Combination of disease duration-to-age at diagnosis and hemoglobin A1c-to-serum C-peptide reactivity ratios predicts patient response to glucose-lowering medication in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study across Japan (JDDM59).

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Knowing the collective clinical factors that determine patient response to glucose-lowering medication would be beneficial in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. We carried out a retrospective cohort study to explore the combination of clinical factors involved in its therapeutic efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The results of cohort studies retrieved using the CoDiC® database across Japan from January 2005 to July 2018 were analyzed based on criterion that using insulin therapy indicates severe type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: A logistic regression analysis showed that age at diagnosis, disease duration, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and serum C-peptide reactivity (CPR) at medication commencement were associated with the probability of insulin treatment. Receiver operating characteristic curve showed that these clinical factors predicted insulin treatment positivity with an area under the curve of >0.600. The area under the curve increased to 0.674 and 0.720 for the disease duration-to-age at diagnosis ratio and HbA1c-to-CPR ratio, respectively. Furthermore, area under the curve increased to 0.727 and 0.750 in the indices (duration-to-age ratio at diagnosis × 43 + HbA1c) and (duration-to-age ration at diagnosis × 21 + HbA1c-to-CPR ratio), respectively. After stratification to three groups according to the indices, monthly HbA1c levels during 6 months of treatment were higher in the upper one-third than in the lower one-third of patients, and many patients did not achieve the target HbA1c level (53 mmol/mol) in the upper one-third, although greater than fourfold more patients were administered insulin in the upper one-third. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of disease duration-to-age at diagnosis and HbA1c-to-CPR ratios is a collective risk factor that predicts response to the medications.

Amrubicin at a lower-dose with routine prophylactic use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have suggested the efficacy of amrubicin (AMR) for relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, doses of AMR in these reports were 40 mg/m(2) or 45 mg/m(2), and severe and frequent myelosuppression were observed. Such side effects are occasionally intolerable, as serious myelosuppression may induce fatal infections. To overcome this clinical problem, we investigated whether 35 mg/m(2) of AMR administration with routine prophylactic use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) can reduce myelosuppression, while maintaining efficacy. METHODS: Between July 2003 and November 2008, 30 relapsed SCLC patients receiving 35 mg/m(2)/day of AMR were evaluated. Amrubicin was administered on days 1-3 every 3 or 4 weeks. Routine prophylactic use of G-CSF was performed beginning on day 8 and continuing for at least 5 consecutive days or until neutrophils recovered to the normal level. RESULTS: The median number of treatment cycles was four (range 1-9). No complete responses and 13 partial responses were observed, with response rates of: overall 43% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26-63%); sensitive cases 33% (95% CI: 10-65%); and refractory cases 50% (95% CI: 26-74%) (p=0.4651). The disease control rate (partial response and stable disease) was 80% (95% CI: 61-92%). The progression-free survival times were: overall 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.2-5.2 months); sensitive cases 4.7 months (95% CI: 2.6-5.4 months); and refractory cases 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.6-5.2 months) (p=0.7124). The median OS times were: overall 9.6 months (95% CI: 7.2-12.5 months); sensitive cases 8.4 months (95% CI: 4.6-13.4 months); and refractory cases 11.0 months (95% CI: 6.5-12.6 months) (p=0.9315). The 1-year survival rate was 33%. Regarding grade 3/4 hematological toxicities: leukopenia (47%); neutropenia (50%); anemia (30%); and thrombocytopenia (33%) were observed. Febrile neutropenia occurred in three patients (10%). Transfusions of red blood cells and platelets were performed for eight (27%) and one (3%) patients, respectively. Treatment-related deaths and grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities were not observed at all. CONCLUSIONS: Considering both safety and efficacy, AMR at a dose of 35 mg/m(2) with routine prophylactic use of G-CSF may be more desirable for the treatment of relapsed SCLC in clinical practice.

[Two cases of effective S-1 monotherapy for patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung after multiple previous chemotherapies].

Case one was a 76-year-old woman. She was diagnosed as having lung adenocarcinoma with multiple metastases (cT4N0M1, stage IV, mucinous BAC)in June, 2004. Starting in July, 2004, she received various modalities of chemotherapy( cisplatin+vinorelbine, gefitinib, pemetrexed, gemcitabine, docetaxel, paclitaxel). S-1 monotherapy given to her starting April, 2006 achieved a partial response(PR)as a seventh-line treatment. Case two was a 60-year-old woman. She was diagnosed as having lung adenocarcinoma with multiple metastases(cT4N3M1, stage IV)in October, 2004. That month, her chemotherapy began. After various treatments(cisplatin+vinorelbine, docetaxel, gefitinib), S-1 monotherapy was initiated in February, 2007 as the fourth-line treatment; as a result, PR was achieved. Even though chemotherapies were performed in succession, in the condition of good general status, salvage chemotherapy can be affected by the rotation of drugs. In such cases, S-1 monotherapy can be a reasonable choice from the standpoint of feasibility and effectiveness.

Correlation of clinical characteristics with detection of hepatitis B virus X gene in liver tissue in HBsAg-negative, and HCV-negative hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

PURPOSE: We studied the clinical features and the etiology of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative and antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) negative patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: A total of 550 patients, hospitalized with an initial diagnosis of HCC were retrospectively studied. Eighty-one of these patients were HBsAg-positive (HB group), 404 patients were anti-HCV positive (HC group). The other 65 patients were negative for both HBsAg and for anti-HCV (NBNC group). We purified HBV-X gene from HCC or non-tumorous liver tissue of 23 NBNC patients using PCR. RESULTS: Clinical features of NBNC as compared with HB and HC patients were as follows, respectively: non-cirrhosis rate (%): 57,37,15 (P = 0.02 for HB, P < 0.00001 for HC), the proportion of patients with normal ALT concentrations (%): 59,28,10 (P = 0.0002 for HB, P < 0.00001 for HC). Forty of 59 NBNC patients (68%) had anti-HBs and/or anti-HBc (healthy controls: 29%, P < 0.00001) and two of 56 had serum HBV DNA. Twelve of 23 NBNC patients had HBV-X gene in HCC and/or non-cancerous liver tissues (52%). None of 52 had serum HCV RNA. CONCLUSIONS: The NBNC patients with HCC had a higher frequency of non-cirrhotic liver without liver injury. The presence of the HBV-X gene in HCC suggests a possible role of past HBV infection in the development of HCC. About half of NBNC HCC is associated with seronegativity for HBsAg and positivity for the HBV-X gene in liver tissue.