Reduce bladder cancer recurrence in patients treated for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: The REBACARE-trial.

BACKGROUND: Following radical nephro-ureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUT), the reported bladder recurrence rate of urothelial carcinoma is 22-47%. A single intravesical instillation of chemotherapy within 10 days following nephro-ureterectomy has the potential to decrease the risk of a bladder recurrence significantly. Despite recommendation by the European Association of Urology guideline to administer a single instillation postoperatively, the compliance rate is low because the risk of extravasation of chemotherapy. AIM: To reduce the risk of bladder cancer recurrence by a single intravesical instillation of Mitomycin immediately (within 3 h) before radical nephro-ureterectomy or partial ureterectomy. METHODS: Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with a (suspicion of a) urothelial carcinoma of the UUT undergoing radical nephro-ureterectomy or partial ureterectomy will be eligible and will receive a single intravesical instillation of Mitomycin within 3 h before surgery. In total, 170 patients will be included in this prospective, observational study. Follow-up will be according to current guidelines. RESULTS: The primary endpoint is the bladder cancer recurrence rate up to two years after surgery. Secondary endpoints are: a) the compliance rate; b) oncological outcome; c) possible side-effects; d) the quality of life; e) the calculation of costs of a single neoadjuvant instillation with Mitomycin and f) molecular characterization of UUT tumors and intravesical recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: A single intravesical instillation of Mitomycin before radical nephro-ureterectomy or partial ureterectomy may reduce the risk of a bladder recurrence in patients treated for UUT urothelial carcinoma and will circumvent the disadvantages of current therapy.

The usefulness of an oral calcium tolerance test in the choice of management of patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria.

We studied 40 patients with calcium urolithiasis and idiopathic hypercalciuria in an attempt to identify patients with an absorptive or renal type of hypercalciuria. An oral calcium tolerance test was performed in all patients, resulting in a rise in serum calcium in all cases (2.35 +/- 0.09 mmol/l vs 2.49 +/- 0.09 mmol/l; P less than 0.001). This was also true for serum phosphate (0.96 +/- 0.17 mmol/l vs 1.09 +/- 0.18 mmol/l; P less than 0.001), TmPO4/GFR (0.95 +/- 0.19 mmol/l vs 1.20 +/- 0.25 mmol/l; P less than 0.001) and fasting calcium excretion (3.14 +/- 1.16 mmol/100 l GF vs 6.17 +/- 2.02 mmol/100 l GF; P less than 0.001). All patients showed a drop in nephrogenous cAMP excretion (1.33 +/- 0.95 nmol/dl GF vs 0.74 +/- 0.72 nmol/dl GF; P less than 0.001). iPTH levels declined significantly (2.70 +/- 1.50 pmol/l vs 2.11 +/- 1.19 pmol/l; P less than 0.001). However, discordant individual changes in suppression of nephrogenous cAMP excretion, and rises in fasting calcium excretion prohibited a distinction between the absorptive or renal type of hypercalciuria. It is concluded that an oral calcium tolerance test is not helpful in the choice of management of patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria.

Pharmacokinetics and endocrine effects of the LHR analogue buserelin after subcutaneous implantation of a slow release preparation in prostatic cancer patients.

The pharmacokinetics and endocrine effects of the LHRH analogue buserelin [D-Ser(TBU)6-LHRH], released from biodegradable implants, were studied in 14 patients with stage C and D prostate cancer. Six patients received a subcutaneous implant of 3.3 mg buserelin monthly, and 8 patients received a subcutaneous implant of 6.6 mg buserelin every two months. Serum levels of buserelin decreased rapidly immediately after implantation. After 1-2 weeks a more gradual decline occurred, while in the two-monthly treated group a third phase of the elimination curve started after 5 weeks. Mean serum buserelin levels just before the next implantation in the two groups were not different. Urinary excretion of buserelin followed the same pattern. Serum LH levels in both groups became non-detectable 2 weeks after the first implant. This decrease of LH levels was accompanied by a suppression of serum testosterone to concentrations below 1 nmol/l (castration level). Side effects were not different from those observed with the intranasal application of buserelin. It is concluded that the subcutaneous application of buserelin is an easily administered form of treatment which has more profound and more reliable endocrine effects when compared with the intranasal administration of the drug. The greatest advantage of the new preparation is that the intervals between applications may be prolonged to at least 2 months.

Hammock anastomosis: a nonrefluxing ureteroileal anastomosis.

During a 9-year period diversion was performed in 48 patients by an antireflux ureteroileal anastomosis. Followup was possible in 30 patients (57 renal units). Among these 57 ureteroileal anastomoses only 3 cases of stenosis (6 per cent) and 11 cases of reflux (less than 20 per cent) were observed. These results are roughly comparable to those with colon conduits. The 30 patients included 2 in whom the antireflux anastomosis formed part of a continent ileal stoma. The method is described and the results are discussed.