Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(11)2021 Nov 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34844958

RESUMO

Brachial plexus injury is a rare but potentially serious complication of laparoscopic surgery. Loss of motor and/or sensory innervation can have a significant impact on the patient's quality of life following otherwise successful surgery. A 38-year-old underwent elective laparoscopic management of severe endometriosis during which she was placed in steep head-down tilt Lloyd-Davies position for a prolonged period. On awakening from anaesthesia, the patient had no sensation or movement of her dominant right arm. A total plexus brachialis injury was suspected. As advised by a neurologist, an MRI brachial plexus, nerve conduction study and electromyography were requested. She was managed conservatively and made a gradual recovery with a degree of residual musculocutaneous nerve neuropathy. The incidence of brachial plexus injury following laparoscopy is unknown but the brachial plexus is particularly susceptible to injury as a result of patient positioning and prolonged operative time. Patient positioning in relation to applied clinical anatomy is explored and risk reduction strategies described.


Assuntos
Neuropatias do Plexo Braquial , Plexo Braquial , Endometriose , Adulto , Neuropatias do Plexo Braquial/etiologia , Endometriose/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Nervo Musculocutâneo , Qualidade de Vida
2.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 39(9): e257-e260, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32658096

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To date, although neonatal infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronovirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been described, none of these have been proven to be the result of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We describe the probable vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a neonate born to a mother with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). RESULTS: Following cesarean section, the neonate was kept in strict isolation. Molecular tests for SARS-CoV-2 on respiratory samples, blood, and meconium were initially negative, but positive on a nasopharyngeal aspirate on the third day of life. On day 5, the neonate developed fever and coryza, which spontaneously resolved. Viral genomic analysis from the mother and neonate showed identical sequences except for 1 nucleotide. CONCLUSION: This report has important implications for infection control and clinical management of pregnant women with COVID-19 and their newborns.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/virologia , Adulto , COVID-19 , Cesárea , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Gravidez , SARS-CoV-2
3.
BMJ Open ; 10(3): e034566, 2020 03 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32184314

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare success rates, associated risks and cost-effectiveness between intrauterine insemination (IUI) and in vitro fertilisation (IVF). DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: The UK from 2012 to 2016. PARTICIPANTS: Data from Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority's freedom of information request for 2012-2016 for IVF/ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection)and IUI as practiced in 319 105 IVF/ICSI and 30 669 IUI cycles. Direct-cost calculations for maternal and neonatal expenditure per live birth (LB) was constructed using the cost of multiple birth model, with inflation-adjusted Bank of England index-linked data. A second direct-cost analysis evaluating the incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER) was modelled using the 2016 national mean (baseline) IVF and IUI success rates. OUTCOME MEASURES: LB, risks from IVF and IUI, and costs to gain 1 LB. RESULTS: This largest comprehensive analysis integrating success, risks and costs at a national level shows IUI is safer and more cost-effective than IVF treatment.IVF LB/cycle success was significantly better than IUI at 26.96% versus 11.49% (p<0.001) but the IUI success is much closer to IVF at 2.35:1, than previously considered. IVF remains a significant source of multiple gestation pregnancy (MGP) compared with IUI (RR (Relative Risk): 1.45 (1.31 to 1.60), p<0.001) as was the rate of twins (RR: 1.58, p<0.001).In 2016, IVF maternal and neonatal cost was £115 082 017 compared with £2 940 196 for IUI and this MGP-related perinatal cost is absorbed by the National Health Services. At baseline tariffs and success rates IUI was £42 558 cheaper than IVF to deliver 1LB with enhanced benefits with small improvements in IUI. Reliable levels of IVF-related MGP, OHSS (ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome), fetal reductions and terminations are revealed. CONCLUSION: IUI success rates are much closer to IVF than previously reported, more cost-effective in delivering 1 LB, and associated with lower risk of complications for maternal and neonatal complications. It is prudent to offer IUI before IVF nationally.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Fertilização in vitro , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Inseminação Artificial , Adulto , Feminino , Fertilização in vitro/efeitos adversos , Fertilização in vitro/economia , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Fertilização in vitro/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Inseminação Artificial/efeitos adversos , Inseminação Artificial/economia , Inseminação Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA