Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Rev. invest. clín ; 73(4): 251-258, Jul.-Aug. 2021. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1347572

RESUMO

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) have an important impact on morbidity and mortality. Objective: This study, therefore, sought to assess the effect of a surgical care bundle on the incidence of SSI in colorectal surgery. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental intervention study with reference to the introduction of a surgical care bundle in 2011. Our study population, made up of patients who underwent colorectal surgery, was divided into the following two periods: 2007-2011 (pre-intervention) and 2012-2017 (post-intervention). The intervention's effect on SSI incidence was analyzed using adjusted odds ratios (OR). Results: A total of 1,727 patients were included in the study. SSI incidence was 13.0% before versus 11.6% after implementation of the care bundle (OR: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.66-1.17, p = 0.37). Multivariate analysis showed that cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neutropenia, and emergency surgery were independently associated with SSI. In contrast, laparoscopic surgery proved to be a protective factor against SSI. Conclusions: Care bundles have proven to be very important in reducing SSI incidence since the measures that constitute these protocols are mutually reinforcing. In our study, the implementation of a care bundle reduced SSI incidence from 13% to 11.6%, though the reduction was not statistically significant.


Assuntos
Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Cirurgia Colorretal/efeitos adversos , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Rev Invest Clin ; 73(4): 251-258, 2021 05 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33944860

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) have an important impact on morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: This study, therefore, sought to assess the effect of a surgical care bundle on the incidence of SSI in colorectal surgery. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental intervention study with reference to the introduction of a surgical care bundle in 2011. Our study population, made up of patients who underwent colorectal surgery, was divided into the following two periods: 2007-2011 (pre-intervention) and 2012-2017 (post-intervention). The intervention's effect on SSI incidence was analyzed using adjusted odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: A total of 1,727 patients were included in the study. SSI incidence was 13.0% before versus 11.6% after implementation of the care bundle (OR: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.66-1.17, p = 0.37). Multivariate analysis showed that cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neutropenia, and emergency surgery were independently associated with SSI. In contrast, laparoscopic surgery proved to be a protective factor against SSI. CONCLUSIONS: Care bundles have proven to be very important in reducing SSI incidence since the measures that constitute these protocols are mutually reinforcing. In our study, the implementation of a care bundle reduced SSI incidence from 13% to 11.6%, though the reduction was not statistically significant.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Colorretal , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Cirurgia Colorretal/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
3.
J Infect Public Health ; 12(4): 591-593, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30342927

RESUMO

The aim of this study is to report the epidemiological characteristics of a food poisoning outbreak due to scombroid fish in a hospital. A case-control study (1:4) was conducted. Patients either symptomatic of food poisoning (cases) or asymptomatic (controls) eating at the hospital cafeteria were included. To identify the source of the outbreak, sanitary control factors were assessed. Microbiological studies and the mast cell tryptase test were performed. All cases and controls received a questionnaire enquiring about symptoms and foods consumed. The odds ratios (OR) for all risk factors and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were assessed. In total, 20 individuals (90% female) were included in the study: four cases and 16 controls. The overall mean age was 43 years (SD: 10.2). The most frequent symptom observed was facial and neck erythaema (100%). Microbiological cultures were negative, the mast cell tryptase test was normal and breakdown of the cold chain did not occur. The most likely source of the outbreak was fried anchovies (OR: 34.7; 95% CI: 1.50-809.6; p=0.02). Methods suitable to the rapid assessment of the outbreak allowed us to establish prompt preventive measures and identify the likely aetiology.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Peixes , Doenças Transmitidas por Alimentos/epidemiologia , Toxinas Marinhas/intoxicação , Alimentos Marinhos/intoxicação , Adulto , Animais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Eritema , Feminino , Doenças Transmitidas por Alimentos/etiologia , Hospitais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco
4.
Cir Cir ; 86(5): 437-445, 2018.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30226486

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Las infecciones de sitio quirúrgico se pueden evitar y los programas de control basados en paquetes de medidas preventivas son eficaces para reducir su incidencia. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto de un Plan de Mejora de Calidad y Seguridad Clínica del paciente intervenido de apendicectomía en la incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico. MÉTODO: Se realizó un estudio cuasi-experimental con análisis antes y después de la introducción de un Plan de Calidad y Seguridad Clínica. Se incluyeron pacientes intervenidos de apendicectomía. Se estudió la incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico durante los 30 días posteriores a la cirugía (periodo máximo de incubación de infección quirúrgica). Se evaluó el efecto de la intervención con la odds ratio (OR) ajustada con un modelo de regresión logística. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 606 pacientes, 267 en el periodo 2009-2010 (antes del plan) y 339 durante 2012-2013 (después del plan). La incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico descendió después del plan del 6 al 5.6% (OR: 0.72; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0.33-1.56; p = 0.839). Hubo mayor cumplimiento de la profilaxis antibiótica, de la preparación prequirúrgica y de la adherencia a la higiene de manos tras la introducción de las medidas. CONCLUSIONES: Aunque la reducción de la incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico no presentó diferencias estadísticamente significativas tras las medidas adoptadas, se ha conseguido mejorar la administración de la profilaxis antibiótica, la adherencia a la higiene de manos y la preparación prequirúrgica. OBJECTIVE: Surgical site infections can be prevented. Control programs based on care bundle have proven to be effective in reducing its incidence. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a Plan for Quality Improvement and Clinical Safety in preventing the incidence of surgical site infection in patients undergoing appendectomy. METHOD: A quasi-experimental study was designed for analysis before and after the introduction of a Plan for Quality and Clinical Safety. Patients undergoing appendectomy were included. The incidence of surgical site infection was studied within 30 days from the time of surgery (maximum incubation period of surgical site infection). The effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated using the odds ratio (OR) adjusted with a logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 606 patients were included, of which 267 were operated in the period 2009-2010 (before the plan) and 339 in 2012-2013 (after the plan). The incidence of surgical site ­infection decreased after the plan from 6 to 5.6% (OR: 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.33-1.56; p = 0.839). There was greater compliance of antibiotic prophylaxis, preoperative preparation and adherence to hand hygiene after the introduction of the measures. CONCLUSIONS: Although the reduction in the incidence of surgical site infection after the measures adopted did not show statistical significant differences, important progress has been made in the compliance of antibiotic prophylaxis, adherence to hand hygiene and in the preoperative preparation.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia/efeitos adversos , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Melhoria de Qualidade , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Criança , Comorbidade , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Higiene das Mãos , Humanos , Incidência , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 42(10): 748-754, 2017 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27879565

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To study risk factors linked to spinal fusion surgical wound infection (SWI) incidence and compare the incidence with rates in Madrid Region, Spain and United States as a whole. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SWI is one of the complications posed by spinal surgery. Indeed, spinal surgery has a higher infection rate than do other orthopedic surgeries such as total hip or knee arthroplasty. The study of risk factors that are susceptible to be modified will enable both the incidence of SWI and, by extension, related morbidity, mortality, and costs to be reduced. METHODS: All patients undergoing spinal fusion at a tertiary hospital from June 2011 to June 2014 were included. Infection rate was calculated, and the association between risk factors and SWI incidence was assessed by reference to odds ratio (OR) with univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The study population (n = 892) had a SWI rate of 3.9%. The standardized infection ratio of our hospital was 0.58 with respect to the Madrid Region, 0.76 with respect to Spain's national rate and 2.05 with respect to the US NHSN/CDC. The multivariate analysis showed that predictive factors of SWI were diabetes mellitus (OR 2.81, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.18-6.72, P < 0.05), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR 5.16, 95% CI: 2.04-13.08, P < 0.05), duration of surgery higher than the 75th percentile (OR 5.39, 95% CI: 1.77-110.84, P < 0.05) and dirty surgery (OR 14.01, 95% CI: 1.01-28.88, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Independent risk factors for SWI in spinal fusion are existence of diabetes mellitus, COPD, duration of surgery higher than the 75th percentile and dirty surgery. Knowing these risk factors enables action to be taken to reduce the SWI rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Assuntos
Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Fatores de Risco , Espanha , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA