formed by other pathogens and confer additional drug resistance. Due to these factors, treatment failure is common. METHODS: A retrospective review of our institutional registry was performed to identify patients treated for fungal PJI. There were 49 patients identified with 8 excluded for not having follow-up, which left 22 knees and 19 hips for analyses. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and surgical details were collected. The primary outcome was failure defined as reoperation for infection following the index surgery for fungal PJI within 1 year of the index surgery. RESULTS: Failure occurred in 10 of 19 knees and 11 of the 22 hips. A higher proportion of patients who have extremity grade C failed treatment, and every patient who failed was host grade 2 or 3. The average number of prior surgeries and time from resection to reimplantation were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this represents the largest cohort of fungal PJIs reported in the literature to date. This data supports other literature in that failure rates were high. More study is needed to further understand this entity and improve care for these patients.

Laceration of the Sciatic Nerve After Closed Reduction of a Dislocated Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Sciatic nerve injury after closed reduction of a dislocated total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an exceedingly rare but tremendously devastating complication. Closed reduction is the standard of care and is typically associated with a low complication rate. There have only been seven sciatic nerve injuries after closed reduction of a dislocated THA reported in the literature, and none were secondary to nerve laceration. We report a case of sciatic nerve laceration after attempted closed reduction of a dislocated THA. This resulted in complete loss of sensory and motor sciatic nerve function. This case highlights the importance of a detailed neurologic examination before and after closed reduction of a dislocated total hip, the importance of using careful reduction maneuvers, and transitioning to open reduction when necessary.

Iatrogenic thrombosis of the deep inferior epigastric artery during diagnostic angiography-a rare complicating factor during rectus free flap harvest.

We describe a 28-year-old man who sustained an open IIIB left ankle fracture dislocation with heel pad avulsion. The patient underwent formal angiography of the left lower extremity, followed by free tissue transfer of a rectus abdominis flap several days later. Intraoperatively, a thrombus was identified in the deep inferior epigastric artery above the femoral artery access site requiring thrombectomy. Histologic analysis estimated the thrombus age at 12 to 72 hours, raising concern that the thrombus was induced during angiogram instrumentation. Donor and recipient site-specific risks of arterial instrumentation (including invasive diagnostics) should be considered when planning free tissue transfer.

No Benefit to Sensor-guided Balancing Compared With Freehand Balancing in TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue balancing in TKA has traditionally relied on surgeons' subjective tactile feedback. Although sensor-guided balancing devices have been proposed to provide more objective feedback, it is unclear whether their use improves patient outcomes. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing freehand balancing with the use of a sensor-guided balancing device and evaluated (1) knee ROM, (2) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (SF-12, WOMAC, and Knee Society Functional Scores [KSFS]), and (3) various surgical and hospital parameters (such as operative time, length of stay [LOS], and surgical complications) at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. METHODS: A total of 152 patients scheduled for primary TKA were recruited and provided informed consent to participate in this this study. Of these, 22 patients were excluded preoperatively, intraoperatively, or postoperatively due to patient request, surgery cancellation, anatomical exclusion criteria determined during surgery, technical issues with the sensor device, or loss to follow-up. After the minimum 2-year follow-up was accounted for, there were 63 sensor-guided and 67 freehand patients, for a total of 130 patients undergoing primary TKA for osteoarthritis. The procedures were performed by one of three fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons (RPS, HJC, JAG) and were randomized to either soft tissue balancing via a freehand technique or with a sensor-guided balancing device at one institution from December 2017 to December 2018. There was no difference in the mean age (72 ± 8 years versus 70 ± 9 years, mean difference 2; p = 0.11), BMI (30 ± 6 kg/m 2 versus 29 ± 6 kg/m 2 , mean difference 1; p = 0.83), gender (79% women versus 70% women; p = 0.22), and American Society of Anesthesiology score (2 ± 1 versus 2 ± 1, mean difference 0; p = 0.92) between the sensor-guided and freehand groups, respectively. For both groups, soft tissue balancing was performed after all bony cuts were completed and trial components inserted, with the primary difference in technique being the ability to quantify the intercompartmental balance using the trial tibial insert embedded with a wireless sensor in the sensor-guided cohort. Implant manufacturers were not standardized. Primary outcomes were knee ROM and PROMs at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Secondary outcomes included pain level evaluated by the VAS, opioid consumption, inpatient physical therapy performance, LOS, discharge disposition, surgical complications, and reoperations. RESULTS: There was no difference in the mean knee ROM at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively between the sensor-guided cohort (113° ± 11°, 119° ± 13°, and 116° ± 12°, respectively) and the freehand cohort (116° ± 13° [p = 0.36], 117° ± 13° [p = 0.41], and 117° ± 12° [p = 0.87], respectively). There was no difference in SF-12 physical, SF-12 mental, WOMAC pain, WOMAC stiffness, WOMAC function, and KSFS scores between the cohorts at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. The mean operative time in the sensor-guided cohort was longer than that in the freehand cohort (107 ± 0.02 versus 84 ± 0.04 minutes, mean difference = 23 minutes; p = 0.008), but there were no differences in LOS, physical therapy performance, VAS pain scores, opioid consumption, discharge disposition, surgical complications, or percentages of patients in each group who underwent reoperation. CONCLUSION: This RCT demonstrated that at 2 years postoperatively, the use of a sensor-balancing device for soft tissue balancing in TKA did not confer any additional benefit in terms of knee ROM, PROMs, and clinical outcomes. Given the significantly increased operative time and costs associated with the use of a sensor-balancing device, we recommend against its routine use in clinical practice by experienced surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Fragility Index as a Measure of Randomized Clinical Trial Quality in Adult Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The Fragility Index (FI) and Reverse Fragility Index are powerful tools to supplement the P value in evaluation of randomized clinical trial (RCT) outcomes. These metrics are defined as the number of patients needed to change the significance level of an outcome. The purpose of this study was to calculate these metrics for published RCTs in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of RCTs in TJA over the last decade. For each study, we calculated the FI (for statistically significant outcomes) or Reverse Fragility Index (for nonstatistically significant outcomes) for all dichotomous, categorical outcomes. We also used the Pearson correlation coefficient to evaluate publication-level variables. RESULTS: We included 104 studies with 473 outcomes; 92 were significant, and 381 were nonstatistically significant. The median FI was 6 overall and 4 and 7 for significant and nonsignificant outcomes, respectively. There was a positive correlation between FI and sample size (R = 0.14, P = .002) and between FI and P values (R = 0.197, P = .000012). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest evaluation of FI in orthopedics literature to date. We found a median FI that was comparable to or higher than FIs calculated in other orthopedic subspecialties. Although the mean and median FIs were greater than the 2 recommended by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines to demonstrate strong evidence, a large percentage of studies have an FI < 2. This suggests that the TJA literature is on par or slightly better than other subspecialties, but improvements must be made. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I; Systematic Review.

Lower Dosing of Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia Is Not Associated With Improved Perioperative Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The choice of anesthesia plays a significant role in the success of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Isobaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia is often used. However, dosing of bupivacaine has not been extensively studied and is usually at the discretion of the treating anesthesiologist and surgeon. The goal of this study was to determine what, if any, effect the dose of bupivacaine spinal anesthesia had on perioperative outcomes in TJA. METHODS: A total of 761 TJAs performed with bupivacaine spinal anesthesia by arthroplasty surgeons were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative outcomes evaluated were operation duration, estimated blood loss, length of stay (LOS) in the postanesthesia care unit, hospital LOS, discharge disposition, episodes of intraoperative hypotension, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and missed physical therapy sessions because of postoperative symptoms of hypotension. A Student's t-test was used for continuous variables, and a chi-squared test was used for categorical variables. RESULTS: Of the 761 patients, 499 (65.6%) received 15 mg isobaric bupivacaine while 262 (34.4%) received <15 mg (range = 7.5-14.5 mg, median = 12.5 mg). With the numbers available in this cohort, lower doses of bupivacaine were not associated with any significant differences between groups for any of the studied perioperative outcomes, including proportion of patients discharged home or LOS. CONCLUSION: Dosage of bupivacaine spinal anesthetic did not affect perioperative outcomes. Bupivacaine may not have a dose-related response curve in this regard, and if seeking to perform same-day or outpatient TJA, other agents may need to be considered, rather than smaller doses of bupivacaine.

Outcomes and survivorship after conversion of failed hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Arthroplasty is the treatment of choice for elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. When compared to total hip arthroplasty (THA), higher revision rates have been reported for hemiarthroplasty (HA). Conversion of failed HA to THA can be complex, especially in the elderly population at risk for revision surgery complications. We report a single institution's experience with conversion of failed HA to THA at mid-term follow-up. METHODS: We identified patients converted from failed HA to THA from 2006 to 2016. Clinical data including indication for index and conversion surgery, maintenance or revision of femoral component during conversion, operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, and need for revision surgery were collected. Descriptive statistics were analysed in SPSS. RESULTS: The cohort included 21 men and 39 women (mean age of 74.5 years). The mean follow-up after conversion HA to THA was 2.8 years. During conversion surgery, the femoral component was revised in 75.0% and retained in 25.0% of cases. After conversion HA to THA, the rate of major complications and re-revision at 2 years was 11.7% and 10.0%, respectively. Femoral revision versus retention did not affect complication rates (11.1% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.31) or re-revision rates (8.9% vs. 13.3%; p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: In this high-risk population, mid-term follow-up demonstrated tolerable complication and re-revision rates, the majority of which were for instability. We observed high rates of femoral component revision during conversion THA, although this did not increase the likelihood of postoperative complications or need for future surgery.

Debridement and Implant Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Knee Infection.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty. We reviewed the current data on DAIR procedures and two-stage exchange for periprosthetic knee infection. This case study illustrates successful treatment of an acute PJI using a debridement and implant retention (DAIR) technique with adjuvant intraosseous (IO) vancomycin. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(4):249-252, 2021).

Shoulder instability, performance, and return to play in National Hockey League players.

BACKGROUND: The shoulder is a commonly injured area in hockey, yet information is lacking on the prevalence and effect of shoulder instability. Our study investigates the incidence of shoulder dislocation events in the National Hockey League (NHL) and the effects on return-to-play (RTP) and player performance. We hypothesize that NHL players would have high RTP rates without significant changes in performance after injury. METHODS: NHL players who suffered in-season shoulder instability events between 2003-2004 and 2017-2018 seasons were identified. Demographic characteristics, incidence of injury, recurrences, RTP, and statistical performance data were collected. Postinjury performance was compared with experience-matched, era-matched, position-matched, and age-matched controls. A mixed generalized linear regression model was used to compare postinjury performance as a function of operative and nonoperative treatment. RESULTS: A total of 57 players experienced 67 shoulder instability events with 98.5% of players returning to play after an average of 26.3 ± 20.8 regular season games missed. Surgery was performed in 47.8% of players with no recurrent injuries postoperatively. Nonoperatively managed players experienced a decrease in points per game (P = .034) compared with surgically treated patients. Recurrence occurred in 14.3% of conservatively managed players, with 33.3% experiencing a season-ending injury. Players with recurrent injuries missed significantly more career games compared with those treated initially with surgery (P = .00324). CONCLUSION: Professional hockey players experience high rates of RTP with acceptable performance outcomes after shoulder instability events; however, recurrent injuries led to significantly more career games missed when treated nonoperatively at the time of injury.

What Is the Learning Curve for New Technologies in Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The adaptation of new technology in joint replacement surgery is often associated with a learning curve, as performance tends to improve with experience. The purpose of this review is to define the learning curve and its relevance to joint replacement surgery in the setting of new technological advances, and to draw analogies with the learning curve of basic surgical training. RECENT FINDINGS: Assessing a surgeon's learning curve for a new technology is complicated and difficult. With every learning curve, the first patients subjected to the novel technology may be at higher risk for adverse events until the learning curve is overcome and a steady state is reached. While measures of performance can be clear and direct in some professions, learning curves with new technology in total joint arthroplasty have been difficult to quantify. Most attempts measure surgical learning curves via an evaluation of the surgical process or patient outcomes. There are published results of both process (i.e., operative time, accuracy of implant position) and outcome measures (i.e., complication rate, revision rate) utilized as proxy for performance during learning curves. We review the concept of the learning curve in joint replacement surgery, highlighting examples of learning curves with adaptation of new technologies, and conclude with a discussion of dilemmas and challenges.

The Evidence for Common Nonsurgical Modalities in Sports Medicine, Part 1: Kinesio Tape, Sports Massage Therapy, and Acupuncture.

OBJECTIVE: There are a number of nonsurgical modalities used by athletes in attempts to improve performance or prevent, treat, and rehabilitate musculoskeletal injuries. A concise review of available evidence on common nonsurgical modalities used today is necessary so that practitioners may appropriately counsel patients. METHODS: A comprehensive review of relevant publications regarding Kinesio taping, sports massage therapy, and acupuncture from 2006 through 2019 was completed using PubMed and Google Scholar. RESULTS: There have been numerous investigations evaluating the efficacy of nonsurgical modalities for a myriad of musculoskeletal conditions. There is some low level evidence to suggest the use of Kinesio tape for athletes with acute shoulder symptoms and acupuncture for carpal tunnel syndrome and as an adjunct treatment for low back pain. There is a need for higher quality research to better elucidate the effect of sports massage therapy on sports performance, recovery, and musculoskeletal conditions in general. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsurgical modalities are low-cost treatment strategies with very few reported adverse outcomes that will likely continue to increase in popularity. High-quality studies are needed to effectively evaluate these treatments, so that care providers can provide appropriate guidance based on evidence-based medicine.

The Evidence for Common Nonsurgical Modalities in Sports Medicine, Part 2: Cupping and Blood Flow Restriction.

OBJECTIVE: There are a number of nonsurgical modalities used by athletes in attempts to improve performance or prevent, treat, and rehabilitate musculoskeletal injuries. A concise review of available evidence on common nonsurgical modalities used today is necessary, so that practitioners may appropriately counsel patients. METHODS: A comprehensive review of relevant publications regarding cupping and blood flow restriction (BFR) from 2006 through 2019 was completed using PubMed and Google Scholar. RESULTS: There have been numerous investigations evaluating the efficacy of nonsurgical modalities for a myriad of musculoskeletal conditions. Cupping may be an effective option with low risk in treating nonspecific, musculoskeletal pain. Studies comparing BFR with non-BFR controls suggest that it may increase muscle strength and endurance for individuals undergoing rehabilitation or sport-specific training by mimicking the low oxygen environment during exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsurgical modalities are low-cost treatment strategies with rates of adverse outcomes as low as 0.008% that will likely continue to increase in popularity. Despite the paucity of recent research in cupping and BFR, evidence suggests benefits with use. High-quality studies are needed to effectively evaluate these treatments, so that care providers can provide appropriate guidance based on evidence-based medicine.

Spinal Anesthesia Using Chloroprocaine is Safe, Effective, and Facilitates Earlier Discharge in Selected Fast-track Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthetic choice plays an underappreciated role in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Chloroprocaine, a short-acting local anesthetic, has been limited to short-duration ambulatory procedures and has not been studied in THA. We compare perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing fast-track THA using chloroprocaine spinal anesthesia with those who have surgery with a longer-acting agent (bupivacaine). METHODS: A total of 143 THAs performed under spinal anesthesia by 3 arthroplasty surgeons between November 2018 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients receiving chloroprocaine were matched 1:1 by demographics to patients receiving bupivacaine. Ultimately, 74 patients were included (37 chloroprocaine and 37 bupivacaine). The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Other perioperative outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients (50%) received chloroprocaine (60 mg), whereas 37 (50%) received bupivacaine (median 10 mg, range 8-15 mg). Among the matched groups, chloroprocaine use was associated with shorter hospital LOS (0.9 vs 1.2 days; P = .03), shorter operative time (68.2 vs 83.6 minutes, P = .03), lower estimated blood loss (184.7 vs 218.9 mL, P = .02), shorter postanesthesia care unit LOS (139.4 vs 194.9 minutes; P = .04), and less intraoperative hypotension (59.5% vs 83.8%, P = .02). Patients receiving chloroprocaine were also more commonly discharged home (100% vs 89.2%; P = .04). CONCLUSION: Chloroprocaine is a safe and reliable option for patients to mobilize rapidly and leave the hospital sooner after THA. Compared with bupivacaine, it is associated with shorter hospital LOS and higher likelihood for discharge to home.

Direct anterior versus mini-anterolateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: early postoperative outcomes and complications.

BACKGROUND: Anterior-based approaches to primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) are being used more frequently, and several variations have been described. The supine direct anterior (DA) approach has been widely studied, but few studies have compared it with the mini-anterolateral (mini-AL) approach (abductor-sparing, Watson-Jones approach) in the lateral decubitus position. This study aims to compare early perioperative complications and outcomes between these 2 approaches. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 340 consecutive THAs (n = 170 DA, n = 170 mini-AL) performed by 3 arthroplasty surgeons at a single institution between January 2017 and May 2018. The primary outcome was reoperation for any reason within 1 year. Secondary outcomes included wound-healing complications and several perioperative factors. A Student's t-test was used for continuous variables, and a chi-squared test was used for categorical variables. RESULTS: In this cohort, 6 patients (4%) from the mini-AL group required reoperation within 1 year, compared with 2 patients (1%) from the DA group (P = .024). However, the DA group had 13 patients (8%) with wound-healing complications compared with 6 patients (4%) in the mini-AL group 4% (P = .036). Perioperative outcomes were similar for operative time, distance walked with physical therapy, morphine milligram equivalent consumed, length of stay, and discharge disposition. Pain scores during index hospitalization were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent THA using the supine DA approach had fewer reoperations within 1 year, but more wound-healing complications compared with the mini-AL approach in the lateral decubitus position. For surgeons performing primary THA using an anterior-based approach, relative risks and benefits of these approaches must be understood. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Polyester Mesh Dressings Reduce Delayed Wound Healing and Reoperations Compared with Silver-Impregnated Occlusive Dressings after Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: New dressings aimed at reducing surgical wound complications after knee arthroplasty continue to evolve. We compared wound complications and reoperations between 2 dressings: 2-octyl cyanoacrylate adhesive and polyester mesh (Dermabond® Prineo®, "mesh") and silver-impregnated occlusive dressings and n-butyl-2-cyancacrylate adhesive (AQUACEL® Ag SURGICAL cover dressing with SwiftSet™, "standard"). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study reviewed 353 consecutive partial and total knee arthroplasties performed by a single surgeon; 6 were excluded for not using either dressing type. Thus, 347 cases were separated into 2 cohorts: mesh (n = 176) and standard dressing (n = 171). Demographics and risk factors were similar, except for age. Surgical and closure techniques were consistent in all patients. Delayed wound healing was assessed by the surgeon at the 2-week office visit for drainage, suture abscess, or wound edge separation. Secondary outcome measures include infection, office-based closure, and return to the operating room for reclosure. RESULTS: There were 2 instances of delayed wound healing in the mesh group and 16 in the standard dressing group (1.14% vs 9.36%, P ≤ .0001). There were significantly fewer reoperations in the mesh group than in the standard group (0 vs 2.33%, P = .04). There were no infections or office-based closures. CONCLUSION: Mesh dressings were associated with fewer episodes of delayed wound healing and reoperations than the standard dressing. A possible mechanism may be that this brand of mesh distributes wound tension more evenly. In addition, because it remains in place longer during the immediate postoperative period, it may work via prolonged wound edge support.