Clinical characteristics of lacrimal drainage pathway disease-associated keratopathy.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical characteristics of 13 cases of noninfectious corneal ulceration related to lacrimal drainage pathway disease. METHODS: Medical records of 13 patients with lacrimal drainage pathway disease-associated keratopathy who were examined at Ehime University Hospital between April 2007 and December 2021 were analyzed. RESULTS: The predisposing lacrimal drainage pathway diseases for corneal ulceration were chronic dacryocystitis in seven patients and lacrimal canaliculitis in six patients. The corneal ulcers were located at the peripheral cornea in 10 patients and the paracentral cornea in three patients. All patients indicated few cellular infiltrations of the ulcerated area at the slit-lamp examination. Corneal perforation was found in seven patients. The primary identified organisms were Streptococcus spp. in chronic dacryocystitis and Actinomycetes spp. in lacrimal canaliculitis. All patients showed rapid healing of the epithelial defects after treatment of the lacrimal drainage pathway disease. The mean time elapsed between treatment of the lacrimal drainage pathway disease and re-epithelialization of corneal ulcer was 14.5 ± 4.8 days. CONCLUSION: Lacrimal drainage pathway disease-associated keratopathy may be characterized by peripheral corneal ulcer with few cellular infiltrations, occasionally leading to corneal perforation. Treatment of the lacrimal drainage pathway disease could be the most effective treatment for lacrimal drainage pathway disease-associated keratopathy.

Evaluation of a new method of irrigation and aspiration for removal of ophthalmic viscoelastic device during cataract surgery in a porcine model.

BACKGROUND: To determine if a method for irrigation and aspiration (I/A) during cataract surgery provides effective removal of ophthalmic viscoelastic device (OVD). METHODS: Japanese porcine eyes were used to evaluate I/A performance with Technique 1 (the I/A tip placed on the center of the anterior surface of the IOL), Technique 2 (the I/A tip alternately pressed near the edge of the IOL optic anterior surface on one side and then the other to tilt the IOL back and forth), and Technique 3 (the I/A tip inserted behind the IOL optic, between it and the posterior capsule). Techniques 1 and 2 were compared using the Miyake-Apple posterior view video technique to visualize the flow of irrigation fluid containing triamcinolone acetonide particles behind the IOL. To check the efficacy of OVD removal from behind the IOL for of all three I/A techniques, OVD with fluorescein beads were inserted inside the lens capsule before implantation of the IOL. After each I/A technique, eyes were prepared for Miyake-Apple viewing and pictures of the lens capsule were taken using fluorescent microscopy. Residual fluorescein beads in the capsular bag were analyzed. RESULTS: Technique 1 resulted in a straight flow of fluid behind the IOL, while Technique 2 resulted in a vortex flow. The average amount of OVD retained inside the capsule after using Technique 2 or 3 was significantly lower than after using Technique 1 (p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Technique 2 proved to remove more effectively fluorescein bead-labelled OVD under the IOL than Technique 1.