Bleeding-associated outcomes with preoperative clopidogrel use in on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass.

Clopidogrel use prior to coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes is associated with a greater incidence of procedural related morbidity. We studied the impact of clopidogrel pre-treatment in patients undergoing off-pump versus on-pump coronary revascularization. This report describes a post hoc analysis of 431 on-pump and 165 off-pump cases from a retrospective multicenter study of the impact of preoperative (within 5 days) clopidogrel use on bleeding related outcomes and surgical reintervention. Logistic regression was used to analyze the outcomes with respect to surgery type and clopidogrel exposure while using a propensity score risk adjustment for off-pump surgery. The hospital length of stay (9.3 ± 5.4 days vs. 8.9 ± 5.3 days, p = 0.35), major bleeding (21% vs. 20%, p = 0.74) and reoperation (3.7% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.53) were similar between on-pump and off-pump, respectively. In both surgical cohorts, recent clopidogrel use was associated with a greater incidence of major bleeding, reoperation, and transfusion. After multivariable adjustment, the odds ratio of major bleeding (1.76, 95% confidence interval 0.88-3.52 on-pump; 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.06-5.30 off-pump) and reoperation (4.52, 95% confidence interval 0.58-36.6 in on-pump; 7.05, 95% confidence interval 0.82-60.5 in off-pump) was increased in clopidogrel-treated patients compared to no clopidogrel. Major bleeding and reoperation did not differ significantly between patients undergoing on- or off-pump surgery. Clopidogrel treatment within 5 days prior to surgery increased the risk of bleeding and reoperation in all CABG patients irrespective of whether surgery was performed on- or off-pump.

Impact of worsening renal function during hospital admission on resource utilization in patients with heart failure.

Renal impairment frequently accompanies heart failure (HF) and is a recognized independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Few data are available assessing the impact of worsening renal function (WRF) during hospitalization on health care resource use in patients with HF. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, de-identified, clinical, laboratory, and economic data for patients admitted to a tertiary care medical center with a primary diagnosis of HF were extracted by MedMining and reviewed retrospectively by the authors. Patients were excluded if they had no previous HF or were admitted for acute coronary syndrome or coronary artery bypass grafting within 30 days of index hospitalization. WRF was defined as ≥ 0.3 mg/dl increase in serum creatinine from baseline at any time during hospitalization. Of 5,803 hospitalized patients with primary HF diagnosis, 827 patients (14%) fulfilled all prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria (74 ± 14 years of age, 43% men, 98% white, admission serum creatinine 1.4 ± 0.9 mg/dl, estimated glomerular filtration rate < 90 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at admission in 83%). During index hospitalization, WRF was identified in nearly 33%. Compared to patients without WRF, those with WRF had greater prevalence of diabetes (54% vs 43%), lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (44 ± 30 vs 62 ± 35 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), higher serum potassium (4.3 ± 0.7 vs 4.2 ± 0.7 mEq/L), and higher B-type natriuretic peptide (845 ± 821 vs 795 ± 947 pg/ml) at baseline (all p values < 0.05). Patients developing WRF incurred higher total inpatient costs ($10,977, range 671 to 212,819, vs $7,820, range 697 to 269,797, p < 0.001) and longer hospital stay (8.2 ± 6.8 vs 5.7 ± 5.5 days, p < 0.001). In conclusion, occurrence of WRF during HF-related hospitalization is associated with higher hospitalization costs and longer hospital stay.

Medication errors involving continuously infused medications in a surgical intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: To document the incidence of medication errors related to medications administered by continuous infusion. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Sixteen-bed surgical intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All continuous infusions in the surgical intensive care unit were evaluated at least once daily for correct flow-sheet charting, concentration, infusion rate, and dose administered, as well as patients' heights and weights (actual, ideal, and "dry"). Collected information was examined to determine the error rate, types of errors occurring, and weight used for dose calculation. Variations inpatient weight measures were compared. Seventy-one patients with 202 total infusions were observed. Errors involving continuously infused medications in our surgical intensive care unit occurred at a rate of 105.9 per 1,000 patient days. For nonweight-based infusions, 94% of doses were delivered correctly. Slightly >10% of the doses administered for weight-based infusions (dose based on dry body weight) were incorrect. Significant differences were found between the weight measurements recorded, but this did not translate into statistically significant differences in the apparent calculated doses delivered. CONCLUSIONS: Medications delivered by continuous infusion, particularly those that are weight based, can contribute to medication errors in the intensive care unit. A large proportion (87.6%) of doses for weight-based infusions was calculated based on estimated or unreliable admission weights. There were no severe consequences resulting from the errors observed in this 1 month investigation; however, depending on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the drug being administered, there is a potential to deliver artificially low or high doses resulting in subtherapeutic or adverse effects.