Early Identification of Hearing Loss and Language Development at 32 Months of Age.

This study examines the relationship between the early identification of hearing loss and language outcomes for deaf/hard of hearing (D/HH) children, with bilateral or unilateral hearing loss and with or without additional disabilities. It was hypothesized that hearing loss identified by 3 months of age would be associated with better language outcomes. Using a prospective, longitudinal design, 86 families completed developmental instruments at two time points: at an average age of 14.8 months and an average age of 32.1 months. Multiple regression examined how hearing loss identified by 3 months of age contributed to later language outcomes while controlling for developmental level at the first time point. Hearing loss identified by 3 months of age was positively associated with better language outcomes for D/HH children at 32 months of age; however, D/HH children still exhibited language delays, compared to normative scores for same-aged hearing peers for reported measures. Language outcomes of children with unilateral hearing loss were not better than those of children with mild-to-moderate bilateral hearing loss. Children with additional disabilities and more severe bilateral hearing loss had lower language scores than those without.

Assessing Fine-Grained Speech Discrimination in Young Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

HYPOTHESIS: Children of 2 to 3 years old with cochlear implants can perform consonant discriminations using fine-grained acoustic cues. BACKGROUND: Children born with severe-to-profound deafness are provided with early cochlear implantation (<2 yr) to maximize oral communication outcomes. Little is known regarding their abilities to discriminate consonant contrasts for accurately identifying speech sounds. METHODS: Using a Reaching for Sound paradigm to collect behavioral responses, consonant contrast discrimination was measured in 13 children with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs; aged 28-37 mo), and 13 age-matched normal-hearing (NH) children. Four contrast pairs were tested: 1) place + voicing, 2) place, 3) voicing, and 4) reduced voice-onset-time cue. Using standard processing strategies, electrodograms showing pulsatile stimulation patterns were created retrospectively to assess the spectral-temporal cues delivered through the clinical speech processors. RESULTS: As a group, children with BiCIs were able to discriminate all consonant contrasts at a level that was above chance, but their performance was poorer than NH children. Larger individual variability in discrimination performance was found in children with BiCIs. Stepwise regression revealed that, in the place contrast, chronological age was correlated with improved discrimination performance among children with BiCIs. CONCLUSION: Children with BiCIs were able to discriminate consonant contrasts using fine-grained spectral-temporal cues above chance level but more poorly than their NH peers. Electrodogram analysis confirmed the access to spectral-temporal cues in the consonant contrasts through clinical speech processors. However, the cue saliency might not have be enough for children with BiCIs to achieve the same discrimination accuracy as NH children.

Spatial Release From Masking in 2-Year-Olds With Normal Hearing and With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

This study evaluated spatial release from masking (SRM) in 2- to 3-year-old children who are deaf and were implanted with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs), and in age-matched normal-hearing (NH) toddlers. Here, we examined whether early activation of bilateral hearing has the potential to promote SRM that is similar to age-matched NH children. Listeners were 13 NH toddlers and 13 toddlers with BiCIs, ages 27 to 36 months. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured for target speech in front (0°) and for competitors that were either Colocated in front (0°) or Separated toward the right (+90°). SRM was computed as the difference between SRTs in the front versus in the asymmetrical condition. Results show that SRTs were higher in the BiCI than NH group in all conditions. Both groups had higher SRTs in the Colocated and Separated conditions compared with Quiet, indicating masking. SRM was significant only in the NH group. In the BiCI group, the group effect of SRM was not significant, likely limited by the small sample size; however, all but two children had SRM values within the NH range. This work shows that to some extent, the ability to use spatial cues for source segregation develops by age 2 to 3 in NH children and is attainable in most of the children in the BiCI group. There is potential for the paradigm used here to be used in clinical settings to evaluate outcomes of bilateral hearing in very young children.

The effect of differential listening experience on the development of expressive and receptive language in children with bilateral cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVES: Growing evidence suggests that children who are deaf and use cochlear implants (CIs) can communicate effectively using spoken language. Research has reported that age of implantation and length of experience with the CI play an important role in a predicting a child's linguistic development. In recent years, the increase in the number of children receiving bilateral CIs (BiCIs) has led to interest in new variables that may also influence the development of hearing, speech, and language abilities, such as length of bilateral listening experience and the length of time between the implantation of the two CIs. One goal of the present study was to determine how a cohort of children with BiCIs performed on standardized measures of language and nonverbal cognition. This study examined the relationship between performance on language and nonverbal intelligence quotient (IQ) tests and the ages at implantation of the first CI and second CI. This study also examined whether early bilateral activation is related to better language scores. DESIGN: Children with BiCIs (n = 39; ages 4 to 9 years) were tested on two standardized measures, the Test of Language Development and the Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised, to evaluate their expressive/receptive language skills and nonverbal IQ/memory. Hierarchical regression analyses were used to evaluate whether BiCI hearing experience predicts language performance. RESULTS: While large intersubject variability existed, on average, almost all the children with BiCIs scored within or above normal limits on measures of nonverbal cognition. Expressive and receptive language scores were highly variable, less likely to be above the normative mean, and did not correlate with Length of first CI Use, defined as length of auditory experience with one cochlear implant, or Length of second CI Use, defined as length of auditory experience with two cochlear implants. CONCLUSIONS: All children in the present study had BiCIs. Most IQ scores were either at or above that found in the general population of typically hearing children. However, there was greater variability in their performance on a standardized test of expressive and receptive language. This cohort of children, who are mainstreamed in schools at age-appropriate grades, whose mothers' education is high, and whose families' socioecononomic status is high, had, as a group, on average, language scores within the same range as the normative sample of hearing children. Further research identifying the predictors that contribute to the high variability in both expressive and receptive language scores in children with BiCIs will provide useful information that can aid in clinical management and decision making.

Reaching for sound measures: an ecologically valid estimate of spatial hearing in 2- to 3-year-old children with bilateral cochlear implants.

HYPOTHESIS: A novel reaching for sound (RFS) methodology can yield a high level of spatial hearing ability in 2- to 3-year-old children with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs). BACKGROUND: A growing number of children who are deaf are receiving BiCIs at a young age. Their spatial hearing abilities are emerging but highly variable within the population. Our novel reaching for sound method uses an ecologically valid approach that engages children and maintains their motivation. The present work was aimed at using the novel RFS method to evaluate spatial hearing in 2- to 3-year-olds with normal hearing and with BiCIs. METHODS: Six children with BiCIs and 15 children with NH, ages 2 to 3 years participated. In the BiCI group, testing was performed in bilateral or single CI (unilateral) conditions. Loudspeakers were separated by ± 60, ± 45, ± 30, or ± 15 degrees. On each trial, a small toy was hidden behind one of the loudspeakers, and the child's task was to reach through a hole in the curtain above the loudspeaker, to indicate source location. Children were reinforced for correct responses. At each angle, the ability of the child to reach criterion of 80% or greater correct was assessed. RESULTS: All BiCI users reached criterion at all angles tested in the bilateral condition; however, performance was poorer when using a single CI. Of the 15 NH children, 13 were able to perform the task accurately and reached criterion at all angles. CONCLUSION: Spatial hearing skills studied with the RFS method revealed novel findings regarding the emergence of sound localization in very young BiCI users.

Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

This report highlights research projects relevant to binaural and spatial hearing in adults and children. In the past decade we have made progress in understanding the impact of bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) on performance in adults and children. However, BiCI users typically do not perform as well as normal hearing (NH) listeners. In this article we describe the benefits from BiCIs compared with a single cochlear implant (CI), focusing on measures of spatial hearing and speech understanding in noise. We highlight the fact that in BiCI listening the devices in the two ears are not coordinated; thus binaural spatial cues that are available to NH listeners are not available to BiCI users. Through the use of research processors that carefully control the stimulus delivered to each electrode in each ear, we are able to preserve binaural cues and deliver them with fidelity to BiCI users. Results from those studies are discussed as well, with a focus on the effect of age at onset of deafness and plasticity of binaural sensitivity. Our work with children has expanded both in number of subjects tested and age range included. We have now tested dozens of children ranging in age from 2 to 14 yr. Our findings suggest that spatial hearing abilities emerge with bilateral experience. While we originally focused on studying performance in free field, where real world listening experiments are conducted, more recently we have begun to conduct studies under carefully controlled binaural stimulation conditions with children as well. We have also studied language acquisition and speech perception and production in young CI users. Finally, a running theme of this research program is the systematic investigation of the numerous factors that contribute to spatial and binaural hearing in BiCI users. By using CI simulations (with vocoders) and studying NH listeners under degraded listening conditions, we are able to tease apart limitations due to the hardware/software of the CI systems from limitations due to neural pathology.