Stasis Dermatitis: Pathophysiology, Current Treatment Paradigms, and the Use of the Flavonoid Diosmin.

Objective: We sought to examine the role of flavonoids, particularly diosmin, as a therapeutic agent for stasis dermatitis (SD) through discussion of pathophysiology, current treatment paradigms, potential mechanisms of action, and a systematic review of evidence on clinical efficacy. Methods: In addition to articles on pathophysiology and standard treatment, a search of PubMed was conducted using the following query: ("Diosmin" OR "MPFF" OR "Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction" OR "Flavonoid") AND ("Stasis Dermatitis" OR "Venous Ulcer" OR "Lipodermatosclerosis"). Emphasis was placed on studies that were randomized controlled trials examining an oral flavonoid against a placebo or standard of care. Results: Diosmin is effective at improving stasis changes, increasing ulcer healing frequency, decreasing the time to ulcer healing, and reducing tissue edema. They also cause significant improvement in patient quality of life and reduction of venous symptoms. Diosmin has been shown to have a favorable safety profile with very few mild adverse events which did not differ significantly from placebo. Flavonoids also appear to be effective for other dermatologic conditions, including rosacea and senile purpura. Conclusion: There is a growing body of evidence indicating that diosmin has therapeutic efficacy in managing stasis dermatitis. Data from studies in diseases with pathogenic similarities suggests the potential for even broader dermatologic applications.

Postherpetic granulomatous dermatitis occurring in the setting of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A case report.

We report a case of a 72-year-old man presenting with a 2-month history of a persistent, painful rash of the chest, axilla, and back. He had a history of recently resolved varicella zoster virus reactivation in the same distribution of the current rash and metastatic malignant melanoma treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab. The histopathology was consistent with granulomatous dermatitis (GD), and a diagnosis of postherpetic isotopic response manifesting as GD was made. Given the paucity of reported cases of postherpetic GD in the setting of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), we discuss the clinicopathologic features of this case and potential mechanisms by which ICIs may contribute to the development of granulomatous disease.

Cryolipolysis in the United States-Review of the clinical data.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive body contouring is becoming more popular in the United States as an alternative to liposuction. The most popular of these methods, cryolipolysis, uses precisely controlled cooling to reduce focal adiposities. The number of cryolipolysis procedures performed annually has experienced rampant growth in United States markets, and the indications have likewise diversified. In light of this change, it is imperative to perform an updated review of available US safety and efficacy data on cryolipolysis. AIMS: To examine the safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis treatments in the United States using data extracted from research performed exclusively at US-based sites. METHODS: In order to identify relevant studies, a literature search was conducted on PubMed using the terms "CoolSculpting" OR "cryolipolysis" OR "lipocryolysis." Articles were manually reviewed to exclude literature reviews, research not performed on humans, studies on experimental combinations of techniques, and any studies not performed in the United States. RESULTS: The initial literature search returned 246 results. Following manual review, a total of 18 studies were selected for data extraction. Mean reduction in fat thickness by ultrasound was 2.0-5.1 mm or 19.6%-32.3%; mean reduction by body caliper was 2.3-7 mm or 14.9%-21.5%. Side effects were mild and transient. Four instances of PAH were documented in 3453 treatment cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Cryolipolysis is a safe, modestly effective method for reducing focal adiposity. Complications are rare and treatable. However, US-based studies are few in number and often of low power and/or quality. More high-quality research is needed for all aspects of cryolipolysis.

A research-based gene panel to investigate breast, ovarian and prostate cancer genetic risk.

There is a need to investigate and better understand the inherited risk of cancer to ensure that clinical applications provide more accurate assessments and management strategies. Developing research-based next-generation sequencing gene panels that not only target (present-day) clinically actionable susceptibility genes but also genes that currently lack sufficient evidence for risk as well as candidate genes, such as those in DNA repair pathways, can help aid this effort. Therefore, gene panel B.O.P. (Breast, Ovarian, and Prostate) was developed to evaluate the genetic risk of breast, ovarian and/or prostate cancer, and this manuscript serves as an introduction to B.O.P. and highlights its initial analytical validity assessment. B.O.P targets 87 genes that have been suggested, predicted, or clinically proven to be associated with breast, ovarian, and/or prostate cancer risk using Agilent Technologies Haloplex probes. The probes were designed for 100 base pair reads on an Illumina platform and target both coding and non-coding exons as well as 10 intronic base pairs flanking the intron-exon boundaries. The initial B.O.P screening involved 43 individuals from the Alabama Hereditary Cancer Cohort, and an average sequencing depth of 809X was obtained. Upon variant filtering and validation, true positives had an average sequencing depth of 659X and allele balance of 0.51. The average false positive sequencing depth was 34X and allele balance was 0.33. Although low sequencing depth was not always indicative of a false positive, high sequencing depths (>100X) signified a true positive. Furthermore, sensitivity and specificity of BRCA1/2 were calculated to be 100% and 92.3%, respectively. Overall, this screening enabled the establishment of criteria to alleviate future validation efforts and strongly supports the use of B.O.P. to further elucidate hereditary cancer susceptibility. Ultimately, continued B.O.P. screening will provide insights toward the genetic risk of and overlap between breast, ovarian, and/or prostate cancer.