[Treatment clusters and personnel assessment in psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy - results of a feasibility study of the platform model]. / Behandlungscluster und Personalbemessung in der psychosomatischen Medizin und Psychotherapie ­ Ergebnisse einer Machbarkeitsstudie zum Plattformmodell.

Treatment clusters and personnel assessment in psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy - results of a feasibility study of the platform model Objectives: In accordance with the legal requirements of the PsychVVG, it is necessary to develop criteria for inpatient and day-care psychosomatic psychotherapeutic care, which can be used to determine the appropriate staffing for different treatment areas and different care structures. For psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy a model with four treatment clusters was developed, which is oriented on the one hand to the psychotherapeutic intensity and on the other hand to the medical expenditure. Method: In three consecutive rounds with up to 30 experts, representative selected from the three institution types university hospital, departmental psychosomatic medicine and specialized clinic, the minute values per patient required for a treatment according to the guidelines were determined using the Delphi method. Newly developed activity profiles for the six occupational groups were used, which allow the recording of all patient- and setting-related activities. Results: With the results of the feasibility study, an instrument has been developed for the first time to determine the requirements of staffing in psychosomatic medicine. Convergent minute values could be formulated for three of the four treatment clusters. Conclusions: The provision of care in psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy is complex, so that a limitation to four treatment areas is only possible if significantly more generous equivalence rules are applied between the professional groups than those laid down in the PPP Directive.

[Psychological stress caused by epidemics among health care workers and implications for coping with the corona crisis: a literature review]. / Psychische Belastungen durch Epidemien bei Beschäftigten im Gesundheitswesen und Implikationen für die Bewältigung der Corona-Krise: eine Literaturübersicht.

Psychological stress caused by epidemics among health care workers and implications for coping with the corona crisis: a literature review Objectives: COVID-19 has significantly changed the working and living conditions within a short period. Despite the milder course of the disease in comparison to other countries, employees in the German health care system are particularly affected by the massive impact of the disease on their professional and private lives. From a scientific point of view, summarized empirical evidence made during other epidemics and at the beginning of the COVID-19-pandemic is largely missing. Methods: Narrative review article, literature search on PubMed database. Results: A total of 56 studies were included, 35 of them on the SARS epidemic and seven on COVID-19; included studies reported overall increased stress levels, anxiety and PTSD symptoms due to health care work during various epidemics. Direct contact with patients, quarantine experiences and perceived health risks were further stress factors in epidemics. Participation in intervention studies enabled better management of epidemic-related situations. Conclusions: Healthcare workers are exposed to high workloads because of epidemics, which can have a variety of adverse effects. Recommendations are made for dealing with periods of high exposure during the COVID-19-pandemic.

[Staffing level: Survey among psychosomatic-psychotherapeutic institutions in Germany]. / Personalausstattung: Befragung psychosomatischpsychotherapeutischer Kliniken und Abteilungen in Deutschland.

Staffing level: Survey among psychosomatic-psychotherapeutic institutions in Germany Objectives: To establish the first nationwide hospital survey to assess the level of staffing for inpatient and daycare treatment in psychosomatic hospitals and specialist departments in Germany. METHODS: Using a standardized written hospital survey from the Deutsches Krankenhausinstitut (DKI), we invited a total of 218 psychosomatic-psychotherapeutic hospitals and specialist departments to participate. The participation rate of the institutions was 35%. RESULTS: In the overall sample, one psychotherapist (physician/clinical psychologist) was responsible for treating a median of 3.9 beds/patients (interquartile range 3.1-5.1) and one nurse a median of 2.9 beds/patients (interquartile range 2.3-3.9). There were significant differences for the nurse-patient ratio depending on the organizational size of the institution. To ensure quality treatment, professional experts saw increased staffing needs of about 12-17% across both professions. For the professional groups of specialist therapists and social workers, broad variances were observed for the therapist-patient ratio in the overall sample. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides an important and relevant data basis for the further discussion to determine mandatory minimal staffing levels in German psychosomatic-psychotherapeutic institutions.

[Normative-empirical determination of personnel requirements in psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy]. / Normativ-empirische Bestimmung des Personalbedarfs in der Psychosomatischen Medizin und Psychotherapie.

OBJECTIVES: There is a high degree of misallocated medical care for patients with somatoform disorders and patients with concomitant mental diseases. This complex of problems could be reduced remarkably by integrating psychosomatic departments into hospitals with maximum medical care. Admitting a few big psychosomatic specialist clinics into the calculation basis decreased the Day-Mix Index (DMI). The massive reduction of the calculated costs per day leads to a gap in funding resulting in a loss of the necessary personnel requirements - at least in university psychosomatic departments. The objective of this article is therefore to empirically verify the reference numbers of personnel resources calculated on the basis of the new German lump-sum reimbursement system in psychiatry and psychosomatics (PEPP). METHODS: The minute values of the reference numbers of Heuft (1999) are contrasted with the minute values of the PEPP reimbursement system in the years 2013 and 2014, as calculated by the Institute for Payment Systems in Hospitals (InEK). RESULTS: The minute values derived from the PEPP data show a remarkable convergence with the minute values of Heuft's reference numbers (1999). CONCLUSIONS: A pure pricing system like the PEPP reimbursement system as designed so far threatens empirically verifiable and qualified personnel requirements of psychosomatic departments. In order to ensure the necessary therapy dosage and display it in minute values according to the valid OPS procedure codes, the minimum limit of the reference numbers is mandatory to maintain the substance of psychosomatic care. Based on the present calculation, a base rate of at least 285 e has to be politically demanded. Future developments in personnel costs have to be refinanced at 100 %.

[The hospital financing frame regulation, psychiatric OPS figures and new reimbursement ordinance for psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy as well as psychiatry and psychotherapy]. / Das Krankenhausfinanzierungsrahmengesetz (KHRG), die Psych-OPS-Ziffern und die neue Entgeltregelung für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie sowie Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie.

In March 2009 the "Krankenhausfinanzierungsrahmengesetz (KHRG)" (Hospital Finance Law) came into force. For this reason, new procedures covering psychosomatic-psychotherapeutic und psychiatric-psychotherapeutic inpatient treatment had to be developed. This paper presents the new Psych-Procedures (Psych-OPS) together with first instructions on coding procedures.