[Survey on Patient Satisfaction with the Usability and Formulation of Budesonide Rectal Foam Following a Change in Head and Applicator Shape and Properties].

Budesonide Rectal Foam (BF) was introduced in 2017 and changed in November 2022 upon request, addressing the challenges encountered with liquid rectal formulations indicated for ulcerative colitis (UC). This formulation is an important agent in the treatment of rectal to sigmoid colon lesions in moderate UC. As the characteristics of the formulation of the rectal formulation are thought to influence patient satisfaction, a survey was conducted on the formulation and patient satisfaction among patients who used BF before and after the change. The survey spanned from January 2023 to May 2023. As the primary endpoint, the same patients were evaluated on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for patient satisfaction. Significant variations in formulation usability and patient satisfaction were observed in 20 eligible patients before and after the change (p<0.05). Patient satisfaction with the formulation was strongly correlated with formulation usability, ease of pushing the head, and ease of insertion (r>0.7). The change in packaging was thought to improve the usability of the formulation and patient satisfaction. The formulation's usability and ease of insertion had a clear influence on satisfaction with the rectal formulation.

[Usefulness of Pharmacist Outpatient Services for Inflammatory Bowel Disease].

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an autoimmune disease that inflames the intestinal tract and reduces patient quality of life. In recent years, prescriptions of biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors have made outpatient pharmacists indispensable to clinics and hospitals. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the effectiveness of immunopharmacist outpatient services in treating IBD. The survey spanned between January 2019 and December 2020 and included patients who had visited an IBD-specialized outpatient clinic. The endpoints were the number of pharmaceutical and accepted interventions, improvement rates, and cost-effectiveness of the pharmacist outpatient services. The definition of pharmaceutical intervention involves the pharmacist outpatient clinic, which refers to the number of prescription proposals made to doctors, and the dispensing room, which refers to the number of inquiries made to doctors. The survey included 139 patients, and 579 assessments were performed in the pharmacist outpatient clinic. Out of 352 pharmaceutical interventions by the outpatient pharmacist group, 341 (96.9%) were accepted by physicians. Similarly, out of 74 pharmaceutical interventions by the dispensing group, 54 (73.0%) were accepted by physicians (p<0.0001). The overall improvement rate of pharmaceutical interventions was 93.5%. The immunopharmacist outpatient clinic was found to be cost-effective, with an estimated value of 44068000 yen. In IBD outpatient services, clinical pharmacists and physicians are integral members of the medical care team and have a positive impact on drug treatment outcomes.

Shared decision-making practices and patient values in pharmacist outpatient care for rheumatic disease: A multiple correspondence analysis.

Purpose: To investigate the value-to-value relationships, relationship between values and patient background, continuation rate of treatment after shared decision-making (SDM), and disease status in order to clarify the values involved in drug therapy decisions for patients with rheumatic disease. Methods: We investigated patient values (efficacy of drug therapy [effectiveness], safety, economics, daily life, and other) and the continuance rate and disease status of treatment after 6 months in 94 patients with rheumatic disease aged ≥18 years who made decisions with pharmacists and physicians in the pharmacy outpatient clinic between September 2019 and April 2021. Multiple correspondence and K-means cluster analyses were performed to show the relationship between values and basic patient information. Results: Among the selected patients, 87% and 47% selected effectiveness for multiple selections and single selection, respectively. Effectiveness was at the center of the graph; three clusters containing other values were placed around it. History of allergy or side effects caused by biologics or Janus kinase inhibitors were in the safety cluster. The non-usage history of biologics or Janus kinase inhibitors was in the economic cluster. Conclusion: Effectiveness was the most important factor for patients with rheumatic disease; the values that patients consider important may shift from effectiveness to other values based on each patient's subjective experience with the treatment and/or the stage of life in which they were treated. It is important to positively link patient values and information about the treatment plan in shared decision-making while establishing rapport with the patient.

Factors Affecting Patients' Acceptance of Switching to Biosimilars Are Disease-Dependent: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Biosimilars (BS) are promoted worldwide because of the high cost of biologics. However, patients are apprehensive about switching to BS. For some diseases, several factors, which may be disease-dependent, influence patients' acceptance of switching to BS. Herein, we evaluated whether factors influencing acceptance for switching were disease-dependent among Japanese patients with different diseases. This cross-sectional study involved pharmacists' interviews with patients who used or planned to use biologics. Demographic and clinical characteristics were retrospectively investigated using the patients' medical records. Multivariate logistic regression showed that switch refusal was associated with a history of adverse reactions to biologics (odds ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 3.38 [1.35-8.44]), history of complaints related to disease activity (3.57 [1.53-8.32]), and unacceptability of generic drugs (7.62 [2.70-21.60]). Subgroup analyses suggested that the unacceptability of generic drugs was a common factor, regardless of the disease. Concomitantly, histories of adverse reactions to biologics and complaints related to disease activity were disease-dependent factors. Healthcare professionals should help patients in selecting BS, considering these factors according to the disease.

Droperidol Reduces Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting and Supports the Continuation of Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Fentanyl.

PURPOSE: To examine the impact of adding droperidol to fentanyl-based intravenous patient- controlled analgesia (IVPCA) on the discontinuation of IVPCA use due to postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). METHODS: Patients who underwent surgeries other than abdominal surgeries and used IVPCA between April 2014 and March 2018 were selected. Patients using IVPCA with fentanyl alone were compared to patients using droperidol added to IVPCA. Patients were allocated to one of two groups depending on the drug used for IVPCA: 1) control group, fentanyl alone; 2) droperidol group, droperidol with fentanyl. The primary endpoint was the discontinuation of IVPCA due to PONV. Secondary endpoints included PONV within 48 hours after surgery, the number of antiemetics used, pain score, and adverse effects. Propensity score matching was used to control the differences in clinical features among patients. RESULTS: Among the 793 patients initially enrolled in this study, 145 were excluded via propensity score matching; 364 of the remaining patients received IVPCA supplemented with droperidol. Propensity score matching showed that discontinuation of IVPCA due to PONV was significantly decreased in the droperidol group compared to the control group (P = 0.01). Further, compared with the control group, the droperidol group had reduced nausea up to 24 hours after surgery (P < 0.01), and the number of vomiting episodes and use of antiemetics decreased within 12 hours after surgery (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of droperidol to IVPCA is associated with a decrease in PONV, as well as the improved continuation of pain treatment with fentanyl-based IVPCA, similar to IVPCA with morphine. However, it is necessary to monitor the side effects of this treatment.